This is another measure of the constancy of radio decay. The various different methods of measuring both radiometric and just plain counting agree with all of the others.
It is the correlations that the YEC'ers have never come close to answering. If you review this thread you will see that they don't seem to ever get to understanding what the heck the word is.
Thanks for the bump, but I'm getting very weary of debating all of this. I know most creos don't ever get a grasp on what their debating. I read through some of this article and I read through some other creo and evo articles on the net and find all kinds contradictory stuff. Like the 100 year old lava flow on Hawaii that dated as old as 2.9 billion years and an average of 1.4 bill by several different methods... I'm sure there's an evo explanation for it, and I'm sure there are creo explanations for it. And then another evo site showing high correlations, and then another creo pointing out flaws and assumptions...
Again, the best creo site I've seen so far written by someone who has been familiar with the debate and who does not swallow everything other creo writers tell him without checking it out is:
The Radiometric Dating GameHe has been in contact with people at Talkorigins and seems to know where the TRUE arguments lie, but I'm sure there's probably an evo explanation cooked up for almost every point he raises too.
So anyways, I'm going to sit here in neutral and wait for inspiration.
™ Version 4.2
