Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,760 Year: 4,017/9,624 Month: 888/974 Week: 215/286 Day: 22/109 Hour: 3/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Does radio-carbon dating disprove evolution?
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1369 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 22 of 308 (339342)
08-11-2006 6:38 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by randman
08-10-2006 11:55 PM


is this the month for creationists to forget which arguments were refuted years and years and years ago?
many archaeologists have accepted radiocarbon dating as a good technique to determine the age of fossils
no archaeologist or paleontologist would be so stupid -- only creationists. very little original organic material remains in fossils, and it was a very shocking and recent discovery that some even could. for all intents and purposes, dinosaurs are rocks. and you cannot date rocks with organic carbon 14. try potassium/argon.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by randman, posted 08-10-2006 11:55 PM randman has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by Quetzal, posted 08-11-2006 10:07 PM arachnophilia has not replied
 Message 28 by Nighttrain, posted 08-12-2006 1:41 AM arachnophilia has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024