Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,787 Year: 4,044/9,624 Month: 915/974 Week: 242/286 Day: 3/46 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Does radio-carbon dating disprove evolution?
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4216 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 251 of 308 (476611)
07-25-2008 9:45 AM
Reply to: Message 243 by johnfolton
07-25-2008 12:57 AM


Re: Nonsense
No one expects C-14 to be spot on except where the sample was frozen like in the Yamal penisula. The geologists saying the yamal peninsula only 10,000 years old is in agreement with the young earth senerio, etc... etc... etc...
What do you mean by "spot on"? The accuracy of carbon dating decreases as the age of the object increases due to the decay of C14. But this does not mean that the dating is false. C14 has a half life of 5715 years. After 10 half lives there is only 1/1024 of the amount left, but there will still be some left only not enough to give an accurate dating, which is why it is only used to date recent (less than 50000 years) objects. Still given the decay of C14 one mole (14 grams) would take ~5000000 years to totally decay ~96 half lives.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969

This message is a reply to:
 Message 243 by johnfolton, posted 07-25-2008 12:57 AM johnfolton has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 254 by johnfolton, posted 07-25-2008 2:48 PM bluescat48 has replied

  
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4216 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 256 of 308 (476676)
07-25-2008 3:19 PM
Reply to: Message 254 by johnfolton
07-25-2008 2:48 PM


Re: Nonsense
Coyote writes
Wrong on both counts! The first is too silly to even bother with. The second--he's behind the times. De Vries way back in 1958 published a paper showing that the amount of C14 in the atmosphere varies! Scientists have worked out a calibration curve to account for that variation, which is not very large anyway.
johnfolton
In marine fossils the concentration of C14 makes seals old even while they are living.
The fact as coyote points out is the self correction (calibration curve) which enables scientists to give a more correct age. What is the difference if an object is dated 20000 years or 21000 years? As for coal, most coal is much older than 30000 years it dates from plants living in the carboniferous period. Any C14 in the coal would have long since decayed. Any found in coal would be an impurity from some other source. If some one found coal with ~10% C14, then one could say that the dating would be off. Finding a few (1000000) atoms of C14 would not change the dating at all.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969

This message is a reply to:
 Message 254 by johnfolton, posted 07-25-2008 2:48 PM johnfolton has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024