Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,480 Year: 3,737/9,624 Month: 608/974 Week: 221/276 Day: 61/34 Hour: 4/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Potassium Argon Sensitivity Analysis
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 823 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 56 of 64 (583911)
09-29-2010 1:52 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by creationliberty
09-29-2010 1:26 PM


Re: K-Ar Dates Not Reliable At All
So what assumptions does Stratigraphy make? What assumptions does tree-ring dating make? It's obvious you are just trying to get some views for your website, thus making you no better than a spammer, but if you would like to debate the material presented, do so HERE.

"What can be asserted without proof, can be dismissed without proof."-Hitch.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by creationliberty, posted 09-29-2010 1:26 PM creationliberty has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by frako, posted 09-29-2010 1:58 PM hooah212002 has replied
 Message 63 by NoNukes, posted 10-01-2010 12:49 AM hooah212002 has seen this message but not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 823 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 59 of 64 (583915)
09-29-2010 2:02 PM
Reply to: Message 58 by frako
09-29-2010 1:58 PM


Re: K-Ar Dates Not Reliable At All
Right, but he said, and I quote,
Message 51
christianliberty writes:
...And ALL are based on the same ASSUMPTIONS....
so C14 dating hardly makes the mistake of tress sometimes having too many rings in one year.

"What can be asserted without proof, can be dismissed without proof."-Hitch.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by frako, posted 09-29-2010 1:58 PM frako has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024