Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 13/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   For whatever - your insult, and radioisotope dating
Joe Meert
Member (Idle past 5680 days)
Posts: 913
From: Gainesville
Joined: 03-02-2002


Message 102 of 121 (77178)
01-08-2004 4:05 PM
Reply to: Message 101 by johnfolton
01-08-2004 12:44 PM


Utterly confused
Whatever,
I'll try to be as polite as I can here. In reading through this thread, it appears you are hopelessly confused and unable to grasp the basics of radiometric dating. You've repeated (and still managed to mess it up) claims made by creationists about radiometric dating. Fortunately, your situation is not terminal, but you'd be better to actually spend some time trying to understand the science involved before criticizing it. For the most part, people have been polite trying to correct your errors. Instead of admitting you have no idea what you are talking about (for which there is no shame) you simply muddle the issue further by snatching irrelevant information from other creationist sites. This precludes any sort of intelligent discussion regarding problems in radiometric dating. Anyway, hang in there, but be careful spouting off information which you do not yet grasp (i.e. nearly everything radiometric from what I am reading). There's no shame in asking for clarification.
Cheers
Joe Meert

This message is a reply to:
 Message 101 by johnfolton, posted 01-08-2004 12:44 PM johnfolton has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 104 by johnfolton, posted 01-08-2004 5:38 PM Joe Meert has not replied

  
Joe Meert
Member (Idle past 5680 days)
Posts: 913
From: Gainesville
Joined: 03-02-2002


Message 112 of 121 (77249)
01-08-2004 10:10 PM
Reply to: Message 109 by Coragyps
01-08-2004 9:52 PM


Sad part is
I don't think he realizes how very confused and self-contradictory his story is. Walt absolutely depends on confusion in the name of God for his following.
Cheers
Joe Meert

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by Coragyps, posted 01-08-2004 9:52 PM Coragyps has not replied

  
Joe Meert
Member (Idle past 5680 days)
Posts: 913
From: Gainesville
Joined: 03-02-2002


Message 118 of 121 (77303)
01-09-2004 8:40 AM
Reply to: Message 113 by johnfolton
01-08-2004 10:53 PM


Thank GOD!
"I don't see any reason to post anymore on this thread, while I don't have all the answers"
JM: Maybe now you'll have some time to actually formulate your thoughts into a coherent package. While I am not in favor of partial birth abortion, this is one thread where I would have turned my head the other way should the administrator decided to act in such a manner.
Cheers
Joe Meert

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by johnfolton, posted 01-08-2004 10:53 PM johnfolton has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 119 by JonF, posted 01-09-2004 10:26 AM Joe Meert has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024