quote:
Could you give us a photo of a fully developed Uranium halo. A halo where the 238U and the 214Po ring can be seen?
Probably, but since it isn't really releavnt to my point I think we'll settle the issues I did raise first.
Do you accept that Gentry's paper provides no evidence against the existence of older Uranium radiohaloes ?
quote:
You don't understand what I said in message 37.
On the contrary, I do know. That's why I replied to point out the obvious errors. You, on the other hand completely misunderstood my response as can clearly be seen.
quote:
Anyway, if accelerated radioactive decay did not take place, how old are the Uranium halos in Gentry's paper? Pls tell me how you arrive at your answer
Gentry supplied an estimate - which you quoted - putting the age at around 240,000 years. Granted this estimate is rough and probably too large, it is still far enough away from the typical YEC estimate (
Edited by PaulK, : Change of title to reflect contents