Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,411 Year: 3,668/9,624 Month: 539/974 Week: 152/276 Day: 26/23 Hour: 2/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Radioactive carbon dating
Vacate
Member (Idle past 4621 days)
Posts: 565
Joined: 10-01-2006


Message 98 of 221 (406964)
06-23-2007 3:25 AM
Reply to: Message 97 by WS-JW
06-23-2007 1:52 AM


WS-JW writes:
Could of been billions of years in designing us
You could very well be correct. You would even have evidence to support your theory!
But if you block supernatural as an explanation
That would be science.
You'll just sit on philosphees of men who say only they decide truth, and get no where
No, philosophies of men are created by men philosophizing. Men practicing science makes conclusions about the natural world. Thats what it does. It does get somewhere! Modern medicine, computers, man on the moon, nuclear power...
Take note of the difference. Different topics, hence different names.
Well of course what i say makes sense, but you must not allow supernatural, right?
If you want to talk about science, then you must not allow supernatural explanations. I think you have it now. Think of it like english class - you must not allow physics. Two different topics. Science and philosophy.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by WS-JW, posted 06-23-2007 1:52 AM WS-JW has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024