|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total) |
| |
popoi | |
Total: 915,806 Year: 3,063/9,624 Month: 908/1,588 Week: 91/223 Day: 2/17 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Junior Member (Idle past 5026 days) Posts: 18 From: Los Angeles,California,USA Joined: |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Radioactive carbon dating | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ArchArchitect Member (Idle past 6180 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: |
Carbon dating is false. The scientists are not taking into account that heat speeds up the amount of Carbon which would obviously alter it's age according to the scientists. (I'm assuming that the people who read this would know what Carbon Dating is).
You want proof? Why do you think that the fossils in volcanic areas are much, much older than those fossils that are found in cooler areas like oasises? The scientists are not including that into the equation, which inevitably makes Carbon dating false.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ArchArchitect Member (Idle past 6180 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: |
I meant the amount of Carbon which escapes the object...sorry about that.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ArchArchitect Member (Idle past 6180 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: |
I am assuming that everyone here knows what Carbon Dating is. A basic property of Carbon14 is that under extreme heat, it decays even faster, making the object appear to be older than it actually is. (That is why fossils that are found near volcanic areas tend to be much older than the fossils that are found in canyons).
Unfortunately, scientists fail to take that under consideration and as a result, fail to plug it in into thier equations. Therefore, they screw up the apparent age of the fossils - or whatever object, who's age they are attempting to determine. However, even if they did plug in something into the equation regarding this, it would still be near if not impossible to determine the actual thermal conditions which the fossil/object underwent.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ArchArchitect Member (Idle past 6180 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: |
Hey, that's awesome fallacycop = I didn't see that b4. I'm glad to see that someone is on the same page as me.
God Bless
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ArchArchitect Member (Idle past 6180 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: |
*sarcasm*
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ArchArchitect Member (Idle past 6180 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: |
It is a fact that fossils near volcanic areas are older than the fossils that are found in canyons.
It is a fact that heat would speed up the decay of Carbon14. I never said that there were no lava marks on the fossils. I also never said that it was basic. And how should I know why the scientists don't plug them in? Oh...maybe it's because it would make no use of it. You even quoted me on it. "It would be near impossible to determine the thermal conditions...." ~The point is that Carbon Dating is not a reliable source for determing the age of a fossil/object.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ArchArchitect Member (Idle past 6180 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: |
This is a very useful link regarding Carbon Dating. Check it out..
Doesn’t Carbon-14 Dating Disprove the Bible?
| Answers in Genesis
I have not read it all yet and I don't think it talks about the thermal property of Carbon14 - or at least not yet, as far as I have gotten. And my old science teacher taught us about the thermal property of Carbon14.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ArchArchitect Member (Idle past 6180 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: |
I said that the PROPERTY is basic. Not that the process is basic. How can the property be basic?! You even know that.
What makes you think that I made these things up. If the guy on this same page said the same thing, wo which Fallacycop replied to?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ArchArchitect Member (Idle past 6180 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: |
Sir, are you suggesting that they are teaching us 'bullshit' is our high schools?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ArchArchitect Member (Idle past 6180 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: |
sorry crashfrog..I had a type-o in my previous message. I meant, "how can the process be basic" not property.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ArchArchitect Member (Idle past 6180 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: |
THEN ENLIGHTEN ME
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ArchArchitect Member (Idle past 6180 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: |
Didn't you read the message after that? I said that there was a type=o. I said that I meant to type,
"I said that the PROPERTY is basic. Not that the process is basic. How can the PROCESS be basic?! You even know that."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ArchArchitect Member (Idle past 6180 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: |
Alright then, give me the link to that "authorative source" of yours. I'll go check it out.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ArchArchitect Member (Idle past 6180 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: |
Only a lowlife would make something up on this forum. I am going by what my teacher told me. Now what is the link to that authorative source?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ArchArchitect Member (Idle past 6180 days) Posts: 58 From: Pasadena, CA Joined: |
ARE YOU THE BLINDEST PERSON ON THIS FORUM?! I even posted it right after that..that I was being sarcastic!! Go read the post right after that one..
AND YOU DIDN'T REPLY TO ME.. I have know Idea who you were replying to, when you asked if he/she thought that physicists were stupid. And ofcourse I don't think that physicists are stupid. There are very smart ones out there, or the scientific world would not have been where it is today.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024