Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,762 Year: 4,019/9,624 Month: 890/974 Week: 217/286 Day: 24/109 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Questions about Xenoliths and dating
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 7 of 13 (264772)
12-01-2005 2:46 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by JonF
12-01-2005 11:40 AM


KBS tuff
I believe there is a topic somewhere, that is fairly specific to the KBS tuff. Unfortunately, I'm currently unable to track it down.
In short, the KBS tuff was a water laid tuff. A rather hybrid volcanic/sedimentary rock. As such, it contained significant contamination from older materials. These contaminants might be considered xenoliths, but I think that would be extending the definition outside of the usual definition.
The contaminents were determined and painstakingly removed from the sample, and a quality dating was the result.
Note: I post this not having read the cited materials. I suspect such is covered in them. I have a Talk Origins reference filed away somewhere, if anyone wishes to demand such. Or you could just go to Talk Origins (or Google) and do a search for "KBS tuff"
Moose
Added by edit: D'oh, you supplied a good Talk Origins reference. It in turn supplied the reference I was thinking of, Radiometric Dating and the Geological Time Scale.
This message has been edited by minnemooseus, 12-01-2005 02:55 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by JonF, posted 12-01-2005 11:40 AM JonF has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by JonF, posted 12-02-2005 9:56 AM Minnemooseus has not replied
 Message 9 by JonF, posted 12-02-2005 10:00 AM Minnemooseus has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024