Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,385 Year: 3,642/9,624 Month: 513/974 Week: 126/276 Day: 23/31 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creation science II
Larni
Member (Idle past 184 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 108 of 312 (502195)
03-10-2009 9:40 AM
Reply to: Message 103 by Kelly
03-10-2009 8:52 AM


Re: I just wanted to correct the misconception
My point is that they arrived at their conclusions based on the scientific data, experiments and results.
But this is simply not the case: you have been unable demonstrate this by your refusal to support your assertion with any examples.
Your position is that creation science is no diiferent from science but your refusal to show (with examples of a creationsit scientic peer revied article) that this is the case prevents anyone from being swayed to your position.
I've been reading both these threads and would be willing to see your point (as I'm sure other on this site would be) if you could give me some reason to.
I'm sure many creationist on this site would be as fascinated as I would be to see a creationist piece of peer reviewed research.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 103 by Kelly, posted 03-10-2009 8:52 AM Kelly has not replied

Larni
Member (Idle past 184 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 250 of 312 (502622)
03-12-2009 3:17 PM
Reply to: Message 249 by Sky-Writing
03-12-2009 3:14 PM


Re: This is so exhausting
Let me guess:
You're some kind of engineer.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 249 by Sky-Writing, posted 03-12-2009 3:14 PM Sky-Writing has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024