Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,468 Year: 3,725/9,624 Month: 596/974 Week: 209/276 Day: 49/34 Hour: 0/5


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why is a Literal Ark Important?
onifre
Member (Idle past 2973 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 17 of 22 (505369)
04-10-2009 4:57 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by doctrbill
04-09-2009 10:07 AM


Re: Point of Fact
And if that is what one wishes to do, then I submit he had rather 8 elephants: 2 African, 2 Asian, 2 Mammoth, and 2 Mastadon.
[minor quibble:] Mastadons went extinct way before the flood date of 4500 years ago.
Mammoths, maybe, but not likely since they too went extinct before the flood, but, closer to the date of 4500 years ago, depending on which source is used.
I suppose that would be reasonable if one insists on applying conventions of modern science to the poetry of ancient legends.
But the word "genus" and "species" which you describe here:
doctorbill writes:
In fact, at Genesis 1:12, where the word "kind" appears twice, the Latin Bible gives it as "genus" in the first instance, and "species" in the second.
...Are in fact representing conventional scientifc terms. You used it in the same form trying to reach a different outcome.

"I smoke pot. If this bothers anyone, I suggest you look around at the world in which we live and shut your mouth."--Bill Hicks
"I never knew there was another option other than to question everything"--Noam Chomsky

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by doctrbill, posted 04-09-2009 10:07 AM doctrbill has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by doctrbill, posted 04-10-2009 6:57 PM onifre has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024