Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,784 Year: 4,041/9,624 Month: 912/974 Week: 239/286 Day: 0/46 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Supernatural events
mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 16 of 60 (355435)
10-09-2006 5:57 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by ringo
10-09-2006 2:48 PM


Dear Watsons
I think what Phat means to say is that he has no reason to believe in this incident, but he can very easily believe that God can perform such an incident.
I could pick many, many points in the video, logically. For example, -1. the expert says that it doesn't show signs of authenticity, well then, perhaps it's not authentic, rather than heavenly.
2. The camera doesn't allow us to know if he had the dust on him precedingly, as there were only close ups after it apparently happened.
3. The stone could have been in the grass all along, as the camera wasn't scanning the area.
4. The credence of a person's reputation is not relevant to any claims. The woman at the start says how well known as good people they are. SO was Geoffrey Dahmer and Dennis Raider. They were, apparently, normal good folk.
5. It's very convenient that not one stone can be spared for a scientific test, because they are precious. Not that I am saying that this is there way out of an experiment, but from a skeptical perspective, this doesn't bode well.
6. If God doesn't want the stones tested, then the stones only fulfill people's belief, and don't evidence anything to people generally. Which begs the question, aren't signs and wonders for everyone? If we already see God's beauty in the sunset, then why the stones? Are not the believer's needs already met?
7. I asked for my hand to be filled with gold dust by the time the video ended. I only got a sweaty palm.
8. Need I prove my inner-Sherlock, anymore? If I don't, then it seems that Theists do observe reason afterall.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by ringo, posted 10-09-2006 2:48 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by ringo, posted 10-09-2006 6:59 PM mike the wiz has not replied
 Message 21 by Coragyps, posted 10-09-2006 8:04 PM mike the wiz has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2196 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 17 of 60 (355439)
10-09-2006 6:28 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by Faith
10-09-2006 12:18 PM


You know, randman believes in that gold filling hokum.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Faith, posted 10-09-2006 12:18 PM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by Phat, posted 10-09-2006 9:58 PM nator has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 438 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 18 of 60 (355442)
10-09-2006 6:59 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by mike the wiz
10-09-2006 5:57 PM


Re: Dear Watsons
mike the wiz writes:
I think what Phat means to say is that he has no reason to believe in this incident, but he can very easily believe that God can perform such an incident.
The question isn't so much, "What can God do?" but, "What does God do?"
If God exists, He could certainly make it rain, but does that mean that every raindrop is a "sign and wonder" from God? He could certainly make precious gems, but would he do it just so those of weak faith can pat themselves on the back for choosing the "right" religion?

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by mike the wiz, posted 10-09-2006 5:57 PM mike the wiz has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by CK, posted 10-09-2006 7:04 PM ringo has not replied

  
CK
Member (Idle past 4154 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 19 of 60 (355444)
10-09-2006 7:04 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by ringo
10-09-2006 6:59 PM


Re: Dear Watsons
yeah it's an odd one - who needs faith when God sends down an Angel with gemstones?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by ringo, posted 10-09-2006 6:59 PM ringo has not replied

  
Parasomnium
Member
Posts: 2224
Joined: 07-15-2003


Message 20 of 60 (355447)
10-09-2006 7:13 PM


It's been doctored too
I noticed two instances of the images having been doctored. The first was rather innocent, it was a shot of the man holding a gem, in which his hands were in black and white, yet the gem was in full colour. Since it was a dramatization of previous events, I can overlook this.
But the second instance was more serious. With the camera crew on scene, the man apparently sees another stone falling. He picks it up, starts crying (more drama), and what do we see next? We see the very same footage we saw before of the man holding the gem (Only now his hands are in colour too.)
Now get this: the film was introduced by a woman going on endlessly about how serious the consequences are if someone were to present a false miracle. And then they go and do precisely that? Do people really buy this nonsense?
RiVeRraT says he has no words for it. Well, neither do I, because some words I'd like to use, among which are 'gullible' and 'deceitful', somehow appear very, very inadequate.
Edited by Parasomnium, : Grammar and style

"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science." - Charles Darwin.
Did you know that most of the time your computer is doing nothing? What if you could make it do something really useful? Like helping scientists understand diseases? Your computer could even be instrumental in finding a cure for HIV/AIDS. Wouldn't that be something? If you agree, then join World Community Grid now and download a simple, free tool that lets you and your computer do your share in helping humanity. After all, you are part of it, so why not take part in it?

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 761 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 21 of 60 (355455)
10-09-2006 8:04 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by mike the wiz
10-09-2006 5:57 PM


Re: Dear Watsons
It's very convenient that not one stone can be spared for a scientific test, because they are precious.
Particularly when I can run a refractive index on one in thirty seconds without harming the stone in the least. I'm betting 1.56 +/- 0.02 - like any other borosilicate glass.
Edited by Coragyps, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by mike the wiz, posted 10-09-2006 5:57 PM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by iceage, posted 10-09-2006 10:26 PM Coragyps has replied
 Message 41 by mike the wiz, posted 10-10-2006 1:06 PM Coragyps has not replied

  
nyenye
Inactive Member


Message 22 of 60 (355475)
10-09-2006 9:18 PM


I don't know if I believe it... it's all kind of weird.... I've seen supernatural things, but the whole gold coming out of your skin is kind of odd....

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18335
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 23 of 60 (355485)
10-09-2006 9:58 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by nator
10-09-2006 6:28 PM


Tooth Fairies
schrafinator writes:
randman believes in that gold filling hokum.
And why would God use Gold? He could just remake the tooth with natural enamal?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by nator, posted 10-09-2006 6:28 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by nator, posted 10-13-2006 7:29 PM Phat has not replied
 Message 55 by Faith, posted 10-14-2006 12:25 PM Phat has not replied

  
iceage 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5941 days)
Posts: 1024
From: Pacific Northwest
Joined: 09-08-2003


Message 24 of 60 (355493)
10-09-2006 10:26 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by Coragyps
10-09-2006 8:04 PM


Re: Dear Watsons
The church reporting this event is just a few miles from where I live.
I have sent an email to the church asking questions on if any testing has been done. Also plan to attend this church on Sunday and will be asking some questions.
Does anyone know what it would take to measure the refraction index? Is this something a gemologist can easily do? Or does it require some very special equipement? I will offer to pay for the test if I can get the results.
The film seems to imply that these are diamonds without actually saying it. I think the term "stones" is used.
Also the gold should be very easy to identify.
I will report my findings, stay tuned...
Edited by troxelso, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Coragyps, posted 10-09-2006 8:04 PM Coragyps has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by Coragyps, posted 10-09-2006 11:06 PM iceage has replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 761 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 25 of 60 (355498)
10-09-2006 11:06 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by iceage
10-09-2006 10:26 PM


Re: Dear Watsons
I couldn't stand to watch enough video to hear what the stones are alleged to be, but I think I'd be able to furnish you (at no charge, in the interest of Science ) with small bottles of liquids matched to a few refractive indices - glass, ruby, diamond....etc. If you immerse a solid bit of something in a liquid of the same refractive index, the edges of the solid "disappear." So if you put crown glass, RI 1.53, in water, RI 1.33, you can see the glass. Put the glass in a toluene-{I'll have to look it up} mixture with RI 1.53, and you can't find it. You can even mix-as-you-watch liquids until the stone vanishes, and measure the index of the liquid later to get precise numbers.
I'd think a gemologist, or an old-timey chemistry or physics department at a university, would also have instrumental ways to measure index. Chemists once did an index on every liquid compound they made, though solids weren't really routine. Pullman and Moscow are there close, no?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by iceage, posted 10-09-2006 10:26 PM iceage has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by riVeRraT, posted 10-09-2006 11:41 PM Coragyps has not replied
 Message 30 by iceage, posted 10-10-2006 12:24 AM Coragyps has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 442 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 26 of 60 (355503)
10-09-2006 11:32 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Phat
10-09-2006 4:34 AM


Re: My personal opinion on this entire situation
Well put.
No one would want to see it be real more than me, but I can't believe it, unless it was me.
The general concencus is that there is another rivial coming,( I have never experienced a rivial, so I am dumb about it) and I even feel God is going to appear in a mighty way. The feeling is that it will be the same as last time, but different. Different in that we are not to hog what it is God is blessing us with, but to go out and share it with others.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Phat, posted 10-09-2006 4:34 AM Phat has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by nator, posted 10-13-2006 7:31 PM riVeRraT has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 442 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 27 of 60 (355504)
10-09-2006 11:33 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by CK
10-09-2006 6:42 AM


Re: My personal opinion on this entire situation
2) followed by an "expert" who leaps straight to the conclusion - yep those came from god BEFORE he even talks about the stones.
I don't think he verified his conclusion, and left it open to any possibility.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by CK, posted 10-09-2006 6:42 AM CK has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 442 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 28 of 60 (355505)
10-09-2006 11:37 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by ringo
10-09-2006 2:48 PM


Re: My personal opinion on this entire situation
By the way, I notice that you capitalized the Holy Tortilla. Interesting
Just in case Ringo....just in case.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by ringo, posted 10-09-2006 2:48 PM ringo has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 442 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 29 of 60 (355506)
10-09-2006 11:41 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by Coragyps
10-09-2006 11:06 PM


Re: Dear Watsons
That will prove if it is supernatural or not?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Coragyps, posted 10-09-2006 11:06 PM Coragyps has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by iceage, posted 10-10-2006 12:28 AM riVeRraT has not replied

  
iceage 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5941 days)
Posts: 1024
From: Pacific Northwest
Joined: 09-08-2003


Message 30 of 60 (355511)
10-10-2006 12:24 AM
Reply to: Message 25 by Coragyps
10-09-2006 11:06 PM


Re: Dear Watsons
Yes Moscow and Pullman or just over 90 miles away. However there are gemologist in town and I have an old acquintance in Spokane that is a gemologist. I want determine the refaction index and specific gravity. From what i understand cubic zerconia has a considerably larger specific gravity of diamond.
But they can't be diamonds. What would be the estimated value of a beatifully cut >50 carat absolutely clear "conflict free" diamond?
Plan to track down the expert witness referenced, Rick Hunt of "Gold and Mineralization Research", No mention of him or his company on goggle.
To help aid in my detective work has anyone seen "stones" like those shown, for sale on ebay or anywhere on the web? They are very large "stones" I think they commented that they were greater than 50 carats.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Coragyps, posted 10-09-2006 11:06 PM Coragyps has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by Modulous, posted 10-10-2006 5:31 AM iceage has not replied
 Message 37 by jar, posted 10-10-2006 8:45 AM iceage has not replied
 Message 38 by Coragyps, posted 10-10-2006 9:22 AM iceage has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024