I have but one thing to say: jar was right in stating your contradiction.
I have always said that all we can know for sure (if one believes in a deity) is that It exists
One cannot believe and know that something exists. Belief is rooted in the unknown. The known is rooted in what we do know--more than just facts, but also an understanding of concepts.
If you know that God exists, how, then, can you belief that he exists?
It is a contradiction.
As to the topic:
as I've said God cannot be articulated by man, God cannot be described.
an anthropomorphic God cannot possibly exist.
As in God doesn't hear, God doesn't see, God isn't good, God cannot be reasoned or boxed in, It simply cannot be described
as second contradiction. God can't be articulated, eh? And what is this that you've done? You've stated that he isn't good, doesn't see, hear, cannot be reasoned or boxed in, can't be described. And yet you've described your God.
If God cannot be anthropomorhpic in any way, much less described, articulated, in anyway, then no one can say anything about any God. You can't say that he can't be something, nor can you say that he is something. For in the first case, you are describing, in the second you are antrhopomorphizing and describing.
Care to explain away the contradictions?
Want to help give back to the world community? Did you know that your computer can help? Join the newest TeamEvC
Climate Modelling to help improve climate predictions for a better tomorrow.