Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,385 Year: 3,642/9,624 Month: 513/974 Week: 126/276 Day: 23/31 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why Belief?
Brian
Member (Idle past 4979 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 115 of 220 (207382)
05-12-2005 10:31 AM
Reply to: Message 114 by Specter
05-12-2005 9:39 AM


Re: By Faith! [Where it really should be]
How do you know that the man and the van in your mums story are the man and the van involved in the killings?
How do you know that the prayer stopped the van?
See? prayer really does change things for the better.
Tell that to the poor souls whose loved ones jumped from the Twin Towers, or who were taken hostage and killed in Iraq, or who were blown up in Inneskillen. Did their prayers change things for the better?
I'm sure there's some excuse though, there always is. These horrific, heartbreaking tragedies are all forgotten when a prayer happens to be part of a coincidence.
Prayers are always answered, the answer might not be the one you wanted but they are all answered. Bit poinltess really don't you think since there is no way to prove that a prayer was answered or not?
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by Specter, posted 05-12-2005 9:39 AM Specter has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 116 by Faith, posted 05-12-2005 11:46 AM Brian has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4979 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 117 of 220 (207418)
05-12-2005 11:57 AM
Reply to: Message 116 by Faith
05-12-2005 11:46 AM


Re: By Faith! [Where it really should be]
If the man and the van WERE involved in the killings then the van's stopping is a VERY good indication that it was answer to prayer.
I fail to see the connection. The driver could have had a change of heart, the police could be stopping traffic up ahead to interview people, the driver may have had a phone call to go somewhere quickly, there are lots of reasons. The prayer might simply be a coincidence.
How do you know any of the above are Specter's point of view?
What specific views are you talking about?
And what's wrong with the idea that sometimes God doesn't answer our prayers anyway?
Because it makes the entire prayer game redundant. All it does is to convince the believer that when anything at all that they pray for comes to pass, in some way, then hey presto God has answered the prayer. If they do not get what they prayed for then they inoke the 'God has said no' clause. It makes prayer pointless.
There are certainly times that when He does it's pretty dramatic
Or pretty coincidental. It is weird that prayers from believers from all faiths appear to be answered sometime or another. I reckon old Yahweh musn't be a jealous god after all.
as in the case of a murderer's stopping the van as he did -- IF indeed he was that known murderer.
Even if he wasn't the murderer it is a great accomplishment for a normally useless entity to do.
BTW, how would we test to see if it was the lady's prayer that prompted God to stop the van?
Brian

This message is a reply to:
 Message 116 by Faith, posted 05-12-2005 11:46 AM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 127 by Specter, posted 05-13-2005 1:17 PM Brian has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4979 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 128 of 220 (207765)
05-13-2005 1:35 PM
Reply to: Message 127 by Specter
05-13-2005 1:17 PM


Re: Test and see..
Stuck in a world of self-fulfilling prophecy specter. God cannot lose in your world, you will always have an excuse for Him.
Of course we dont focus on the bad, and we shouldn't focus just on the good either. We should look at everything, and in doing so we need to conclude that God is completely useless or a complete barbarian.
I can see what is wrong with our world, and a great deal of it is caused by religion. In fact, most of it is. I also have a solution, the funides should bugger off to their paradise and leave the rest of us alone to live out our lives in a safer world.
We only se the bad in it that we can't focus on the truly amazing things God does for us in our brief lifespans here on Earth.
Such as? Oh that breast cancer you were talking about, why did God create that I wonder, or should I focus on the knowledge he gave our doctors to help cure some cases?
The thing that you don't see is that the world of God is a fantasy world created in your mind, and you are simply keeping this delusion going by making these excuses all the time. it is easy to do, we could convince ourselves that Sauron is coming back if we really put our minds to it.
It must be great to have such faith, and good luck to you. I personally prefer reality, but that isnt every one's cup of tea.
Cheers.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 127 by Specter, posted 05-13-2005 1:17 PM Specter has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 132 by Faith, posted 05-13-2005 4:24 PM Brian has replied
 Message 148 by Specter, posted 05-16-2005 12:39 PM Brian has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4979 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 133 of 220 (207862)
05-13-2005 4:33 PM
Reply to: Message 132 by Faith
05-13-2005 4:24 PM


Re: Test and see..
I see, death is caused by religion.
Sickness is caused by religion.
Poverty is caused by religion.
Hatred and murder are caused by religion.
Rape and child molestation are caused by religion.
Greed and exploitation are caused by religion.
Hitler was caused by religion.
Stalin's murderous regime was caused by religion.
Any point in stating the obvious?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 132 by Faith, posted 05-13-2005 4:24 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 135 by Faith, posted 05-13-2005 4:37 PM Brian has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4979 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 137 of 220 (207878)
05-13-2005 6:21 PM
Reply to: Message 135 by Faith
05-13-2005 4:37 PM


Re: Test and see..
The obvious? Death is caused by religion? Without religion nobody would ever die? Interesting thnking there. And without religion nobody would ever get sick? That's obvious too huh? And nobody would ever commit murder or rape or harm children if there were no religion? Stalinism was based on religion rather than opposed to religion? News to me. That's quite a paradise you have in mind if only religion went away.
I am not sure if you have some sort of problem understanding what people write, but no one said that there would be no death or no suffering or no anything else.
If you read what I wrote closely enough you would see that I claimed:
and a great deal of it is caused by religion. In fact, most of it is.
A lot of time would be saved if you read carefully.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 135 by Faith, posted 05-13-2005 4:37 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 138 by Faith, posted 05-13-2005 7:15 PM Brian has not replied
 Message 139 by Phat, posted 05-14-2005 3:47 PM Brian has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4979 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 141 of 220 (208548)
05-16-2005 6:40 AM
Reply to: Message 139 by Phat
05-14-2005 3:47 PM


Re: Test and see..
I would say that a great deal of it is caused by sinful human nature...
Which is a conclusion based on what a religion says. This sinful nature is really nothing more than a device for explaining why God is so useless.
which abuses religion.
In your interpretation maybe.
Were there no religion, we would not live blissfyully in an imaginary land with no borders and John Lennon. We would be as sinful and greedy and prideful as ever.
I could do without John Lennon.
If we removed religion (which is never going to happen)then a great deal of these borders woudl be removed. For example, people wouldn't bethrown of their land because an ancient book of mythology says someone's God promised them this land.
It would express itself different ways.
You mean we would start getting atheist suicide bombers? I wonder why so many suicide bombers are affliated to one religoin or another?
Perhaps, Brian, what you mean't to say was that much of the ugliness of humanity has been expressed through the blatant misuse of religion and in the name of religion.
I don't know if it is blatant misuse or not. Who is to say that Torquemada abused religion or not? I think to say that someone is abusing a religion is again down to your interpretation of the data.
I certainly think that there are very few Christians out there, but that is also my interpretation of the texts.
There is certainly no contest between the horrors of atheism and the horrors of theism. The theistic faiths cannot live with one another, in fact, many of them cannot even live with their own kind, they will always find something to fight about. It may be whether a child should or should not be baptised, but they will find something.
You may want to say that these people are abusing religion, but they seem to be able to justify what they are doing by using their holy books.
Christians have certainly had their fair share of Holy Wars.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 139 by Phat, posted 05-14-2005 3:47 PM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 142 by Phat, posted 05-16-2005 8:41 AM Brian has replied
 Message 147 by Faith, posted 05-16-2005 12:17 PM Brian has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4979 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 143 of 220 (208577)
05-16-2005 9:12 AM
Reply to: Message 142 by Phat
05-16-2005 8:41 AM


Re: Test and see..
Nothing except that 2000 years ago, God so loved the world that He sent His one and only son that whosoever(who so chooses)to believe in Him will not perish but will have everlasting life.
A small problem here.
This sending by God of his one and only son has been the single most catastrophic event in the history of the world, God must really hate His creation when we take His omniscience into consideration.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 142 by Phat, posted 05-16-2005 8:41 AM Phat has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4979 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 149 of 220 (208681)
05-16-2005 2:12 PM
Reply to: Message 148 by Specter
05-16-2005 12:39 PM


Re: Word on it!
Well, excuse me if you will, but who's to say what we need to believe in? I could believe in an orange-hued outer space (not saying I do, BTW).
Well, tell me, based on the Holy Books of the theistic faiths, what other options are there?
So do all of us a huge favor and tell us why you think the world's troubles are caused by religion?
Because almost every major atrocity has had a religious element to it. Look at a handful of major historical atrocities and tell me if religon had any part to play in them. Then get back to me.
And just what is your problem with the Middle Eastern Religions?
Where have I said anything about Middle Eastern Religions?
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 148 by Specter, posted 05-16-2005 12:39 PM Specter has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 153 by Specter, posted 05-17-2005 8:38 AM Brian has replied
 Message 166 by Mr. Ex Nihilo, posted 05-17-2005 2:24 PM Brian has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4979 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 154 of 220 (208987)
05-17-2005 9:00 AM
Reply to: Message 153 by Specter
05-17-2005 8:38 AM


Re: Word on it!
Well, I don't know any other religious area that does this than the Middle East.
Well, there are other groups outside of the Middle Eastern faiths that have suicide bombers.
A Hindu suicide bomber killed the Sri Lanka president Ranasinghe Premadasa in 1993.
The Temple of the Tooth, a Buddhist Holy Place was targeted by Hindu suicide bombers in 1998.
There’s more, but you get the drift.
But does that give you any reason to leave a religion?
I suppose it could be, depends on the individual.
The general atrocities attributed to Christianity had nothing to do with my own decision to leave it. I just couldn’t accept it anymore, it is an insult to one’s intelligence.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 153 by Specter, posted 05-17-2005 8:38 AM Specter has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 155 by jar, posted 05-17-2005 10:46 AM Brian has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4979 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 156 of 220 (209016)
05-17-2005 11:32 AM
Reply to: Message 155 by jar
05-17-2005 10:46 AM


Re: it is an insult to one’s intelligence.
God sends God to be sacrificed to God to correct an error made by God.
Doesn't get sillier than that.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 155 by jar, posted 05-17-2005 10:46 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 158 by jar, posted 05-17-2005 11:41 AM Brian has replied
 Message 161 by Faith, posted 05-17-2005 11:47 AM Brian has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4979 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 160 of 220 (209021)
05-17-2005 11:46 AM
Reply to: Message 158 by jar
05-17-2005 11:41 AM


Re: it is an insult to one’s intelligence.
I think my position of why Christianity is an insult to one's intelligence may drag this off topic, but I'm happy to start another thread on the subject. Would need to be after Friday though, I've got a few finishing touches to put to something.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 158 by jar, posted 05-17-2005 11:41 AM jar has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4979 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 162 of 220 (209023)
05-17-2005 11:49 AM
Reply to: Message 161 by Faith
05-17-2005 11:47 AM


Re: it is an insult to one’s intelligence.
And God the Father sent God the Son.
To save us from ourselves.
That's the one!
But let's save it (and God's errors) for another thread.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 161 by Faith, posted 05-17-2005 11:47 AM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 165 by Specter, posted 05-17-2005 2:12 PM Brian has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4979 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 167 of 220 (209056)
05-17-2005 2:28 PM
Reply to: Message 165 by Specter
05-17-2005 2:12 PM


Re: Insult This!
Are you telling me that God sent God to correct his mistakes?
Well, I cannot claim the credit for this, the credit belongs to the authors of the Bible.
So there could be no way it was the Father's fault indirectly.
Not indirectly, but directly.
El wasn't exactly the cleverest god in the Canaanite pantheon, and if you read the Bible carefully you will see that He is pretty thick. The other Canaanite gods must have everytime El said something.
And don't you use the "he shouldn't have made them" excuse. It's sophistry!
Okay I promise not to use that one, I hadn't thought of that actually.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 165 by Specter, posted 05-17-2005 2:12 PM Specter has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4979 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 169 of 220 (209064)
05-17-2005 3:14 PM
Reply to: Message 166 by Mr. Ex Nihilo
05-17-2005 2:24 PM


God isnt that nice.
The scope of these rules, and the universaility of their acceptance within most world religions within one form or another seems to indicate that humanity is generally agreed that human nature is flawed in these directions (even if they can't necessarilly agree on the solution for correcting these situations).
I would remove 'Thou Shalt Not Kill' from your list as God quite explicitly commands people to kill, Joshua for example, so this commandment is not a rigid one.
I would also remove 'Thou Shalt Not Steal, because it is not a rigid one either as God also commands people to steal other people's property. Palestine would be the prime example of this. And we know full well that many people worked extra hard to take a great deal of land off the Palestinians based on the Conquest myth.
I would also remove 'Thou Shall Not Bear False Witness' as God Himself is happy to lie to people, a la King Ahab
I also suppose those who kill, steal, or lie, also dishonour their parents in a way, so perhaps we should remove this too?
So, it doesn't really leave many religious elements.
Its fine and well to say that atrocities reject these religious elements but the God of the Old testament explicitly commands peole to break most of them. So, if God can sanction Joshua's slaughtering of thousands of innocent people then why should killing be considered 'unreligious'?
The scope of these rules, and the universaility of their acceptance within most world religions within one form or another seems to indicate that humanity is generally agreed that human nature is flawed in these directions
Wouldn't you consider that it is just because humans are prone to these 'weaknesses' that the Bible authors made them into the commandments?
Even secular societies seems to mirror an loose acceptance of these 7 "broken points" above -- although, again, the solution to preventing and correcting these situations diverge sharply from philosopby to philosophy.
But we dont get secular societies attempting genocide on another society because of religion (Cathars for example). Atheists do not kill in the name of a God, many theists do, and will continue to do so. If killing is so unreligious then why have Bishops blessed so many armies before they go into battle? Why don't these bishops declare how ungodly killing is?
On the flip-side of the argument, I guess I'd agree with you to some extant. However, these religions themselves usually define exactly what they're doing wrong so that they may correct themselves.
And then go right on making the same mistakes?
Furthermore, as Faith and Phatboy note, simply removing religion from society won't remove the fact that people still tend to do things wrong.
I quite agree and it would be silly of me to suggest this, that's why I said a great deal of suffering would be removed. We wouldn't have people blowing themselves up in the name of Allah, or doctors at abortion clinics being murdered, or a whole range of other horrendous events.
When things go wrong, people will usually still be guilty of 1) not honoring their father and mother, 2) killing, 3) committing adultery on their S.O., 4) stealing, 5) lying, 6) desiring their neighbor's S.O. lustfully, and/or 7) desiring their neighbor's goods greedilly...or some combination of these factors.
It seems to me that all these things have a very human component to their causality -- not God or gods.
But, as I say, we have the Old Testament God explicitly commanding humans to kill, rape, and steal. So, religious types can find justification in these commands.
Also, how many people are homophobic based soley on their reading of the Bible?
Clearly the cause of all this pain and suffering is human in origin -- not divine.
Well, ultimately, I would agree, but I believe that humans created god and not vice versa. I also agree that humans frequently misuse religion for their own ends, but if that religion wasn't there then would they really find that many other excuses to carry out atrocities?
And if all the pain and suffering starts with humanity, I don't really see how removing religious influences will alleviate this suffering at all.
The thing about religion is that it is a very powerful driving force, people become obsessed with following their god and I cannot think of a greater motivation than thinking that you are serving this greater being.
The same old things which cause pain and suffering will most likely move in to fill the void left open by 'religious crimes' after all these religions has been removed.
Well, we won't know this for sure because there always will be religions, its a fact of life.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 166 by Mr. Ex Nihilo, posted 05-17-2005 2:24 PM Mr. Ex Nihilo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 172 by jar, posted 05-17-2005 4:15 PM Brian has replied
 Message 186 by Mr. Ex Nihilo, posted 05-19-2005 10:53 PM Brian has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4979 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 170 of 220 (209067)
05-17-2005 3:18 PM
Reply to: Message 168 by lfen
05-17-2005 3:07 PM


Re: Word on it!
Buddhism has a much better record in this record partly because there is no implicit sanction of slaughter as a valid religious response.
Even the peace loving Buddhist have a history of militancy. Remember that the Tokyo subway poisoned gas attack was carried out by Buddhists.
On a purely traditional front, there are also stories of Bodhisattva's murdering people because they knew that these people would murder others later in life.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 168 by lfen, posted 05-17-2005 3:07 PM lfen has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 171 by lfen, posted 05-17-2005 3:50 PM Brian has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024