Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,870 Year: 4,127/9,624 Month: 998/974 Week: 325/286 Day: 46/40 Hour: 1/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A puzzling thing about traditional religion
funkmasterfreaky
Inactive Member


Message 61 of 100 (24287)
11-25-2002 5:37 PM
Reply to: Message 60 by graedek
11-25-2002 5:33 PM


quote:
But an omniscient God's knowledge is inviolable. God cannot be wrong, thus, that knowledge is equivalent to determining the outcome. Once an omniscient being knows what the action will be that action is locked in tight. It will happen precisely as God has forseen. This is predestination, not free will.
John can you re word this for me please it makes no sense to me. I can't see your reasoning there at all. thanx I never claimed to be the quickest stick in the bucket
------------------
saved by grace

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by graedek, posted 11-25-2002 5:33 PM graedek has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by joz, posted 11-25-2002 5:50 PM funkmasterfreaky has not replied

  
joz
Inactive Member


Message 62 of 100 (24291)
11-25-2002 5:50 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by funkmasterfreaky
11-25-2002 5:37 PM


[QUOTE]Originally posted by funkmasterfreaky:
[B][quote]John can you re word this for me please it makes no sense to me. I can't see your reasoning there at all. thanx I never claimed to be the quickest stick in the bucket[/B][/QUOTE]
Let me give you an example from science, at the quantum level things (electrons etc) exsist as probability wave functions, if you observe a particular particle, you collapse the wave function for that particle, saying we have free will is akin to saying our actions are described by a probability wave function, as soon as an observer (lets say your God) knows our future actions the wave function has effectively collapsed and predetermined our actions otherwise the observer can not be said to KNOW.....
So its either Gods Omniscience or our free will, one of them needs to be voted off the island (well technically one of them was never on the island but you catch my drift)......

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by funkmasterfreaky, posted 11-25-2002 5:37 PM funkmasterfreaky has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by John, posted 11-25-2002 8:05 PM joz has replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 63 of 100 (24306)
11-25-2002 7:43 PM
Reply to: Message 60 by graedek
11-25-2002 5:33 PM


quote:
Originally posted by graedek:

What does this mean?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by graedek, posted 11-25-2002 5:33 PM graedek has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by funkmasterfreaky, posted 11-26-2002 1:01 AM John has not replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 64 of 100 (24309)
11-25-2002 8:05 PM
Reply to: Message 62 by joz
11-25-2002 5:50 PM


[QUOTE]Originally posted by joz:
[B][QUOTE]Originally posted by funkmasterfreaky:
[B][quote]John can you re word this for me please it makes no sense to me. I can't see your reasoning there at all. thanx I never claimed to be the quickest stick in the bucket[/B][/QUOTE]
Let me give you an example from science, at the quantum level things (electrons etc) exsist as probability wave functions, if you observe a particular particle, you collapse the wave function for that particle, saying we have free will is akin to saying our actions are described by a probability wave function, as soon as an observer (lets say your God) knows our future actions the wave function has effectively collapsed and predetermined our actions otherwise the observer can not be said to KNOW.....
So its either Gods Omniscience or our free will, one of them needs to be voted off the island (well technically one of them was never on the island but you catch my drift)......[/B][/QUOTE]
Hey! That's GOOOOOOOD, Joz!!!
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by joz, posted 11-25-2002 5:50 PM joz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by Chara, posted 11-25-2002 8:20 PM John has not replied
 Message 72 by joz, posted 11-25-2002 11:44 PM John has not replied

  
Chara
Inactive Member


Message 65 of 100 (24311)
11-25-2002 8:20 PM
Reply to: Message 64 by John
11-25-2002 8:05 PM


[QUOTE]Originally posted by John:
[B][QUOTE]Originally posted by joz:
[B][QUOTE]Originally posted by funkmasterfreaky:
[B][quote]John can you re word this for me please it makes no sense to me. I can't see your reasoning there at all. thanx I never claimed to be the quickest stick in the bucket[/B][/QUOTE]
Let me give you an example from science, at the quantum level things (electrons etc) exsist as probability wave functions, if you observe a particular particle, you collapse the wave function for that particle, saying we have free will is akin to saying our actions are described by a probability wave function, as soon as an observer (lets say your God) knows our future actions the wave function has effectively collapsed and predetermined our actions otherwise the observer can not be said to KNOW.....
So its either Gods Omniscience or our free will, one of them needs to be voted off the island (well technically one of them was never on the island but you catch my drift)......[/B][/QUOTE]
Hey! That's GOOOOOOOD, Joz!!!
[/B][/QUOTE]
glad you understood it John ... but then you're all soooooooo smrt!!
[This message has been edited by Chara, 11-25-2002]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by John, posted 11-25-2002 8:05 PM John has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by forgiven, posted 11-25-2002 8:27 PM Chara has not replied

  
forgiven
Inactive Member


Message 66 of 100 (24312)
11-25-2002 8:27 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by Chara
11-25-2002 8:20 PM


quote:
Originally posted by Chara:
glad you understood it John ... but then you're all soooooooo smrt!!
hmmmm.. i think i read long ago that as long as you occasionally said that you were welcome here *grin*

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by Chara, posted 11-25-2002 8:20 PM Chara has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by funkmasterfreaky, posted 11-25-2002 10:59 PM forgiven has not replied

  
funkmasterfreaky
Inactive Member


Message 67 of 100 (24328)
11-25-2002 10:59 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by forgiven
11-25-2002 8:27 PM


quote:
Let me give you an example from science, at the quantum level things (electrons etc) exsist as probability wave functions, if you observe a particular particle, you collapse the wave function for that particle, saying we have free will is akin to saying our actions are described by a probability wave function, as soon as an observer (lets say your God) knows our future actions the wave function has effectively collapsed and predetermined our actions otherwise the observer can not be said to KNOW.....
So its either Gods Omniscience or our free will, one of them needs to be voted off the island (well technically one of them was never on the island but you catch my drift)......
Okay first off i better say something ignorant about your little bracket thingy there. Wait i'll hold but it's all i can do not to. Man am i sick of this kind of thing. Quit with the mockery i'm trying to quit this myself but i have a hard time when i read this kind of trash add on.
Now the only part i got was the mockery of God. I said something in the flood thread about why would you explain something scientifically to a person without a great scientific knowledge, they wouldn't get it. Thanx for clarifying my post elsewhere but this one particle spins donkeys into a monkey to chicken over pie / quantum meatdonkey=blah blah blah blah.
Now if you don't mind John you want to take another go at this cuz the logic is still out to lunch in my mind.. So if you can think of yet another way to word it i'd be much obliged.
------------------
saved by grace

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by forgiven, posted 11-25-2002 8:27 PM forgiven has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 68 by John, posted 11-25-2002 11:23 PM funkmasterfreaky has replied
 Message 70 by joz, posted 11-25-2002 11:36 PM funkmasterfreaky has replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 68 of 100 (24332)
11-25-2002 11:23 PM
Reply to: Message 67 by funkmasterfreaky
11-25-2002 10:59 PM


quote:
Originally posted by funkmasterfreaky:
Okay first off i better say something ignorant about your little bracket thingy there.
Bracket thingie? Do you mean the part that reads "as soon as an observer (lets say your God)"?
hmmm... well, Funkie, we were talking about your God. The reason for the bracket thingie is that the argument depends upon an omniscient observer, but not necessarily your God or any God at all for that matter. It could be Bubba the psychic, so long as Bubba is never ever ever wrong.
quote:
Thanx for clarifying my post elsewhere but this one particle spins donkeys into a monkey to chicken over pie / quantum meatdonkey=blah blah blah blah.
Its really quite simple. If you don't know what is going to happen it may still happen anyway. Or maybe not.
quote:
Now if you don't mind John you want to take another go at this cuz the logic is still out to lunch in my mind.. So if you can think of yet another way to word it i'd be much obliged.
Think about your basic conditions.
1) God is omniscient-- all-knowing and without error in that knowledge
2) We have free will-- the ability to choose between options
Now think of the mind of God. Did you see the flash of everything that was, is and will be? That is the sum of God's knowledge about our world. Since he has known from the beginning it could just as easily be called a memory. God has had this knowledge from the beginning and God is never wrong-- a condition of omnipotence. In other words, there can be no deviation from this memory, this knowledge in God's head. If there were a deviation then God would have been wrong -- an impossible thing for an omniscient God. Free will implies that we can choose one of the other option. But we can't. We must choose the one God has forseen ( or God is not omniscient, and theologians start jumping out of windows ) This is predestination.
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by funkmasterfreaky, posted 11-25-2002 10:59 PM funkmasterfreaky has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by funkmasterfreaky, posted 11-25-2002 11:30 PM John has replied
 Message 77 by Chara, posted 11-26-2002 1:08 AM John has replied

  
funkmasterfreaky
Inactive Member


Message 69 of 100 (24336)
11-25-2002 11:30 PM
Reply to: Message 68 by John
11-25-2002 11:23 PM


The bracket comment i made was about the end little smart ass island comment.
So you are saying that because i know my cat will eat food he has to eat food?
He no longer has an option because i know he's going to eat food.
------------------
saved by grace

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by John, posted 11-25-2002 11:23 PM John has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by joz, posted 11-25-2002 11:37 PM funkmasterfreaky has not replied
 Message 73 by John, posted 11-25-2002 11:49 PM funkmasterfreaky has not replied

  
joz
Inactive Member


Message 70 of 100 (24337)
11-25-2002 11:36 PM
Reply to: Message 67 by funkmasterfreaky
11-25-2002 10:59 PM


FMF there was no mockery intended I was just arguing (using an analogy with quantum mechanics) that you can`t have free will and an omniscient observer.....
Thats it, no mockery intended, admitedly with the "survivor" reference at the end I deviated from a purely formal phrasing of my argument but even then there was no intention of mockery...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by funkmasterfreaky, posted 11-25-2002 10:59 PM funkmasterfreaky has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by funkmasterfreaky, posted 11-26-2002 1:05 AM joz has not replied

  
joz
Inactive Member


Message 71 of 100 (24338)
11-25-2002 11:37 PM
Reply to: Message 69 by funkmasterfreaky
11-25-2002 11:30 PM


quote:
Originally posted by funkmasterfreaky:
The bracket comment i made was about the end little smart ass island comment.
So you are saying that because i know my cat will eat food he has to eat food?
He no longer has an option because i know he's going to eat food.

It depends, do you claim to be omniscient?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by funkmasterfreaky, posted 11-25-2002 11:30 PM funkmasterfreaky has not replied

  
joz
Inactive Member


Message 72 of 100 (24339)
11-25-2002 11:44 PM
Reply to: Message 64 by John
11-25-2002 8:05 PM


quote:
Originally posted by John:
Hey! That's GOOOOOOOD, Joz!!!
I know I save it for special occasions, I`m not sure if anyone else has used this before but if they have I`m not aware of it (wouldn`t be that surprised tho I`m not THAT smart). I formulated it almost a year ago in a conversation on these boards with a fella called redstang....
I`ve trotted it out a few times since and have yet to recieve a decent answer....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by John, posted 11-25-2002 8:05 PM John has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 74 by Chara, posted 11-26-2002 12:58 AM joz has not replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 73 of 100 (24341)
11-25-2002 11:49 PM
Reply to: Message 69 by funkmasterfreaky
11-25-2002 11:30 PM


quote:
Originally posted by funkmasterfreaky:
The bracket comment i made was about the end little smart ass island comment.
So you are saying that because i know my cat will eat food he has to eat food?
He no longer has an option because i know he's going to eat food.

No. It doesn't work with you and I because we don't have absolute certainty of anything. God, however, does. The key is the omniscience of God.
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by funkmasterfreaky, posted 11-25-2002 11:30 PM funkmasterfreaky has not replied

  
Chara
Inactive Member


Message 74 of 100 (24349)
11-26-2002 12:58 AM
Reply to: Message 72 by joz
11-25-2002 11:44 PM


[QUOTE]Originally posted by joz:
I`ve trotted it out a few times since and have yet to recieve a decent answer....[/B][/QUOTE]
Well, joz you left me in the dust on that one ... suppose you could present it in terms a lowly housewife could understand

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by joz, posted 11-25-2002 11:44 PM joz has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 85 by forgiven, posted 11-26-2002 1:11 PM Chara has not replied

  
funkmasterfreaky
Inactive Member


Message 75 of 100 (24350)
11-26-2002 1:01 AM
Reply to: Message 63 by John
11-25-2002 7:43 PM


quote:
Originally posted by John:
quote:
Originally posted by graedek:

What does this mean?

It's the newest philosophy containing the meaning of life .. pretty hard to wrap your mind around hey.
------------------
saved by grace

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by John, posted 11-25-2002 7:43 PM John has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 82 by forgiven, posted 11-26-2002 12:27 PM funkmasterfreaky has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024