Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,815 Year: 3,072/9,624 Month: 917/1,588 Week: 100/223 Day: 11/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What evidence is needed to change a creationist
Blue Jay
Member (Idle past 2697 days)
Posts: 2843
From: You couldn't pronounce it with your mouthparts
Joined: 02-04-2008


Message 112 of 144 (466234)
05-13-2008 7:29 PM
Reply to: Message 109 by Buckfan328
05-13-2008 5:19 PM


Hi, Buck. Welcome to EvC!
Buckfan328 writes:
Ultimately, science is fallible because scientists are fallible and I believe God's word to be infallible so when they seem to be in conflict I will of course go with the latter.
Because you consider yourself a scientist, you acknowledge with this statement that you are fallible. I choose not to attach any credence to your belief in the Bible's infallibility, because the beliefs of a fallible man are fallible by definition.

I'm Thylacosmilus.
Darwin loves you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by Buckfan328, posted 05-13-2008 5:19 PM Buckfan328 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024