Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,806 Year: 3,063/9,624 Month: 908/1,588 Week: 91/223 Day: 2/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What evidence is needed to change a creationist
Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 14 of 144 (445079)
01-01-2008 3:24 AM
Reply to: Message 13 by Buzsaw
12-31-2007 9:42 PM


Re: A Whole Lot
Buzsaw writes:
quote:
Explain why your theory can circumvent the 1st law of thermodynamics relative to your contention that there was no before the BB.
Huh? What does evolution have to do with the creation of the universe?
Be specific, Buzsaw. Why does evolution depend upon the the creation of the universe happening in a specific way?
You don't need to provide an explanation regarding how to derive the First Law from first principles as I have done for the Second Law. Instead, all you need to do is show that evolution is dependent upon the Big Bang.

Rrhain

Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Buzsaw, posted 12-31-2007 9:42 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 15 of 144 (445081)
01-01-2008 3:26 AM
Reply to: Message 13 by Buzsaw
12-31-2007 9:42 PM


Re: A Whole Lot
Buzsaw writes:
quote:
Verify that life began naturally void of ID
Huh? What does the origin of life have to do with evolution?
Be specific, Buzsaw. Are you saying god can't create life that evolves?

Rrhain

Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Buzsaw, posted 12-31-2007 9:42 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by Lithodid-Man, posted 01-01-2008 4:34 AM Rrhain has not replied

  
Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 59 of 144 (448346)
01-13-2008 1:40 AM
Reply to: Message 56 by jaywill
01-12-2008 7:07 AM


Re: Changing my view of creation
jaywill responds to DrJones*:
quote:
quote:
Who designed god?
No one. God always was.
So if god doesn't need a creator, why does the universe? What's so special about god? If you're willing to concede that there are some things that do not need outside direction, why can't the universe be one of those things?
quote:
Do you think the "Cosmic Buck" stops anywhere? I do.
Why can't it stop with the universe? If you're going to concede that it has to stop, why can't the universe be that place?
Note: Cosmogenesis has nothing to do with evolution.

Rrhain

Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by jaywill, posted 01-12-2008 7:07 AM jaywill has not replied

  
Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 60 of 144 (448347)
01-13-2008 1:43 AM
Reply to: Message 57 by jaywill
01-12-2008 7:24 AM


Re: Other questions about evolution
jaywill writes:
quote:
But after a little while you think about the big picture again of macro evolution and it seems no more likely than before.
If 1 + 1 = 2, why can't 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 10?
"Macroevolution" is nothing more than a lot of "microevolution." So if you're willing to concede that evolution happens, why can't it happen as much as you like?
How does the genome know that it isn't allowed to evolve anymore?

Rrhain

Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by jaywill, posted 01-12-2008 7:24 AM jaywill has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024