Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Rationalising The Irrational - Hardcore Theists Apply Within
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 39 of 277 (497380)
02-03-2009 10:46 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Straggler
02-01-2009 7:15 PM


Responses To OP Questions
Straggler writes:
QUESTIONS
1) Which came first for you personally (honestly) - Belief in God/Jesus/Bible or knowledge of the empirical evidence that you consider to support this position?
2) Are your beliefs the result of rational and objective conclusions based on physical evidence which have been confirmed by your relationship with God OR are your beliefs based on your relationship with God which you deem to have been confirmed by the objective physical evidence available? Which way round is it?
3) Could you maintain your faith in the absence of any objective empirical evidence that supports this position? (I.e. how faithful are you?)
4) If the objective empirical evidence which you deem to support your beliefs were present but the relationship with God side of your faith was absent would you still believe as you do? (I.e. is the empirical evidence alone enough to maintain your position?)
5) Is empirical evidence or subjective knowledge of God's presence the root basis of your beliefs?
END QUESTIONS
Good job on the OP, Straggler. These questions are well thought out and well articulated with the exception that Imo, you're over emphasizing the empirical thing. Since there's a whole lot of science stuff that's not regarded as empirical, aren't you requiring a higher standard here on us to whom the questions are directed?
Definition: Empirical Evidence:
The dictionary definition of empirical evidence is evidence relating to or based on experience or observation. This type of evidence is necessary for a theory to be confirmed.
(Embolding mine for emphasis)
1. Since my birth in 1935, no one in my family darkened a church door until I was around 9 or 10 years old, about 1945. When we moved to town the neighbors got permission to take 3 of us older kids to the local Baptist Sunday school & church. This hadn't gone on long before an evangelist/prophecy teacher, Clay Cooper from the West coast somewhere came in and did evangelistic services, integrating Biblical prophecy into the messages. About that time, after the war, the the Jewish people were on the move from Europe and things were progressing in Palestine for the emergence of the Jewish state which was to become Israel in 1948.
As for my conversion, those prophecy messages preached inspiringly, citing the prophecies of Israel relative to the news and other prophetic messages during this week of evening services were what motivated me to be one of the people in the meetings to go forward and kneel at the front pew to ask Jesus to save my soul. Eventually all 8 members of the family became Christians. Our parents have gone on to be with the Lord and all five of my brothers and sisters remain devout evangelical Christians.
The oldest daughter of the neighbor folks who took us to church was beside me at the front pew praying. I was dry eyed and to me it was somewhat like a matter of fact offer from God which I was receiving with little emotion. However the neighbor girl beside me showed emotion and cried some.
A week or so after my conversion some doubts came into my thinking as I thought about my conversion in that I had not experienced any emotional high, so to speak, as the girl beside me had. However as I was reading a little salvation tract of scriptures it became clear to me that this doubt was of Satan. The little tract had the verses of 1st John 5:11, 12, and 13 in it. I believe it was providential that that track was there for me. It said these reassuring words: (perhaps not exact quote but close-it became one of my memory verses) " This is the record, that God has given us eternal life and this life is in his son. He that has the son, has life; and he that has not the son of God has not life. These things have I written to you that believe on his name that you may know that you have eternal life." There was another verse in the tract which was John 1:12. "As many as have received him, to them he gave power to become the sons of God."
It was the prophecy evidence coupled with inspirational preaching of the corresponding Biblical prophecies and the sin/salvation message of the gospel of Jesus the savior which motivated me to a conversion experience at a young age.
I believe that the power of the Holy Spirit brings conviction to the conscience of sinful mankind and draws the seeking soul to a salvation experience in which the multipresent Holy Spirit actually becomes integral to the mind/brain area within the body of the person. I believe that that night, the Holy Spirit effected a conversion and I began to grow into maturity as a new babe in Christ Jesus born spiritually into a child of God.
I've answered your #1 question in depth because for me, though it was not an emotional moment experience, but the most significant turning point in my life.
As to whether I was motivated by faith or evidence, it was definitely both; perhaps 50/50. This man, Clay Cooper was not only an inspiring speaker, but well versed in scripture, history, and current events. His nightly messages were put forth in a manner that even a 10 year old inquisitive and impressionable child sat on the edge of the seat, so to speak, so as not to miss the good news.
2. I believe this was covered in my #1 answer.
3. For me I may have responded to gospel message on the basis of guilt/conscience sin problem. Back in those days the great majority of Americans were theists and had an ingrained idea that God existed as well as a belief in Heaven and Hell. Thus, there was an underlying conscious conviction of the sin problem. When explained fully and accurately, the gospel message of the NT makes good sense to a lot of folks.
Having said that, I believe that for me, the possibility of becoming an apostate would have been far greater, were it not for the reasonable evidence, some which I would categorize as empirical and some which may not be regarded as such.
4. This question took a bit more thought for a forthright response. I believe it was the apostle Peter in Ist Peter 2:2
who said "As new babes in Christ, desire the sincere milk of the word, that you may grow thereby...." (not sure if exact)
The closer one draws to God, i.e. reads scripture, prays, attends classes, fellowship, etc, the more I am convinced that God draws to us and the more he reveals himself to us. That is definitely my experience. There have been such phenomenal experiential incidents in my life that I am absolutely convinced of this.
I found that early in my Christian life I needed support from mentors, pastors and teachers coupled with prayer; Otherwise the evidence would have become less meaningless to the Christian life and more of a phenomena that was overshadowed by the pleasures, duties and experiences of the secular as aspects of life. Without the daily reading of the scriptures including things like the wisdom of King Solomon's Proverbs and the prophetical books along with the social and moral good and sensible aspects of the scriptures, the evidence alone would not be nearly as significant.
For one thing the evidence is not understood without corroborating the prophets and itemizing the significant ones so as to ingrain them into the mind. Eschatology is not for novices. Imo many of the notable prophecy preachers are full of beans on some of the issues. Too many of them tend to regurgitate stuff from books of their contemporaries rather than doing the scripture intensive study and corroborating the prophets in order to get the full picture. In short, few care about or are aware of the evidences. Some are vaguely aware, but the cares of the world take priority.
In summary to the above on #4, without the faith/inspiration/gospel aspects of the Christian life, perhaps I would not have researched and apprised myself enough on the evidences to keep me in the faith
Sadly, relative few of the patrons of America's churches are apprised of archaeological evidences such as the significant Exodus research that has been done. Few professing Christians prioritize their Christianity. For most, church is either not relevant or it's a one hour a week social event and the Bible is opened once or twice a week or never.
#5. 50/50
Edited by Buzsaw, : Delete sentence. Add title

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Straggler, posted 02-01-2009 7:15 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by Straggler, posted 02-04-2009 8:17 AM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 49 of 277 (497493)
02-04-2009 11:17 AM
Reply to: Message 44 by Straggler
02-04-2009 8:17 AM


Re: Responses To OP Questions
Straggler writes:
The idea of empirical evidence as opposed to internal "evidence" is absolutely key to the direction that this discussion is likely to take. ......
I am not really one for basing arguments on dictionary definitions. Scientific evidence is indisputably empirical in nature by any common definition of the term. Scientific evidence is also objective and independently verifiable as described here:
This is so typical with mainline science. When the standard definition of science terms fall short of supporting mainline science positions, no problem; retrofit the definition to support your science view, i.e. the mainline scientific interpretation of observations.
Your terminology relative to "empirical evidence" is telling; "the idea of empirical evidence ........is key...." Problem: Our side's idea of empirical evidence must comply with yours and not with the standard scientific definition of the term to qualify as hypothesis or theory. It has been repeatedly claimed that there is no ongoing ID creationist science on this board by our counterparts.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by Straggler, posted 02-04-2009 8:17 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by Straggler, posted 02-04-2009 11:46 AM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 53 by Modulous, posted 02-04-2009 1:13 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 64 of 277 (497568)
02-04-2009 5:42 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by Straggler
02-04-2009 11:46 AM


Re: Concepts Not Words
Straggler writes:
Concepts Buz. Concepts not definitions are what is important.
Sigh. Concept: Online Dictionary:
A general idea derived or inferred from specific instances or occurrences.
2. Something formed in the mind; a thought or notion. See Synonyms at idea.
3. A scheme; a plan: "began searching for an agency to handle a new restaurant concept
I suppose I'll get heck for defining concept now.
Are we moving from empirical evidence to specific instances and occurrences for establishing theory? Specific instances and occurrences bolstered by some evidences are what motivated me to become a Christian and keeps me into Biblical Christianity.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by Straggler, posted 02-04-2009 11:46 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 68 by Straggler, posted 02-04-2009 6:26 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 73 of 277 (497605)
02-04-2009 11:42 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by Straggler
02-04-2009 8:17 AM


Re: Responses To OP Questions
Straggler writes:
IF it could be conclusively demonstrated by empirical means that the flood never happened, the Noah's ark never existed, that the BB took place, that abiogenesis is a common natural occurrance in the universe, that evolution of new species is happening continually and that none of the remaining biblical prophecies were likely to come true would you still believe in God as you do now?
1. There would have to be a whole lot more evidence of transitional fossils in place now to get me into the notion of evolution and out of the Biblical POV. That is pie in the sky. Imo, there should be millions of specimens.
2. Nearly all of the latter day unfulfilled prophecies are beginning to emerge into fulfillment so there's little left to dissuade me from the Biblical POV.
3. There's enough evidence in place so that if things like the flood were empirically falsified, I would stick with that evidence and conclude that there were errors in the record.
4. There's far too much personal experience empirical evidence for me ever to become an apostate. Of course that evidence is empirical to me and not such that I should expect you to acknowledge.
Now my friend, let me ask you a question. If it could be empirically demonstrated and verified that the debris relative to the Exodus at the Nuweiba sandbar was indeed charriot parts, that the split rock in the region was relative to the Exodus and that the black top mountain in the region was indeed Mt Sinai, imperially verified by additional artifacts in the region, would you be convinced of the Biblical record relative to that event?

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by Straggler, posted 02-04-2009 8:17 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 74 by anglagard, posted 02-05-2009 4:24 AM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 77 by Straggler, posted 02-05-2009 12:15 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 78 of 277 (497666)
02-05-2009 12:23 PM
Reply to: Message 74 by anglagard
02-05-2009 4:24 AM


Re: Responses To OP Questions
anglagard writes:
There are millions of transitional fossils as every fossil is inherently transitional. Your lack of cognitive ability to understand this is exactly what the ToE says is not an impediment to its validity.
I should have specified the terminology. I'm talking macro evolution rather than the abrupt differences of groups/species of animals, such as fish/amphibian etc. which are observed It would take millions more of micro evolution fossil specimens all the way up from fin to leg and other physiological steps, etc to convince me of macro-evolution of the species. Imo, the fossil record clearly favors sudden creation of the species.
Don't ask me here to elaborate as that would lead off topic.
Yes, Tyre is uninhabited to this day and Jesus returned in 1844 but he is in hiding.
These are either debatable or strawmen examples. The 1944 example is totally strawman as it is not a Biblical prophecy. It is a nut case example of someone's ignorance of the Biblical prophecies.
It would not matter how much evidence there is against any global flood to as you would not believe even God if he told you otherwise. (as God has done through physics, chemistry, geology, biology, anthropology, history, and linguistics in at least 100 categories of millions of pieces of evidence).
That's all debatable and not for this thread.
anglagard writes:
Buzsaw writes:
4. There's far too much personal experience empirical evidence for me ever to become an apostate. Of course that evidence is empirical to me and not such that I should expect you to acknowledge.
Your relationship with whatever personal god you have made up is meaningless to me except when you try to use the levers of state to force me and mine to worship your, what in IMO, is a false god of hate and fear. To me and many others this constitutes a rejection of the message of Jesus Christ, who preached love, feeding the poor, healing the sick, and turning the other cheek.
Please read and shift into comprehend mode before responding, Anglagard. Note the emboldened statement. This is another strawman of yours which has no relationship to my personal experiences bolstering my own faith in the Bible.
anglagard writes:
Buzsaw writes:
Now my friend, let me ask you a question. If it could be empirically demonstrated and verified that the debris relative to the Exodus at the Nuweiba sandbar was indeed charriot parts, that the split rock in the region was relative to the Exodus and that the black top mountain in the region was indeed Mt Sinai, imperially verified by additional artifacts in the region, would you be convinced of the Biblical record relative to that event?
Obviously this is not addressed to me as your hatred of what I have to say, from your posts, likely extends to my person in your case. But to answer your question the answer would be an emphatic NO if it came from your usual dishonest sources who violate a Commandment of God.
1. Another strawman. That we disagree is not tantamount to hate on my part towards you as a person.
2. Your "emphatic NO" is a blind unsupported assertion. If you think sources which I've cited for the Exodus are evil and disobedient to God, feel free to bring up the threads support your charge in another thread.
Btw, Your own attitude and manner of responding strikes me more of hatred than anything I've posted. Perhaps it would be good and edifying for you to examine your own attitude before judging other members of the board.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by anglagard, posted 02-05-2009 4:24 AM anglagard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 98 by anglagard, posted 02-09-2009 2:52 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024