Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,762 Year: 4,019/9,624 Month: 890/974 Week: 217/286 Day: 24/109 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   "THE EXODUS REVEALED" VIDEO
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1369 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 233 of 860 (121116)
07-02-2004 4:45 AM
Reply to: Message 230 by Lysimachus
07-02-2004 2:17 AM


red sea?
you're overlooking an important point here:
if the hebrews crossed the red sea, then the bible is obviously wrong on the matter, because it sure doesn't say that's what they did at all.
says "yam cuwph." or "the sea of reeds" NOT "the red sea"
and either way, supposing there is a chariot wheel at the bottom of the red sea, what does it prove? the egyptians did have boats, you know.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 230 by Lysimachus, posted 07-02-2004 2:17 AM Lysimachus has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 259 by Brian, posted 07-05-2004 8:19 AM arachnophilia has replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1369 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 260 of 860 (122071)
07-05-2004 8:27 AM
Reply to: Message 259 by Brian
07-05-2004 8:19 AM


Re: red sea?
I took Buz's hand and walked him through every instance of Yam Suph in the Bible, of course, he never refuted a single reference. This is Buz's way to maintain Bible inerrancy, just ignore problems.
well, i just love how it's not biblical inerrency we're after, but the inerrency of bad translation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 259 by Brian, posted 07-05-2004 8:19 AM Brian has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 261 by Lysimachus, posted 07-05-2004 3:35 PM arachnophilia has not replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1369 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 319 of 860 (123568)
07-10-2004 6:23 AM
Reply to: Message 316 by Buzsaw
07-10-2004 12:44 AM


2. If you believe they exist, why, in all this wide world should they just happen to be found near the other corroborating things relative to the Biblical account and what BETTER, explanation could you offer, other than the ridiculous notion that they were scattered across Nuweiba from an ancient ship or the other ridiculous notion that they were prepared and planted by Wyatt?
i'm gonna go off topic for a sec, but it ties in.
out in the carribean, they kept finding these classical greek sculptures. "evidence for atlantis!" all the crackpots screamed. they were in relatively shallow water, too. you could go dive and see them for yourself. how in the world had they gotten there?
turns out that rennaissance ships routinely used old, unwanted, greek-style sculptures for ballast, and had to dump them at a certain point in the transatlantic journey.
a wheel at the bottom of the red sea means nothing. it's extremely plausible that it's from a ship of some kind.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 316 by Buzsaw, posted 07-10-2004 12:44 AM Buzsaw has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024