Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,468 Year: 3,725/9,624 Month: 596/974 Week: 209/276 Day: 49/34 Hour: 0/5


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   "THE EXODUS REVEALED" VIDEO
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 45 of 860 (102826)
04-26-2004 2:27 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by Buzsaw
04-25-2004 7:57 PM


Re: Two Exoduses, or maybe three?
quote:
It places it in the 18th dynasty, sometime in the 14th century BC.
This question is more for young earthers than for Buz, but how does this line up against the geneology time-telling method for biblical literalists? (i.e., add up the life span of everyone in the Bible and get roughly 6000 years.) Do the dates jive?

"As the days go by, we face the increasing inevitability that we are alone in a godless, uninhabited, hostile and meaningless universe. Still, you've got to laugh, haven't you?"
-Holly

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Buzsaw, posted 04-25-2004 7:57 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by Buzsaw, posted 04-26-2004 10:17 PM Dan Carroll has replied

Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 53 of 860 (103043)
04-27-2004 10:30 AM
Reply to: Message 47 by Buzsaw
04-26-2004 10:17 PM


Re: Two Exoduses, or maybe three?
quote:
To clarify my position, I believe the animals and man are about 6000 years old, the age of the earth, sun and moon being undetermined.
Ah. My mistake.
quote:
The Biblical geneological record would put this sometime in the 14th century BC.
Do you have a link or something to how the geneological record is done? I'd like to read up on it a bit.

"As the days go by, we face the increasing inevitability that we are alone in a godless, uninhabited, hostile and meaningless universe. Still, you've got to laugh, haven't you?"
-Holly

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Buzsaw, posted 04-26-2004 10:17 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by Buzsaw, posted 04-27-2004 11:20 PM Dan Carroll has not replied
 Message 56 by AdminAsgara, posted 04-27-2004 11:32 PM Dan Carroll has not replied

Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 60 of 860 (103278)
04-28-2004 1:31 AM


Ah, thank you Buz, thank you Asgara. Got me some reading to do...
And just as a side note reccomendation, those might be something to keep in the links/reference section. They could certainly be of use when debating the historical accuracy of the bible.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024