Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,784 Year: 4,041/9,624 Month: 912/974 Week: 239/286 Day: 46/109 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Fulfilled Prophecy
anglagard
Member (Idle past 862 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 55 of 303 (374594)
01-04-2007 10:47 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Buzsaw
01-02-2007 7:37 PM


False Prophets
Here are some of my favorite Biblical prophecies:
quote:
Matthew 7:15 - 23 "Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits. Are grapes gathered from thorns, or figs from thistles? So, every sound tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears evil fruit. A sound tree cannot bear evil fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus you will know them by their fruits. Not everyone who says to me Lord, Lord, shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of my father who is in heaven. On that day many will say to me Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name and do mighty works in your name? And then I will declare to them, "I never knew you, depart from me you evildoers."
quote:
Matthew 24:11 - 13 "And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many. And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved."
quote:
The Second Epistle of Peter, chapter two begins with these words:
"But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction."
quote:
The First Epistle of John, chapter four begins with these words:
"Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God; because many false prophets are gone out into the world."
The thing I like about these Biblical prophecies is that they are the only ones I know of that seem to come true on a daily basis.
BTW, the wiki article on False Prophets I lifted these quotes from begins with this as the second sentence:
quote:
Prophets are particularly important figures in Judaism, Christianity and Islam, and to prophesy falsely is seen as one of the worst forms of blasphemy since it falsely claims the speaker is acting with divine authority directly on behalf of God.
Revelations predicts television?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Buzsaw, posted 01-02-2007 7:37 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by jar, posted 01-04-2007 10:52 PM anglagard has not replied

anglagard
Member (Idle past 862 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 60 of 303 (374624)
01-05-2007 12:42 AM
Reply to: Message 59 by crashfrog
01-05-2007 12:37 AM


Re: Poor form.
FYI, Jar is no longer an admin

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by crashfrog, posted 01-05-2007 12:37 AM crashfrog has not replied

anglagard
Member (Idle past 862 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 64 of 303 (374630)
01-05-2007 1:09 AM
Reply to: Message 59 by crashfrog
01-05-2007 12:37 AM


Re: Poor form.
crashfrog writes:
Relax, already. Are you under the impression that there's a magic number of insults that will cause Buz to shrug his shoulders and realize how wrong he's been? (I'm pretty sure it doesn't work like that.)
I notice you don't seem to shrink from defending yourself against misrepresentation or defending your beliefs. On what grounds do you criticise jar for doing the same thing that you do quite often?
Personally, I consider Buzsaw's professed and unquesioning belief in his interpretation of prophecy a threat to God and country. I certainly do not want anyone to hasten such end-time beliefs through nuclear, chemical, or biological means.
Buzsaw is quite restrained as an admin, but I believe anyone, including Buzsaw and jar, should have the right to clarify their statements and defend themselves against misinterpretation or misrepresentation of same.
The discussion may be heated at times but IMO there is a lot at stake. I prophecise that none of us mentioned will significantly change our respective beliefs at this late stage but all of us have the right to not be misrepresented.
That includes jar.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by crashfrog, posted 01-05-2007 12:37 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by crashfrog, posted 01-05-2007 11:40 AM anglagard has not replied

anglagard
Member (Idle past 862 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 72 of 303 (374842)
01-05-2007 10:16 PM
Reply to: Message 71 by Hyroglyphx
01-05-2007 9:55 PM


Re: SOON, IN A THEATER NEAR YOU, BUZ`S PREDICTIONS FOR 2007 (MAY BE?)
Nemesis writes:
Buz does not have the gift of prophecy
My point exactly, glad you said it. Maybe he'll listen to you because judging by his boycott of my posts, he apparently considers my soul beyond redemption according to his standards.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-05-2007 9:55 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 73 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-05-2007 10:30 PM anglagard has replied

anglagard
Member (Idle past 862 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 78 of 303 (374878)
01-06-2007 2:47 AM
Reply to: Message 73 by Hyroglyphx
01-05-2007 10:30 PM


Re: SOON, IN A THEATER NEAR YOU, BUZ`S PREDICTIONS FOR 2007 (MAY BE?)
Nemesis writes:
From the little I have seen, Buz seems to be offering his analysis on the scriptures in question. I should add that his interpretation is not far off from the majority of Christian scholarship. Some people here are making Buz out to be coming up with some off-the-wall interpretations. I haven't seen that. From the little I have read it seems sound, doctrinally.
Yes Buz is interpreting the Bible for our benefit since it appears in his own mind that he speaks for God and us mere mortals are too stupid to actually read and properly understand it. I say take it to the mainstream forms of Christianity (Catholic majority) and see if it it floats like the hypothetical unicorn in hypothetical flood sediments.
When, if ever, will the authoritarian fundies show the proper respect for their preferred deity over temporal rulers of such false interpretation? How many warnings concerning false prophets in the Bible does it take for the message to stick?
If one has respect for God, shoudn't such respect extend to the point where one is allowed to actually think about what is said in the Bible rather than violate the literal warning against false prophets?
Chapter and verse - where does the Bible predict television? Please show a specific quote.
Edited by anglagard, : Clarity
Edited by anglagard, : appropriate question

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-05-2007 10:30 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 83 by Phat, posted 01-06-2007 12:52 PM anglagard has not replied
 Message 89 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-06-2007 2:12 PM anglagard has replied

anglagard
Member (Idle past 862 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 92 of 303 (374965)
01-06-2007 3:25 PM
Reply to: Message 89 by Hyroglyphx
01-06-2007 2:12 PM


Re: SOON, IN A THEATER NEAR YOU, BUZ`S PREDICTIONS FOR 2007 (MAY BE?)
NJ writes:
So, the Bible does not mention television outright, only possible allusions of it. Its just one of those things that is only now conceivable because of the increase of technology. Why do you ask?
The reason I ask is that this prophecy business clearly shows that literal inerrantists are claiming they can use the Bible to mean television, when it does not clearly say television. Yet when someone says the six days of creation may be interpreted as something other than six literal days, the literal inerrantist has a cow.
The position held by these fundies appears to be that the Bible says whatever they want it to say and everyone who disagrees will be roasting in hell. The justification is that they are better than anyone else at interpreting the Bible because they have God-like powers of perception while others are mere fallible mortals.
No wonder such fundies often feel it is OK to lie, cheat, steal, blasphemy and even kill by proxy. Since the Bible says whatever they want it to say, no strictures, such as commandments, apply to them, only to others.
And you wonder why I may get a bit upset with such a position.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-06-2007 2:12 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 100 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-06-2007 11:09 PM anglagard has replied

anglagard
Member (Idle past 862 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 104 of 303 (375061)
01-07-2007 1:11 AM
Reply to: Message 100 by Hyroglyphx
01-06-2007 11:09 PM


Ten Well Known Examples
No wonder such fundies often feel it is OK to lie, cheat, steal, blasphemy and even kill by proxy. Since the Bible says whatever they want it to say, no strictures, such as commandments, apply to them, only to others.
Name me one that feels its ok to lie, cheat or steal, etc. Not one of them. Even the worst of them don't believe that.
Here is a list of 10 to start with:
Ron Wyatt - unrepentant liar (to be fair, some have argued he may have been insane and therefore didn't know he was lying)
Ted Haggard - repentant liar
Jim Bakker - repentant liar, tax cheat, and thief
Jimmy Swaggart - repentant liar
Kent Hovind - unrepentant liar, tax cheat, and thief
Oral Roberts - unrepentant liar
Sun Myong Moon - unrepantant liar, tax cheat, thief, and blasphemer
David Koresh - unrepentant liar, blasphemer, and proxy killer
Pat Robertson - unrepentant liar
Benny Hinn - unrepentant liar
I limited blasphemy to those who have claimed they are Jesus.
{ABE} I also limited tax cheat/thief to those actually convicted in court.
There's more if this list is insufficient.
Edited by anglagard, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 100 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-06-2007 11:09 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 106 by iceage, posted 01-07-2007 1:53 AM anglagard has not replied
 Message 119 by Buzsaw, posted 01-07-2007 10:58 AM anglagard has replied
 Message 133 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-07-2007 11:19 PM anglagard has replied

anglagard
Member (Idle past 862 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 130 of 303 (375170)
01-07-2007 7:18 PM
Reply to: Message 119 by Buzsaw
01-07-2007 10:58 AM


Re: Ten Well Known Examples
Buzsaw writes:
1. Some names on your list are not Biblical fundamentalists at all but mere cultists.
Which ones? Perhaps our definitions of Biblical fundamentalist are different. About half of the individuals I listed are there for saying God told them 'such and such' would happen and then it didn't happen. Now either they lied or God lied. I simply presumed that they lied.
2. Among the millions of Biblical fundies, it should not be unusual to expect that there will be some who will not consistently adhere to all of the fundamentals of the Bible.
Yes, I agree. NJ asked me to provide one example and I provided 10. Like I said, I could easily provide even more.
3. Secularists and non-Biblical fundies have a worse track record globally than Biblical fundies have by a long shot. Well over a hundred million people last century were murdered by their own secularist governments prohibitive of the propagation of the Biblical fundamentals. Most global terrorists in our day have some connection to Islam. The most oppressed nations today are either Communist leaning or Islamic fundamentalist with few Biblical fundies in them.
Would have to agree there as well considering Mao and Stalin alone. However, if one were to take the time frame back 1000 years just in Europe and its conquests, or compare how many people science saved relative to how many all anti-science belief systems together killed over the last 100 years, one would obtain a different answer. As to global terrorists, what you say is true at present so far as I know, especially since groups like the Tamil Tigers and White Supremacists are usually not considered 'global.' Your observation was not always true and may not remain true, and is subject to one's definition of 'global terrorist.'
This is of course veering off-topic but thought I should reply since it is so rare for us to agree on anything.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by Buzsaw, posted 01-07-2007 10:58 AM Buzsaw has not replied

anglagard
Member (Idle past 862 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 136 of 303 (375230)
01-07-2007 11:53 PM
Reply to: Message 133 by Hyroglyphx
01-07-2007 11:19 PM


Re: Ten Well Known Examples
NJ explaining:
However, many of them do live a duplicitous life, including myself at times. But none of them exonerate that behavior which is why they attempt to do it clandestinely. Why? Because they know its wrong.
I said that not one, whether they live a duplicitous life or not, tell others that its okay to steal, fornicate, lie, etc. Of course there are those that live a duplicitous life, but they don't go around telling others that its a-okay.
OK, the phrase "none of them exonerate that behavior" threw me from your real intent as I sure have seen a lot of attempts among those listed, especially when first caught. That is, provided they actually managed to repent of their sins against at least some of the 10 commandments in the first place.
Why are 'fundies' generally not known for chastising such behaviour in their allies? Why have these false prophets not been universally condemned by such "true" believers?
Is the moral guidance provided through Biblical literalism and inerrancy so weak?
Why?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 133 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-07-2007 11:19 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

anglagard
Member (Idle past 862 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 191 of 303 (375792)
01-10-2007 12:04 AM
Reply to: Message 188 by Buzsaw
01-09-2007 11:09 PM


Re: Proof orbelief?
buzsaw writes:
You people are flat out denying the imperical evidence I've produced.
Sigmund, you're slip is showing!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 188 by Buzsaw, posted 01-09-2007 11:09 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024