|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,784 Year: 4,041/9,624 Month: 912/974 Week: 239/286 Day: 46/109 Hour: 0/3 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Fulfilled Prophecy | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
anglagard Member (Idle past 862 days) Posts: 2339 From: Socorro, New Mexico USA Joined: |
Here are some of my favorite Biblical prophecies:
quote: quote: quote: quote: The thing I like about these Biblical prophecies is that they are the only ones I know of that seem to come true on a daily basis. BTW, the wiki article on False Prophets I lifted these quotes from begins with this as the second sentence:
quote: Revelations predicts television?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
anglagard Member (Idle past 862 days) Posts: 2339 From: Socorro, New Mexico USA Joined: |
FYI, Jar is no longer an admin
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
anglagard Member (Idle past 862 days) Posts: 2339 From: Socorro, New Mexico USA Joined: |
crashfrog writes: Relax, already. Are you under the impression that there's a magic number of insults that will cause Buz to shrug his shoulders and realize how wrong he's been? (I'm pretty sure it doesn't work like that.) I notice you don't seem to shrink from defending yourself against misrepresentation or defending your beliefs. On what grounds do you criticise jar for doing the same thing that you do quite often? Personally, I consider Buzsaw's professed and unquesioning belief in his interpretation of prophecy a threat to God and country. I certainly do not want anyone to hasten such end-time beliefs through nuclear, chemical, or biological means. Buzsaw is quite restrained as an admin, but I believe anyone, including Buzsaw and jar, should have the right to clarify their statements and defend themselves against misinterpretation or misrepresentation of same. The discussion may be heated at times but IMO there is a lot at stake. I prophecise that none of us mentioned will significantly change our respective beliefs at this late stage but all of us have the right to not be misrepresented. That includes jar.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
anglagard Member (Idle past 862 days) Posts: 2339 From: Socorro, New Mexico USA Joined: |
Nemesis writes: Buz does not have the gift of prophecy My point exactly, glad you said it. Maybe he'll listen to you because judging by his boycott of my posts, he apparently considers my soul beyond redemption according to his standards.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
anglagard Member (Idle past 862 days) Posts: 2339 From: Socorro, New Mexico USA Joined: |
Nemesis writes: From the little I have seen, Buz seems to be offering his analysis on the scriptures in question. I should add that his interpretation is not far off from the majority of Christian scholarship. Some people here are making Buz out to be coming up with some off-the-wall interpretations. I haven't seen that. From the little I have read it seems sound, doctrinally. Yes Buz is interpreting the Bible for our benefit since it appears in his own mind that he speaks for God and us mere mortals are too stupid to actually read and properly understand it. I say take it to the mainstream forms of Christianity (Catholic majority) and see if it it floats like the hypothetical unicorn in hypothetical flood sediments. When, if ever, will the authoritarian fundies show the proper respect for their preferred deity over temporal rulers of such false interpretation? How many warnings concerning false prophets in the Bible does it take for the message to stick? If one has respect for God, shoudn't such respect extend to the point where one is allowed to actually think about what is said in the Bible rather than violate the literal warning against false prophets? Chapter and verse - where does the Bible predict television? Please show a specific quote. Edited by anglagard, : Clarity Edited by anglagard, : appropriate question
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
anglagard Member (Idle past 862 days) Posts: 2339 From: Socorro, New Mexico USA Joined: |
NJ writes: So, the Bible does not mention television outright, only possible allusions of it. Its just one of those things that is only now conceivable because of the increase of technology. Why do you ask? The reason I ask is that this prophecy business clearly shows that literal inerrantists are claiming they can use the Bible to mean television, when it does not clearly say television. Yet when someone says the six days of creation may be interpreted as something other than six literal days, the literal inerrantist has a cow. The position held by these fundies appears to be that the Bible says whatever they want it to say and everyone who disagrees will be roasting in hell. The justification is that they are better than anyone else at interpreting the Bible because they have God-like powers of perception while others are mere fallible mortals. No wonder such fundies often feel it is OK to lie, cheat, steal, blasphemy and even kill by proxy. Since the Bible says whatever they want it to say, no strictures, such as commandments, apply to them, only to others. And you wonder why I may get a bit upset with such a position.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
anglagard Member (Idle past 862 days) Posts: 2339 From: Socorro, New Mexico USA Joined: |
No wonder such fundies often feel it is OK to lie, cheat, steal, blasphemy and even kill by proxy. Since the Bible says whatever they want it to say, no strictures, such as commandments, apply to them, only to others. Name me one that feels its ok to lie, cheat or steal, etc. Not one of them. Even the worst of them don't believe that. Here is a list of 10 to start with: Ron Wyatt - unrepentant liar (to be fair, some have argued he may have been insane and therefore didn't know he was lying) Ted Haggard - repentant liar Jim Bakker - repentant liar, tax cheat, and thief Jimmy Swaggart - repentant liar Kent Hovind - unrepentant liar, tax cheat, and thief Oral Roberts - unrepentant liar Sun Myong Moon - unrepantant liar, tax cheat, thief, and blasphemer David Koresh - unrepentant liar, blasphemer, and proxy killer Pat Robertson - unrepentant liar Benny Hinn - unrepentant liar I limited blasphemy to those who have claimed they are Jesus. {ABE} I also limited tax cheat/thief to those actually convicted in court. There's more if this list is insufficient. Edited by anglagard, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
anglagard Member (Idle past 862 days) Posts: 2339 From: Socorro, New Mexico USA Joined: |
Buzsaw writes:
1. Some names on your list are not Biblical fundamentalists at all but mere cultists. Which ones? Perhaps our definitions of Biblical fundamentalist are different. About half of the individuals I listed are there for saying God told them 'such and such' would happen and then it didn't happen. Now either they lied or God lied. I simply presumed that they lied.
2. Among the millions of Biblical fundies, it should not be unusual to expect that there will be some who will not consistently adhere to all of the fundamentals of the Bible. Yes, I agree. NJ asked me to provide one example and I provided 10. Like I said, I could easily provide even more.
3. Secularists and non-Biblical fundies have a worse track record globally than Biblical fundies have by a long shot. Well over a hundred million people last century were murdered by their own secularist governments prohibitive of the propagation of the Biblical fundamentals. Most global terrorists in our day have some connection to Islam. The most oppressed nations today are either Communist leaning or Islamic fundamentalist with few Biblical fundies in them. Would have to agree there as well considering Mao and Stalin alone. However, if one were to take the time frame back 1000 years just in Europe and its conquests, or compare how many people science saved relative to how many all anti-science belief systems together killed over the last 100 years, one would obtain a different answer. As to global terrorists, what you say is true at present so far as I know, especially since groups like the Tamil Tigers and White Supremacists are usually not considered 'global.' Your observation was not always true and may not remain true, and is subject to one's definition of 'global terrorist.' This is of course veering off-topic but thought I should reply since it is so rare for us to agree on anything.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
anglagard Member (Idle past 862 days) Posts: 2339 From: Socorro, New Mexico USA Joined: |
NJ explaining:
However, many of them do live a duplicitous life, including myself at times. But none of them exonerate that behavior which is why they attempt to do it clandestinely. Why? Because they know its wrong. I said that not one, whether they live a duplicitous life or not, tell others that its okay to steal, fornicate, lie, etc. Of course there are those that live a duplicitous life, but they don't go around telling others that its a-okay. OK, the phrase "none of them exonerate that behavior" threw me from your real intent as I sure have seen a lot of attempts among those listed, especially when first caught. That is, provided they actually managed to repent of their sins against at least some of the 10 commandments in the first place. Why are 'fundies' generally not known for chastising such behaviour in their allies? Why have these false prophets not been universally condemned by such "true" believers? Is the moral guidance provided through Biblical literalism and inerrancy so weak? Why?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
anglagard Member (Idle past 862 days) Posts: 2339 From: Socorro, New Mexico USA Joined: |
buzsaw writes:
You people are flat out denying the imperical evidence I've produced. Sigmund, you're slip is showing!
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024