He was adopted by Joesph
Being adopted, although a admirable act, does not mean that the adopted child has your blood. The messiah is to be of Davud's bloodline, and there is no way to link Jesus to the BLOOD of David.
his biological genes go thru Nathan,
Which is no good.
The prophecy goes though Solomon, so the author of matthew's gospel has effectively negated jesus' claim to messiahship. Only one problem of many I may add.
matthews genologies and lukes geneologies do not conflict but confirm that the virgin birth prophecy was fullfilled.
The virgin birth prophecy in Isaiah 7:14 was fulfilled in Isaiah 8:
It will overflow all its channels,
run over all its banks
and sweep on into Judah, swirling over it,
passing through it and reaching up to the neck.
Its outspread wings will cover the breadth of your land,
O Immanuel
There he is, right before your eyes, Immanuel, whose name means God with us, not in person of course, but God is with us in purpose. But, as you can see, Immanuel has already been born, being the subject referred to by the 'your' in 'your land'.
Isn't it amazing how easy it is to rip the Bible apart and show that Jesus was no messiah?
All you have to do is read the Bible and think a little for yourself.
Also, as I never tire of telling some Xians, Isaiah 7:14 is not even a messianic prophecy. Why not study Jusdaism for a bit, then reassess the NT?
I asked earlier, and you perhaps missed it, but who was the virgin in the Book of Isaiah that gave birth to a son? (clue: isaiah 8:3)
Brian.