|
Author
|
Topic: Noah's Ark volume calculation
|
Black
Member (Idle past 1132 days) Posts: 77 Joined: 11-28-2008
|
|
Message 331 of 347 (500209)
02-23-2009 11:10 PM
|
Reply to: Message 330 by Coyote
02-23-2009 11:00 PM
|
|
Re: Dinosaurs & definitions
Coyote,Incorrect. The book of Genesis is evidence that the Ark existed. The rest of your post is mute. P.S. I just wanted to make sure we are on the same page. Science becomes faith when you claim microevolution leads to macroevolution or when you claim the fossil record supports macroevolution. Edited by Black, : edit
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 330 by Coyote, posted 02-23-2009 11:00 PM | | Coyote has responded |
|
Theodoric
Member Posts: 3859 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: 08-15-2005 Member Rating: 6.5
|
|
|
Message 332 of 347 (500211)
02-23-2009 11:18 PM
|
Reply to: Message 331 by Black
02-23-2009 11:10 PM
|
|
Re: Dinosaurs & definitions
So you claim that the volume calculation is irrelevant, because the Ark really existed and your proof is the book of genesis?I just want to make sure I understand you correctly. Oh by the way, how is the book of genesis proof the Ark story really happened?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 331 by Black, posted 02-23-2009 11:10 PM | | Black has responded |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 335 by Black, posted 02-23-2009 11:20 PM | | Theodoric has not yet responded |
|
Coyote
Member Posts: 3937 Joined: 01-12-2008 Member Rating: 9.7
|
|
|
Message 333 of 347 (500213)
02-23-2009 11:19 PM
|
Reply to: Message 331 by Black
02-23-2009 11:10 PM
|
|
Re: Dinosaurs & definitions
| Incorrect. The book of Genesis is evidence that the Ark existed. The rest of your post is mute. |
The bible is not scientific evidence. There is no scientific evidence that the ark ever existed. There are mountains of scientific evidence that show the global flood about 4,350 years ago never happened. I have some from my own work. Find an appropriate thread and I'll share it with you. And you mean moot, not mute.
Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 331 by Black, posted 02-23-2009 11:10 PM | | Black has not yet responded |
|
lyx2no
Member (Idle past 665 days) Posts: 1277 From: A vast, undifferentiated plane. Joined: 02-28-2008
|
|
|
Message 334 of 347 (500214)
02-23-2009 11:19 PM
|
Reply to: Message 331 by Black
02-23-2009 11:10 PM
|
|
Troll
| The rest of your post is mute. |
All post are mute. They're written. You mean "moot", troll, but even there you're wrong. You've produced nothing so far but contradiction. Got anything else? Edited by lyx2no, : Punctuation
Genesis 2
17 But of the ponderosa pine, thou shalt not eat of it; for in the day that thou shinniest thereof thou shalt sorely learn of thy nakedness.
18 And we all live happily ever after.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 331 by Black, posted 02-23-2009 11:10 PM | | Black has responded |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 336 by Black, posted 02-23-2009 11:20 PM | | lyx2no has not yet responded |
|
Black
Member (Idle past 1132 days) Posts: 77 Joined: 11-28-2008
|
|
|
Message 335 of 347 (500215)
02-23-2009 11:20 PM
|
Reply to: Message 332 by Theodoric
02-23-2009 11:18 PM
|
|
Re: Dinosaurs & definitions
Theodoric,There is no such thing as proof but however it is evidence.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 332 by Theodoric, posted 02-23-2009 11:18 PM | | Theodoric has not yet responded |
|
Black
Member (Idle past 1132 days) Posts: 77 Joined: 11-28-2008
|
|
|
Message 336 of 347 (500216)
02-23-2009 11:20 PM
|
Reply to: Message 334 by lyx2no
02-23-2009 11:19 PM
|
|
Re: Troll
lyx2n0,not true. I ment mute. Oh, and contradiction is enough. Edited by Black, : edit
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 334 by lyx2no, posted 02-23-2009 11:19 PM | | lyx2no has not yet responded |
|
Theodoric
Member Posts: 3859 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: 08-15-2005 Member Rating: 6.5
|
|
|
Message 337 of 347 (500217)
02-23-2009 11:20 PM
|
Reply to: Message 331 by Black
02-23-2009 11:10 PM
|
|
Re: Dinosaurs & definitions
Oh and the word is moot, not mute.mute means silent. Might want to brush up on that vocab if you want anyone to take any of your points seriously. Edited by Theodoric, : spelling
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 331 by Black, posted 02-23-2009 11:10 PM | | Black has responded |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 338 by Black, posted 02-23-2009 11:21 PM | | Theodoric has not yet responded |
|
Black
Member (Idle past 1132 days) Posts: 77 Joined: 11-28-2008
|
|
|
Message 338 of 347 (500218)
02-23-2009 11:21 PM
|
Reply to: Message 337 by Theodoric
02-23-2009 11:20 PM
|
|
Re: Dinosaurs & definitions
theodoric,exactly.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 337 by Theodoric, posted 02-23-2009 11:20 PM | | Theodoric has not yet responded |
|
Coyote
Member Posts: 3937 Joined: 01-12-2008 Member Rating: 9.7
|
|
|
Message 339 of 347 (500219)
02-23-2009 11:26 PM
|
Reply to: Message 331 by Black
02-23-2009 11:10 PM
|
|
Re: Dinosaurs & definitions
| Incorrect. The book of Genesis is evidence that the Ark existed. The rest of your post is mute. |
The bible is not scientific evidence. There is no scientific evidence that the ark ever existed. There are mountains of scientific evidence that show the global flood about 4,350 years ago never happened. I have some from my own work. Find an appropriate thread and I'll share it with you. And you mean moot, not mute.
Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 331 by Black, posted 02-23-2009 11:10 PM | | Black has responded |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 341 by Black, posted 02-23-2009 11:28 PM | | Coyote has responded |
|
Coyote
Member Posts: 3937 Joined: 01-12-2008 Member Rating: 9.7
|
|
|
Message 340 of 347 (500220)
02-23-2009 11:27 PM
|
Reply to: Message 331 by Black
02-23-2009 11:10 PM
|
|
Re: Dinosaurs & definitions
Oops.Edited by Coyote, : Eliminate duplicate
Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 331 by Black, posted 02-23-2009 11:10 PM | | Black has not yet responded |
|
Black
Member (Idle past 1132 days) Posts: 77 Joined: 11-28-2008
|
|
|
Message 341 of 347 (500222)
02-23-2009 11:28 PM
|
Reply to: Message 339 by Coyote
02-23-2009 11:26 PM
|
|
Re: Dinosaurs & definitions
Coyote,The book of Genesis does indicate that an ark existed therefor it is evidence. I ment mute. In other words: be silent or your post is silent. It's a metaphor. Are we going to attack each other all day or are we going to debate? Edited by Black, : edit Edited by Black, : edit Edited by Black, : edit Edited by Black, : edit
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 339 by Coyote, posted 02-23-2009 11:26 PM | | Coyote has responded |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 342 by Coyote, posted 02-23-2009 11:33 PM | | Black has responded |
|
Coyote
Member Posts: 3937 Joined: 01-12-2008 Member Rating: 9.7
|
|
|
Message 342 of 347 (500224)
02-23-2009 11:33 PM
|
Reply to: Message 341 by Black
02-23-2009 11:28 PM
|
|
Re: Dinosaurs & definitions
| Coyote, The book of Genesis does indicate that an ark existed therefor it is evidence. I ment mute. In other words: STFU |
This thread is in the Science Forum. Evidence here should be scientific evidence. The bible is not scientific evidence; it is folklore and myth. The scientific evidence shows that the purported global flood about 4,350 years ago didn't happen as described. And no, I won't STFU.
Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 341 by Black, posted 02-23-2009 11:28 PM | | Black has responded |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 343 by IchiBan, posted 02-23-2009 11:51 PM | | Coyote has not yet responded | | | Message 344 by Black, posted 02-24-2009 12:02 AM | | Coyote has responded |
|
IchiBan
Member (Idle past 886 days) Posts: 88 Joined: 07-07-2008
|
|
|
Message 343 of 347 (500227)
02-23-2009 11:51 PM
|
Reply to: Message 342 by Coyote
02-23-2009 11:33 PM
|
|
Re: Dinosaurs & definitions
Folklore and myth is the destiny of most science. What was science at one point in time is now folklore and myth. Science continually gives new answers that are not necessarily more correct just new.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 342 by Coyote, posted 02-23-2009 11:33 PM | | Coyote has not yet responded |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 345 by Black, posted 02-24-2009 12:05 AM | | IchiBan has not yet responded |
|
Black
Member (Idle past 1132 days) Posts: 77 Joined: 11-28-2008
|
|
|
Message 344 of 347 (500228)
02-24-2009 12:02 AM
|
Reply to: Message 342 by Coyote
02-23-2009 11:33 PM
|
|
Re: Dinosaurs & definitions
Coyote,http://ehwchurch.org/gallery/v/Apologetics/CreationScience/Seminar+3+-+Dinosaurs+and+the+Bible.html check the link out it has some good information in it. just click play when the link loads. Edited by Black, : edit
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 342 by Coyote, posted 02-23-2009 11:33 PM | | Coyote has responded |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 346 by Coyote, posted 02-24-2009 12:23 AM | | Black has not yet responded |
|
Black
Member (Idle past 1132 days) Posts: 77 Joined: 11-28-2008
|
|
|
Message 345 of 347 (500229)
02-24-2009 12:05 AM
|
Reply to: Message 343 by IchiBan
02-23-2009 11:51 PM
|
|
Re: Dinosaurs & definitions
ichiBan,Yeah lol. ;)
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 343 by IchiBan, posted 02-23-2009 11:51 PM | | IchiBan has not yet responded |
|
™ Version 4.0 Beta
