Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,804 Year: 4,061/9,624 Month: 932/974 Week: 259/286 Day: 20/46 Hour: 1/1


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ The Bible: Accuracy and Inerrancy ⇒

Inerrancy of the Bible 2

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Inerrancy of the Bible 2
CK
Member (Idle past 4154 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 10 of 118 (179434)
01-21-2005 6:38 PM 		Reply to: Message 9 by Brian
01-21-2005 6:22 PM

Not what you asked but I think this will have you holding your ribs -
​
Account Suspended
​
(BTW - someone who actually saw the original confirmed that the diagram was TAPED in from a science book).
This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Brian, posted 01-21-2005 6:22 PM Brian has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by Brian, posted 01-21-2005 6:45 PM CK has not replied
 Message 17 by johnfolton, posted 01-21-2005 10:09 PM CK has not replied
  
CK
Member (Idle past 4154 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 35 of 118 (179592)
01-22-2005 8:59 AM 		Reply to: Message 32 by Phat
01-22-2005 7:26 AM

Actually no - Star Trek is not very believable and em..is fiction.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by Phat, posted 01-22-2005 7:26 AM Phat has not replied
  
CK
Member (Idle past 4154 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 83 of 118 (180701)
01-26-2005 4:14 AM 		Reply to: Message 82 by Incognito
01-26-2005 4:05 AM

Re: Errors have been weak at best, any of you believers yet?
quote:
a. All dating techniques are built on assumptions that have been proven wrong multiple times. If they really were reliable they'd be correct almost all the time - not just occasionally.
​
Would you be willing to go to one of the dating threads and back that asseration - you must be joking if you think people would like that old chestnut pass.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by Incognito, posted 01-26-2005 4:05 AM Incognito has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 85 by Incognito, posted 01-26-2005 4:24 AM CK has replied
  
CK
Member (Idle past 4154 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 87 of 118 (180707)
01-26-2005 4:48 AM 		Reply to: Message 85 by Incognito
01-26-2005 4:24 AM

Re: It sounds like I need to read the rest of your forums...
when you have got the chance, take a look - you may be the first creationist who actually knows what they are on about rather than just parroting rubbish from AIG.
​
Maybe....
This message is a reply to:
 Message 85 by Incognito, posted 01-26-2005 4:24 AM Incognito has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024