Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,794 Year: 4,051/9,624 Month: 922/974 Week: 249/286 Day: 10/46 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Isaiah and the Dead Sea Scrolls
Primordial Egg
Inactive Member


Message 190 of 204 (203140)
04-27-2005 7:24 PM
Reply to: Message 189 by ramoss
04-27-2005 2:53 PM


Re: How sure are you about the authenticity of Dead Sea Scrolls
ramoss writes:
The only source seems to be the place you cut/paste this information from , which is http://www.islam-is-the-only-solution.com/scrolls.htm
looking at that site, with its unusual spellings of "Islaam" and "Quraan", the inappropriate use of colour, its ever-so-slightly belligerent style and its liberal sprinkling of the Arabic codex, I'm inclined to believe that Checkmate is somehow affiliated with the site. Especially as he's now used that site a few times as source and warned of going to other Islamic sites as sources.
Not that there's anything wrong with being associated with that site per se, but if one is using the source as evidence and is connected with it in some way, it should be made apparent, for good order.
Checkmate - can you please confirm or deny this?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 189 by ramoss, posted 04-27-2005 2:53 PM ramoss has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 193 by contracycle, posted 04-28-2005 11:45 AM Primordial Egg has replied
 Message 196 by Checkmate, posted 04-28-2005 3:24 PM Primordial Egg has not replied

  
Primordial Egg
Inactive Member


Message 195 of 204 (203384)
04-28-2005 1:32 PM
Reply to: Message 193 by contracycle
04-28-2005 11:45 AM


Re: How sure are you about the authenticity of Dead Sea Scrolls
Neither of those are particularly unusual; I have seen at least 8 spellings of Koran, which is merely the most used term in English.
Fair enough - it was the first time I've seen these particular spellings. "Quran" (with or without an apostrophe) and "Koran" are the big two, in my experience. Islaam and Quraan are more accurate phonetically.
I tend to agree that projecting Fundamentalism onto Islam is probably an error. Biblical literalism is hard when the book itself is so metaphorical and reflective - it is not like the Christian bible, which appears as a pretty dry account, and to which an appeal to litralism can be made precisely becuase it is not much accompanied by metaphor or reflection.
Was this a response to anything I said (and not Checkmate)? + Did you mean Quran when you said Christian Bible above? If so, I'd agree that by its very nature the Quran is more instructional than the Bible. Funadmentalism to me is more about psychological condition - I'd say it could be applied to certain adherents of Christianity and Islam in equal measure.
PE

This message is a reply to:
 Message 193 by contracycle, posted 04-28-2005 11:45 AM contracycle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 200 by contracycle, posted 04-29-2005 7:02 AM Primordial Egg has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024