Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 107 (8805 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 12-14-2017 4:56 AM
339 online now:
CosmicChimp, frako, NoNukes, PaulK, Phat (AdminPhat), Pressie, Tangle (7 members, 332 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: jaufre
Post Volume:
Total: 824,107 Year: 28,713/21,208 Month: 779/1,847 Week: 154/475 Day: 1/46 Hour: 1/0

Announcements: Reporting debate problems OR discussing moderation actions/inactions


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Prev1234567
8
Author Topic:   Was Adam Packin' Heat?
Phat
Member
Posts: 10230
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.3


Message 106 of 120 (811178)
06-05-2017 2:59 PM
Reply to: Message 91 by bluegenes
06-03-2017 11:11 AM


Re: The Lord has a penus and testicles
An omnipotent being would have an infinite number of penises (penes, penii), by definition. And infinite testicles.

He'd be capable of screwing everyone else and everything else at the same time.

Sounds a bit like our president!

Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. RC Sproul
"A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." Mark Twain "
~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith
"as long as chance rules, God is an anachronism."~Arthur Koestler

This message is a reply to:
 Message 91 by bluegenes, posted 06-03-2017 11:11 AM bluegenes has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 107 by Davidjay, posted 06-05-2017 9:44 PM Phat has acknowledged this reply

Davidjay 
Suspended Member
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 107 of 120 (811211)
06-05-2017 9:44 PM
Reply to: Message 106 by Phat
06-05-2017 2:59 PM


Re: The Lord has a penus and testicles
Phat are you posting as a member or as a 'moderator ? As a member I can more easily respond to your posts rather than if you are a moderator, looking to moderate or make one conform and agree ..

Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science.

Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,


This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by Phat, posted 06-05-2017 2:59 PM Phat has acknowledged this reply

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 108 of 120 (811212)
06-05-2017 9:49 PM
Reply to: Message 105 by ringo
06-05-2017 12:07 PM


Re: The Lord had to come 'physically
Ringo, thanks for illustrating an insincere question, that you supposedly want an answer to. The religious scribes and pharisees and the self righteous used to try this trick innumerable times against Jesus. And He only answered for the sake of those listening, or if HERE, only for those READERS (who were not yet hardcore religious evolutionaries).

God made Adam and Eve without using a womb. He was taking a shortcut already by getting Mary pregnant. So it doesn't make any sense whatsoever for the Holy Spirit to have a womb.

You as with atheists and evolutionists think a cute question might stump a Christian, a creationist or the Lord Himself. You think you can mock the Lord through a dumb ignorant trick question ?

Sorry I know your tricks, and can find no way to help READERS think about Jesus and truths from your ignorant trick question.


Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science.

Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,


This message is a reply to:
 Message 105 by ringo, posted 06-05-2017 12:07 PM ringo has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 110 by ringo, posted 06-06-2017 11:50 AM Davidjay has responded

  
bluegenes
Member (Idle past 90 days)
Posts: 3119
From: U.K.
Joined: 01-24-2007


(1)
Message 109 of 120 (811227)
06-06-2017 2:09 AM
Reply to: Message 96 by Davidjay
06-04-2017 9:36 AM


Re: The Lord has a penus and testicles
Davidjay writes:

No, it's the package that keeps on giving, even though you evolutionists try to neuter the truth and neuter opposition.

Why would we need to neuter an impotent opposition?

Davidjay writes:

I love winning, and I love proving that evolutionists can not stand the heat and are not packin, except for packin up and leavin...

What you actually do is continually make unsupported claims, then declare victory. That's like a five year old repeatedly stating that Santa Claus brings the Christmas presents, then childishly considering his unsupported declaration to be evidence or proof of the claim in itself.

"I win because I said it is so", says the kid, as he sticks his tongue out and stamps his foot.

Davidjay writes:

Onward Christian Soldiers. Jesus wins again.

And why? Because you said so.

Don't blame others for your inability to support creationist claims, your own impotence. You are self-neutered.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 96 by Davidjay, posted 06-04-2017 9:36 AM Davidjay has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 118 by Davidjay, posted 06-09-2017 11:55 AM bluegenes has responded

ringo
Member
Posts: 13968
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 110 of 120 (811260)
06-06-2017 11:50 AM
Reply to: Message 108 by Davidjay
06-05-2017 9:49 PM


Re: The Lord had to come 'physically
Davidjay writes:

Ringo, thanks for illustrating an insincere question, that you supposedly want an answer to.


Well, I didn't expect an answer. The question was meant to underscore your asinine point.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 108 by Davidjay, posted 06-05-2017 9:49 PM Davidjay has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 111 by Davidjay, posted 06-08-2017 10:51 AM ringo has responded

Davidjay 
Suspended Member
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 111 of 120 (811453)
06-08-2017 10:51 AM
Reply to: Message 110 by ringo
06-06-2017 11:50 AM


Re:Mathematical proof of Body Design
Your asinine point is behind you..... even if it makes you uncomfortable.

The Lord had a 'maximus' behind and in front... as Moses saw it. The Lord was not a blob as in Star Wars or as imagined by atheists and evolutionists, the Lord had a magnificient body, and gave that exact image and its technology and spirituality potenials to us according to the design and proportions.

But evolutionists dont know math and atheists hate math and refuse to study the design of their own bodies. Atheists and evolutionists hate science and oppose science.

Deal with it.. or study the truth of our bodys design

http://www.davidjayjordan.com/...ticalProofHumanDesign1.html

Edited by Davidjay, : No reason given.


Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science.

Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,


This message is a reply to:
 Message 110 by ringo, posted 06-06-2017 11:50 AM ringo has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 112 by Coyote, posted 06-08-2017 11:04 AM Davidjay has not yet responded
 Message 113 by ringo, posted 06-08-2017 11:45 AM Davidjay has responded

  
Coyote
Member
Posts: 6037
Joined: 01-12-2008
Member Rating: 2.0


Message 112 of 120 (811458)
06-08-2017 11:04 AM
Reply to: Message 111 by Davidjay
06-08-2017 10:51 AM


Re:Mathematical proof of Body Design
Atheists and evolutionists hate science and oppose science.

On the contrary: it is fundamentalists such as yourself who hate and opposes science because science shows that your beliefs are wrong.

Good example: the YEC belief is totally disproved by scientific dating, and the belief in a global flood ca. 4350 years ago is totally disproved by many fields of science. Even my archaeological research disproves it!

But of course you won't address that evidence, you just keep on posting nonsense and unsupported claims, boasting of victory, and trolling. Reminds me of Pigeon Chess.

Edited by Coyote, : spelling


Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

Belief gets in the way of learning--Robert A. Heinlein

In the name of diversity, college student demands to be kept in ignorance of the culture that made diversity a value--StultisTheFool

It's not what we don't know that hurts, it's what we know that ain't so--Will Rogers

If I am entitled to something, someone else is obliged to pay--Jerry Pournelle

If a religion's teachings are true, then it should have nothing to fear from science...--dwise1

"Multiculturalism" demands that the US be tolerant of everything except its own past, culture, traditions, and identity.

Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other points of view--William F. Buckley Jr.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by Davidjay, posted 06-08-2017 10:51 AM Davidjay has not yet responded

ringo
Member
Posts: 13968
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 113 of 120 (811466)
06-08-2017 11:45 AM
Reply to: Message 111 by Davidjay
06-08-2017 10:51 AM


Re: Re:Mathematical proof of Body Design
Davidjay writes:

The Lord had a 'maximus' behind and in front... as Moses saw it.


According to Exodus 33, what Moses saw was God's "glory". Think of a very bright light. You can't look at it directly without damaging your eyesight but if it's pointed away from you - i.e. you're behind it - you can see it reflected from other objects.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by Davidjay, posted 06-08-2017 10:51 AM Davidjay has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 114 by Davidjay, posted 06-08-2017 7:16 PM ringo has responded

Davidjay 
Suspended Member
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 114 of 120 (811493)
06-08-2017 7:16 PM
Reply to: Message 113 by ringo
06-08-2017 11:45 AM


Re: Re:Mathematical proof of Body Design
I quess you speak from experience, or are you making up another theory... on a theory of a theory. Or are you just hoping by luck and chance to have made up a new excuse for you not believeing what is before your eyes.

Moses saw the Lord in all His glory, meaning totally naked and beautiful and emanating, as clothes do not do the Lord justice, as His BODY is as magnificent as magnificent gets...which is why viewers fell down on their faces when seeing him or his angels.

Have some respect Ringo, or viewers, because in your pride and arrogancy, you just have no idea of what ground you tread upon, when you deny the Lord his GLORY and POWER.

Anyway, for the sake of READERS and not you Ringo, again note how Jesus was before their eyes and was real, even after his resurrection, witnessed and realised by doubting Thomas. So much so that he declared 'MY LORD and MY GOD' and he believed forever til his death, without doubting.

Jesus was seen, Jesus was real, if you accept Jesus you can and will see Jesus.... a promise is a promise, whether now or in the future.

http://www.davidjayjordan.com/...ngJesuspreventsSuicide.html

http://www.davidjayjordan.com/FaceofJesus.html


Thanks to the webmasters HERE for allowing me to defeat atheists and evolutionists HERE, and show they have no math, no science backing them up and that they are totally dependant on semantics and luck and chance as their only support for their religion. Thanks again...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by ringo, posted 06-08-2017 11:45 AM ringo has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 115 by ringo, posted 06-09-2017 11:40 AM Davidjay has responded

  
ringo
Member
Posts: 13968
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 115 of 120 (811592)
06-09-2017 11:40 AM
Reply to: Message 114 by Davidjay
06-08-2017 7:16 PM


Re: Re:Mathematical proof of Body Design
Davidjay writes:

I quess you speak from experience....


I speak from reading the Bible. You should try it sometime instead of making up your own stories.

Davidjay writes:

Anyway, for the sake of READERS and not you Ringo, again note how Jesus was before their eyes and was real, even after his resurrection, witnessed and realised by doubting Thomas.


Why do you accept that story as written but you make up a lot of silly nonsense about the story in Exodus?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by Davidjay, posted 06-08-2017 7:16 PM Davidjay has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 116 by Davidjay, posted 06-09-2017 11:49 AM ringo has responded

Davidjay 
Suspended Member
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 116 of 120 (811596)
06-09-2017 11:49 AM
Reply to: Message 115 by ringo
06-09-2017 11:40 AM


Re: Re:Mathematical proof of Body Design
You must learn to explain yourself Ringo and learn to be clear... try using more than one sentence in your honest query or try to clear your mind beforehand. Maybe get rid of the ****** THEREIN.

Anyway the Bible is literal and when it is mysterious, it always explains the text later to the Lords people (SEE Prophecy, especially Daniel 2,4,5,7,8,9,11,12)

As for exodus, the first one was literal and the second one is literal and even more IMPORTANT

http://www.davidjayjordan.com/2ndExodus2.html

The main verses being

Jeremiah 51:6-9,13
Mathew 24:16 ...
Revelations 12:15,16
I Corinthians 10:11
Revelations 12:6
Micah 7:15
Hosea 2:1 & 15
Esdras 15:11
Zechariah 2, 9, 10
Amos 9:11
Joel 2:28-31
Ezekiel 34:13 -25
Jeremiah 23:3,6
John 10:16

Edited by Davidjay, : No reason given.


Thanks to the webmasters HERE for allowing me to defeat atheists and evolutionists HERE, and show they have no math, no science backing them up and that they are totally dependant on semantics and luck and chance as their only support for their religion. Thanks again...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 115 by ringo, posted 06-09-2017 11:40 AM ringo has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 117 by ringo, posted 06-09-2017 11:53 AM Davidjay has not yet responded

  
ringo
Member
Posts: 13968
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 117 of 120 (811598)
06-09-2017 11:53 AM
Reply to: Message 116 by Davidjay
06-09-2017 11:49 AM


Re: Re:Mathematical proof of Body Design
Davidjay writes:

Anyway the Bible is literal....


Some of it is and some of it isn't. Do you think Psalm 23 was written by a literal sheep or a figurative sheep?

Davidjay writes:

As for exodus, the first one was literal....


That's what I'm saying. What the text actually SAYS is nothing about God's naughty bits. You're the one who is adding a fanciful interpretation.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 116 by Davidjay, posted 06-09-2017 11:49 AM Davidjay has not yet responded

Davidjay 
Suspended Member
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 118 of 120 (811599)
06-09-2017 11:55 AM
Reply to: Message 109 by bluegenes
06-06-2017 2:09 AM


Re: The Lord has a penus and testicles
Don't blame others for your inability to support creationist claims, your own impotence. You are self-neutered.

Nah, I and my wife of my youth have done our part and brought five new souls into the world via the Lords created method and his amazing and beautiful reproductive system..

Not into neutering, but believe in obeying the first commandment.

"Be fruitful and multiply"...... great math once you get the hang of it. Its easier than you think.... I mean addition is fantastic, but multiplying is even greater.... what a thrill, all by design. Amazing DESIGN..... never deny design....

Thats the real BIG BANG....


Thanks to the webmasters HERE for allowing me to defeat atheists and evolutionists HERE, and show they have no math, no science backing them up and that they are totally dependant on semantics and luck and chance as their only support for their religion. Thanks again...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by bluegenes, posted 06-06-2017 2:09 AM bluegenes has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 119 by bluegenes, posted 06-10-2017 2:24 AM Davidjay has not yet responded

  
bluegenes
Member (Idle past 90 days)
Posts: 3119
From: U.K.
Joined: 01-24-2007


Message 119 of 120 (811633)
06-10-2017 2:24 AM
Reply to: Message 118 by Davidjay
06-09-2017 11:55 AM


Re: The Lord has a penus and testucles
Davidjay writes:

Nah, I and my wife of my youth have done our part and brought five new souls into the world via the Lords created method and his amazing and beautiful reproductive system......Thats the real BIG BANG....

I'm glad to hear about the fledgling jays, and that you've enjoyed at least five "BIG BANGS", but I was referring to the impotence of your "arguments", not your reproductive capacity.

David writes:

"Be fruitful and multiply"...... great math once you get the hang of it. Its easier than you think.... I mean addition is fantastic, but multiplying is even greater.... what a thrill, all by design. Amazing DESIGN..... never deny design....

Presumably the Lord's penus and teticules weren't intelligently designed. But does he follow his own advice to be fruitful and multiply, and use his reproductive apparatus (or apparatis) to produce godlets or demigods?

Or is it just decorative?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 118 by Davidjay, posted 06-09-2017 11:55 AM Davidjay has not yet responded

AdminPhat
Administrator
Posts: 1829
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-03-2004
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 120 of 120 (811653)
06-10-2017 7:46 AM


Closing For Now
Terminal off topic drift. Closing for now...

  • Please stay on topic for a thread. Open a new thread for new topics.
  • Points should be supported with evidence and reasoned argumentation.
  • The sincerely held beliefs of other members deserve your respect. Please keep discussion civil. Argue the position, not the person.

  •   
    Prev1234567
    8
    Newer Topic | Older Topic
    Jump to:


    Copyright 2001-2015 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

    ™ Version 4.0 Beta
    Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2017