I will propose to you, though, that contrary to the critics, the Bible is extremely historically accurate. Yes it is a book based in theism. However, it is also a witness in a sense to geology, biology and other sciences. Of course it does not use scientific terminology, which had not yet even been invented. The fact is that many of the sciences, particularly archaeology and geology have supported the historicity of the Bible.
Unfortunately the archaelogical evidence does not confirm the
supernatural elements of the Bible; any more than the discovery of Troy confirms the supernatural fables about Greek gods to be found in the
Iliad; or any more than the fact that Dick Whittington was "thrice Lord Mayor of London" confirms the supernatural aspects of
that fairy story.
As for your claims that biology and geology confirm the Bible, I can only suppose that some unkind person has been pulling your leg.
™ Version 4.2
