watta
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 17 of 56 (197568)
04-07-2005 8:57 PM
|
Reply to: Message 16 by Dr Jack 04-07-2005 8:43 AM
|
|
My understanding is that it is from analysis of a few years ago,even more astonishing,and therefore controversial, is a claim I read in the press [and thus to be taken with a grain of salt or 2] that a site in the Kimberley has been suggested to be 80,000 years old or more.The report is a few years old and I haven't heard more.Of course rhat is a really old date ..aboriginal culture is truly amazing.Actually I would like to find out more about this myself but don't have the facilities.I might try to get more info..
This message is a reply to: | | Message 16 by Dr Jack, posted 04-07-2005 8:43 AM | | Dr Jack has not replied |
|