IAJ writes:
Genesis's employed breakdowns is superior in the application of a creational overview and applying for all generations. Your description can be wrong with a new insight, or it can be less than adequate when finer differentials are discovered - but these are not impacting. As a minimilist, big pic overview, and as the applicable factors of the narrative's fundamental message, which is not narrowed to our current assessments of life form divisions, genesis is correct and wise. 'And everything that creepeth' anticipates all subjective categories:
Do bats lay eggs?
The OT is the epitome of grammar.
Which version?
Wrong again. You have to render the same deliberation as you would a science or math equation. Note the clause: 'and every living creature' - it caters to bacteria, germs and yet some futuristically discoverable life group:
I guess every living creature would by definition mean all life, is a tautology meaningful? Does it win wars, provide for economic development, cure diseases, or even add to human understanding?
I have to agree with Dr A, I suppose every court needs a jester.