Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,870 Year: 4,127/9,624 Month: 998/974 Week: 325/286 Day: 46/40 Hour: 1/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Unacknowledged Accuracy of Genesis 1
MacCullock
Junior Member (Idle past 6289 days)
Posts: 5
From: Southern California, USA
Joined: 02-01-2007


Message 98 of 302 (382138)
02-03-2007 1:13 PM
Reply to: Message 97 by Nimrod
01-02-2007 5:22 AM


Read the Bible as obviously as possible
danny writes:
As it stands, the chronology of universal presented in Genesis is as follows:
Light - the Big Bang
Firmament - the expanse/expansion of the Universe
Earth
Seas
Vegetation
Sun, Moon and stars
Oceanic Life
Land based Animals
Mankind
HOW TO READ THE BIBLE.
Unfortunately you are making some of the same erroneous Young Earth Creationist extra-scriptural assumptions from the middle ages, before we knew much about the age of the earth and the solar system, etc. God requires us to look at the glory of His creation in Psalm 19 - not ignore what His creation teaches us.
God requires us to test everything especially such opinions of men which can be based on mistaken assumptions. We should accept claims consistent with known truth, and test them by looking at what they predict which can be verified. This is not only the way we are to determine useful scientific claims, God gave the same principles several thousand years before scientists did, when He told Israel how to discern which prophet must be obeyed and which should be stoned in Deuteronomy 18. Sir Francis Bacon first put forth those principles, and he was a Bible student, but I can't give an actual quote that it came from the Bible.
Read ONLY what the Bible actually says, and when you have questions look carefully at the original Hebrew because that was what earlier or biased translators were trying to do. The Bible requires us to read it in the most obvious way possible which makes sense, but consider related Scripture, PLUS well verified knowledge of His creation if you really want His truth.
Be VERY careful not to accept additions to Scripture without a clear reference, because...
In Revelation 22:18, God writes:
If anyone adds anything to what is written here, God will add to that person the plagues described in this book.
CREATE IS NOT MAKE, MAKE IS NOT CREATE.
The first assumption to forget is that God always means creation from nothing. If God doesn't use "create" (the Hebrew "bara"), don't assume that is what He means (that would be adding to scripture against Proverbs 30:5-6). The heavens and the earth were created from nothing in Gen 1:1, so the stars and sun were created from nothing first, then probably later the earth. Since it says "and earth" it may have been later but we cannot assert that must be what God means.
Read it again in one of the more modern translations. Genesis 1, New Living Translation (Courtesy of BibleGateway.com)
THE SIX DAYS COME AFTER "IN THE BEGINNING".
When God discusses the six days specifically, He mentions nothing about creating any part of heaven or earth (Gen 1:31, Gen 2:1, Gen 2:4b, Exodus 20:11). We should assume the first day begins like the other five, with God speaking something into creation or appearance (Gen 1:3). During the time represented by the six days, only three kinds of living things are created from nothing, no part of the heavens nor the earth.
In the beginning must come prior to the first day by some unspecified time, because nothing done during in the beginning occurs during the six days and vice versa. The word translated as "in the beginning" is used many other places for unspecified time introducing a new period of activity, such as in Jeremiah 28:1 and 49:34 about the beginning of some king's reigns (courtesy of BlueletterBible.org's Concordance "C" button).
There is every reason to assume that during the first day God lets light reach the surface of the waters, and there is no scriptural basis to assert God did anything else about the creation process that day. Reading Gen 1:3-4, it is almost a definition of a day. The best way to see this is in the New American Standard Bible version of Genesis one, which emphasises word-for-word translation rather than thought for thought.
Emphasis added in this excerpt.
In Genesis 1 (NASB), God writes:
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. The earth was formless and void, and darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was moving over the surface of the waters.
3Then God said, "Let there be light"; and there was light. God saw that the light was good; and God separated the light from the darkness. God called the light day, and the darkness He called night And there was evening and there was morning, one day.
Then God said, "Let there be an expanse in the midst of the waters, and let it separate the waters from the waters.... And there was evening and there was morning, a second day.
9Then God said, "Let the waters below the heavens be gathered into one place, and let the dry land appear"; and it was so.... Then God said, "Let the earth sprout vegetation, ... The earth brought forth vegetation, ... There was evening and there was morning, a third day.
14Then God said, "Let there be lights in the expanse of the heavens to separate the day from the night, ... and for days and years; ... God made the two great lights, the greater light to govern the day, and the lesser light to govern the night; He made the stars also....
There was evening and there was morning, a fourth day.
20Then God said, "Let the waters teem with swarms of living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth in the open expanse of the heavens. God created the great sea monsters and every living creature that moves... and every winged bird after its kind.... There was evening and there was morning, a fifth day.
24 Then God said, "Let the earth bring forth living creatures after their kind: cattle and creeping things and beasts of the earth after their kind"; and it was so.... Then God said, "Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; and let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the cattle and over all the earth.... there was evening and there was morning, the sixth day.
What every other Bible calls "the first day", the NASB calls "one day" not "the first" day. "The first" might be mistaken to mean no creation occured before that point, which is probably why God words it so. The second through fifth day references are NOT "the" second, for example but "a second". It is my assumption this should be read as if God is not referring to five specific consecutive 24 hour days, but rather five consecutive series of days, with each series (except the first) being of unmentioned length and each series represented by one day of the seven-day week God is trying to teach us about here (see Exodus 20:11 again). This is more clearly true when you realize God is saying at least one typical vegetation growing season occured during the period represented by "a third day" (Genesis 1:11-12).
The "and it was so" of Gen 1:24 means God accomplished that land creatures reproduced their kind in the most obvious way, requiring at least months of normal time like it does today. It is also true God sometimes speaks of His future work as if it is already accomplished because He foreknows it will be fulfilled. So these declarations God accomplished a growing season or animal gestation in one day could be read as that He ordained all the parameters of success in one day, and it was later fulfilled. Another example of calling done what God foreknows will be done later is the language actually used about Abraham already being the "father of nations" several years before his first child was born Genesis 17:1-8. The actual Hebrew is that God says Abraham IS already the father of nations, but this NLT translates it in more modern English as a promise about the future.
I assume God calls the final day of the six "the sixth day" because that is when everything came to completion for His purposes. "The sixth" could also be specific because God has one specific day in mind representing the entire period, or because He actually did complete all that in one twenty-four hour day. So many many things seem to occur at their normal pace then that the 24 hour interpretation seems not so obvious.
The Hebrew word translated as "day" is "yom" which is a word for a period of activity or daylight that can be many days or years, or just an hour. God doesn't try to speak of His activity before there was observable daylight on the earth because it would make no sense to speak of daylight activity before men could have seen daylight. The word "yom" is also used in Gen 2:4 referring to the entire six yoms when God made heaven and earth complete.
Why does God use the terms morning and evening with each day reference if it isn't about a 24 hour day? I assume we are to read them as the beginning and ending of each series of days represented by that corresponding day of the week God is teaching us about. There is scriptural precedent for that interpretation in Psalm 90:5-6, by Moses himself about the beginning and ending of the life of grass.
WHY WAS IT DARK ON "ONE DAY"?
If God created the sun in the beginning, why is it dark at the start of "one day"? You need to read the scripture which shatters the YEC reading of Genesis 1 in pieces. Someone nearly posted it here before, but now I get to glorify His truth...
In Job 38:2-9 (NASB), God writes:
Who is this that darkens counsel by words without knowledge? ... Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth? ... Who laid its cornerstone, when the morning stars sang together...? Or who enclosed the sea with doors when, bursting forth, it went out from the womb; When I made a cloud its garment and thick darkness its swaddling band,
Plainly the earth was constructed after the morning stars, then the sea burst forth, and then thick clouds covered the earth. Since God does not claim this all happened in an instant, we should assume it occured before daylight reached the surface of the waters. God is loosely referring to the construction of this entire blue planet for men of all ages so they may learn how to relate to the Creator and His work (and how foolish was the Egyptian worship of false gods of the sun, earth, and animals). We should expect illustrative terms from typical human activity, not celestial mechanics. This appears to agree with current science that the earth surface was some sort of land-form before the seas existed. It does not preclude forming the seas by condensation, since the water might have burst forth partly as steam before it became those thick clouds, plus of course the thick clouds are well described as thinning dramatically between "one day" and "a fourth day".
THE FIRMAMENT.
The usual interpretation of forming the firmament is simply that the thick clouds above the water separated from the seas. This formed the sky under clouds and above the sea, which could be described from the surface as like an upside down bowl (a partial sphere) in shape.
PLANTS BEFORE SUNLIGHT?
Energy from sunlight reaches the surface of the earth even when it is cloudy, so there is no contradiction in claiming that land vegetation was produced after the day/night cycle was observable and before the sun itself could be discerned as a body in the heavens. Nor is there any need for a extra-scriptural miraculous source of light and energy God does not mention (a common sin of the YEC's).
WHEN ANIMAL LIFE BEGAN.
As for when many kinds of animal life began, God is not specific. About sea and land creatures God is mentioning only those with the "breath of life" in them, presumably air-breathers like a prototype whale, crocodile, or horse which would be familiar to men for example. Those mentioned are probably the ancestral animal type for all of their genus. This means God does not say when fish, bacteria, molluscs, insects, or earthworms began, nor whether they were created from nothing or more primitive types of creatures.
There is much more to be said, but I will have to come back to this when I can. Enjoy!
TOPIC - Please read Admin Message 102 before responding to this post.
AdminPD
Edited by AdminPD, : Warning

My child, pay attention to what I say. Listen carefully to my words. Don’t lose sight of them. Let them penetrate deep into your heart, for they bring life to those who find them, and healing to their whole body. Proverbs 4:20-22, NLT
Blog: DefendOthers.blogspot.com The Dead Sea Scrolls in San Diego 2007! www.SDScrolls.org

This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by Nimrod, posted 01-02-2007 5:22 AM Nimrod has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 99 by AdminPD, posted 02-03-2007 1:35 PM MacCullock has replied
 Message 101 by arachnophilia, posted 02-03-2007 11:22 PM MacCullock has replied

MacCullock
Junior Member (Idle past 6289 days)
Posts: 5
From: Southern California, USA
Joined: 02-01-2007


Message 103 of 302 (382330)
02-04-2007 12:00 PM
Reply to: Message 101 by arachnophilia
02-03-2007 11:22 PM


Re: Read the Bible as obviously as possible
arachnophilia writes:
on the contrary, heaven is created on day two. it did not exist before then. its function is to separate waters above from waters below. you could argue that land existed before day three, but for all intents and purposes, that's when it was created.
Thank you, arachnophilia, for bringing up an aspect of understanding Genesis which YEC's typically get wrong. My goal is to get to an "obvious" interpretation of Genesis one which is informed by what God's creation has told us through science (that is what Psalm 19:1-11 means if you truly get it into your heart)
What is between the waters above and below was MADE on the second day from pre-existing clouds and atmosphere. If you have a cite saying something was "created" (other than the three kinds of living things) during the six days please show it to us. Please remember "create", at least in Genesis' early chapters is always a translation of the Hebrew "bara" which means a divine creation from nothing.
Your disagreement may be about what "heaven" means in Genesis 1:1. The Hebrew "twot" can mean either the sky or the visible universe as this concordance ref shows.
If that is your disagreement, it is probably based upon the fact that in Gen 1:8 God does name what He made on the second day the same as what He creates in the beginning, but as always with Hebrew the context is VERY significant. For those who may not know, Biblical Hebrew has EXTREMELY few words, and it is more of a struggle than one might expect to get ONE "obvious" translation which makes sense. That struggle is surely a deliberate part of God's plan, since God not only commands us to be discerning, but to be deep into understanding what He says. I believe that is why He has personally confirmed so many scriptures to me, because that is what I try to do. One such example was Proverbs 30:5-6 by radio while understanding YEC mistakes was on my mind (for better examples, see my blog at Defend Others as Yourself) [ed 02-04].
The context here includes the fact that Hebrew term "the heavens and the earth" is a dualism (like "good and evil", "body and soul", or "day and night") always used to mean the entire universe [ed 02-04]. If that is what the Bible translators rely on, it would make sense if Gen 1:1 "heaven" is always translated as non-earth astronomical bodies, and Gen 1:8 "heaven" modified by "firmament" is always translated as sky.
Here is BlueLetterBible.org for Gen 1. By clicking the "C" for 1:1, then on "created" you can see what is "divinely created from nothing" (Hebrew bara) in the beginning is different from what is made from existing things (Hebrew asah) in Gen 1:7, because the word for firmament, expanse, or sky modifies it. I think of this as God creating what is ABOVE the sky from nothing in 1:1 and making the sky itself from existing clouds and atmosphere in Gen 1:7. Can there be any other obvious interpretation of this? It seems doubtful such other obvious translation would be consistent with what God's creation has told us through science. Please help us out here.
Just for good measure, here is how to see every major English translation for Gen 1:1-9 at BibleGateway.com. I checked the thing created from nothing in 1:1 versus the thing made from clouds and atmosphere in Gen 1:7. In every case the translators say the thing made on day two differs from what is created in the beginning. To check this out, all you have to do is change that selection bar at the top and click update to verify what I am saying. The Bible versions I checked were: NIV, NASB, NLT, KJV, ESV, NKJV, ASV, NLV, and HCSB. Those are the only versions listed I have any familiarity with and they all agreed what is created in the beginning differs from what is made on day two.
Here are some better expressed words from a better authority supporting that creation of astronomical bodies in the beginning is distinct from making the sky on the second day.
Dr Richard M. Davidson writes:
If "heaven and earth" refers to the whole universe, this "beginning" (at least for part of the "heavens") must have been before the first day of earth's creation week, since the "sons of God" were already created and sing for joy when the foundations of the earth are laid (Job 38:7).
"Heavens and earth" equal the globe (earth) and the surrounding heavenly spheres, (possibly only the atmosphere and solar system, but more probably includes the whole material universe....
if Genesis 1 begins with only a title or summary, then verse 2 contradicts verse 1. God creates the earth (verse 1), but the earth pre-exists creation (verse 2). This interpretation simply cannot explain the reference to the existence of the earth already in verse 2....
Dr Richard M Davidson, Professor of Old Testament Interpretation, Andrews University, MDiv, PhD. Quotes found here [ed 02-04].
If you have a source which contradicts every major version of the Bible on what happened day two, please tell us what it might be. I do strongly advise you to take Job 38:2-3 and Revelation 22:18 seriously before you reply.
This response also answers your assertions about WHY WAS IT DARK ON ONE DAY?, and PLANTS BEFORE SUNLIGHT?. In Gen 1:1 God creates the astronomical bodies, which has to include the sun if nothing else. In Gen 1:14-18 on the fourth day, God makes complete His purposes for already existing sun, moon, and stars. Asserting He "created" them then is simply adding to Scriptures what you and the Young Earth Creationists want them to say. [ed 02-04]
Edited by MacCullock, : Keeping to the thread topic.
Edited by MacCullock, : ed 02-04 re: heaven and earth dualism, Proverbs 30:5-6 by radio, Dr Davidson quote, and that this responds to two other assertions.

My child, pay attention to what I say. Listen carefully to my words. Don’t lose sight of them. Let them penetrate deep into your heart, for they bring life to those who find them, and healing to their whole body. Proverbs 4:20-22, NLT
Blog: DefendOthers.blogspot.com The Dead Sea Scrolls in San Diego 2007! www.SDScrolls.org

This message is a reply to:
 Message 101 by arachnophilia, posted 02-03-2007 11:22 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 104 by MacCullock, posted 02-04-2007 12:15 PM MacCullock has not replied
 Message 107 by doctrbill, posted 02-04-2007 9:58 PM MacCullock has not replied
 Message 108 by arachnophilia, posted 02-04-2007 11:08 PM MacCullock has not replied

MacCullock
Junior Member (Idle past 6289 days)
Posts: 5
From: Southern California, USA
Joined: 02-01-2007


Message 104 of 302 (382337)
02-04-2007 12:15 PM
Reply to: Message 103 by MacCullock
02-04-2007 12:00 PM


Re: Read the Bible as obviously as possible
please delete this. I have already edited the above to show how it relates to the thread topic.
Thank you admins all for what you do. You are a big part of what makes this forum so valuable!
Edited by MacCullock, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 103 by MacCullock, posted 02-04-2007 12:00 PM MacCullock has not replied

MacCullock
Junior Member (Idle past 6289 days)
Posts: 5
From: Southern California, USA
Joined: 02-01-2007


Message 105 of 302 (382449)
02-04-2007 6:52 PM
Reply to: Message 99 by AdminPD
02-03-2007 1:35 PM


Re: Welcome to EvC
Dear AdminPD, you are correct that I meant to respond to danny's original post. Is there a way to correct my own posting in that regard? It does not show as a message responding to his post. Thank you!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by AdminPD, posted 02-03-2007 1:35 PM AdminPD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 106 by AdminPD, posted 02-04-2007 9:00 PM MacCullock has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024