Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,833 Year: 4,090/9,624 Month: 961/974 Week: 288/286 Day: 9/40 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   51 scientific facts that disprove the Bible
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.3


Message 48 of 167 (496719)
01-30-2009 4:42 AM
Reply to: Message 47 by Minnemooseus
01-30-2009 4:38 AM


Re: The pi=3 argument
I think it's extremely questionable that the Bible gives a value of 3 in the first place, as it requires you to make assumptions about the shape of the vessel that aren't in the text anyway.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Minnemooseus, posted 01-30-2009 4:38 AM Minnemooseus has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by Huntard, posted 01-30-2009 5:03 AM Dr Jack has replied

Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.3


Message 50 of 167 (496721)
01-30-2009 5:33 AM
Reply to: Message 49 by Huntard
01-30-2009 5:03 AM


Re: The pi=3 argument
Whether it says 'completely round' or not depends on your translation.. More importantly it is not at all certain that the description it gives is the diameter and circumference of the same circle, especially given the following passage where it says "It was a handbreadth thick; and its brim was shaped like the brim of a cup, like a lily blossom" (from the NKJV translation you quoted).
As rare as it may be, I think Answers in Genesis gets this one right (the 2nd suggestion, not the 1st).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by Huntard, posted 01-30-2009 5:03 AM Huntard has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024