traste writes:
That process is not really good, infact astronomer Carl Sagan once said mutation is "lethal".
Even IF Sagan were qualified to say this, I call bullshit on this one. Give me the complete source, or admit you were lying.
Are mutations producing anything new?
Yes.
The famous experiment on fruitfly drosophila melanogaster did not produce anything new,the fruitly remained a fruitfly.
You really don't know what evolution is all about, do you?
In fact modern research show that they have no significant effect on the creature only on their owners.
Stop lying. There were many effects on the fruitflies, including new species.
The magic we observe today (in responds of your second sentence),can be observe directly and can be proven that the trick is indeed done.
Same with evolutions.
Why compare proven things to unproven things.?
I don't know, you keep bringing up creationsism, not us.
Actually Im, not surprise that you reasct in this manner, this the way proponents of evolution behave whenever they encounter any scientifc laws that are inconflict with their beliefs.
There exists no scientific law that contradicts evolution. Stop lying.
The law of recurrent is not a "so- called law" it well established that organism has real boundaries and they canot go beyond that boundaries.
Really? Would you mind pointing out where those boundaries are, if it is so well established?
Some science professor are saying that fish is indeed a family.
Another lie without backing.
If intellectual men will list the history of fraud science evolution will be on the top.
Actually, it will probably be creationsim.
I hunt for the truth