Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,798 Year: 4,055/9,624 Month: 926/974 Week: 253/286 Day: 14/46 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Did viruses precede other life?
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5059 days)
Posts: 3428
From: Ithaca,NY, USA
Joined: 12-20-2001


Message 15 of 32 (145623)
09-29-2004 11:23 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by Denesha
06-05-2004 5:48 AM


Re: Viruses came first
The question would bring back IN GLADYSHEV'S ANSWER, a question as to the LamarkvsDarwin but in a format that Gould thought scholarship on Aristotle by Mayr gained. I did not think so before I was acquainted AGAIN with the thought of Darwinizing hierarchical thermodynamics. Then I had thought
EvC Forum: Genes=Logic Circuits?
but now it clear to me that a reply to this thread specifically will require top-down evidence WHERE AND WHEN Georgi had bottom up facts. It might even be > than 4D but lets not get outlandish about it. I am quite certain that VRMLHistory INSTANTIATES hierarchical thermodyanmics but just what the visual of mutiple chromatographic columns would appear like from the organism that the virus IS NOT is completely opaque to me at this time/viewpoint (so far).
But I had said
quote:
But rather than do this explaining let me get right to the point assuming that virus are not absolute charge bearers as I have suggested
.
Now we ask the question if two negatives of this
If "viruses are absolute charge carriers" then as Quoting Crick "exact knowledge is the enemy of vitalism" is false. This is logical and I do not relie either on x-ray crystalography or techonological binaries. I have been kicked out of the evolutioist discussion because they simply wanted something they could not have, tommarrow today (see site NAiG etc) and wanted to blame the coming of Chirst FOR ALL OF IT no matter the faith. This is the same error (on a lighter note consider age and area as a joke of Humphries's area clades) as the war against west. If NOW there is no east or west in won no norths or south science did and was map vs sspam. This is science even when I fail to "renew" it.
is a positive!
Lets not trick ourseleves but understand today "renew" in my former sense to me "regenerate" in Gladyshev's and try on the logic of that!!
SeeFROM
http://EvC Forum: Francis Crick's "Molecules & Men"(preview) -->EvC Forum: Francis Crick's "Molecules & Men"(preview)
&
http://EvC Forum: My Understanding (hypothetically) -->EvC Forum: My Understanding (hypothetically)
under ther relusion that "fairy circles" apply to Delbruck's math of the virus (from Bohr) rather than mushroom and since then lichens as I, BSM, have thought. This is what I was hinting at to some extent in
EvC Forum: All about Brad McFall.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Denesha, posted 06-05-2004 5:48 AM Denesha has not replied

  
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5059 days)
Posts: 3428
From: Ithaca,NY, USA
Joined: 12-20-2001


Message 28 of 32 (147523)
10-05-2004 1:05 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by crashfrog
09-29-2004 4:37 PM


Ah, the carnivore in me, druuuls...
It is not time for me- but WHEN IS an ANGLE not the pectoral fin handle- when it is snapping the turtle soup--
You would have had to think of the SAMPLE outside the code but within your posting discourse for one to have thought yous two confused the shape of the organism for a different environment. but then we get the the artic compared with the sahara here. Oh how I wish panbiogeography was better used.
I put my record in - NO I DONT THINK VIRUSES "PRECEDED" other life. just like I think virus as AIDS is a more sociological than anthropological. I do know that cartoons were made of algebraists however.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by crashfrog, posted 09-29-2004 4:37 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024