With random changes, you could make it more messed up and misspelled and confusing, perhaps even impossible to read. But you could not exchange some of my words and make synonyms for those words that would be more scholarly sounding or more scientific or better sounding. That's the whole point.
there was a member a while back, a really nutter, who kept going on about moses's cd-rom collection. he was using strong's concordance to find alternate renderings of certain words in the bible, and derive some higher meaning (about cd-roms) from them.
so i began using his methods against him. at one point, i was "translating" his own posts against him. it was actually quite entertaining.
so, yes, you can do it. i have.
That is called DUPLICATION, which means, making an extra copy of PREVIOUSLY existing code! MY POINT! That's the best you could do, you couldn't add new code for new cells or tissues or organs or something. You could ONLY duplicate that which had already existed! This is my point!
whoa whoa. wait a second, engage the brain a little.
if i have the following string of numbers:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
and i
duplicate one number:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 8
and then i modify one number:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
tada, new data.