"Best" evidence for evolution.

How do you figure that?I see Asian mating with African producing an Afro-Asian by the recombination of genes and new dominant and recessive traits. We see no evolution through mutation nor any imaginary missing links between the three of them.We observe Husky mating with Mastiff producing the Chinook - again with no evolution or missing links between them.All we observe is breed mating with breed producing new breeds (variation) within the species by the recombination of genes and new dominant and recessive traits.We observe no evolution by mutation anywhere in the natural world. They have simply misclassified 95% of the fossil records as separate species, when they are in reality breeds of one species or another.These:http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRTulI5Kd1LKklC79...Are no different than these:http://www.alegoo.com/...-dog-breeds/small-dog-breeds-17.jpgJust as they incorrectly classified Darwin's Finches as separate species before even studying them. Then when we do study them we find they have been interbreeding and producing fertile offspring since they arrived on the islands. But as usual, evolutionists refuse to correct their mistakes.And so babies and adults of the same species also gets incorrectly classified as separate species.Jack Horner: Where are the baby dinosaurs? | TED TalkAnd fossils belonging to man.Skull of Homo erectus throws story of human evolution into disarray | Europe | The GuardianOnce you clear up all those mistakes and wipe half of them from the books, you will be left with nothing to theorize upon except Kind after Kind.EDIT: We agree the preponderance of the evidence should be the deciding factor, and all of nature declares it is breed mating with breed creating new breeds within the species that causes variation. Not evolution.Edited by justatruthseeker, : No reason given.