wardog writes:
The style of their definitions are not all that different to mine. Evolutionists will accept a bland definition in that case, but not from a creationist, I guess.
Unfortunately this doesn't wash. As evolution is essentially change over time, the lines between biological classifications are necessarily blurred. If they weren't then this would be an argument
against evolution!
With "kinds", on the other hand, you are in effect proposing absolute barriers between species. These barriers should, by their very nature, be very easy to pinpoint. However, no such barriers have been observed.
In any case, as is common with anti-evolution proponents you forget that it is your job to provide
positive evidence for your assertions. Criticising evolutionary theory does not provide support for your position by default.
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.