Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Black Rednecks and White Liberals (by Thomas Sowell)
kuresu
Member (Idle past 2538 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 121 of 130 (378844)
01-22-2007 12:12 AM
Reply to: Message 107 by tudwell
01-21-2007 7:05 PM


Re: Thinking about privilege
I'm not sure how widespread these two are in school curricula, but in my senior english class we read
I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings
Their Eyes Were Watching God.
granted, it was for an AP/IB english. but yeah, not too many authors (besides white ones) are read in schools.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by tudwell, posted 01-21-2007 7:05 PM tudwell has not replied

  
Jaderis
Member (Idle past 3450 days)
Posts: 622
From: NY,NY
Joined: 06-16-2006


Message 122 of 130 (378867)
01-22-2007 5:01 AM
Reply to: Message 106 by nator
01-21-2007 5:52 PM


Re: Sowell's wrong
A few years ago, I was in Tokyo to attend the wedding of a lifelong friend of my husband's.
At the time, this friend taught at a branch of the University of Maryland in Tokyo that was funded by the US military, so technically, he was a civilian employee of the military. Through his employment status, he was able to reserve some rooms for us at a military hotel in the middle of the city.
There were only a couple of US channels on the televisions in the rooms; CNN and FOX.
Before CNN News came on, there was a message on the screen that warned the person watching the TV in the hotel room (most likely to be a memeber of the US military) that some of the views expressed or news presented on the program might not be entirely supportive of the war in Iraq.
You know what was shown at the start of every FOX News broadcast?
No warning about any "unsupportive" views or news, of course.
As the music came up and the announcer came on, you heard him say, and you read the words as they appeared on the screen superimposed over an American flag, "FOX News; Part of the Team!"
Now, just what do you think they meant by calling themselves, "Part of the Team"?
Does that sound like they aren't "geared towards any demographic"?
Wow...just wow. That is insane and utterly horrifying.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by nator, posted 01-21-2007 5:52 PM nator has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2195 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 123 of 130 (378895)
01-22-2007 10:43 AM
Reply to: Message 103 by Hyroglyphx
01-21-2007 4:22 PM


Re: Thinking about privilege
quote:
In fact, it was a white man, a Republican white man, no less, that freed the slaves to begin with. So, where is this white privilege?
The republicans used to be the abolitionists, and the democrats used to be the pro-slavery people.
Somewhere in the 1950's, the switch happened. After that, the Republicans became the pro-segregationist, pro-KKK, pro-racism party, and the Democrats became the Civil Rights party.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 103 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-21-2007 4:22 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
docpotato
Member (Idle past 5072 days)
Posts: 334
From: Portland, OR
Joined: 07-18-2003


Message 124 of 130 (378897)
01-22-2007 10:50 AM
Reply to: Message 119 by kuresu
01-22-2007 12:00 AM


Re: Sowell's wrong
a conservative station (which Fox is) play the Simpsons and Family Guy.
I could be wrong, but I think it's important to maintain the distinction between the Fox Network and Fox News. While it's true that both are owned and thereby controlled by the same person, AFAIK they operate under entirely different conditions (different heads of programming and etc.)
Both are driven by one thing: advertising dollars. Both try to bring in more advertising dollars by appealing to a niche demographic. Fox News clearly panders to the conservatives of the country (to see this, one only needs to see the anchors speak about Reagan...they practically have hearts appearing around their heads, they're so in love with him). Fox News hit on the fact that conservatives had heard the myth that the liberal media was perpetrating lies and bias so many times that they felt they were being underserved. Bada-bing, there's an audience waiting to be snatched up.
Meanwhile Fox TV generally aims for a significantly larger demographic that is (more-or-less) politically agnostic, skews younger, and is interested in more edgy entertainment than the folks who would watch CBS. As an entertainment company, Fox TV is politically anarchic, bending to the will of whatever it is people will watch. The politics of say, 24 are quite different than those of The Simpsons.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by kuresu, posted 01-22-2007 12:00 AM kuresu has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 125 of 130 (378910)
01-22-2007 11:50 AM
Reply to: Message 105 by crashfrog
01-21-2007 5:11 PM


Re: Thinking about privilege
So, because there's not slavery anymore, racism is a thing of the past?
I didn't say that or even make allusions to it. First, slavery fell, which was a major shift in the right direction but racism and segregation was still alive and well. Then segregation fell, another great stride in the right direction, but racism was still alive and well. And every year since then, this country grows less and less racist. Racism still exists, Crash, coming from all sides. That's unquestionable. But you seem to want to believe in a fantasy where whites can do no right, and blacks can do no wrong. This extreme view is completely racist, yet, you try to turn it around on me who has completely denounced racism entirely.
How many times do I have to prove it?
The only thing you've proven is your unwillingness to leave your tower of moral superiority. You are not being reasonable, you are being extreme. Instead of budging on your extreme view, even a little, you'd rather hang on it instead of conceding the obvious. You make blanket statements about both whites and blacks, that in good conscience, you couldn't make unless you were truly extreme.
there's a long way to go before equality. But rather than push towards that future, you'd rather engage in victim-blaming to assuage your guilt.
I think the guilt is all on your side as you seem to want to purge your demons over being born white. I've never met anyone more miserable about the way they were born. Aside from which, I'm not making blanket statements about race, but consequently you are. I've said, NUMEROUS times, that we are dealing with culture, not race. But you refuse to recognize that. You'd rather just despise me than honestly listen to what I've been consistently saying, from the beginning.
Yeah, yeah, "some of your best friends are black." Racists always say that. It's coded language for "I'm about to say something racist, but I don't want to be called out as racist for it."
Then what did I say that was racist following my introduction of Woody, if that's true? He's my friend, Crash. I'm just telling you about my friend and how he'd probably flame you if you insulted him by offering a hand out. That's the point. People of your ilk are more insulting with your extreme patronage, falling all over yourselves to accommodate someone who doesn't need accommodating. He just needs you to get off your knees, stop sniveling all over him and just treat him the same as everyone else. You are trying to offer a special status, whereas I am offering equality.
Who ever said a black man couldn't be a good carpenter
Not you, Crash. They are actually the best. Its those white devils that can't seem to swing the iron.
except you who's absolutely certain that any time you've been passed over for a job for a minority, it's "affirmative action" and not simply you being out-competed in the workforce?
So, because I said affirmative action is wrong you're going to mischaracterize me saying that I think every time I'm passed up for a job, it must be due to AA? I actually have an interview in a few hours. I guess we'll see what we see.
But your stats prove racism. What are you talking about?
No, what are you talking about? The number of white Death Row inmates exceeded those of black inmates. The number of total white prisoners was 2,016 and where black inmates was 1,655, which is completely in proportion to the amount of those on death row. In other words, our justice system isn't going to pander to your specious cry of racism. The justice system take measures to ensure that jurors are impartial by creating a jury of mixed races. We are convicted by our peers, Crash.
quote:
Oh, yes, obviously it couldn't possibly be that the person happened to be white.
Wha...? No, of course they're white. That's what we're talking about, NJ! White people!
You said something about how the media picks white people to do their stories on, which is just so ridiculous, but anyway.... The point is, the media picks interesting and often sensational stories. If the focal point of the sensational story just so happens to be a white person, are you going to accept that? Or is this some diabolical plot to keep black people out of the camera? I mean, really, where do you come up with these fantastic stories?
How many world-renown composers from history can you think of?
How many of them are white? How many of them are black?
Oh wow, yes, yes, that proves racism, can't you see!!! Or it proves that black American culture is not predominantly interested in classical music. Nonetheless, here you are. Gosh, that's an awfully big list. But even no black composers existed, if you just wanted to talk about pianists, I can name about 10 without thinking very hard about it. Where do you think Jazz comes from? It first synthesized from elements of classical and Ragtime music.
How many classical composers can you think of that are black? How many of them are white? Why do you think we call their music "classic" and not "European"?
For the same reason people didn't call the sky peanut butter-- meaning, this is an asinine question, therefore, you get an asinine reply.
You don't live in those countries, NJ. Do you not even know where you live?
Other people do, and yet you disparage the most accommodating nations on the planet. It was the United States and Great Britain that brought this to a halt, and both countries have continued in that vein ever since. But you don't speak about other countries who would lob off your head at the first squeak to made about injustice. But, no, its America that is perverse and unjust.
Who's a liberal? Who should blame what?
You posted a Wikipedia article entitled, "White Privilege." The "he" I'm referring to is the man quoted in the article.
I'm reading a new book now, and ironically enough, after browsing through the chapters I stumbled onto a page about racism in America and how the left deals with it.
Embarrassed by the defeat of Soviet Communism, leftists changed their language and tactics, putting class hatred on the back burner and turning to racial combat instead... a loudly professed prejudice against white people as the new "Class enemy." The new radical mindset demonized white males specifically and saw them as an ersatz ruling class-- or more accurately-- caste, responsible for every social disparity...
leftists propose themselves as opponents of racism, when in fact their agenda is not about racism at all, but about subverting the status quo. In the absence of real racists in university admissions offices, the left created a myth-- "institutionalized racism"-- that is alleged to explain all disparities in university admissions. The creation of this myth is essential to keep alive the discredited marxist ideal that an alien power separates the citizens of democratic societies into rulers and ruled, the dominant race and the races of the oppressed. Behind the doctrine that all blacks are victims speaks the agenda of sustaining the marxist paradigm and its social war.
- Jaime Glasov
"At the time of those struggles, Malcolm X was King's great antagonist in the black community, leading its resistance to the civil rights hope. The black Muslim publicly scorned King's March on Washington as "ridiculous" and predicted its failure... He rejected King's call to non-violence and his goal of an integrated society... Malcolm even denied King's racial authenticity, redefining the term "negro," which was to now mean, "Uncle Tom."...
But what of Elijah Muhammed? What is a racist and religious cultist doing in a monument to Martin Luther King, Jr? It is truly a perverse intrusion. The teaching of Elijah Muhammed mirror the white supremacist doctrines of the southern racists whose rule King fought. According to his teachings, white people were invented six thousand years ago by a mad scientist named Yacub in a failed experiment to dilute the blood of the original human beings, who were black. The result was a morally tainted strain of humanity-- "white devil's"-- who want to devastate the whole world and oppress all other human beings...
King's moral legacy was in large part squandered by those who inherited it after his death. The moral decline of the civil rights leadership is reflected in many episodes of the last quarter century: the embrace of racist demagogues like Louis Farrakhan and Al Sharpton, and indefensible causes like Tawana bradley, O.J. Simpson, the Los Angeles race riots, etc...
The moral abdication of black civil rights leaders is integrally, (if not fully explained by) their close association with a radical left, whose anti-white hatred are by-product of its anti-Americanism. The left's own attitudes towards blacks are so patronizing that one disillusioned activist was inspired to write a book about them, entitled, "Liberal Racism."
Harvard's prestigious W.E.B. DuBois African American Studies Institute, for example, provided an academic platform for lecturer Noel Ignatiev to launch "Whiteness studies," an academic field promoting the idea that "whiteness" is a "social construct" that is oppressive and must be "abolished."
The magazine "Race Traitor" is the theoretical organ of this academic cult, emblazoned with the motto: "Treason to Whiteness is Loyalty to Humanity." This is hardly a new theme on the left, echoing as it does Susan Sontag's perverse claim that "the white race is the cancer of history." (Sontag eventually expressed regrets about her remark, not because of the racial smear, but out of deference to cancer patients who might feel unjustly slurred.)
-David Horowitz

"A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word, 'darkness' on the walls of his cell." -C.S. Lewis

This message is a reply to:
 Message 105 by crashfrog, posted 01-21-2007 5:11 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 126 by crashfrog, posted 01-22-2007 2:42 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1492 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 126 of 130 (378956)
01-22-2007 2:42 PM
Reply to: Message 125 by Hyroglyphx
01-22-2007 11:50 AM


Re: Thinking about privilege
But you seem to want to believe in a fantasy where whites can do no right, and blacks can do no wrong.
Again, I've established that this is a lie, and the fact that you've been unable to substantiate it with my words is the proof.
Again, I'm asking you to cease this deliberate attempt to misrepresent me. You know these statements are false, nothing in my posts has ever suggested that "blacks can do no wrong", and you continue to repeat these obvious falsehoods regardless. It's quite rude.
The only thing you've proven is your unwillingness to leave your tower of moral superiority.
Am I morally superior to a racist? Yes, obviously.
I've never met anyone more miserable about the way they were born.
Who said anything about being miserable? I'm just making the completely obvious and true statement that being born white, and living in America, comes with advantages that aren't available to minorities. And a lot of those advantages are things you don't even think about until you hear the story of someone who's lived without those advantages, but seen others reap the benefits of them.
Nothing you've said has rebutted that basic point. You've been grappling with these strawmen, and offering these misrepresentations and lies that I'm calling all blacks saints and all whites devils - something I've never done.
I've said, NUMEROUS times, that we are dealing with culture, not race. But you refuse to recognize that.
Refuse to recognize it? Nonsense, I've been talking about culture the whole time. Race, after all, is culturally constructed. But even though it's a cultural construct, everybody belongs to a race, and our culture privileges some races and penalizes others.
That's racism.
Then what did I say that was racist following my introduction of Woody, if that's true?
That, if one black man can be a successful carpenter, no systemic racism against black people must exist.
In addition to being idiotic and fallacious, it's racist. The racist implication is that blacks are so stupid and lazy that if they can make it as carpenters, well, the doors must really be open!
No, what are you talking about?
Your inability to understand fractions, apparently.
The number of white Death Row inmates exceeded those of black inmates.
Irrelevant. The ratio is racist - the percentage of black people on Death Row is greater than the percentage of black people in America as a whole.
I told you to look at the ratios, NJ. Why didn't you?
If the focal point of the sensational story just so happens to be a white person, are you going to accept that?
Am I just going to accept what the media tells me?
No. Why would you? Start questioning things, NJ. Do you really think white people are more capable of doing interesting things than black people?
People are people. Or they should be, but racists think differently.
meaning, this is an asinine question, therefore, you get an asinine reply.
Meaning, it's a question you can't answer, so you're going to dodge it. Let me ask it again:
Why do you think we call their music "classic" and not "European"?
I mean, they were in Europe when they composed it, weren't they? So why don't we call it "European" instead of the generic "classical"? I mean, the people who were writing it didn't call it classical at the time; they called it "music". You'd be an idiot to call something new "classical".
I know why we use these names - the people who wrote that music were white people in white culture, and one of the privileges of being white in American culture is that white history is normalized. The history of whites is the "default" history. The music of whites is the "default" music. Therefore, things that whites did are "history." Things that blacks did are "black history."
That's white privilege.
But, no, its America that is perverse and unjust.
It's America we were talking about. Pardon me for not going off-topic. Also, it's America where we both live, even if you can't seem to remember that.
The "he" I'm referring to is the man quoted in the article.
Who? What man?
Are you saying you made those comments knowing absolutely nothing about the person to whom you were referring? Does that strike you as an intelligent way to proceed in a debate?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 125 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-22-2007 11:50 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1430 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 127 of 130 (379048)
01-22-2007 6:56 PM
Reply to: Message 86 by crashfrog
01-20-2007 6:05 PM


Re: Thinking about privilege
Another example of white privilege is the recent news glut talk over the fact that two (2) coaches for the superbowl are black
It's like one is out of the ordinary so talking about two is really ... showing your hidden biases.
Doesn't this mean that black coaches are just not really expected to be good enough to get their teams to the superbowl?
Enjoy.

Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)


we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 86 by crashfrog, posted 01-20-2007 6:05 PM crashfrog has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 130 by kuresu, posted 01-22-2007 11:17 PM RAZD has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 128 of 130 (379109)
01-22-2007 11:14 PM
Reply to: Message 118 by crashfrog
01-21-2007 11:59 PM


Re: Suspect/Victim
CF writes:
In fact the exact opposite is true - complaints against cops for racism are almost always immediately dismissed
Yes, because they're usually proven to be fraudulent charges by those who use the race card.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW ---- Jesus said, "When these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads, for your redemption draws near." Luke 21:28

This message is a reply to:
 Message 118 by crashfrog, posted 01-21-2007 11:59 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 129 by crashfrog, posted 01-22-2007 11:17 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1492 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 129 of 130 (379111)
01-22-2007 11:17 PM
Reply to: Message 128 by Buzsaw
01-22-2007 11:14 PM


Re: Suspect/Victim
Buz, when the discussion takes the form:
Buz: Such-and-such never happens.
Crash: No, in fact, it often does.
Buz: Ok, it does, but...
That's a sign that you're losing the debate - as the defenders of racism have always lost, which is why they always resort to force.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 128 by Buzsaw, posted 01-22-2007 11:14 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
kuresu
Member (Idle past 2538 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 130 of 130 (379112)
01-22-2007 11:17 PM
Reply to: Message 127 by RAZD
01-22-2007 6:56 PM


Re: Thinking about privilege
or how about the comment by the Colt's coach
"I'm proud to be representing african-americans"?
why does he need to make that statement? Do the white coaches say "I'm proud to be representin'"? not to my knowledge.
if there was no racism, such comments wouldn't be made. (not that the comment is racist, but rather, a result of racism).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 127 by RAZD, posted 01-22-2007 6:56 PM RAZD has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024