There are possible alternatives, and I find that the evolutionary explanations that answer for the problems we see, are insufficient. Living fossils for example - I believe flesh being preserved on dino bones , etc...all these evidences are more logically explained with the Creation model, and it is the job of scientists to prove otherwise, and protect their theory - but the explanations are poor nowadays because of the comfortable acceptance of evolution. Anyone who thinks deeply enough can find holes.
If one digs deep enough, one can probably find "holes" in any theory. That is what a theory is, the most logical explanation for a given problem. All theories are falsifiable. Even theories called laws are falsifiable. Mendeeleev's periodic law was partially falsified with the discovery of the proton. Thus when the law stated that the periodic state of the elements were periodic functions of atomic weights the was changed to atomic number and was thus modified and made more correct. That is how science operates.
all these evidences are more logically explained with the Creation model, and it is the job of scientists to prove otherwise
Actually it would be the job of creationists to prove their model not simply debunk the evolutionist model. Scientists do attempt to "prove"
otherwise
Edited by bluescat48, : quote typo
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969