If what you saw with your own eyes (or observed directly in any other way) conflicted with a vicarious account from a "highly respected" scientist in a "highly respected" scientific journal, which would you believe? Yourself, or the scientist?
What if you were someone with no scientific background whatsoever. Which should you believe?
Sinequanon: this is simply a super clear thinking point!
Evolutionary scientists would postulate that the obvious intricate design seen in every organism and the organized complexity of nature as a whole is not real - indicative of the work of invisible Designer.
This is how we know evolution is atheistic nonsense defiantly insulting our intelligence and reality. This explains why over half of all adults in the U.S. are creationists; evolutionary scientists are liars.
Ray
™ Version 4.2