Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,833 Year: 4,090/9,624 Month: 961/974 Week: 288/286 Day: 9/40 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Criticizing neo-Darwinism
Taz
Member (Idle past 3319 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 273 of 309 (463965)
04-22-2008 11:57 AM
Reply to: Message 268 by bertvan
04-21-2008 5:41 PM


bertvan writes:
I was under the impreswsion that both Down's syndrome and sycle cell were defects.
Nobody is denying that mutations often cause a lot of problems. But this doesn't mean that all of them are disadvantageous. It just so happens that heterozygous sickle cell gives you immunity to malaria, which is a prevalent disease in Africa. The African population would have been wiped out by this disease if they didn't gain this mutation. But in a malaria-free environment, heterozygous and homozygous sickle cell cause a lot of problems. It all depends on the environment on what is considered advantageous and what's non-advantageous.
Firthermore, if genetic accidents, somehow turned into biological features by "natural selection" is a strawman, all you have to do is explain the real origin of biological features according to NeoDarwinism.
Somehow? What somehow? Environmental factors made sure that the sickle cell mutation was just advantageous enough to keep it alive within the population. That's not "somehow".
Look at it this way. It sure beats trying to get a miracle out of your god.

I'm trying to see things your way, but I can't put my head that far up my ass.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 268 by bertvan, posted 04-21-2008 5:41 PM bertvan has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024