3 online now:	LamarkNewAge, Minnemooseus (Adminnemooseus), Rahvin
Newest Member:	ChatGPT
Post Volume:	Total: 916,482 Year: 3,739/9,624 Month: 610/974 Week: 223/276 Day: 63/34 Hour: 0/2

EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Biological Evolution ⇒

Mimicry and neodarwinism

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Author

Topic: Mimicry and neodarwinism

Muhd

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 56 of 188 (347324)
09-07-2006 5:22 PM

Reply to: Message 55 by New Cat's Eye
09-07-2006 4:37 PM

For those of us who have not been indoctrinated into believing the theory, it is just one more reason not to believe.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 55 by New Cat's Eye, posted 09-07-2006 4:37 PM		New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 59 by New Cat's Eye, posted 09-07-2006 5:57 PM		Muhd has replied

Muhd

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 61 of 188 (347463)
09-08-2006 12:49 AM

Reply to: Message 59 by New Cat's Eye
09-07-2006 5:57 PM

quote:
Not believing should be the default position until the theory is convincing.

Right. So Evolution should be disregarded as a valid theory because it only accounts for a very small part of the evidence.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 59 by New Cat's Eye, posted 09-07-2006 5:57 PM		New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 63 by Dr Adequate, posted 09-08-2006 6:06 AM	Muhd has replied
	Message 64 by New Cat's Eye, posted 09-08-2006 10:03 AM	Muhd has replied

Muhd

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 95 of 188 (348279)
09-12-2006 1:01 AM

Reply to: Message 64 by New Cat's Eye
09-08-2006 10:03 AM

Wow. My own personal editor. I'm flattered.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 64 by New Cat's Eye, posted 09-08-2006 10:03 AM		New Cat's Eye has not replied

Muhd

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 96 of 188 (348281)
09-12-2006 1:05 AM

Reply to: Message 63 by Dr Adequate
09-08-2006 6:06 AM

Read:
Darwinism does not account for the evidence, therefore it is not convincing.

If Darwinism is not convincing, we shouldn't believe it (that's what Catholic Scientist said)

Since Darwinsim is not convincing, we shouldn't believe it

This message is a reply to:
	Message 63 by Dr Adequate, posted 09-08-2006 6:06 AM		Dr Adequate has not replied

Muhd

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 97 of 188 (348282)
09-12-2006 1:09 AM

Reply to: Message 94 by Dr Adequate
09-11-2006 10:46 PM

quote:
How wrong can you get? Do creationists have some sort of competition over who can manage the most misinformation per sentence, or what?

Curses! We've been found out! Every Creationist for himself!

Actually we're just here to talk some sense into you.

Edited by Muhd, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 94 by Dr Adequate, posted 09-11-2006 10:46 PM		Dr Adequate has not replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 99 by NosyNed, posted 09-12-2006 2:05 AM		Muhd has not replied

Muhd

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 98 of 188 (348285)
09-12-2006 1:25 AM

Reply to: Message 94 by Dr Adequate
09-11-2006 10:46 PM

quote:
Supplementary question: why can't you guys base your arguments on facts? (Hint: 'cos you're wrong.)

Well I don't know much about the subject of this thread so I would have to make that argument elsewhere.

Edited by Muhd, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 94 by Dr Adequate, posted 09-11-2006 10:46 PM		Dr Adequate has not replied

Date format: mm-dd-yyyy

Timezone: ET (US)

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Do Nothing Button