Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,829 Year: 4,086/9,624 Month: 957/974 Week: 284/286 Day: 5/40 Hour: 1/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   misc lexeme morpholgy and semantic theory
Jaderis
Member (Idle past 3452 days)
Posts: 622
From: NY,NY
Joined: 06-16-2006


Message 17 of 85 (413485)
07-31-2007 3:12 AM
Reply to: Message 13 by Rob
07-31-2007 1:28 AM


As you said yourself, "it appears that thea (to view) and thea (the feminine of theos) are merely homonyms."
If 'thea' is the feminine of 'theos', how can they be homonyms? They have the same meaning (gods).
Thea and theos are not homonyms. Thea meaning "to view" and thea meaning "goddess" (feminine of theos meaning god) are homonyms.
I'm still researching the etymologies so I don't have anything else to offer right now. I just wanted to clear that up.

"You are metaphysicians. You can prove anything by metaphysics; and having done so, every metaphysician can prove every other metaphysician wrong--to his own satisfaction. You are anarchists in the realm of thought. And you are mad cosmos-makers. Each of you dwells in a cosmos of his own making, created out of his own fancies and desires. You do not know the real world in which you live, and your thinking has no place in the real world except in so far as it is phenomena of mental aberration." -The Iron Heel by Jack London

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Rob, posted 07-31-2007 1:28 AM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by Rob, posted 07-31-2007 3:22 AM Jaderis has not replied

  
Jaderis
Member (Idle past 3452 days)
Posts: 622
From: NY,NY
Joined: 06-16-2006


Message 22 of 85 (413494)
07-31-2007 4:03 AM
Reply to: Message 18 by Rob
07-31-2007 3:18 AM


Re: Definition of words
If theory only means 'a view to see'. What is it you are looking at?
If it means to contemplate, then what are you contemplating?
A seperate section of reality?
Is reality divided?
Indeed, the ancient Greek philosophers wondered the same thing. They even established the practice of theoria in which they would travel to other cities to witness sacred events, report and through the experience be "transformed by the journey of theoria and the activity of contemplation." The practice and its meaning evolved as you will read in the link.
None of this, however, has anything to do with the original etymology and the meaning of thea "to view."
Nor, as Paul and others have pointed out, does it have anything to do with the current definitions of theory and theology or the what "reality" is.
You can believe that all of reality is God, that's fine with me and, I am sure, all of us here, but your etymological arguments do nothing to support that idea or the idea that the word theory has anything to do with God.
Besides, words only have the meaning that we humans give to them. They have no other significance.

"You are metaphysicians. You can prove anything by metaphysics; and having done so, every metaphysician can prove every other metaphysician wrong--to his own satisfaction. You are anarchists in the realm of thought. And you are mad cosmos-makers. Each of you dwells in a cosmos of his own making, created out of his own fancies and desires. You do not know the real world in which you live, and your thinking has no place in the real world except in so far as it is phenomena of mental aberration." -The Iron Heel by Jack London

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Rob, posted 07-31-2007 3:18 AM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by Rob, posted 07-31-2007 10:09 AM Jaderis has not replied

  
Jaderis
Member (Idle past 3452 days)
Posts: 622
From: NY,NY
Joined: 06-16-2006


Message 41 of 85 (413843)
08-01-2007 3:19 PM
Reply to: Message 34 by Rob
08-01-2007 9:50 AM


Re: correction
I wonder why they didn't just call it 'theary'?
Um...because two words were used as the base for theory: thea and horan.
I contend that it is because the greater Christian culture would have been insensed at the obvious attempt to change the paradigm.
Whatever are you on about??? The ancient Greeks could not have possibly been attempting to change the Christian paradigm because there were NO CHRISTIANS in ancient Greece!
Edited by Jaderis, : fixed quotes

"You are metaphysicians. You can prove anything by metaphysics; and having done so, every metaphysician can prove every other metaphysician wrong--to his own satisfaction. You are anarchists in the realm of thought. And you are mad cosmos-makers. Each of you dwells in a cosmos of his own making, created out of his own fancies and desires. You do not know the real world in which you live, and your thinking has no place in the real world except in so far as it is phenomena of mental aberration." -The Iron Heel by Jack London

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by Rob, posted 08-01-2007 9:50 AM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 43 by Rob, posted 08-02-2007 2:55 AM Jaderis has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024