|
|
Msg
Num
|
Message Details
|
Reply To
|
Replies
|
|
1
|
Message 1
By RAZD
05-25-2008 4:41 AM |
|
|
|
|
2
|
Message 2
By Admin
05-25-2008 8:43 AM |
|
|
|
|
3
|
Message 3
By RAZD
05-25-2008 9:43 PM |
Message 2
By Admin
05-25-2008 8:43 AM |
|
|
|
4
|
Percy, from the "Absence of Evidence" topic (Message 4)
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
Re: Percy, from the "Absence of Evidence" topic (Message 5)
|
Percy, from the "Absence of Evidence" topic (Message 4)
|
|
|
|
6
|
It;s only a matter of time ... (Message 6)
By RAZD
06-05-2008 8:01 PM |
Re: Percy, from the "Absence of Evidence" topic (Message 5)
|
|
|
|
7
|
Bump for David101 (Message 7)
By RAZD
06-05-2008 11:44 PM |
|
|
|
|
8
|
Re: Bump for David101 (Message 8)
|
Bump for David101 (Message 7)
By RAZD
06-05-2008 11:44 PM |
|
|
|
9
|
Message 9
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
Message 10
|
Message 9
|
|
|
|
11
|
Message 11
By Taz
06-08-2008 12:40 AM |
Message 10
|
|
|
|
12
|
Continental Drift accepted by the 1960s (Message 12)
|
Message 11
By Taz
06-08-2008 12:40 AM |
|
|
|
13
|
So, can we get back to the shell game? (Message 13)
By RAZD
06-08-2008 5:29 PM |
|
|
|
|
14
|
Re: So, can we get back to the shell game? (Message 14)
|
So, can we get back to the shell game? (Message 13)
By RAZD
06-08-2008 5:29 PM |
|
|
|
15
|
Re: So, can we get back to the shell game? (Message 15)
|
Re: So, can we get back to the shell game? (Message 14)
|
|
|
|
16
|
Re: So, can we get back to the shell game? (Message 16)
By RAZD
06-09-2008 6:50 PM |
Re: So, can we get back to the shell game? (Message 15)
|
|
|
|
17
|
Message 17
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
Message 18
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
To be Fair (Message 19)
|
Message 18
|
|
|
|
20
|
How long under water is the issue here. (Message 20)
By RAZD
06-14-2008 4:30 AM |
Message 17
|
|
|
|
21
|
Geologic column (Message 21)
|
Message 1
By RAZD
05-25-2008 4:41 AM |
|
|
|
22
|
Re: Geologic column (Message 22)
By RAZD
06-15-2008 6:53 PM |
Geologic column (Message 21)
|
|
|
|
23
|
Re: Geologic column (Message 23)
|
Re: Geologic column (Message 22)
By RAZD
06-15-2008 6:53 PM |
|
|
|
24
|
Re: Geologic column (Message 24)
By RAZD
06-15-2008 11:13 PM |
Re: Geologic column (Message 23)
|
|
|
|
25
|
Message 25
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 26)
|
How long under water is the issue here. (Message 20)
By RAZD
06-14-2008 4:30 AM |
|
|
|
27
|
Jason777 (Message 27)
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
Re: Geologic column (Message 28)
By ICANT
07-22-2008 12:08 AM |
Re: Geologic column (Message 23)
|
|
|
|
29
|
Message 29
|
Message 25
|
|
|
|
30
|
Message 30
|
Message 29
|
|
|
|
31
|
Message 31
|
Message 30
|
|
|
|
32
|
Message 32
|
Message 25
|
|
|
|
33
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 33)
By RAZD
08-03-2008 9:47 PM |
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 26)
|
|
|
|
34
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 34)
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 33)
By RAZD
08-03-2008 9:47 PM |
|
|
|
35
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 35)
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 34)
|
|
|
|
36
|
Nonsense (Message 36)
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 35)
|
|
|
|
37
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 37)
By RAZD
09-14-2008 1:54 PM |
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 35)
|
|
|
|
38
|
Message 38
|
Message 10
|
|
|
|
39
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 39)
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 37)
By RAZD
09-14-2008 1:54 PM |
|
|
|
40
|
Message 40
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
Message 41
By Percy
09-15-2008 6:14 AM |
Message 40
|
|
|
|
42
|
Assumptions again (Message 42)
|
Message 40
|
|
|
|
43
|
Message 43
|
Message 41
By Percy
09-15-2008 6:14 AM |
|
|
|
44
|
Message 44
By Percy
09-15-2008 7:36 PM |
Message 43
|
|
|
|
45
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 45)
By RAZD
09-15-2008 7:51 PM |
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 39)
|
|
|
|
46
|
Old corals and going off topic (Message 46)
By RAZD
09-15-2008 8:15 PM |
Message 43
|
|
|
|
47
|
Advice for you Jason (Message 47)
|
Message 43
|
|
|
|
48
|
Re: Advice for you Jason (Message 48)
|
Advice for you Jason (Message 47)
|
|
|
|
49
|
Re: Advice for you Jason (Message 49)
|
Re: Advice for you Jason (Message 48)
|
|
|
|
50
|
Staying on Topic (Message 50)
|
Re: Advice for you Jason (Message 48)
|
|
|
|
51
|
Catastrophic evidence in the tapeats sandstone (Message 51)
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
Re: Staying on Topic (Message 52)
|
Staying on Topic (Message 50)
|
|
|
|
53
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 53)
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 45)
By RAZD
09-15-2008 7:51 PM |
|
|
|
54
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 54)
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 53)
|
|
|
|
55
|
flood == volcanic destruction? (Message 55)
By RAZD
09-22-2008 10:53 PM |
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 53)
|
|
|
|
56
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 56)
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 54)
|
|
|
|
57
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 57)
By JonF
09-29-2008 6:22 PM |
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 56)
|
|
|
|
58
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 58)
|
flood == volcanic destruction? (Message 55)
By RAZD
09-22-2008 10:53 PM |
|
|
|
59
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 59)
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 58)
|
|
|
|
60
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 60)
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 59)
|
|
|
|
61
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 61)
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 60)
|
|
|
|
62
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 62)
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 61)
|
|
|
|
63
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 63)
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 62)
|
|
|
|
64
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 64)
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 63)
|
|
|
|
65
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 65)
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 56)
|
|
|
|
66
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 66)
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 64)
|
|
|
|
67
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 67)
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 66)
|
|
|
|
68
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 68)
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 67)
|
|
|
|
69
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 69)
By RAZD
09-29-2008 11:46 PM |
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 58)
|
|
|
|
70
|
NOT about WHEN ... (Message 70)
By RAZD
09-29-2008 11:49 PM |
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 67)
|
|
|
|
71
|
Not about WHEN ... (Message 71)
By RAZD
09-29-2008 11:50 PM |
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 68)
|
|
|
|
72
|
Re: NOT about WHEN ... (Message 72)
|
NOT about WHEN ... (Message 70)
By RAZD
09-29-2008 11:49 PM |
|
|
|
73
|
Re: NOT about WHEN ... (Message 73)
|
NOT about WHEN ... (Message 70)
By RAZD
09-29-2008 11:49 PM |
|
|
|
74
|
Re: NOT about WHEN ... (Message 74)
By RAZD
10-02-2008 8:54 PM |
Re: NOT about WHEN ... (Message 73)
|
|
|
|
75
|
BUMP FOR Zothar (Message 75)
By RAZD
10-04-2008 1:42 PM |
|
|
|
|
76
|
Message 76
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
It's Called Erosion (Message 77)
|
Message 76
|
|
|
|
78
|
Message 78
|
Message 76
|
|
|
|
79
|
Where's the Mountains At? (Message 79)
|
Message 76
|
|
|
|
80
|
Message 80
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
Message 81
|
Message 80
|
|
|
|
82
|
Message 82
By RAZD
10-06-2008 7:50 AM |
Message 80
|
|
|
|
83
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 83)
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 57)
By JonF
09-29-2008 6:22 PM |
|
|
|
84
|
Misconception Concerning Igneous Rock (Message 84)
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 83)
|
|
|
|
85
|
Way off-topic, and probably very wrong (Message 85)
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 83)
|
|
|
|
86
|
Re: NOT about WHEN ... (Message 86)
|
Re: NOT about WHEN ... (Message 74)
By RAZD
10-02-2008 8:54 PM |
|
|
|
87
|
Re: NOT about WHEN ... (Message 87)
By Percy
10-12-2008 8:56 AM |
Re: NOT about WHEN ... (Message 86)
|
|
|
|
88
|
false dichotomy or not? (Message 88)
By RAZD
10-12-2008 11:36 AM |
Re: NOT about WHEN ... (Message 86)
|
|
|
|
89
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 89)
By edge
10-12-2008 8:04 PM |
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 83)
|
|
|
|
90
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 90)
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 83)
|
|
|
|
91
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 91)
By edge
10-12-2008 11:38 PM |
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 90)
|
|
|
|
92
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 92)
By RAZD
10-13-2008 9:34 AM |
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 90)
|
|
|
|
93
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 93)
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 92)
By RAZD
10-13-2008 9:34 AM |
|
|
|
94
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 94)
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 69)
By RAZD
09-29-2008 11:46 PM |
|
|
|
95
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 95)
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 94)
|
|
|
|
96
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 96)
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 59)
|
|
|
|
97
|
The real flood/catastrophe that nearly destroyed humanity? (Message 97)
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 94)
|
|
|
|
98
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 98)
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 96)
|
|
|
|
99
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 99)
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 96)
|
|
|
|
100
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big story. (Message 100)
By RAZD
10-15-2008 10:02 PM |
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 94)
|
|
|
|
101
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 101)
|
Re: flood == volcanic destruction? <---Big Super-Mega!!! (Message 96)
|
|
|
|
102
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 102)
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 65)
|
|
|
|
103
|
Re: Misconception Concerning Igneous Rock (Message 103)
|
Misconception Concerning Igneous Rock (Message 84)
|
|
|
|
104
|
Re: Misconception Concerning Igneous Rock (Message 104)
|
Re: Misconception Concerning Igneous Rock (Message 103)
|
|
|
|
105
|
Re: Way off-topic, and probably very wrong (Message 105)
|
Way off-topic, and probably very wrong (Message 85)
|
|
|
|
106
|
Re: Way off-topic, and probably very wrong (Message 106)
|
Re: Way off-topic, and probably very wrong (Message 105)
|
|
|
|
107
|
Re: Misconception Concerning Igneous Rock (Message 107)
|
Re: Misconception Concerning Igneous Rock (Message 103)
|
|
|
|
108
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 108)
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 89)
By edge
10-12-2008 8:04 PM |
|
|
|
109
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 109)
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 90)
|
|
|
|
110
|
Re: Way off-topic, and probably very wrong (Message 110)
By RAZD
10-16-2008 8:01 PM |
Way off-topic, and probably very wrong (Message 85)
|
|
|
|
111
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 111)
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 109)
|
|
|
|
112
|
Pretending (Message 112)
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 109)
|
|
|
|
113
|
Re: Misconception Concerning Igneous Rock (Message 113)
|
Re: Misconception Concerning Igneous Rock (Message 107)
|
|
|
|
114
|
The date of the flood (Message 114)
|
Re: Misconception Concerning Igneous Rock (Message 113)
|
|
|
|
115
|
Re: The date of the flood - not necessary yet? (Message 115)
By RAZD
10-20-2008 2:31 PM |
The date of the flood (Message 114)
|
|
|
|
116
|
Re: The date of the flood - not necessary yet? (Message 116)
|
Re: The date of the flood - not necessary yet? (Message 115)
By RAZD
10-20-2008 2:31 PM |
|
|
|
117
|
Re: The date of the flood - not necessary yet? (Message 117)
|
Re: The date of the flood - not necessary yet? (Message 116)
|
|
|
|
118
|
Re: The date of the flood - not necessary yet? (Message 118)
|
Re: The date of the flood - not necessary yet? (Message 117)
|
|
|
|
119
|
Re: The date of the flood - not necessary yet? (Message 119)
|
Re: The date of the flood - not necessary yet? (Message 118)
|
|
|
|
120
|
Re: The date of the flood - not necessary yet? (Message 120)
By Percy
10-21-2008 8:46 AM |
Re: The date of the flood - not necessary yet? (Message 117)
|
|
|
|
121
|
Re: The date of the flood - not necessary yet? (Message 121)
|
Re: The date of the flood - not necessary yet? (Message 120)
By Percy
10-21-2008 8:46 AM |
|
|
|
122
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 122)
By edge
11-07-2008 9:20 PM |
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 108)
|
|
|
|
123
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 123)
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 122)
By edge
11-07-2008 9:20 PM |
|
|
|
124
|
Sorry, no flood (Message 124)
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 123)
|
|
|
|
125
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 125)
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 123)
|
|
|
|
126
|
Re: The date of the flood - not necessary yet? (Message 126)
|
Re: The date of the flood - not necessary yet? (Message 120)
By Percy
10-21-2008 8:46 AM |
|
|
|
127
|
nothing about trilobites (Message 127)
By RAZD
11-16-2008 8:08 PM |
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 123)
|
|
|
|
128
|
so what about them trilobites eh? (Message 128)
By RAZD
11-16-2008 8:09 PM |
Re: The date of the flood - not necessary yet? (Message 126)
|
|
|
|
129
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 129)
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 123)
|
|
|
|
130
|
Setting The Record Straight (Message 130)
|
so what about them trilobites eh? (Message 128)
By RAZD
11-16-2008 8:09 PM |
|
|
|
131
|
Re: Plate Tectonics - Where's the "V"? (Message 131)
|
Re: How long under water is the issue here. (Message 111)
|
|
|
|
132
|
Message 132
|
Message 1
By RAZD
05-25-2008 4:41 AM |
|
|
|
133
|
Re: Setting The Record Straight (Message 133)
|
Setting The Record Straight (Message 130)
|
|
|
|
134
|
Creation "science" again (Message 134)
|
Message 132
|
|
|
|
135
|
Re: Creation "science" again (Message 135)
|
Creation "science" again (Message 134)
|
|
|
|
136
|
Re: Plate Tectonics - Where's the "V"? (Message 136)
|
Re: Plate Tectonics - Where's the "V"? (Message 131)
|
|
|
|
137
|
Re: Creation "science" again (Message 137)
|
Re: Creation "science" again (Message 135)
|
|
|
|
138
|
Re: Creation "science" again (Message 138)
|
Re: Creation "science" again (Message 135)
|
|
|
|
139
|
Re: Plate Tectonics - Where's the "V"? (Message 139)
By RAZD
11-18-2008 7:09 PM |
Re: Plate Tectonics - Where's the "V"? (Message 131)
|
|
|
|
140
|
Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 140)
By RAZD
11-18-2008 8:14 PM |
Message 132
|
|
|
|
141
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 141)
|
Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 140)
By RAZD
11-18-2008 8:14 PM |
|
|
|
142
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 142)
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 141)
|
|
|
|
143
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 143)
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 142)
|
|
|
|
144
|
Not an Answer, Ray (Message 144)
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 143)
|
|
|
|
145
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 145)
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 141)
|
|
|
|
146
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 146)
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 141)
|
|
|
|
147
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 147)
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 141)
|
|
|
|
148
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 148)
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 141)
|
|
|
|
149
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 149)
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 142)
|
|
|
|
150
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 150)
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 145)
|
|
|
|
151
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 151)
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 148)
|
|
|
|
152
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 152)
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 147)
|
|
|
|
153
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 153)
By rueh
11-19-2008 4:11 PM |
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 151)
|
|
|
|
154
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 154)
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 153)
By rueh
11-19-2008 4:11 PM |
|
|
|
155
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 155)
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 154)
|
|
|
|
156
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 156)
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 151)
|
|
|
|
157
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 157)
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 156)
|
|
|
|
158
|
fountains don't make mountains (Message 158)
By RAZD
11-19-2008 7:31 PM |
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 141)
|
|
|
|
159
|
Re: fountains don't make mountains (Message 159)
|
fountains don't make mountains (Message 158)
By RAZD
11-19-2008 7:31 PM |
|
|
|
160
|
Re: fountains don't make mountains (Message 160)
|
fountains don't make mountains (Message 158)
By RAZD
11-19-2008 7:31 PM |
|
|
|
161
|
CFO suspended for 1 week (Message 161)
|
Re: fountains don't make mountains (Message 160)
|
|
|
|
162
|
take a while to think about it (Message 162)
By RAZD
11-20-2008 8:26 AM |
Re: fountains don't make mountains (Message 160)
|
|
|
|
163
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 163)
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 157)
|
|
|
|
164
|
Mt. Everest has 500+ feet of limestone (Message 164)
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 141)
|
|
|
|
165
|
Re: Mt. Everest has 500+ feet of limestone (Message 165)
|
Mt. Everest has 500+ feet of limestone (Message 164)
|
|
|
|
166
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 166)
By edge
11-23-2008 11:21 AM |
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 151)
|
|
|
|
167
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 167)
|
Re: Still no creationist explanation of fossilized marine life on mountaintops. (Message 166)
By edge
11-23-2008 11:21 AM |
|
|
|
168
|
Re: PLATE TECTONICS FAILS PHYSICS 101 - NO ENERGY = NO MOUNTAIN!!! (Message 168)
|
Re: Plate Tectonics - Where's the "V"? (Message 136)
|
|
|
|
169
|
Re: PLATE TECTONICS FAILS PHYSICS 101 - NO ENERGY = NO MOUNTAIN!!! (Message 169)
|
Re: PLATE TECTONICS FAILS PHYSICS 101 - NO ENERGY = NO MOUNTAIN!!! (Message 168)
|
|
|
|
170
|
Re: PLATE TECTONICS FAILS PHYSICS 101 - NO ENERGY = NO MOUNTAIN!!! (Message 170)
|
Re: PLATE TECTONICS FAILS PHYSICS 101 - NO ENERGY = NO MOUNTAIN!!! (Message 168)
|
|
|
|
171
|
Re: PLATE TECTONICS FAILS PHYSICS 101 - NO ENERGY = NO MOUNTAIN!!! (Message 171)
|
Re: PLATE TECTONICS FAILS PHYSICS 101 - NO ENERGY = NO MOUNTAIN!!! (Message 168)
|
|
|
|
172
|
Re: PLATE TECTONICS FAILS PHYSICS 101 - NO ENERGY = NO MOUNTAIN!!! (Message 172)
|
Re: PLATE TECTONICS FAILS PHYSICS 101 - NO ENERGY = NO MOUNTAIN!!! (Message 168)
|
|
|
|
173
|
Small is not negligable (Message 173)
By RAZD
12-02-2008 8:15 AM |
Re: PLATE TECTONICS FAILS PHYSICS 101 - NO ENERGY = NO MOUNTAIN!!! (Message 168)
|
|
|
|
174
|
Another Excellent Post, CaveDiver but ... (Message 174)
|
Re: PLATE TECTONICS FAILS PHYSICS 101 - NO ENERGY = NO MOUNTAIN!!! (Message 172)
|
|
|
|
175
|
Crank support even worse than YECs (Message 175)
|
Re: PLATE TECTONICS FAILS PHYSICS 101 - NO ENERGY = NO MOUNTAIN!!! (Message 168)
|
|
|
|
176
|
Re: Crank support even worse than YECs (Message 176)
By Percy
12-02-2008 12:48 PM |
Crank support even worse than YECs (Message 175)
|
|
|
|
177
|
Re: Crank support even worse than YECs (Message 177)
|
Crank support even worse than YECs (Message 175)
|
|
|
|
178
|
Re: Crank support even worse than YECs (Message 178)
|
Re: Crank support even worse than YECs (Message 177)
|
|
|
|
179
|
Observations (Message 179)
|
Re: Crank support even worse than YECs (Message 177)
|
|
|
|
180
|
Re: Crank support even worse than YECs (Message 180)
|
|
