|
Msg Num
|
Message Details
|
Reply To
|
Replies
|
|
1
|
Message 1
By RAZD
09-19-2009 4:22 PM
|
|
|
|
2
|
Thread Copied from Proposed New Topics Forum (Message 2)
|
|
|
|
3
|
Mutually Exclusive Evidenced Alternatives (Message 3)
|
Message 1
By RAZD
09-19-2009 4:22 PM
|
|
|
4
|
stop playing word games and address the issue (Message 4)
By RAZD
09-19-2009 5:59 PM
|
Mutually Exclusive Evidenced Alternatives (Message 3)
|
|
|
5
|
Who Is In Denial Here? (Message 5)
|
stop playing word games and address the issue (Message 4)
By RAZD
09-19-2009 5:59 PM
|
|
|
6
|
Ending now? (Message 6)
|
Who Is In Denial Here? (Message 5)
|
|
|
7
|
Goodbye again (Message 7)
By RAZD
09-19-2009 6:47 PM
|
Who Is In Denial Here? (Message 5)
|
|
|
8
|
Re: Ending now? (Message 8)
By RAZD
09-19-2009 6:49 PM
|
Ending now? (Message 6)
|
|
|
9
|
Re: stop playing word games and address the issue (Message 9)
|
stop playing word games and address the issue (Message 4)
By RAZD
09-19-2009 5:59 PM
|
|
|
10
|
Message 10
|
Re: Ending now? (Message 8)
By RAZD
09-19-2009 6:49 PM
|
|
|
11
|
Re: Goodbye again (Message 11)
|
Goodbye again (Message 7)
By RAZD
09-19-2009 6:47 PM
|
|
|
12
|
Message 12
By RAZD
09-19-2009 7:32 PM
|
Message 10
|
|
|
13
|
still no evidence? (Message 13)
By RAZD
09-19-2009 7:39 PM
|
Re: stop playing word games and address the issue (Message 9)
|
|
|
14
|
Re: still no evidence? (Message 14)
|
still no evidence? (Message 13)
By RAZD
09-19-2009 7:39 PM
|
|
|
15
|
Re: still no evidence? (Message 15)
By RAZD
09-19-2009 7:53 PM
|
Re: still no evidence? (Message 14)
|
|
|
16
|
Re: still no evidence? (Message 16)
|
Re: still no evidence? (Message 15)
By RAZD
09-19-2009 7:53 PM
|
|
|
17
|
Re: still no evidence? (Message 17)
|
Re: still no evidence? (Message 15)
By RAZD
09-19-2009 7:53 PM
|
|
|
18
|
Re: still no evidence? (Message 18)
By RAZD
09-19-2009 8:35 PM
|
Re: still no evidence? (Message 17)
|
|
|
19
|
Re: still no evidence? (Message 19)
|
Re: still no evidence? (Message 18)
By RAZD
09-19-2009 8:35 PM
|
|
|
20
|
Re: still no evidence? (Message 20)
By RAZD
09-20-2009 11:17 AM
|
Re: still no evidence? (Message 19)
|
|
|
21
|
Re: still no evidence? (Message 21)
|
Re: still no evidence? (Message 19)
|
|
|
22
|
Re: still no evidence? (Message 22)
|
Re: still no evidence? (Message 18)
By RAZD
09-19-2009 8:35 PM
|
|
|
23
|
in a nutshell (Message 23)
By RAZD
09-20-2009 1:15 PM
|
Re: still no evidence? (Message 22)
|
|
|
24
|
Re: still no evidence? (Message 24)
|
Re: still no evidence? (Message 21)
|
|
|
25
|
Re: still no evidence? (Message 25)
|
Re: still no evidence? (Message 20)
By RAZD
09-20-2009 11:17 AM
|
|
|
26
|
Evidence of What? (Message 26)
|
Re: still no evidence? (Message 18)
By RAZD
09-19-2009 8:35 PM
|
|
|
27
|
Re: still no evidence? (Message 27)
By RAZD
09-20-2009 4:24 PM
|
Re: still no evidence? (Message 25)
|
|
|
28
|
Material Or Immaterial? (Message 28)
|
Re: still no evidence? (Message 27)
By RAZD
09-20-2009 4:24 PM
|
|
|
29
|
topic straggler -- CAN you keep to a topic? (Message 29)
By RAZD
09-20-2009 5:23 PM
|
Material Or Immaterial? (Message 28)
|
|
|
30
|
What Is The Topic? (Message 30)
|
topic straggler -- CAN you keep to a topic? (Message 29)
By RAZD
09-20-2009 5:23 PM
|
|
|
31
|
What Is The Topic? - Read the OP (Message 31)
By RAZD
09-20-2009 7:13 PM
|
What Is The Topic? (Message 30)
|
|
|
32
|
Re: still no evidence? (Message 32)
|
Re: still no evidence? (Message 20)
By RAZD
09-20-2009 11:17 AM
|
|
|
33
|
agnostic pro and agnostic con (Message 33)
By RAZD
09-20-2009 7:57 PM
|
Re: still no evidence? (Message 32)
|
|
|
34
|
the Dawkins theist to atheist scale (Message 34)
By RAZD
09-20-2009 8:38 PM
|
Re: still no evidence? (Message 32)
|
|
|
35
|
Re: What Is The Topic? - Read the OP (Message 35)
|
What Is The Topic? - Read the OP (Message 31)
By RAZD
09-20-2009 7:13 PM
|
|
|
36
|
Re: the Dawkins theist to atheist scale (Message 36)
|
the Dawkins theist to atheist scale (Message 34)
By RAZD
09-20-2009 8:38 PM
|
|
|
37
|
So we want evidence of absence? (or maybe philosophy will suffice?) (Message 37)
|
Re: still no evidence? (Message 27)
By RAZD
09-20-2009 4:24 PM
|
|
|
38
|
The Unicorn Rides Again (Message 38)
|
What Is The Topic? - Read the OP (Message 31)
By RAZD
09-20-2009 7:13 PM
|
|
|
39
|
Re: The Unicorn Rides Again (Message 39)
|
The Unicorn Rides Again (Message 38)
|
|
|
40
|
Agnostics and atheists, dating but not exclusive. (Message 40)
|
Re: The Unicorn Rides Again (Message 39)
|
|
|
41
|
Message 41
|
The Unicorn Rides Again (Message 38)
|
|
|
42
|
I'm missing something...I think (Message 42)
|
Message 1
By RAZD
09-19-2009 4:22 PM
|
|
|
43
|
atheist towards what? (Message 43)
|
Re: The Unicorn Rides Again (Message 39)
|
|
|
44
|
Re: The Unicorn Rides Again (Message 44)
|
Re: The Unicorn Rides Again (Message 39)
|
|
|
45
|
"Obviously" Made-Up? (Message 45)
|
Message 41
|
|
|
46
|
Re: The Unicorn Rides Again (Message 46)
|
Re: The Unicorn Rides Again (Message 44)
|
|
|
47
|
Re: "Obviously" Made-Up? (Message 47)
|
"Obviously" Made-Up? (Message 45)
|
|
|
48
|
Re: "Obviously" Made-Up? (Message 48)
|
Re: "Obviously" Made-Up? (Message 47)
|
|
|
49
|
Re: atheist towards what? (Message 49)
|
atheist towards what? (Message 43)
|
|
|
50
|
Re: "Obviously" Made-Up? (Message 50)
|
Re: "Obviously" Made-Up? (Message 48)
|
|
|
51
|
Re: "Obviously" Made-Up? (Message 51)
|
Re: "Obviously" Made-Up? (Message 47)
|
|
|
52
|
Re: "Obviously" Made-Up? (Message 52)
|
Re: "Obviously" Made-Up? (Message 51)
|
|
|
53
|
Re: "Obviously" Made-Up? (Message 53)
|
Re: "Obviously" Made-Up? (Message 52)
|
|
|
54
|
Re: "Obviously" Made-Up? (Message 54)
|
Re: "Obviously" Made-Up? (Message 53)
|
|
|
55
|
Re: atheist towards what? (Message 55)
|
Re: atheist towards what? (Message 49)
|
|
|
56
|
Evidenced Beyond Belief (Message 56)
|
Re: "Obviously" Made-Up? (Message 54)
|
|
|
57
|
Re: "Obviously" Made-Up? (Message 57)
|
Re: "Obviously" Made-Up? (Message 50)
|
|
|
58
|
Re: Evidenced Beyond Belief (Message 58)
|
Evidenced Beyond Belief (Message 56)
|
|
|
59
|
Re: "Obviously" Made-Up? (Message 59)
|
Re: "Obviously" Made-Up? (Message 57)
|
|
|
60
|
Re: "Obviously" Made-Up? (Message 60)
|
Re: "Obviously" Made-Up? (Message 59)
|
|
|
61
|
Re: "Obviously" Made-Up? (Message 61)
|
Re: "Obviously" Made-Up? (Message 60)
|
|
|
62
|
Re: "Obviously" Made-Up? (Message 62)
|
Re: "Obviously" Made-Up? (Message 61)
|
|
|
63
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 63)
By RAZD
09-21-2009 9:17 PM
|
I'm missing something...I think (Message 42)
|
|
|
64
|
Re: So we want evidence of absence? (or maybe philosophy will suffice?) (Message 64)
By RAZD
09-21-2009 9:29 PM
|
So we want evidence of absence? (or maybe philosophy will suffice?) (Message 37)
|
|
|
65
|
Re: agnostic pro and agnostic con (Message 65)
|
agnostic pro and agnostic con (Message 33)
By RAZD
09-20-2009 7:57 PM
|
|
|
66
|
Topic Please? (Message 66)
By RAZD
09-21-2009 10:31 PM
|
|
|
|
67
|
Re: So we want evidence of absence? (or maybe philosophy will suffice?) (Message 67)
|
Re: So we want evidence of absence? (or maybe philosophy will suffice?) (Message 64)
By RAZD
09-21-2009 9:29 PM
|
|
|
68
|
Re: the Dawkins theist to atheist scale (Message 68)
By RAZD
09-21-2009 10:53 PM
|
Re: the Dawkins theist to atheist scale (Message 36)
|
|
|
69
|
Re: Topic Please? (Message 69)
|
Topic Please? (Message 66)
By RAZD
09-21-2009 10:31 PM
|
|
|
70
|
Re: What Is The Topic? - Read the OP (Message 70)
By RAZD
09-21-2009 11:10 PM
|
Re: What Is The Topic? - Read the OP (Message 35)
|
|
|
71
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 71)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 63)
By RAZD
09-21-2009 9:17 PM
|
|
|
72
|
Re: the Dawkins theist to atheist scale (Message 72)
|
the Dawkins theist to atheist scale (Message 34)
By RAZD
09-20-2009 8:38 PM
|
|
|
73
|
Re: Topic Please? (Message 73)
By RAZD
09-21-2009 11:25 PM
|
Re: Topic Please? (Message 69)
|
|
|
74
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 74)
By RAZD
09-21-2009 11:36 PM
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 71)
|
|
|
75
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 75)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 74)
By RAZD
09-21-2009 11:36 PM
|
|
|
76
|
Partial absence of evidence vs total absense of evidence (Message 76)
|
Topic Please? (Message 66)
By RAZD
09-21-2009 10:31 PM
|
|
|
77
|
Re: the Dawkins theist to atheist scale (Message 77)
|
Re: the Dawkins theist to atheist scale (Message 68)
By RAZD
09-21-2009 10:53 PM
|
|
|
78
|
Message 78
|
Message 12
By RAZD
09-19-2009 7:32 PM
|
|
|
79
|
Re: Evidenced Beyond Belief (Message 79)
|
Re: Evidenced Beyond Belief (Message 58)
|
|
|
80
|
Re: Topic Please? (Message 80)
|
Topic Please? (Message 66)
By RAZD
09-21-2009 10:31 PM
|
|
|
81
|
Re: "Obviously" Made-Up? (Message 81)
|
Re: "Obviously" Made-Up? (Message 61)
|
|
|
82
|
Re: Evidenced Beyond Belief (Message 82)
|
Re: Evidenced Beyond Belief (Message 79)
|
|
|
83
|
This is getting ridiculous. (Message 83)
|
|
|
|
84
|
Re: Evidenced Beyond Belief (Message 84)
|
Re: Evidenced Beyond Belief (Message 82)
|
|
|
85
|
Re: Evidenced Beyond Belief (Message 85)
|
Re: Evidenced Beyond Belief (Message 84)
|
|
|
86
|
Re: Topic Please? (Message 86)
|
Re: Topic Please? (Message 73)
By RAZD
09-21-2009 11:25 PM
|
|
|
87
|
Re: Topic Please? (Message 87)
|
Re: Topic Please? (Message 86)
|
|
|
88
|
Re: Evidenced Beyond Belief (Message 88)
|
Re: Evidenced Beyond Belief (Message 85)
|
|
|
89
|
Re: Topic Please? (Message 89)
|
Re: Topic Please? (Message 87)
|
|
|
90
|
Re: Topic Please? Get it right? (Message 90)
By RAZD
09-22-2009 6:33 PM
|
Re: Topic Please? (Message 89)
|
|
|
91
|
Re: Topic Please? Get it right? (Message 91)
|
Re: Topic Please? Get it right? (Message 90)
By RAZD
09-22-2009 6:33 PM
|
|
|
92
|
More problems here (Message 92)
By RAZD
09-22-2009 7:01 PM
|
Re: Topic Please? (Message 86)
|
|
|
93
|
21 posts, 3 promises, failure to address the topic, no evidence. (Message 93)
By RAZD
09-22-2009 7:04 PM
|
Re: Topic Please? Get it right? (Message 91)
|
|
|
94
|
relative scale, implies relative justification (Message 94)
By RAZD
09-22-2009 8:07 PM
|
Re: the Dawkins theist to atheist scale (Message 77)
|
|
|
95
|
Re: Partial absence of evidence vs total absense of evidence (Message 95)
By RAZD
09-22-2009 8:20 PM
|
Partial absence of evidence vs total absense of evidence (Message 76)
|
|
|
96
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 96)
By RAZD
09-22-2009 8:26 PM
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 75)
|
|
|
97
|
Re: More problems here (Message 97)
|
More problems here (Message 92)
By RAZD
09-22-2009 7:01 PM
|
|
|
98
|
Re: More problems here (Message 98)
By RAZD
09-22-2009 8:39 PM
|
Re: More problems here (Message 97)
|
|
|
99
|
Is RAZD pseudo-skeptical on creationism? (Message 99)
|
Re: Partial absence of evidence vs total absense of evidence (Message 95)
By RAZD
09-22-2009 8:20 PM
|
|
|
100
|
Message 100
|
Re: Partial absence of evidence vs total absense of evidence (Message 95)
By RAZD
09-22-2009 8:20 PM
|
|
|
101
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 101)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 96)
By RAZD
09-22-2009 8:26 PM
|
|
|
102
|
Re: Topic Please? (Message 102)
By PaulK
09-23-2009 1:49 AM
|
Topic Please? (Message 66)
By RAZD
09-21-2009 10:31 PM
|
|
|
103
|
Re: relative scale, implies relative justification (Message 103)
|
relative scale, implies relative justification (Message 94)
By RAZD
09-22-2009 8:07 PM
|
|
|
104
|
Are You Denying Facts? Or Not? (Message 104)
|
21 posts, 3 promises, failure to address the topic, no evidence. (Message 93)
By RAZD
09-22-2009 7:04 PM
|
|
|
105
|
Re: More problems here (Message 105)
|
Re: More problems here (Message 98)
By RAZD
09-22-2009 8:39 PM
|
|
|
106
|
Re: Are You Denying Facts? Or Not? (Message 106)
|
Are You Denying Facts? Or Not? (Message 104)
|
|
|
107
|
Immaterial "Something".??????????? (Message 107)
|
Re: Are You Denying Facts? Or Not? (Message 106)
|
|
|
108
|
Sorry. (Message 108)
|
Re: Are You Denying Facts? Or Not? (Message 106)
|
|
|
109
|
Re: Immaterial "Something".??????????? (Message 109)
|
Immaterial "Something".??????????? (Message 107)
|
|
|
110
|
Re: More problems here (Message 110)
By RAZD
09-23-2009 8:36 PM
|
Re: More problems here (Message 105)
|
|
|
111
|
The Fact is: STILL no evidence for your atheist position (Message 111)
By RAZD
09-23-2009 9:40 PM
|
Are You Denying Facts? Or Not? (Message 104)
|
|
|
112
|
Re: Topic Please? (Message 112)
By RAZD
09-23-2009 9:54 PM
|
Re: Topic Please? (Message 102)
By PaulK
09-23-2009 1:49 AM
|
|
|
113
|
Re: More problems here (Message 113)
|
Re: More problems here (Message 110)
By RAZD
09-23-2009 8:36 PM
|
|
|
114
|
Re: relative scale, implies relative justification (Message 114)
By RAZD
09-23-2009 10:32 PM
|
Re: relative scale, implies relative justification (Message 103)
|
|
|
115
|
Re: More problems here (Message 115)
By RAZD
09-23-2009 10:44 PM
|
Re: More problems here (Message 113)
|
|
|
116
|
Re: More problems here (Message 116)
|
Re: More problems here (Message 115)
By RAZD
09-23-2009 10:44 PM
|
|
|
117
|
Time to show RAZD the evidence (Message 117)
|
Are You Denying Facts? Or Not? (Message 104)
|
|
|
118
|
Re: Topic Please? (Message 118)
By PaulK
09-24-2009 1:49 AM
|
Re: Topic Please? (Message 112)
By RAZD
09-23-2009 9:54 PM
|
|
|
119
|
Re: relative scale, implies relative justification (Message 119)
|
Re: relative scale, implies relative justification (Message 114)
By RAZD
09-23-2009 10:32 PM
|
|
|
120
|
Re: Is RAZD pseudo-skeptical on creationism? (Message 120)
By RAZD
09-24-2009 8:53 PM
|
Is RAZD pseudo-skeptical on creationism? (Message 99)
|
|
|
121
|
heating hypotheses and hurricanes (Message 121)
By RAZD
09-24-2009 9:22 PM
|
Message 100
|
|
|
122
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 122)
By RAZD
09-24-2009 10:47 PM
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 101)
|
|
|
123
|
note to others - re replies (Message 123)
By RAZD
09-24-2009 10:59 PM
|
|
|
|
124
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 124)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 122)
By RAZD
09-24-2009 10:47 PM
|
|
|
125
|
Message 125
|
heating hypotheses and hurricanes (Message 121)
By RAZD
09-24-2009 9:22 PM
|
|
|
126
|
Re: Immaterial "Something".??????????? (Message 126)
|
Re: Immaterial "Something".??????????? (Message 109)
|
|
|
127
|
Re: The Fact is: STILL no evidence for your atheist position (Message 127)
|
The Fact is: STILL no evidence for your atheist position (Message 111)
By RAZD
09-23-2009 9:40 PM
|
|
|
128
|
Stupid Request (Message 128)
|
Time to show RAZD the evidence (Message 117)
|
|
|
129
|
Re: Immaterial "Something".??????????? (Message 129)
|
Re: Immaterial "Something".??????????? (Message 126)
|
|
|
130
|
Re: Immaterial "Something".??????????? (Message 130)
|
Re: Immaterial "Something".??????????? (Message 129)
|
|
|
131
|
Re: Immaterial "Something".??????????? (Message 131)
|
Re: Immaterial "Something".??????????? (Message 130)
|
|
|
132
|
Re: Immaterial "Something".??????????? (Message 132)
|
Re: Immaterial "Something".??????????? (Message 131)
|
|
|
133
|
False Dichotomy? What False Dichotomy? (Message 133)
|
Re: Immaterial "Something".??????????? (Message 129)
|
|
|
134
|
Re: False Dichotomy? What False Dichotomy? (Message 134)
|
False Dichotomy? What False Dichotomy? (Message 133)
|
|
|
135
|
Re: False Dichotomy? What False Dichotomy? (Message 135)
|
Re: False Dichotomy? What False Dichotomy? (Message 134)
|
|
|
136
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 136)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 122)
By RAZD
09-24-2009 10:47 PM
|
|
|
137
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 137)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 136)
|
|
|
138
|
Re: False Dichotomy? What False Dichotomy? (Message 138)
|
Re: False Dichotomy? What False Dichotomy? (Message 135)
|
|
|
139
|
Re: False Dichotomy? What False Dichotomy? (Message 139)
|
Re: False Dichotomy? What False Dichotomy? (Message 138)
|
|
|
140
|
Re: False Dichotomy? What False Dichotomy? (Message 140)
|
Re: False Dichotomy? What False Dichotomy? (Message 139)
|
|
|
141
|
Re: False Dichotomy? What False Dichotomy? (Message 141)
|
Re: False Dichotomy? What False Dichotomy? (Message 140)
|
|
|
142
|
Re: False Dichotomy? What False Dichotomy? (Message 142)
|
Re: False Dichotomy? What False Dichotomy? (Message 138)
|
|
|
143
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 143)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 137)
|
|
|
144
|
Re: False Dichotomy? What False Dichotomy? (Message 144)
|
Re: False Dichotomy? What False Dichotomy? (Message 138)
|
|
|
145
|
Re: False Dichotomy? What False Dichotomy? (Message 145)
|
Re: False Dichotomy? What False Dichotomy? (Message 138)
|
|
|
146
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 146)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 143)
|
|
|
147
|
Good Question? (Message 147)
|
Re: False Dichotomy? What False Dichotomy? (Message 142)
|
|
|
148
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 148)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 143)
|
|
|
149
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 149)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 148)
|
|
|
150
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 150)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 149)
|
|
|
151
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 151)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 149)
|
|
|
152
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 152)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 143)
|
|
|
153
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 153)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 151)
|
|
|
154
|
Absence of Evidence. What Do We Mean? (Message 154)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 150)
|
|
|
155
|
wonderful (Message 155)
By RAZD
09-25-2009 8:16 PM
|
Re: More problems here (Message 116)
|
|
|
156
|
Re: Topic Please? (Message 156)
By RAZD
09-25-2009 8:21 PM
|
Re: Topic Please? (Message 118)
By PaulK
09-24-2009 1:49 AM
|
|
|
157
|
Re: relative scale, implies relative justification (Message 157)
By RAZD
09-25-2009 10:23 PM
|
Re: relative scale, implies relative justification (Message 119)
|
|
|
158
|
Word... (Message 158)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 146)
|
|
|
159
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 159)
By RAZD
09-25-2009 10:27 PM
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 124)
|
|
|
160
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 160)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 148)
|
|
|
161
|
Re: wonderful (Message 161)
|
wonderful (Message 155)
By RAZD
09-25-2009 8:16 PM
|
|
|
162
|
Soap Bubbles and Evidence (Message 162)
By RAZD
09-25-2009 10:57 PM
|
Message 125
|
|
|
163
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 163)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 159)
By RAZD
09-25-2009 10:27 PM
|
|
|
164
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 164)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 152)
|
|
|
165
|
Re: relative scale, implies relative justification (Message 165)
|
Re: relative scale, implies relative justification (Message 157)
By RAZD
09-25-2009 10:23 PM
|
|
|
166
|
Re: Topic Please? (Message 166)
By PaulK
09-26-2009 4:12 AM
|
Re: Topic Please? (Message 156)
By RAZD
09-25-2009 8:21 PM
|
|
|
167
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 167)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 153)
|
|
|
168
|
Re: Is RAZD pseudo-skeptical on creationism? (Message 168)
|
Re: Is RAZD pseudo-skeptical on creationism? (Message 120)
By RAZD
09-24-2009 8:53 PM
|
|
|
169
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 169)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 160)
|
|
|
170
|
Special Pleading for the atheist position to excuse the absence of evidence? (Message 170)
By RAZD
09-26-2009 6:16 PM
|
Re: The Fact is: STILL no evidence for your atheist position (Message 127)
|
|
|
171
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 171)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 169)
|
|
|
172
|
Zen Deism == agnostic theism (Message 172)
By RAZD
09-26-2009 7:32 PM
|
Re: relative scale, implies relative justification (Message 165)
|
|
|
173
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 173)
By RAZD
09-26-2009 7:40 PM
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 171)
|
|
|
174
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 174)
By RAZD
09-26-2009 8:57 PM
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 136)
|
|
|
175
|
Re: wonderful (Message 175)
By RAZD
09-26-2009 9:39 PM
|
Re: wonderful (Message 161)
|
|
|
176
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 176)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 174)
By RAZD
09-26-2009 8:57 PM
|
|
|
177
|
Re: wonderful (Message 177)
|
Re: wonderful (Message 175)
By RAZD
09-26-2009 9:39 PM
|
|
|
178
|
Re: Topic Please? (Message 178)
By RAZD
09-26-2009 10:12 PM
|
Re: Topic Please? (Message 166)
By PaulK
09-26-2009 4:12 AM
|
|
|
179
|
Re: Is RAZD pseudo-skeptical on creationism? (Message 179)
By RAZD
09-26-2009 10:46 PM
|
Re: Is RAZD pseudo-skeptical on creationism? (Message 168)
|
|
|
180
|
Re: wonderful - now let's revisit the topic (Message 180)
By RAZD
09-26-2009 11:36 PM
|
Re: wonderful (Message 177)
|
|
|
181
|
Re: wonderful - now let's revisit the topic (Message 181)
|
Re: wonderful - now let's revisit the topic (Message 180)
By RAZD
09-26-2009 11:36 PM
|
|
|
182
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 182)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 173)
By RAZD
09-26-2009 7:40 PM
|
|
|
183
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 183)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 176)
|
|
|
184
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 184)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 174)
By RAZD
09-26-2009 8:57 PM
|
|
|
185
|
How many 50%s in 100%? (Message 185)
|
Re: Is RAZD pseudo-skeptical on creationism? (Message 179)
By RAZD
09-26-2009 10:46 PM
|
|
|
186
|
Re: Topic Please? (Message 186)
By PaulK
09-27-2009 3:38 AM
|
Re: Topic Please? (Message 178)
By RAZD
09-26-2009 10:12 PM
|
|
|
187
|
For me, any considerations of God concerns the one who interfaced with the Earth (Message 187)
|
Re: Partial absence of evidence vs total absense of evidence (Message 95)
By RAZD
09-22-2009 8:20 PM
|
|
|
188
|
Message 188
|
Soap Bubbles and Evidence (Message 162)
By RAZD
09-25-2009 10:57 PM
|
|
|
189
|
Message 189
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 167)
|
|
|
190
|
Message 190
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 173)
By RAZD
09-26-2009 7:40 PM
|
|
|
191
|
Message 191
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 174)
By RAZD
09-26-2009 8:57 PM
|
|
|
192
|
Message 192
|
Re: wonderful (Message 175)
By RAZD
09-26-2009 9:39 PM
|
|
|
193
|
Let me know if I'm missing something... (Message 193)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 174)
By RAZD
09-26-2009 8:57 PM
|
|
|
194
|
Re: relative scale, implies relative justification (Message 194)
|
Re: relative scale, implies relative justification (Message 157)
By RAZD
09-25-2009 10:23 PM
|
|
|
195
|
Re: wonderful - now let's revisit the topic (Message 195)
By RAZD
09-27-2009 9:32 PM
|
Re: wonderful - now let's revisit the topic (Message 181)
|
|
|
196
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 196)
By RAZD
09-27-2009 9:43 PM
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 184)
|
|
|
197
|
Re: How many 50%s in 100%? (Message 197)
By RAZD
09-27-2009 9:58 PM
|
How many 50%s in 100%? (Message 185)
|
|
|
198
|
Not sure who's missing something (Message 198)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 184)
|
|
|
199
|
Re: Topic Please? (Message 199)
By RAZD
09-27-2009 10:14 PM
|
Re: Topic Please? (Message 186)
By PaulK
09-27-2009 3:38 AM
|
|
|
200
|
Re: For me, any considerations of God concerns the one who interfaced with the Earth (Message 200)
By RAZD
09-27-2009 10:30 PM
|
For me, any considerations of God concerns the one who interfaced with the Earth (Message 187)
|
|
|
201
|
finally, a description (Message 201)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 196)
By RAZD
09-27-2009 9:43 PM
|
|
|
202
|
Re: wonderful - now let's revisit the topic (Message 202)
|
Re: wonderful - now let's revisit the topic (Message 195)
By RAZD
09-27-2009 9:32 PM
|
|
|
203
|
Rrhaining ... (Message 203)
By RAZD
09-27-2009 10:57 PM
|
Message 188
|
|
|
204
|
Re: For me, any considerations of God concerns the one who interfaced with the Earth (Message 204)
|
Re: For me, any considerations of God concerns the one who interfaced with the Earth (Message 200)
By RAZD
09-27-2009 10:30 PM
|
|
|
205
|
tomorrow (Message 205)
By RAZD
09-27-2009 11:09 PM
|
Let me know if I'm missing something... (Message 193)
|
|
|
206
|
small edit on previous reply (Message 206)
By RAZD
09-27-2009 11:11 PM
|
Re: relative scale, implies relative justification (Message 194)
|
|
|
207
|
Re: Topic Please? (Message 207)
By PaulK
09-28-2009 1:40 AM
|
Re: Topic Please? (Message 199)
By RAZD
09-27-2009 10:14 PM
|
|
|
208
|
Re: How many 50%s in 100%? (Message 208)
|
Re: How many 50%s in 100%? (Message 197)
By RAZD
09-27-2009 9:58 PM
|
|
|
209
|
Message 209
|
Rrhaining ... (Message 203)
By RAZD
09-27-2009 10:57 PM
|
|
|
210
|
Message 210
|
Rrhaining ... (Message 203)
By RAZD
09-27-2009 10:57 PM
|
|
|
211
|
Message 211
|
Message 1
By RAZD
09-19-2009 4:22 PM
|
|
|
212
|
Agnosticism vs. pseudoskepticism (Message 212)
|
Message 189
|
|
|
213
|
Re: Zen Deism == agnostic theism (Message 213)
|
Zen Deism == agnostic theism (Message 172)
By RAZD
09-26-2009 7:32 PM
|
|
|
214
|
Re: Zen Deism == agnostic theism (Message 214)
|
Re: Zen Deism == agnostic theism (Message 213)
|
|
|
215
|
Re: Agnosticism vs. pseudoskepticism (Message 215)
|
Agnosticism vs. pseudoskepticism (Message 212)
|
|
|
216
|
Re: Zen Deism == agnostic theism (Message 216)
|
Re: Zen Deism == agnostic theism (Message 213)
|
|
|
217
|
Re: Zen Deism == agnostic theism (Message 217)
|
Re: Zen Deism == agnostic theism (Message 216)
|
|
|
218
|
Re: False Dichotomy? What False Dichotomy? (Message 218)
|
Re: False Dichotomy? What False Dichotomy? (Message 142)
|
|
|
219
|
Re: False Dichotomy? What False Dichotomy? (Message 219)
|
Re: False Dichotomy? What False Dichotomy? (Message 145)
|
|
|
220
|
Re: Agnosticism vs. pseudoskepticism (Message 220)
|
Agnosticism vs. pseudoskepticism (Message 212)
|
|
|
221
|
Re: Agnosticism vs. pseudoskepticism (Message 221)
|
Agnosticism vs. pseudoskepticism (Message 212)
|
|
|
222
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 222)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 167)
|
|
|
223
|
Re: Special Pleading for the atheist position to excuse the absence of evidence? (Message 223)
|
Special Pleading for the atheist position to excuse the absence of evidence? (Message 170)
By RAZD
09-26-2009 6:16 PM
|
|
|
224
|
Re: False Dichotomy? What False Dichotomy? (Message 224)
|
Re: False Dichotomy? What False Dichotomy? (Message 219)
|
|
|
225
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 225)
By RAZD
09-28-2009 7:21 PM
|
finally, a description (Message 201)
|
|
|
226
|
Re: False Dichotomy? What False Dichotomy? (Message 226)
|
Re: False Dichotomy? What False Dichotomy? (Message 218)
|
|
|
227
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 227)
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 225)
By RAZD
09-28-2009 7:21 PM
|
|
|
228
|
At least an attempt at in depth analysis, rather than off the cuff stuff (Message 228)
By RAZD
09-28-2009 9:26 PM
|
Let me know if I'm missing something... (Message 193)
|
|
|
229
|
Message 229
By RAZD
09-28-2009 9:46 PM
|
Message 211
|
|
|
230
|
Re: Zen Deism == agnostic theism (Message 230)
By RAZD
09-28-2009 9:59 PM
|
Re: Zen Deism == agnostic theism (Message 213)
|
|
|
231
|
Re: Special Pleading for the atheist position to excuse the absence of evidence? (Message 231)
By RAZD
09-28-2009 10:04 PM
|
Re: Special Pleading for the atheist position to excuse the absence of evidence? (Message 223)
|
|
|
232
|
Moderation may be needed to keep on the topic (Message 232)
By RAZD
09-28-2009 10:12 PM
|
Thread Copied from Proposed New Topics Forum (Message 2)
|
|
|
233
|
Re: At least an attempt at in depth analysis, rather than off the cuff stuff (Message 233)
|
At least an attempt at in depth analysis, rather than off the cuff stuff (Message 228)
By RAZD
09-28-2009 9:26 PM
|
|
|
234
|
Re: Moderation may be needed to keep on the topic (Message 234)
|
Moderation may be needed to keep on the topic (Message 232)
By RAZD
09-28-2009 10:12 PM
|
|
|
235
|
Golden Rule? Well, not really. (Message 235)
|
At least an attempt at in depth analysis, rather than off the cuff stuff (Message 228)
By RAZD
09-28-2009 9:26 PM
|
|
|
236
|
Re: Moderation may be needed to keep on the topic (Message 236)
|
Re: Moderation may be needed to keep on the topic (Message 234)
|
|
|
237
|
Re: Special Pleading for the atheist position to excuse the absence of evidence? (Message 237)
|
Re: Special Pleading for the atheist position to excuse the absence of evidence? (Message 231)
By RAZD
09-28-2009 10:04 PM
|
|
|
238
|
Re: Agnosticism vs. pseudoskepticism (Message 238)
|
Agnosticism vs. pseudoskepticism (Message 212)
|
|
|
239
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 239)
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 227)
|
|
|
240
|
Re: Zen Deism == agnostic theism (Message 240)
|
Re: Zen Deism == agnostic theism (Message 214)
|
|
|
241
|
Re: Agnosticism vs. pseudoskepticism (Message 241)
|
Re: Agnosticism vs. pseudoskepticism (Message 215)
|
|
|
242
|
Re: Zen Deism == agnostic theism (Message 242)
|
Re: Zen Deism == agnostic theism (Message 216)
|
|
|
243
|
Re: Agnosticism vs. pseudoskepticism (Message 243)
|
Re: Agnosticism vs. pseudoskepticism (Message 220)
|
|
|
244
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 244)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 222)
|
|
|
245
|
Re: Zen Deism == agnostic theism (Message 245)
|
Re: Zen Deism == agnostic theism (Message 230)
By RAZD
09-28-2009 9:59 PM
|
|
|
246
|
Example Please - Shining Beacon of Negativity Required (Message 246)
|
Re: I'm missing something...I think (Message 244)
|
|
|
247
|
Theism is a negative position; against nature. (Message 247)
|
Moderation may be needed to keep on the topic (Message 232)
By RAZD
09-28-2009 10:12 PM
|
|
|
248
|
Re: Example Please - Shining Beacon of Negativity Required (Message 248)
|
Example Please - Shining Beacon of Negativity Required (Message 246)
|
|
|
249
|
Only 100%, not more, please!! (Message 249)
|
Re: Agnosticism vs. pseudoskepticism (Message 241)
|
|
|
250
|
Re: Only 100%, not more, please!! (Message 250)
|
Only 100%, not more, please!! (Message 249)
|
|
|
251
|
Re: Zen Deism == agnostic theism (Message 251)
|
Re: Zen Deism == agnostic theism (Message 213)
|
|
|
252
|
Re: Special Pleading for the atheist position to excuse the absence of evidence? (Message 252)
|
Re: Special Pleading for the atheist position to excuse the absence of evidence? (Message 237)
|
|
|
253
|
Re: Example Please - Shining Beacon of Negativity Required (Message 253)
|
Re: Example Please - Shining Beacon of Negativity Required (Message 248)
|
|
|
254
|
Re: Special Pleading for the atheist position to excuse the absence of evidence? (Message 254)
|
Re: Special Pleading for the atheist position to excuse the absence of evidence? (Message 237)
|
|
|
255
|
Your imagination is rational? (Message 255)
By Stile
09-29-2009 8:51 AM
|
Re: Only 100%, not more, please!! (Message 250)
|
|
|
256
|
Re: Agnosticism vs. pseudoskepticism (Message 256)
|
Re: Agnosticism vs. pseudoskepticism (Message 243)
|
|
|
257
|
Re: Zen Deism == agnostic theism (Message 257)
|
Re: Zen Deism == agnostic theism (Message 251)
|
|
|
258
|
Re: Example Please - Shining Beacon of Negativity Required (Message 258)
|
Re: Example Please - Shining Beacon of Negativity Required (Message 253)
|
|
|
259
|
Re: Your imagination is rational? (Message 259)
|
Your imagination is rational? (Message 255)
By Stile
09-29-2009 8:51 AM
|
|
|
260
|
Re: Only 100%, not more, please!! (Message 260)
|
Re: Only 100%, not more, please!! (Message 250)
|
|
|
261
|
Re: Agnosticism vs. pseudoskepticism (Message 261)
|
Re: Agnosticism vs. pseudoskepticism (Message 256)
|
|
|
262
|
Message 262
|
Agnosticism vs. pseudoskepticism (Message 212)
|
|
|
263
|
Re: Only 100%, not more, please!! (Message 263)
|
Re: Only 100%, not more, please!! (Message 260)
|
|
|
264
|
Message 264
|
Re: Zen Deism == agnostic theism (Message 217)
|
|
|
265
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 265)
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 227)
|
|
|
266
|
Message 266
|
Message 264
|
|
|
267
|
Re: Example Please - Shining Beacon of Negativity Required (Message 267)
|
Re: Example Please - Shining Beacon of Negativity Required (Message 258)
|
|
|
268
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 268)
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 265)
|
|
|
269
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 269)
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 268)
|
|
|
270
|
Re: Only 100%, not more, please!! (Message 270)
|
Re: Only 100%, not more, please!! (Message 263)
|
|
|
271
|
Re: Moderation may be needed to keep on the topic (Message 271)
|
Re: Moderation may be needed to keep on the topic (Message 236)
|
|
|
272
|
The negative hypothesis is not the rational default (Message 272)
|
Message 262
|
|
|
273
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 273)
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 269)
|
|
|
274
|
Message 274
|
Re: Moderation may be needed to keep on the topic (Message 271)
|
|
|
275
|
Re: The negative hypothesis is not the rational default (Message 275)
|
The negative hypothesis is not the rational default (Message 272)
|
|
|
276
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 276)
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 273)
|
|
|
277
|
Message 277
|
Message 274
|
|
|
278
|
Re: Only 100%, not more, please!! (Message 278)
|
Re: Only 100%, not more, please!! (Message 270)
|
|
|
279
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 279)
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 276)
|
|
|
280
|
Re: The negative hypothesis is not the rational default (Message 280)
|
Re: The negative hypothesis is not the rational default (Message 275)
|
|
|
281
|
Message 281
|
Message 277
|
|
|
282
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 282)
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 279)
|
|
|
283
|
Re: The negative hypothesis is not the rational default (Message 283)
|
Re: The negative hypothesis is not the rational default (Message 280)
|
|
|
284
|
Re: The negative hypothesis is not the rational default (Message 284)
|
Re: The negative hypothesis is not the rational default (Message 280)
|
|
|
285
|
Message 285
|
Message 281
|
|
|
286
|
Re: The negative hypothesis is not the rational default (Message 286)
|
Re: The negative hypothesis is not the rational default (Message 283)
|
|
|
287
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 287)
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 282)
|
|
|
288
|
Re: Only 100%, not more, please!! (Message 288)
|
Re: Only 100%, not more, please!! (Message 278)
|
|
|
289
|
Re: The negative hypothesis is not the rational default (Message 289)
|
Re: The negative hypothesis is not the rational default (Message 284)
|
|
|
290
|
Re: The negative hypothesis is not the rational default (Message 290)
|
Re: The negative hypothesis is not the rational default (Message 286)
|
|
|
291
|
Re: The negative hypothesis is not the rational default (Message 291)
|
Re: The negative hypothesis is not the rational default (Message 289)
|
|
|
292
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 292)
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 287)
|
|
|
293
|
Your inconsistency is rational? (Message 293)
By Stile
09-29-2009 12:29 PM
|
Re: Your imagination is rational? (Message 259)
|
|
|
294
|
Evidential Ballpark (Message 294)
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 269)
|
|
|
295
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 295)
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 292)
|
|
|
296
|
Re: Evidential Ballpark (Message 296)
|
Evidential Ballpark (Message 294)
|
|
|
297
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 297)
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 295)
|
|
|
298
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 298)
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 297)
|
|
|
299
|
Re: Evidential Ballpark (Message 299)
|
Re: Evidential Ballpark (Message 296)
|
|
|
300
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 300)
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 298)
|
|
|
301
|
Re: Only 100%, not more, please!! (Message 301)
|
Re: Only 100%, not more, please!! (Message 278)
|
|
|
302
|
Re: Evidential Ballpark (Message 302)
|
Re: Evidential Ballpark (Message 299)
|
|
|
303
|
Re: Evidential Ballpark (Message 303)
|
Re: Evidential Ballpark (Message 302)
|
|
|
304
|
Re: Evidential Ballpark (Message 304)
|
Re: Evidential Ballpark (Message 303)
|
|
|
305
|
Re: Evidential Ballpark (Message 305)
|
Re: Evidential Ballpark (Message 304)
|
|
|
306
|
Re: Agnosticism vs. pseudoskepticism (Message 306)
|
Re: Agnosticism vs. pseudoskepticism (Message 261)
|
|
|
307
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 307)
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 265)
|
|
|
308
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 308)
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 297)
|
|
|
309
|
What Do You Mean BY God? (Message 309)
|
Re: Agnosticism vs. pseudoskepticism (Message 306)
|
|
|
310
|
Re: What Do You Mean BY God? (Message 310)
|
What Do You Mean BY God? (Message 309)
|
|
|
311
|
A thought (Message 311)
By PaulK
09-29-2009 3:04 PM
|
|
|
|
312
|
Pointlessness (Message 312)
By Stile
09-29-2009 3:14 PM
|
Re: What Do You Mean BY God? (Message 310)
|
|
|
313
|
Re: Evidential Ballpark (Message 313)
|
Re: Evidential Ballpark (Message 305)
|
|
|
314
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 314)
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 308)
|
|
|
315
|
Re: Evidential Ballpark (Message 315)
|
Re: Evidential Ballpark (Message 313)
|
|
|
316
|
Are You? (Message 316)
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 314)
|
|
|
317
|
Re: Evidential Ballpark (Message 317)
|
Re: Evidential Ballpark (Message 315)
|
|
|
318
|
Re: Are You? (Message 318)
|
Are You? (Message 316)
|
|
|
319
|
Re: Are You? (Message 319)
|
Re: Are You? (Message 318)
|
|
|
320
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 320)
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 314)
|
|
|
321
|
Re: Evidential Ballpark (Message 321)
|
Re: Evidential Ballpark (Message 317)
|
|
|
322
|
Message 322
|
Message 266
|
|
|
323
|
Re: Are You? (Message 323)
|
Re: Are You? (Message 318)
|
|
|
324
|
Brief Clarification (Message 324)
|
Re: Evidential Ballpark (Message 317)
|
|
|
325
|
Re: Evidential Ballpark (Message 325)
|
Re: Evidential Ballpark (Message 321)
|
|
|
326
|
Re: relative scale, implies relative justification (Message 326)
By RAZD
09-29-2009 9:41 PM
|
Re: relative scale, implies relative justification (Message 194)
|
|
|
327
|
Re: wonderful - now let's revisit the topic (Message 327)
By RAZD
09-29-2009 9:51 PM
|
Re: wonderful - now let's revisit the topic (Message 202)
|
|
|
328
|
Re: How many 50%s in 100%? (Message 328)
By RAZD
09-29-2009 9:56 PM
|
Re: How many 50%s in 100%? (Message 208)
|
|
|
329
|
Negative hypothesis = burden (Message 329)
By RAZD
09-29-2009 10:00 PM
|
Message 209
|
|
|
330
|
Re: Golden Rule? Thanks. (Message 330)
By RAZD
09-29-2009 10:08 PM
|
Golden Rule? Well, not really. (Message 235)
|
|
|
331
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 331)
By RAZD
09-29-2009 10:13 PM
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 239)
|
|
|
332
|
Re: Theism is a negative position; against nature. (Message 332)
By RAZD
09-29-2009 10:24 PM
|
Theism is a negative position; against nature. (Message 247)
|
|
|
333
|
Re: Your imagination is rational? (Message 333)
By RAZD
09-29-2009 10:35 PM
|
Your imagination is rational? (Message 255)
By Stile
09-29-2009 8:51 AM
|
|
|
334
|
Re: Agnosticism vs. pseudoskepticism (Message 334)
By RAZD
09-29-2009 10:49 PM
|
Re: Agnosticism vs. pseudoskepticism (Message 261)
|
|
|
335
|
Exactly (Message 335)
By RAZD
09-29-2009 10:55 PM
|
Message 266
|
|
|
336
|
how can you have any atheists then (Message 336)
By RAZD
09-29-2009 11:35 PM
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 307)
|
|
|
337
|
a minor correction (Message 337)
By RAZD
09-29-2009 11:59 PM
|
Re: Evidential Ballpark (Message 325)
|
|
|
338
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 338)
By RAZD
09-30-2009 12:56 AM
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 227)
|
|
|
339
|
Message 339
|
Re: Special Pleading for the atheist position to excuse the absence of evidence? (Message 252)
|
|
|
340
|
Message 340
|
Re: Special Pleading for the atheist position to excuse the absence of evidence? (Message 254)
|
|
|
341
|
Message 341
|
Message 266
|
|
|
342
|
Message 342
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 269)
|
|
|
343
|
1 out of many equally probable possibilities (Message 343)
|
Re: relative scale, implies relative justification (Message 326)
By RAZD
09-29-2009 9:41 PM
|
|
|
344
|
Message 344
|
The negative hypothesis is not the rational default (Message 272)
|
|
|
345
|
Message 345
|
Re: The negative hypothesis is not the rational default (Message 280)
|
|
|
346
|
Message 346
|
|
|
|
347
|
Rationally Consistent (Message 347)
By Stile
09-30-2009 8:41 AM
|
Re: Your imagination is rational? (Message 333)
By RAZD
09-29-2009 10:35 PM
|
|
|
348
|
Absence of evidence is...... (Message 348)
|
Re: Theism is a negative position; against nature. (Message 332)
By RAZD
09-29-2009 10:24 PM
|
|
|
349
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 349)
|
Absence of evidence is...... (Message 348)
|
|
|
350
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 350)
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 349)
|
|
|
351
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 351)
By Stile
09-30-2009 10:07 AM
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 349)
|
|
|
352
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 352)
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 350)
|
|
|
353
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 353)
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 351)
By Stile
09-30-2009 10:07 AM
|
|
|
354
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 354)
By Stile
09-30-2009 11:06 AM
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 353)
|
|
|
355
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 355)
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 350)
|
|
|
356
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 356)
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 353)
|
|
|
357
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 357)
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 349)
|
|
|
358
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 358)
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 352)
|
|
|
359
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 359)
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 358)
|
|
|
360
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 360)
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 355)
|
|
|
361
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 361)
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 354)
By Stile
09-30-2009 11:06 AM
|
|
|
362
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 362)
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 359)
|
|
|
363
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 363)
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 356)
|
|
|
364
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 364)
By Stile
09-30-2009 3:05 PM
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 361)
|
|
|
365
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 365)
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 363)
|
|
|
366
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 366)
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 363)
|
|
|
367
|
Message 367
|
Re: Evidential Ballpark (Message 302)
|
|
|
368
|
Message 368
|
Re: Evidential Ballpark (Message 304)
|
|
|
369
|
Message 369
|
Message 368
|
|
|
370
|
If you want to get away with sniping... (Message 370)
|
Message 369
|
|
|
371
|
Message 371
|
Pointlessness (Message 312)
By Stile
09-29-2009 3:14 PM
|
|
|
372
|
Message 372
|
Re: wonderful - now let's revisit the topic (Message 327)
By RAZD
09-29-2009 9:51 PM
|
|
|
373
|
Message 373
|
Negative hypothesis = burden (Message 329)
By RAZD
09-29-2009 10:00 PM
|
|
|
374
|
Message 374
|
Re: Agnosticism vs. pseudoskepticism (Message 334)
By RAZD
09-29-2009 10:49 PM
|
|
|
375
|
Message 375
|
how can you have any atheists then (Message 336)
By RAZD
09-29-2009 11:35 PM
|
|
|
376
|
The "Null Hypothesis" Argument (Message 376)
By RAZD
09-30-2009 10:47 PM
|
|
|
|
377
|
Re: 1 out of many equally probable possibilities (Message 377)
By RAZD
09-30-2009 11:15 PM
|
1 out of many equally probable possibilities (Message 343)
|
|
|
378
|
Re: The "Null Hypothesis" Argument (Message 378)
|
The "Null Hypothesis" Argument (Message 376)
By RAZD
09-30-2009 10:47 PM
|
|
|
379
|
Re: Rationally Consistent (Message 379)
By RAZD
09-30-2009 11:49 PM
|
Rationally Consistent (Message 347)
By Stile
09-30-2009 8:41 AM
|
|
|
380
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 380)
By RAZD
10-01-2009 12:14 AM
|
Absence of evidence is...... (Message 348)
|
|
|
381
|
Absence of evidence as...err....oxymoronic evidence. (Message 381)
|
Re: Absence of evidence is...... (Message 380)
By RAZD
10-01-2009 12:14 AM
|
|
|
382
|
Message 382
|
The "Null Hypothesis" Argument (Message 376)
By RAZD
09-30-2009 10:47 PM
|
|
|
383
|
Null and void (Message 383)
|
Message 345
|
|
|
384
|
Message 384
|
Re: The "Null Hypothesis" Argument (Message 378)
|
|
|
385
|
Re: Agnosticism vs. pseudoskepticism (Message 385)
|
Re: Agnosticism vs. pseudoskepticism (Message 306)
|
|
|
386
|
Re: Only 100%, not more, please!! (Message 386)
|
Re: Only 100%, not more, please!! (Message 301)
|
|
|
387
|
Fitting theistic considerations into methodological naturalism (Message 387)
|
Partial absence of evidence vs total absense of evidence (Message 76)
|
|
|
388
|
Message 388
|
Null and void (Message 383)
|
|
|
389
|
What inconsistency? (Message 389)
|
Your inconsistency is rational? (Message 293)
By Stile
09-29-2009 12:29 PM
|
|
|
390
|
Re: The negative hypothesis is not the rational default (Message 390)
|
Re: The negative hypothesis is not the rational default (Message 291)
|
|
|
391
|
Re: Only 100%, not more, please!! (Message 391)
|
Re: Only 100%, not more, please!! (Message 288)
|
|
|
392
|
Re: Only 100%, not more, please!! (Message 392)
|
Re: Only 100%, not more, please!! (Message 386)
|
|
|
393
|
Re: 1 out of many equally probable possibilities (Message 393)
|
Re: 1 out of many equally probable possibilities (Message 377)
By RAZD
09-30-2009 11:15 PM
|
|
|
394
|
Re: The negative hypothesis is not the rational default (Message 394)
|
Re: The negative hypothesis is not the rational default (Message 390)
|
|
|
395
|
"Unknowable, outside our universe......"? (Message 395)
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 331)
By RAZD
09-29-2009 10:13 PM
|
|
|
396
|
X is definitely not more likely than y (Message 396)
|
Re: Only 100%, not more, please!! (Message 391)
|
|
|
397
|
"Silly" Criteria (Message 397)
|
Re: The negative hypothesis is not the rational default (Message 390)
|
|
|
398
|
Null and void part 2 (Message 398)
|
Message 388
|
|
|
399
|
Likelihood is still belief (Message 399)
|
Re: Only 100%, not more, please!! (Message 392)
|
|
|
400
|
Natural Vs Supernatural Answers (Message 400)
|
Likelihood is still belief (Message 399)
|
|
|
401
|
Re: The negative hypothesis is not the rational default (Message 401)
|
Re: The negative hypothesis is not the rational default (Message 394)
|
|
|
402
|
Re: X is definitely not more likely than y (Message 402)
|
X is definitely not more likely than y (Message 396)
|
|
|
403
|
This inconsistency. (Message 403)
By Stile
10-01-2009 8:25 AM
|
What inconsistency? (Message 389)
|
|
|
404
|
This is misunderstanding. (Message 404)
|
This inconsistency. (Message 403)
By Stile
10-01-2009 8:25 AM
|
|
|
405
|
Re: X is definitely not more likely than y (Message 405)
|
Re: X is definitely not more likely than y (Message 402)
|
|
|
406
|
Re: This is misunderstanding. (Message 406)
By Stile
10-01-2009 10:56 AM
|
This is misunderstanding. (Message 404)
|
|
|
407
|
This is still misunderstanding. (Message 407)
|
Re: This is misunderstanding. (Message 406)
By Stile
10-01-2009 10:56 AM
|
|
|
408
|
Re: X is definitely not more likely than y (Message 408)
|
Re: X is definitely not more likely than y (Message 405)
|
|
|
409
|
Re: Fitting theistic considerations into methodological naturalism (Message 409)
|
Fitting theistic considerations into methodological naturalism (Message 387)
|
|
|
410
|
Re: X is definitely not more likely than y (Message 410)
|
Re: X is definitely not more likely than y (Message 408)
|
|
|
411
|
Message 411
|
Message 339
|
|
|
412
|
your god, logically (Message 412)
|
Message 411
|
|
|
413
|
Re: your god, logically (Message 413)
|
your god, logically (Message 412)
|
|
|
414
|
Re: your god, logically (Message 414)
|
Re: your god, logically (Message 413)
|
|
|
415
|
Re: your god, logically (Message 415)
|
Re: your god, logically (Message 414)
|
|
|
416
|
Oh, for the good old days! (Message 416)
|
Likelihood is still belief (Message 399)
|
|
|
417
|
Re: This is still misunderstanding. (Message 417)
|
This is still misunderstanding. (Message 407)
|
|
|
418
|
Re: X is definitely not more likely than y (Message 418)
|
Re: X is definitely not more likely than y (Message 410)
|
|
|
419
|
Oh for the repetitious arguments to cease! (Message 419)
|
Oh, for the good old days! (Message 416)
|
|
|
420
|
"Somethingsupernaturaldidit" (Message 420)
|
Re: The negative hypothesis is not the rational default (Message 401)
|
|
|
421
|
improbable things can be right, its just not likely (Message 421)
|
Re: X is definitely not more likely than y (Message 418)
|
|
|
422
|
Re: how can you have any atheists then (Message 422)
|
how can you have any atheists then (Message 336)
By RAZD
09-29-2009 11:35 PM
|
|
|
423
|
Re: your god, logically (Message 423)
|
Re: your god, logically (Message 415)
|
|
|
424
|
Re: Agnosticism vs. pseudoskepticism (Message 424)
|
Re: Agnosticism vs. pseudoskepticism (Message 385)
|
|
|
425
|
Real pseudo-skeptism (Message 425)
|
Oh for the repetitious arguments to cease! (Message 419)
|
|
|
426
|
Re: Re: finally, a description (Message 426)
|
Re: finally, a description (Message 338)
By RAZD
09-30-2009 12:56 AM
|
|
|
427
|
Negative position, burden of evidence, and true skepticism with reasonable doubts (Message 427)
By RAZD
10-01-2009 7:46 PM
|
Real pseudo-skeptism (Message 425)
|
|
|
428
|
Yawn...The Denial Goes On. (Message 428)
|
Negative position, burden of evidence, and true skepticism with reasonable doubts (Message 427)
By RAZD
10-01-2009 7:46 PM
|
|
|
429
|
Lots of bark, but no bite. (Message 429)
By RAZD
10-01-2009 8:34 PM
|
Yawn...The Denial Goes On. (Message 428)
|
|
|
430
|
Re: 1 out of many equally probable possibilities (Message 430)
By RAZD
10-01-2009 9:22 PM
|
Re: 1 out of many equally probable possibilities (Message 393)
|
|
|
431
|
Re: Yawn...The Denial Goes On. (Message 431)
|
Yawn...The Denial Goes On. (Message 428)
|
|
|
432
|
One on one debate, RAZD? (Message 432)
|
Negative position, burden of evidence, and true skepticism with reasonable doubts (Message 427)
By RAZD
10-01-2009 7:46 PM
|
|
|
433
|
Re: This is still misunderstanding. (Message 433)
|
Re: This is still misunderstanding. (Message 417)
|
|
|
434
|
Re: "Somethingsupernaturaldidit" is not the position (Message 434)
|
"Somethingsupernaturaldidit" (Message 420)
|
|
|
435
|
Message 435
|
Null and void part 2 (Message 398)
|
|
|
436
|
The Ultimate God of The Ultimate Gap - Again. (Message 436)
|
Lots of bark, but no bite. (Message 429)
By RAZD
10-01-2009 8:34 PM
|
|
|
437
|
Message 437
|
Message 411
|
|
|
438
|
Understanding the confusion (Message 438)
By Stile
10-02-2009 8:34 AM
|
This is still misunderstanding. (Message 407)
|
|
|
439
|
Cartesian solipsism (Message 439)
|
Message 435
|
|
|
440
|
Re: 1 out of many equally probable possibilities (Message 440)
|
Re: 1 out of many equally probable possibilities (Message 430)
By RAZD
10-01-2009 9:22 PM
|
|
|
441
|
Re: This is still misunderstanding. (Message 441)
|
Re: This is still misunderstanding. (Message 433)
|
|
|
442
|
The Circularity Of Citing Belief As Evidence Upon Which To Believe (Message 442)
|
Re: "Somethingsupernaturaldidit" is not the position (Message 434)
|
|
|
443
|
Re: Yawn...The Denial Goes On. (Message 443)
|
Re: Yawn...The Denial Goes On. (Message 431)
|
|
|
444
|
"I don't know" - Word Games (Message 444)
|
Cartesian solipsism (Message 439)
|
|
|
445
|
Pseudo-Probabilities are not the issue. (Message 445)
By RAZD
10-02-2009 8:28 PM
|
One on one debate, RAZD? (Message 432)
|
|
|
446
|
The probability of finding a leaf with chloryphyll is virtually 100% (Message 446)
By RAZD
10-02-2009 9:48 PM
|
Re: 1 out of many equally probable possibilities (Message 440)
|
|
|
447
|
Re: The probability of finding a leaf with chloryphyll is virtually 100% (Message 447)
|
The probability of finding a leaf with chloryphyll is virtually 100% (Message 446)
By RAZD
10-02-2009 9:48 PM
|
|
|
448
|
swings and roundabouts (Message 448)
|
The probability of finding a leaf with chloryphyll is virtually 100% (Message 446)
By RAZD
10-02-2009 9:48 PM
|
|
|
449
|
assertions and supporting evidence or logic (Message 449)
By RAZD
10-03-2009 10:21 AM
|
swings and roundabouts (Message 448)
|
|
|
450
|
Re: assertions and supporting evidence or logic (Message 450)
|
assertions and supporting evidence or logic (Message 449)
By RAZD
10-03-2009 10:21 AM
|
|
|
451
|
Re: assertions and supporting evidence or logic (Message 451)
By RAZD
10-03-2009 4:17 PM
|
Re: assertions and supporting evidence or logic (Message 450)
|
|
|
452
|
steadily moving forwards (Message 452)
|
Re: assertions and supporting evidence or logic (Message 451)
By RAZD
10-03-2009 4:17 PM
|
|
|
453
|
Facing reality, atheism is a belief (Message 453)
|
Re: assertions and supporting evidence or logic (Message 451)
By RAZD
10-03-2009 4:17 PM
|
|
|
454
|
Re: Facing reality, atheism is a belief (Message 454)
|
Facing reality, atheism is a belief (Message 453)
|
|
|
455
|
Re: Facing reality, atheism is a belief (Message 455)
|
Re: Facing reality, atheism is a belief (Message 454)
|
|
|
456
|
Re: Facing reality, atheism is a belief (Message 456)
|
Re: Facing reality, atheism is a belief (Message 455)
|
|
|
457
|
probability problems (Message 457)
By RAZD
10-04-2009 2:50 PM
|
steadily moving forwards (Message 452)
|
|
|
458
|
Re: Facing reality, atheism is a belief (Message 458)
By RAZD
10-04-2009 2:59 PM
|
Facing reality, atheism is a belief (Message 453)
|
|
|
459
|
Back to the OP (Message 459)
|
Re: Facing reality, atheism is a belief (Message 458)
By RAZD
10-04-2009 2:59 PM
|
|
|
460
|
Re: Back to the OP (Message 460)
|
Back to the OP (Message 459)
|
|
|
461
|
Re: probability problems (Message 461)
|
probability problems (Message 457)
By RAZD
10-04-2009 2:50 PM
|
|
|
462
|
Re: probability problems (Message 462)
By RAZD
10-04-2009 7:58 PM
|
Re: probability problems (Message 461)
|
|
|
463
|
Re: Back to the OP (Message 463)
By RAZD
10-04-2009 8:05 PM
|
Re: Back to the OP (Message 460)
|
|
|
464
|
Re: Back to the OP (Message 464)
|
Re: Back to the OP (Message 463)
By RAZD
10-04-2009 8:05 PM
|
|
|
465
|
Re: probability problems (Message 465)
|
Re: probability problems (Message 462)
By RAZD
10-04-2009 7:58 PM
|
|
|
466
|
Re: Back to the OP (Message 466)
By RAZD
10-04-2009 9:20 PM
|
Re: Back to the OP (Message 464)
|
|
|
467
|
Re: Back to the OP (Message 467)
|
Re: Back to the OP (Message 466)
By RAZD
10-04-2009 9:20 PM
|
|
|
468
|
Re: Pseudo-Probabilities are not the issue. (Message 468)
|
Pseudo-Probabilities are not the issue. (Message 445)
By RAZD
10-02-2009 8:28 PM
|
|
|
469
|
Re: probability problems (Message 469)
|
Re: probability problems (Message 465)
|
|
|
470
|
Re: probability problems (Message 470)
|
Re: probability problems (Message 469)
|
|
|
471
|
Circularity and Evasion (Message 471)
|
Re: probability problems (Message 469)
|
|
|
472
|
Re: Pseudo-Probabilities are not the issue. (Message 472)
|
Pseudo-Probabilities are not the issue. (Message 445)
By RAZD
10-02-2009 8:28 PM
|
|
|
473
|
Re: Back to the OP (Message 473)
By RAZD
10-05-2009 9:09 PM
|
Re: Back to the OP (Message 467)
|
|
|
474
|
Message 474
|
Cartesian solipsism (Message 439)
|
|
|
475
|
Message 475
|
Facing reality, atheism is a belief (Message 453)
|
|
|
476
|
Message 476
|
Re: Back to the OP (Message 460)
|
|
|
477
|
Message 477
|
Message 474
|
|
|
478
|
Re: Pseudo-Probabilities are not the issue. (Message 478)
By RAZD
10-05-2009 10:08 PM
|
Re: Pseudo-Probabilities are not the issue. (Message 468)
|
|
|
479
|
Message 479
|
Message 476
|
|
|
480
|
x = y + b clarification (Message 480)
By RAZD
10-05-2009 10:45 PM
|
Re: probability problems (Message 469)
|
|
|
481
|
Message 481
|
Message 477
|
|
|
482
|
Message 482
|
Message 479
|
|
|
483
|
Re: Back to the OP (Message 483)
|
Re: Back to the OP (Message 473)
By RAZD
10-05-2009 9:09 PM
|
|
|
484
|
Message 484
|
Message 481
|
|
|
485
|
Message 485
|
Message 482
|
|
|
486
|
Message 486
|
Message 485
|
|
|
487
|
Dawkins's scale - a needed clarification (Message 487)
|
Re: Pseudo-Probabilities are not the issue. (Message 478)
By RAZD
10-05-2009 10:08 PM
|
|
|
488
|
Denial (Message 488)
|
x = y + b clarification (Message 480)
By RAZD
10-05-2009 10:45 PM
|
|
|
489
|
Re: Pseudo-Probabilities are not the issue. (Message 489)
|
Re: Pseudo-Probabilities are not the issue. (Message 478)
By RAZD
10-05-2009 10:08 PM
|
|
|
490
|
Re: x = y + b clarification (Message 490)
|
x = y + b clarification (Message 480)
By RAZD
10-05-2009 10:45 PM
|
|
|
491
|
Message 491
|
Message 486
|
|
|
492
|
Message 492
|
Message 491
|
|
|
493
|
Re: Denial ... of non-existent evidence? (488 posts, 69 Straggler, still no evidence) (Message 493)
By RAZD
10-06-2009 3:16 PM
|
Denial (Message 488)
|
|
|
494
|
Message 494
|
Message 492
|
|
|
495
|
Re: probability problems continue (Message 495)
By RAZD
10-06-2009 4:07 PM
|
Re: probability problems (Message 465)
|
|
|
496
|
Any evidence against the proposition "gods are unlikely"? (Message 496)
|
Re: Pseudo-Probabilities are not the issue. (Message 478)
By RAZD
10-05-2009 10:08 PM
|
|
|
497
|
More misrepresentation -- a continuing consistent pattern (Message 497)
By RAZD
10-06-2009 4:31 PM
|
Re: Pseudo-Probabilities are not the issue. (Message 472)
|
|
|
498
|
Other problems. (Message 498)
By RAZD
10-06-2009 4:42 PM
|
Message 481
|
|
|
499
|
Re: Back to the OP (Message 499)
By RAZD
10-06-2009 4:46 PM
|
Re: Back to the OP (Message 483)
|
|
|
500
|
Message 500
|
Message 494
|
|
|
501
|
Re: Back to the OP (Message 501)
|
Re: Back to the OP (Message 499)
By RAZD
10-06-2009 4:46 PM
|
|
|
502
|
Denial II - The Revenge of The Deist (Message 502)
|
Re: Denial ... of non-existent evidence? (488 posts, 69 Straggler, still no evidence) (Message 493)
By RAZD
10-06-2009 3:16 PM
|
|
|
503
|
Re: Dawkins's scale - a needed clarification (Message 503)
By RAZD
10-06-2009 6:06 PM
|
Dawkins's scale - a needed clarification (Message 487)
|
|
|
504
|
Message 504
|
Message 500
|
|
|
505
|
Re: Denial II - The Revenge of The Deist (Message 505)
By RAZD
10-06-2009 6:30 PM
|
Denial II - The Revenge of The Deist (Message 502)
|
|
|
506
|
Re: Denial II - The Revenge of The Deist (Message 506)
|
Denial II - The Revenge of The Deist (Message 502)
|
|
|
507
|
Re: Back to the OP (Message 507)
By RAZD
10-06-2009 6:46 PM
|
Re: Back to the OP (Message 501)
|
|
|
508
|
Re: Back to the OP (Message 508)
|
Re: Back to the OP (Message 507)
By RAZD
10-06-2009 6:46 PM
|
|
|
509
|
Re: Dawkins's scale - a needed clarification (Message 509)
|
Re: Dawkins's scale - a needed clarification (Message 503)
By RAZD
10-06-2009 6:06 PM
|
|
|
510
|
Any evidence FOR the proposition "gods are unlikely"? ANY AT ALL? (Message 510)
By RAZD
10-06-2009 8:54 PM
|
Any evidence against the proposition "gods are unlikely"? (Message 496)
|
|
|
511
|
Re: probability problems continue (Message 511)
|
Re: probability problems continue (Message 495)
By RAZD
10-06-2009 4:07 PM
|
|
|
512
|
For all pratical purposes (Message 512)
|
|
|
|
513
|
Re: For all pratical purposes (Message 513)
By RAZD
10-06-2009 9:15 PM
|
For all pratical purposes (Message 512)
|
|
|
514
|
Re: probability problems continue (Message 514)
By RAZD
10-06-2009 9:40 PM
|
Re: probability problems continue (Message 511)
|
|
|
515
|
Re: probability problems continue (Message 515)
|
Re: probability problems continue (Message 514)
By RAZD
10-06-2009 9:40 PM
|
|
|
516
|
Re: For all practical purposes (Message 516)
|
Re: For all pratical purposes (Message 513)
By RAZD
10-06-2009 9:15 PM
|
|
|
517
|
Re: probability problems continue (Message 517)
|
Re: probability problems continue (Message 515)
|
|
|
518
|
Re: For all practical purposes (Message 518)
|
Re: For all practical purposes (Message 516)
|
|
|
519
|
Message 519
|
Message 504
|
|
|
520
|
Any evidence FOR the proposition "fairies are unlikely"? ANY AT ALL? (Message 520)
|
Any evidence FOR the proposition "gods are unlikely"? ANY AT ALL? (Message 510)
By RAZD
10-06-2009 8:54 PM
|
|
|
521
|
Re: Denial II - The Revenge of The Deist (Message 521)
|
Re: Denial II - The Revenge of The Deist (Message 505)
By RAZD
10-06-2009 6:30 PM
|
|
|
522
|
Evidence that unevidenced concepts are highly unlikely (Message 522)
By Stile
10-07-2009 9:55 AM
|
Re: Rationally Consistent (Message 379)
By RAZD
09-30-2009 11:49 PM
|
|
|
523
|
Message 523
|
Message 519
|
|
|
524
|
Message 524
|
Message 523
|
|
|
525
|
Message 525
|
Message 524
|
|
|
526
|
Message 526
|
Message 523
|
|
|
527
|
Re: For all practical purposes (Message 527)
By RAZD
10-07-2009 8:38 PM
|
Re: For all practical purposes (Message 516)
|
|
|
528
|
Message 528
|
Message 526
|
|
|
529
|
Re: For all practical purposes (Message 529)
|
Re: For all practical purposes (Message 527)
By RAZD
10-07-2009 8:38 PM
|
|
|
530
|
Message 530
|
Message 491
|
|
|
531
|
Message 531
|
Other problems. (Message 498)
By RAZD
10-06-2009 4:42 PM
|
|
|
532
|
Omphalism and Other Matters (Message 532)
|
Message 525
|
|
|
533
|
My Coelacanth And Other Animals (Message 533)
|
Other problems. (Message 498)
By RAZD
10-06-2009 4:42 PM
|
|
|
534
|
Message 534
|
Message 525
|
|
|
535
|
omphallic issues (Message 535)
By RAZD
10-08-2009 6:09 PM
|
Re: probability problems continue (Message 515)
|
|
|
536
|
Re: Any evidence FOR the proposition "fairies are unlikely"? ANY AT ALL? (Message 536)
By RAZD
10-08-2009 6:13 PM
|
Any evidence FOR the proposition "fairies are unlikely"? ANY AT ALL? (Message 520)
|
|
|
537
|
Re: Denial II - The Revenge of The Deist (Message 537)
By RAZD
10-08-2009 6:18 PM
|
Re: Denial II - The Revenge of The Deist (Message 521)
|
|
|
538
|
Re: Evidence that unevidenced concepts are highly unlikely (Message 538)
By RAZD
10-08-2009 6:24 PM
|
Evidence that unevidenced concepts are highly unlikely (Message 522)
By Stile
10-07-2009 9:55 AM
|
|
|
539
|
Message 539
By RAZD
10-08-2009 6:27 PM
|
Message 531
|
|
|
540
|
Message 540
By RAZD
10-08-2009 6:34 PM
|
Message 525
|
|
|
541
|
Message 541
By RAZD
10-08-2009 6:35 PM
|
Message 526
|
|
|
542
|
Re: For all pratical purposes (Message 542)
By RAZD
10-08-2009 6:36 PM
|
For all pratical purposes (Message 512)
|
|
|
543
|
Re: probability problems (Message 543)
By RAZD
10-08-2009 6:39 PM
|
Re: probability problems (Message 469)
|
|
|
544
|
Re: The "Null Hypothesis" Argument (Message 544)
By RAZD
10-08-2009 6:39 PM
|
Re: The "Null Hypothesis" Argument (Message 378)
|
|
|
545
|
Summary Time (and the livin is easy) (Message 545)
By RAZD
10-08-2009 6:53 PM
|
Thread Copied from Proposed New Topics Forum (Message 2)
|
|
|
546
|
The O.P. (Message 546)
|
Re: Any evidence FOR the proposition "fairies are unlikely"? ANY AT ALL? (Message 536)
By RAZD
10-08-2009 6:13 PM
|
|
|
547
|
Summation (Message 547)
|
Message 541
By RAZD
10-08-2009 6:35 PM
|
|
|
548
|
The Ignominy of Agnosticism - Tuck Your Shirt In!! (Message 548)
|
Re: Denial II - The Revenge of The Deist (Message 537)
By RAZD
10-08-2009 6:18 PM
|
|
|
549
|
Re: probability problems (Message 549)
|
Re: probability problems (Message 543)
By RAZD
10-08-2009 6:39 PM
|
|
|
550
|
Pseudoepistemology and the brain's tendency to create meaning (Message 550)
|
|
|
|
551
|
Summary, and problems in the O.P. (Message 551)
|
Summary Time (and the livin is easy) (Message 545)
By RAZD
10-08-2009 6:53 PM
|
|
|
552
|
Short 'cause I'm Lazy (Message 552)
By Stile
10-09-2009 9:52 AM
|
Re: Evidence that unevidenced concepts are highly unlikely (Message 538)
By RAZD
10-08-2009 6:24 PM
|
|
|
553
|
Message 553
|
Message 539
By RAZD
10-08-2009 6:27 PM
|
|
|
554
|
Past Predictions And The Wider Debate (Message 554)
|
Re: Denial II - The Revenge of The Deist (Message 537)
By RAZD
10-08-2009 6:18 PM
|
|
|
555
|
Past Predictions And The Wider Debate (Message 555)
|
Re: Denial II - The Revenge of The Deist (Message 537)
By RAZD
10-08-2009 6:18 PM
|
|
|
556
|
Hidden (Message 556)
|
|
|
|
557
|
Hidden (Message 557)
|
Hidden (Message 556)
|
|
|
558
|
Hidden (Message 558)
|
Hidden (Message 557)
|
|
|
559
|
Hidden (Message 559)
|
Hidden (Message 557)
|
|
|
560
|
Hidden (Message 560)
|
Hidden (Message 559)
|
|
|
561
|
Closing time (Message 561)
|
|
|
|
562
|
Summary Finale Finally (yeah, it's long ...) (Message 562)
By RAZD
10-21-2009 9:12 PM
|
|
|