|
|
Msg
Num
|
Message Details
|
Reply To
|
Replies
|
|
1
|
Message 1
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
How about a more generalized topic? (Message 2)
|
Message 1
|
|
|
|
3
|
Re: How about a more generalized topic? (Message 3)
|
How about a more generalized topic? (Message 2)
|
|
|
|
4
|
^BUMP^ for Adminnemooseus (Message 4)
By Admin
10-30-2009 6:15 AM |
|
|
|
|
5
|
Promoted with considerable reservations (Message 5)
|
Re: How about a more generalized topic? (Message 3)
|
|
|
|
6
|
Thread Copied from Proposed New Topics Forum (Message 6)
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
Rejecting deities--but which ones? (Message 7)
|
Message 1
|
|
|
|
8
|
Message 8
By iano
11-02-2009 10:24 PM |
Message 1
|
|
|
|
9
|
Re: Rejecting deities--but which ones? (Message 9)
|
Rejecting deities--but which ones? (Message 7)
|
|
|
|
10
|
Message 10
|
Message 8
By iano
11-02-2009 10:24 PM |
|
|
|
11
|
Message 11
By Peg
11-03-2009 1:13 AM |
Message 10
|
|
|
|
12
|
Message 12
|
Message 11
By Peg
11-03-2009 1:13 AM |
|
|
|
13
|
Message 13
|
Message 11
By Peg
11-03-2009 1:13 AM |
|
|
|
14
|
The absence of evidence we'd expect to find (Message 14)
|
Message 1
|
|
|
|
15
|
Message 15
By Peg
11-03-2009 4:38 AM |
Message 13
|
|
|
|
16
|
Message 16
By Larni
11-03-2009 5:47 AM |
Message 8
By iano
11-02-2009 10:24 PM |
|
|
|
17
|
Message 17
By iano
11-03-2009 6:22 AM |
Message 16
By Larni
11-03-2009 5:47 AM |
|
|
|
18
|
Re: The absence of evidence we'd expect to find (Message 18)
|
The absence of evidence we'd expect to find (Message 14)
|
|
|
|
19
|
Message 19
|
Message 1
|
|
|
|
20
|
Re: The absence of evidence we'd expect to find (Message 20)
|
The absence of evidence we'd expect to find (Message 14)
|
|
|
|
21
|
Message 21
|
Message 1
|
|
|
|
22
|
Evidence? (Message 22)
|
Message 21
|
|
|
|
23
|
Missing component of the question (Message 23)
|
Message 1
|
|
|
|
24
|
Message 24
|
Message 19
|
|
|
|
25
|
Message 25
|
Message 24
|
|
|
|
26
|
Message 26
|
Message 25
|
|
|
|
27
|
Re: Missing component of the question (Message 27)
|
Missing component of the question (Message 23)
|
|
|
|
28
|
Re: Missing component of the question (Message 28)
|
Re: Missing component of the question (Message 27)
|
|
|
|
29
|
Re: Missing component of the question (Message 29)
|
Re: Missing component of the question (Message 28)
|
|
|
|
30
|
Re: Missing component of the question (Message 30)
|
Re: Missing component of the question (Message 29)
|
|
|
|
31
|
Re: Missing component of the question (Message 31)
|
Re: Missing component of the question (Message 30)
|
|
|
|
32
|
Re: Missing component of the question (Message 32)
|
Re: Missing component of the question (Message 31)
|
|
|
|
33
|
Re: Missing component of the question (Message 33)
|
Re: Missing component of the question (Message 31)
|
|
|
|
34
|
Re: Missing component of the question (Message 34)
|
Re: Missing component of the question (Message 33)
|
|
|
|
35
|
Re: Missing component of the question (Message 35)
|
Re: Missing component of the question (Message 32)
|
|
|
|
36
|
Re: Missing component of the question (Message 36)
|
Re: Missing component of the question (Message 35)
|
|
|
|
37
|
Re: Evidence? (Message 37)
|
Evidence? (Message 22)
|
|
|
|
38
|
Re: Evidence? (Message 38)
|
Evidence? (Message 22)
|
|
|
|
39
|
Re: Missing component of the question (Message 39)
|
Re: Missing component of the question (Message 35)
|
|
|
|
40
|
Message 40
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
Message 41
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
Dammit (Message 42)
|
Message 40
|
|
|
|
43
|
Message 43
|
Message 41
|
|
|
|
44
|
Re: Dammit (Message 44)
|
Dammit (Message 42)
|
|
|
|
45
|
Message 45
|
Message 43
|
|
|
|
46
|
Message 46
|
Message 45
|
|
|
|
47
|
Message 47
|
Message 45
|
|
|
|
48
|
Message 48
|
Message 46
|
|
|
|
49
|
Of Pens and Gods (Message 49)
By Stile
11-06-2009 1:55 PM |
Message 45
|
|
|
|
50
|
Lightning Bolts and Logic (Message 50)
|
Message 48
|
|
|
|
51
|
Message 51
|
Message 47
|
|
|
|
52
|
Message 52
|
Message 51
|
|
|
|
53
|
Re: Of Pens and Gods (Message 53)
|
Of Pens and Gods (Message 49)
By Stile
11-06-2009 1:55 PM |
|
|
|
54
|
Message 54
By RAZD
11-06-2009 8:14 PM |
Message 52
|
|
|
|
55
|
Message 55
|
Message 54
By RAZD
11-06-2009 8:14 PM |
|
|
|
56
|
Re: Lightning Bolts and Logic (Message 56)
|
Lightning Bolts and Logic (Message 50)
|
|
|
|
57
|
Re: Lightning Bolts and Logic (Message 57)
By Peg
11-07-2009 1:24 AM |
Re: Lightning Bolts and Logic (Message 56)
|
|
|
|
58
|
Re: Lightning Bolts and Logic (Message 58)
|
Re: Lightning Bolts and Logic (Message 56)
|
|
|
|
59
|
Re: Lightning Bolts and Logic (Message 59)
|
Re: Lightning Bolts and Logic (Message 57)
By Peg
11-07-2009 1:24 AM |
|
|
|
60
|
Message 60
By RAZD
11-07-2009 10:45 AM |
Message 55
|
|
|
|
61
|
Re: Lightning Bolts and Logic (Message 61)
By RAZD
11-07-2009 11:05 AM |
Re: Lightning Bolts and Logic (Message 56)
|
|
|
|
62
|
Message 62
|
Message 60
By RAZD
11-07-2009 10:45 AM |
|
|
|
63
|
Message 63
By RAZD
11-07-2009 8:08 PM |
Message 62
|
|
|
|
64
|
Order must be governed (Message 64)
By Peg
11-07-2009 9:52 PM |
Re: Lightning Bolts and Logic (Message 59)
|
|
|
|
65
|
Re: Order must be governed (Message 65)
|
Order must be governed (Message 64)
By Peg
11-07-2009 9:52 PM |
|
|
|
66
|
Order must be governed, and if true so is deception (Message 66)
|
Order must be governed (Message 64)
By Peg
11-07-2009 9:52 PM |
|
|
|
67
|
Re: Presence VS Absence Of Evidence (Message 67)
|
Message 1
|
|
|
|
68
|
Re: Order must be governed (Message 68)
By Peg
11-08-2009 1:27 AM |
Re: Order must be governed (Message 65)
|
|
|
|
69
|
Peg, please obey the rules. (Message 69)
|
Re: Order must be governed (Message 68)
By Peg
11-08-2009 1:27 AM |
|
|
|
70
|
Re: Peg, please obey the rules. (Message 70)
By Peg
11-08-2009 6:35 AM |
Peg, please obey the rules. (Message 69)
|
|
|
|
71
|
Well done (Message 71)
|
Re: Peg, please obey the rules. (Message 70)
By Peg
11-08-2009 6:35 AM |
|
|
|
72
|
Re: Well done (Message 72)
By Peg
11-08-2009 7:17 AM |
Well done (Message 71)
|
|
|
|
73
|
Re: Well done (Message 73)
|
Re: Well done (Message 72)
By Peg
11-08-2009 7:17 AM |
|
|
|
74
|
Re: Well done (Message 74)
|
Re: Well done (Message 72)
By Peg
11-08-2009 7:17 AM |
|
|
|
75
|
Message 75
|
Message 52
|
|
|
|
76
|
Unlikely? (Message 76)
|
Message 75
|
|
|
|
77
|
Re: Lightning Bolts and Logic (Message 77)
|
Re: Lightning Bolts and Logic (Message 57)
By Peg
11-07-2009 1:24 AM |
|
|
|
78
|
Message 78
|
Message 63
By RAZD
11-07-2009 8:08 PM |
|
|
|
79
|
Re: Unlikely? (Message 79)
|
Unlikely? (Message 76)
|
|
|
|
80
|
Message 80
By RAZD
11-08-2009 3:58 PM |
Message 78
|
|
|
|
81
|
Re: Lightning Bolts and Logic (Message 81)
|
Re: Lightning Bolts and Logic (Message 58)
|
|
|
|
82
|
Message 82
|
Message 80
By RAZD
11-08-2009 3:58 PM |
|
|
|
83
|
lack of evidence is evidence of the lack of evidence. (Message 83)
By RAZD
11-08-2009 7:45 PM |
Message 82
|
|
|
|
84
|
Re: Lightning Bolts and Logic (Message 84)
By RAZD
11-08-2009 7:51 PM |
Re: Lightning Bolts and Logic (Message 81)
|
|
|
|
85
|
Re: lack of evidence is evidence of the lack of evidence. (Message 85)
|
lack of evidence is evidence of the lack of evidence. (Message 83)
By RAZD
11-08-2009 7:45 PM |
|
|
|
86
|
Re: Lightning Bolts and Logic (Message 86)
|
Re: Lightning Bolts and Logic (Message 81)
|
|
|
|
87
|
Re: lack of evidence is evidence of the lack of evidence. (Message 87)
By RAZD
11-08-2009 9:37 PM |
Re: lack of evidence is evidence of the lack of evidence. (Message 85)
|
|
|
|
88
|
Message 88
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
Re: Well done (Message 89)
By Peg
11-09-2009 4:24 AM |
Re: Well done (Message 73)
|
|
|
|
90
|
Re: Well done (Message 90)
By Peg
11-09-2009 4:39 AM |
Re: Well done (Message 74)
|
|
|
|
91
|
Re: Well done (Message 91)
|
Re: Well done (Message 89)
By Peg
11-09-2009 4:24 AM |
|
|
|
92
|
Well said (Message 92)
By Stile
11-09-2009 10:13 AM |
Message 88
|
|
|
|
93
|
Message 93
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
Re: Well done (Message 94)
|
Re: Well done (Message 89)
By Peg
11-09-2009 4:24 AM |
|
|
|
95
|
Message 95
|
Message 93
|
|
|
|
96
|
Re: Unlikely? (Message 96)
|
Re: Unlikely? (Message 79)
|
|
|
|
97
|
Message 97
|
Message 95
|
|
|
|
98
|
Re: Unlikely? (Message 98)
|
Re: Unlikely? (Message 96)
|
|
|
|
99
|
Re: Unlikely? (Message 99)
|
Re: Unlikely? (Message 98)
|
|
|
|
100
|
Message 100
|
Message 1
|
|
|
|
101
|
Re: Well done (Message 101)
By Peg
11-09-2009 8:16 PM |
Re: Well done (Message 91)
|
|
|
|
102
|
Re: Well done (Message 102)
By Peg
11-09-2009 8:27 PM |
Re: Well done (Message 94)
|
|
|
|
103
|
Nonsense (Message 103)
|
Re: Well done (Message 101)
By Peg
11-09-2009 8:16 PM |
|
|
|
104
|
why (Message 104)
By RAZD
11-09-2009 8:41 PM |
Re: Well done (Message 101)
By Peg
11-09-2009 8:16 PM |
|
|
105
|
Re: why (Message 105)
By Peg
11-10-2009 12:03 AM |
why (Message 104)
By RAZD
11-09-2009 8:41 PM |
|
|
|
106
|
Re: Well done (Message 106)
|
Re: Well done (Message 102)
By Peg
11-09-2009 8:27 PM |
|
|
|
107
|
Re: Well done (Message 107)
|
Re: Well done (Message 101)
By Peg
11-09-2009 8:16 PM |
|
|
|
108
|
Re: Unlikely? (Message 108)
|
Re: Unlikely? (Message 99)
|
|
|
|
109
|
Re: Well done (Message 109)
By Peg
11-11-2009 5:11 AM |
Re: Well done (Message 106)
|
|
|
|
110
|
Re: Well done (Message 110)
By Peg
11-11-2009 5:15 AM |
Re: Well done (Message 107)
|
|
|
|
111
|
Re: Well done (Message 111)
|
Re: Well done (Message 110)
By Peg
11-11-2009 5:15 AM |
|
|
|
112
|
Re: Well done (Message 112)
|
Re: Well done (Message 109)
By Peg
11-11-2009 5:11 AM |
|
|
|
113
|
Re: Well done (Message 113)
By Peg
11-11-2009 5:40 AM |
Re: Well done (Message 111)
|
|
|
|
114
|
Re: Well done (Message 114)
|
Re: Well done (Message 113)
By Peg
11-11-2009 5:40 AM |
|
|
|
115
|
incompleteness (Message 115)
By RAZD
11-11-2009 7:59 AM |
Re: Well done (Message 112)
|
|
|
|
116
|
Re: incompleteness (Message 116)
|
incompleteness (Message 115)
By RAZD
11-11-2009 7:59 AM |
|
|
|
117
|
Re: Well done (Message 117)
|
Re: Well done (Message 112)
|
|
|
|
118
|
Re: Well done (Message 118)
|
Re: Well done (Message 111)
|
|
|
|
119
|
Re: Well done (Message 119)
|
Re: Well done (Message 112)
|
|
|
|
120
|
Re: Well done (Message 120)
|
Re: Well done (Message 118)
|
|
|
|
121
|
Re: Well done (Message 121)
|
Re: Well done (Message 119)
|
|
|
|
122
|
fine tuning is a fable (Message 122)
|
Re: Well done (Message 119)
|
|
|
|
123
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 123)
|
fine tuning is a fable (Message 122)
|
|
|
|
124
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 124)
|
fine tuning is a fable (Message 122)
|
|
|
|
125
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 125)
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 124)
|
|
|
|
126
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 126)
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 124)
|
|
|
|
127
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 127)
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 125)
|
|
|
|
128
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 128)
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 127)
|
|
|
|
129
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 129)
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 126)
|
|
|
|
130
|
Gambling with universes (Message 130)
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 131)
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 129)
|
|
|
|
132
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 132)
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 131)
|
|
|
|
133
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 133)
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 129)
|
|
|
|
134
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 134)
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 132)
|
|
|
|
135
|
Re: Well done (Message 135)
|
Re: Well done (Message 118)
|
|
|
|
136
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 136)
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 124)
|
|
|
|
137
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 137)
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 136)
|
|
|
|
138
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 138)
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 137)
|
|
|
|
139
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 139)
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 138)
|
|
|
|
140
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 140)
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 139)
|
|
|
|
141
|
Re: incompleteness (Message 141)
By RAZD
11-11-2009 7:56 PM |
Re: incompleteness (Message 116)
|
|
|
|
142
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 142)
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 133)
|
|
|
|
143
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 143)
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 134)
|
|
|
|
144
|
Re: Well done (Message 144)
|
Re: Well done (Message 135)
|
|
|
|
145
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 145)
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 136)
|
|
|
|
146
|
Re: incompleteness (Message 146)
|
Re: incompleteness (Message 141)
By RAZD
11-11-2009 7:56 PM |
|
|
|
147
|
More Rational Conclusion? (Message 147)
|
Re: Unlikely? (Message 108)
|
|
|
|
148
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 148)
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 142)
|
|
|
|
149
|
Nein, nein, nein... (Message 149)
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 148)
|
|
|
|
150
|
Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 150)
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 148)
|
|
|
|
151
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 151)
|
Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 150)
|
|
|
|
152
|
Re: Fine tuning (Message 152)
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 151)
|
|
|
|
153
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 153)
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 151)
|
|
|
|
154
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 154)
By Peg
11-12-2009 10:33 PM |
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 136)
|
|
|
|
155
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 155)
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 154)
By Peg
11-12-2009 10:33 PM |
|
|
|
156
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 156)
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 154)
By Peg
11-12-2009 10:33 PM |
|
|
|
157
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 157)
|
Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 150)
|
|
|
|
158
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 158)
|
Re: fine tuning is a fable (Message 139)
|
|
|
|
159
|
Re: Well done (Message 159)
|
Re: Well done (Message 144)
|
|
|
|
160
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 160)
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 157)
|
|
|
|
161
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 161)
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 160)
|
|
|
|
162
|
Description, not prescription (Message 162)
|
Re: Well done (Message 159)
|
|
|
|
163
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 163)
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 161)
|
|
|
|
164
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 164)
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 163)
|
|
|
|
165
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 165)
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 164)
|
|
|
|
166
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 166)
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 153)
|
|
|
|
167
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 167)
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 164)
|
|
|
|
168
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 168)
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 166)
|
|
|
|
169
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 169)
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 168)
|
|
|
|
170
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 170)
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 169)
|
|
|
|
171
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 171)
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 170)
|
|
|
|
172
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 172)
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 171)
|
|
|
|
173
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 173)
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 172)
|
|
|
|
174
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 174)
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 169)
|
|
|
|
175
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 175)
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 174)
|
|
|
|
176
|
Empirical Objective Evidence In Favour Of Gods? (Message 176)
|
Re: incompleteness (Message 141)
By RAZD
11-11-2009 7:56 PM |
|
|
|
177
|
Re: Empirical Objective Evidence In Favour Of Gods? (Message 177)
|
Empirical Objective Evidence In Favour Of Gods? (Message 176)
|
|
|
|
178
|
Re: Empirical Objective Evidence In Favour Of Gods? (Message 178)
|
Re: Empirical Objective Evidence In Favour Of Gods? (Message 177)
|
|
|
|
179
|
Re: Empirical Objective Evidence In Favour Of Gods? (Message 179)
|
Re: Empirical Objective Evidence In Favour Of Gods? (Message 178)
|
|
|
|
180
|
Re: Empirical Objective Evidence In Favour Of Gods? (Message 180)
|
Re: Empirical Objective Evidence In Favour Of Gods? (Message 179)
|
|
|
|
181
|
Straggler lies again. (Message 181)
By RAZD
11-16-2009 7:18 PM |
Empirical Objective Evidence In Favour Of Gods? (Message 176)
|
|
|
|
182
|
Re: Empirical Objective Evidence In Favour Of Gods? (Message 182)
|
Re: Empirical Objective Evidence In Favour Of Gods? (Message 180)
|
|
|
|
183
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 183)
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 175)
|
|
|
|
184
|
Predictable (Message 184)
|
Straggler lies again. (Message 181)
By RAZD
11-16-2009 7:18 PM |
|
|
|
185
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 185)
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 183)
|
|
|
|
186
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 186)
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 185)
|
|
|
|
187
|
No basis to ask "why" (Message 187)
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 186)
|
|
|
|
188
|
Pi in the sky (Message 188)
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 183)
|
|
|
|
189
|
Re: Pi in the sky (Message 189)
|
Pi in the sky (Message 188)
|
|
|
|
190
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 190)
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 185)
|
|
|
|
191
|
Re: Pi in the sky (Message 191)
|
Pi in the sky (Message 188)
|
|
|
|
192
|
apology accepted (Message 192)
By RAZD
11-18-2009 12:04 AM |
Predictable (Message 184)
|
|
|
|
193
|
Re: Pi in the sky (Message 193)
|
Re: Pi in the sky (Message 191)
|
|
|
|
194
|
Re: Pi in the sky (Message 194)
|
Re: Pi in the sky (Message 193)
|
|
|
|
195
|
Re: Pi in the sky (Message 195)
|
Re: Pi in the sky (Message 194)
|
|
|
|
196
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 196)
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 190)
|
|
|
|
197
|
Re: Pi in the sky (Message 197)
|
Re: Pi in the sky (Message 195)
|
|
|
|
198
|
Human Invention Is A Valid Argument - Progress At Last (Message 198)
|
apology accepted (Message 192)
By RAZD
11-18-2009 12:04 AM |
|
|
|
199
|
typical Straggler confirmation bias (Message 199)
By RAZD
11-18-2009 8:15 PM |
Human Invention Is A Valid Argument - Progress At Last (Message 198)
|
|
|
|
200
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 200)
|
Re: Fine tuning is alive and well (Message 190)
|
|
|
|
201
|
REFUTED: Absence of Evidence - There Is No Such Thing (Message 201)
|
typical Straggler confirmation bias (Message 199)
By RAZD
11-18-2009 8:15 PM |
|
|
|
202
|
Typical Straggler conflations, fallacies, confirmation bias and false conclusions. (Message 202)
By RAZD
11-19-2009 10:14 PM |
REFUTED: Absence of Evidence - There Is No Such Thing (Message 201)
|
|
|
|
203
|
Why Deny The Evidence Exists? (Message 203)
|
Typical Straggler conflations, fallacies, confirmation bias and false conclusions. (Message 202)
By RAZD
11-19-2009 10:14 PM |
|
|
|
204
|
Your diagram fitted to the real claim. (Message 204)
|
Typical Straggler conflations, fallacies, confirmation bias and false conclusions. (Message 202)
By RAZD
11-19-2009 10:14 PM |
|
|
|
205
|
Re: Why Deny The Evidence Exists? ... er ... What Evidence? (Message 205)
By RAZD
11-20-2009 10:27 PM |
Why Deny The Evidence Exists? (Message 203)
|
|
|
|
206
|
Exchanging one fallacy for another? (or two or three?) (Message 206)
By RAZD
11-21-2009 5:00 PM |
Your diagram fitted to the real claim. (Message 204)
|
|
|
|
207
|
Concede and Move On (Message 207)
|
Re: Why Deny The Evidence Exists? ... er ... What Evidence? (Message 205)
By RAZD
11-20-2009 10:27 PM |
|
|
|
208
|
Message 208
|
Message 93
|
|
|
|
209
|
Re: Exchanging one fallacy for another? (or two or three?) (Message 209)
|
Exchanging one fallacy for another? (or two or three?) (Message 206)
By RAZD
11-21-2009 5:00 PM |
|
|
|
210
|
Re: Unlikely? (Message 210)
|
Re: Unlikely? (Message 96)
|
|
|
|
211
|
Message 211
|
Message 97
|
|
|
|
212
|
Re: Well done (Message 212)
|
Re: Well done (Message 109)
By Peg
11-11-2009 5:11 AM |
|
|
|
213
|
Message 213
|
Message 211
|
|
|
|
214
|
Incredible (Message 214)
|
Re: Unlikely? (Message 210)
|
|
|
|
215
|
Purpose of Diagram? (Message 215)
By Stile
11-24-2009 8:49 AM |
Exchanging one fallacy for another? (or two or three?) (Message 206)
By RAZD
11-21-2009 5:00 PM |
|
|
|
216
|
Re: Purpose of Diagram? (Message 216)
|
Purpose of Diagram? (Message 215)
By Stile
11-24-2009 8:49 AM |
|
|
|
217
|
Re: Purpose of Diagram? (Message 217)
By Stile
11-24-2009 10:42 AM |
Re: Purpose of Diagram? (Message 216)
|
|
|
|
218
|
Re: Purpose of Diagram? (Message 218)
|
Re: Purpose of Diagram? (Message 217)
By Stile
11-24-2009 10:42 AM |
|
|
|
219
|
Re: Purpose of Diagram? (Message 219)
By Stile
11-24-2009 11:20 AM |
Re: Purpose of Diagram? (Message 218)
|
|
|
|
220
|
Re: Purpose of Diagram? (Message 220)
By RAZD
11-24-2009 6:45 PM |
Purpose of Diagram? (Message 215)
By Stile
11-24-2009 8:49 AM |
|
|
|
221
|
Re: Purpose of Diagram? (Message 221)
|
Re: Purpose of Diagram? (Message 220)
By RAZD
11-24-2009 6:45 PM |
|
|
|
222
|
still straggling behind (Message 222)
By RAZD
11-24-2009 7:14 PM |
Concede and Move On (Message 207)
|
|
|
|
223
|
Message 223
|
Message 213
|
|
|
|
224
|
Re: Exchanging one fallacy for another? (or two or three?) (Message 224)
By RAZD
11-24-2009 7:51 PM |
Re: Exchanging one fallacy for another? (or two or three?) (Message 209)
|
|
|
|
225
|
Re: Purpose of Diagram? (Message 225)
By RAZD
11-24-2009 7:59 PM |
Re: Purpose of Diagram? (Message 221)
|
|
|
|
226
|
Identify the issue (Message 226)
By Stile
11-25-2009 8:23 AM |
Re: Purpose of Diagram? (Message 220)
By RAZD
11-24-2009 6:45 PM |
|
|
|
227
|
Message 227
|
Message 223
|
|
|
|
228
|
Formula? (Message 228)
By Jon
11-25-2009 11:26 AM |
|
|
|
|
229
|
Re: Formula? (Message 229)
|
Formula? (Message 228)
By Jon
11-25-2009 11:26 AM |
|
|
|
230
|
Re: Formula? (Message 230)
By Jon
11-25-2009 12:19 PM |
Re: Formula? (Message 229)
|
|
|
|
231
|
Re: Formula? (Message 231)
|
Re: Formula? (Message 230)
By Jon
11-25-2009 12:19 PM |
|
|
|
232
|
Re: Formula? (Message 232)
|
Formula? (Message 228)
By Jon
11-25-2009 11:26 AM |
|
|
|
233
|
Re: Formula? (Message 233)
|
Re: Formula? (Message 232)
|
|
|
|
234
|
Re: Formula? (Message 234)
By Jon
11-25-2009 1:36 PM |
Re: Formula? (Message 232)
|
|
|
|
235
|
Re: Identify the issue (Message 235)
By RAZD
11-25-2009 4:34 PM |
Identify the issue (Message 226)
By Stile
11-25-2009 8:23 AM |
|
|
|
236
|
Re: Formula? (Message 236)
|
Re: Formula? (Message 234)
By Jon
11-25-2009 1:36 PM |
|
|
|
237
|
Concede and Move On - Still In Denial (Message 237)
|
still straggling behind (Message 222)
By RAZD
11-24-2009 7:14 PM |
|
|
|
238
|
Re: Identify the issue (Message 238)
|
Re: Identify the issue (Message 235)
By RAZD
11-25-2009 4:34 PM |
|
|
|
239
|
Re: Formula? (Message 239)
By Jon
11-26-2009 1:14 AM |
Re: Formula? (Message 236)
|
|
|
|
240
|
Still with the logical fallacies (Message 240)
By RAZD
11-26-2009 4:32 PM |
Concede and Move On - Still In Denial (Message 237)
|
|
|
|
241
|
Re: Formula? (Message 241)
|
Re: Formula? (Message 232)
|
|
|
|
242
|
Rotting cheeses creating universes. (Message 242)
|
Re: Exchanging one fallacy for another? (or two or three?) (Message 224)
By RAZD
11-24-2009 7:51 PM |
|
|
|
243
|
Re: Lightning Bolts and Logic (Message 243)
|
Re: Lightning Bolts and Logic (Message 61)
By RAZD
11-07-2009 11:05 AM |
|
|
|
244
|
Re: Lightning Bolts and Logic (Message 244)
|
Re: Lightning Bolts and Logic (Message 84)
By RAZD
11-08-2009 7:51 PM |
|
|
|
245
|
Re: Lightning Bolts and Logic (Message 245)
By RAZD
11-27-2009 12:52 PM |
Re: Lightning Bolts and Logic (Message 243)
|
|
|
|
246
|
Absence of Evidence (Message 246)
|
Still with the logical fallacies (Message 240)
By RAZD
11-26-2009 4:32 PM |
|
|
|
247
|
Summary Time or Time to readress the Topic? (Message 247)
By RAZD
11-30-2009 11:18 PM |
Absence of Evidence (Message 246)
|
|
|
|
248
|
Summary - Absence of Evidence (Message 248)
|
Summary Time or Time to readress the Topic? (Message 247)
By RAZD
11-30-2009 11:18 PM |
|
|
|
249
|
RIP - Absence of Evidence (Message 249)
|
Summary Time or Time to readress the Topic? (Message 247)
By RAZD
11-30-2009 11:18 PM |
|
|
|
250
|
Re: Summary - Absence of Evidence (Message 250)
By RAZD
12-05-2009 5:10 AM |
Summary - Absence of Evidence (Message 248)
|
|
|
|
251
|
Re: RIP - Absence of Evidence (Message 251)
By RAZD
12-05-2009 5:24 AM |
RIP - Absence of Evidence (Message 249)
|
|
|
|
252
|
Re: RIP - Absence of Evidence (Message 252)
|
Re: RIP - Absence of Evidence (Message 251)
By RAZD
12-05-2009 5:24 AM |
|
|
|
253
|
Re: RIP - Absence of Evidence (Message 253)
By RAZD
12-05-2009 7:45 PM |
Re: RIP - Absence of Evidence (Message 252)
|
|
|
|
254
|
Message 254
|
|
|
|
|
255
|
Re: RIP - Absence of Evidence (Message 255)
|
Re: RIP - Absence of Evidence (Message 253)
By RAZD
12-05-2009 7:45 PM |
|
|
|
256
|
**added** (Message 256)
By RAZD
12-05-2009 11:34 PM |
Re: RIP - Absence of Evidence (Message 255)
|
|
|
|
257
|
The philosopher's Santa (Message 257)
|
**added** (Message 256)
By RAZD
12-05-2009 11:34 PM |
|
|
|
258
|
The Logical problems with strong atheism. (Message 258)
By RAZD
12-06-2009 1:09 PM |
The philosopher's Santa (Message 257)
|
|
|
|
259
|
Maps and Mountains (Message 259)
|
Re: Summary - Absence of Evidence (Message 250)
By RAZD
12-05-2009 5:10 AM |
|
|
|
260
|
Re: RIP - Absence of Evidence (Message 260)
|
Re: RIP - Absence of Evidence (Message 251)
By RAZD
12-05-2009 5:24 AM |
|
|
|
261
|
The Practical Problem With Incessant Agnosticism (Message 261)
|
The Logical problems with strong atheism. (Message 258)
By RAZD
12-06-2009 1:09 PM |
|
|
|
262
|
Re: The Logical problems with strong atheism. (Message 262)
|
The Logical problems with strong atheism. (Message 258)
By RAZD
12-06-2009 1:09 PM |
|
|
|
263
|
the NON RIP of the Absence of Evidence argument as used by atheists (Message 263)
By RAZD
12-10-2009 8:20 PM |
Re: RIP - Absence of Evidence (Message 260)
|
|
|
|
264
|
Re: the NON RIP of the Absence of Evidence argument as used by atheists (Message 264)
|
the NON RIP of the Absence of Evidence argument as used by atheists (Message 263)
By RAZD
12-10-2009 8:20 PM |
|
|
|
265
|
Re: the NON RIP of the Absence of Evidence argument as used by atheists (Message 265)
By RAZD
12-10-2009 9:24 PM |
Re: the NON RIP of the Absence of Evidence argument as used by atheists (Message 264)
|
|
|
|
266
|
Bunny Boiler (Message 266)
|
the NON RIP of the Absence of Evidence argument as used by atheists (Message 263)
By RAZD
12-10-2009 8:20 PM |
|
|
|
267
|
Re: Maps and Mountains - Modeling Logical Fallacies against reality (Message 267)
By RAZD
12-11-2009 8:12 PM |
Maps and Mountains (Message 259)
|
|
|
|
268
|
Re: The Practical Problem With Incessant Agnosticism (Message 268)
By RAZD
12-11-2009 8:54 PM |
The Practical Problem With Incessant Agnosticism (Message 261)
|
|
|
|
269
|
Re: The Logical problems with strong atheism. (Message 269)
By RAZD
12-11-2009 9:08 PM |
Re: The Logical problems with strong atheism. (Message 262)
|
|
|
|
270
|
Silly Straggler (Message 270)
By RAZD
12-11-2009 9:24 PM |
Bunny Boiler (Message 266)
|
|
|
|
271
|
Re: the NON RIP of the Absence of Evidence argument as used by atheists (Message 271)
|
Re: the NON RIP of the Absence of Evidence argument as used by atheists (Message 265)
By RAZD
12-10-2009 9:24 PM |
|
|
|
272
|
Absence of belief. (Message 272)
|
Re: The Logical problems with strong atheism. (Message 269)
By RAZD
12-11-2009 9:08 PM |
|
|
|
273
|
lying? or just laying out a truth you don't like? (Message 273)
By RAZD
12-12-2009 9:19 AM |
Re: the NON RIP of the Absence of Evidence argument as used by atheists (Message 271)
|
|
|
|
274
|
Bunny Boiler Part 2 - The Bunny Bites Back (Message 274)
|
Silly Straggler (Message 270)
By RAZD
12-11-2009 9:24 PM |
|
|
|
275
|
Contradictory Scales of Belief (Message 275)
|
lying? or just laying out a truth you don't like? (Message 273)
By RAZD
12-12-2009 9:19 AM |
|
|
|
276
|
Simple steps to logical results. (Message 276)
By RAZD
12-14-2009 7:40 PM |
Contradictory Scales of Belief (Message 275)
|
|
|
|
277
|
Re: RIP - Absence of Evidence (Message 277)
|
Re: RIP - Absence of Evidence (Message 251)
By RAZD
12-05-2009 5:24 AM |
|
|
|
278
|
Subjective Evidence? The Shock Return!! (Message 278)
|
Simple steps to logical results. (Message 276)
By RAZD
12-14-2009 7:40 PM |
|
|
|
279
|
Message 279
By Jon
12-15-2009 1:32 PM |
|
|
|
|
280
|
Re: Subjective Evidence? The Shock Return!! (Message 280)
By ICANT
12-15-2009 3:21 PM |
Subjective Evidence? The Shock Return!! (Message 278)
|
|
|
|
281
|
Re: Subjective Evidence? The Shock Return!! (Message 281)
|
Re: Subjective Evidence? The Shock Return!! (Message 280)
By ICANT
12-15-2009 3:21 PM |
|
|
|
282
|
Re: Subjective Evidence? The Shock Return!! (Message 282)
By ICANT
12-15-2009 3:47 PM |
Re: Subjective Evidence? The Shock Return!! (Message 281)
|
|
|
|
283
|
Re: Subjective Evidence? The Shock Return!! (Message 283)
|
Re: Subjective Evidence? The Shock Return!! (Message 282)
By ICANT
12-15-2009 3:47 PM |
|
|
|
284
|
Re: Subjective Evidence? The Shock Return!! (Message 284)
|
Re: Subjective Evidence? The Shock Return!! (Message 283)
|
|
|
|
285
|
Re: Subjective Evidence? The Shock Return!! (Message 285)
By ICANT
12-15-2009 4:50 PM |
Re: Subjective Evidence? The Shock Return!! (Message 283)
|
|
|
|
286
|
Straggler's Holy Book (Message 286)
|
Re: Subjective Evidence? The Shock Return!! (Message 282)
By ICANT
12-15-2009 3:47 PM |
|
|
|
287
|
Re: Straggler's Holy Book (Message 287)
|
Straggler's Holy Book (Message 286)
|
|
|
|
288
|
Re: Straggler's Holy Book (Message 288)
|
Re: Straggler's Holy Book (Message 287)
|
|
|
|
289
|
Re: Straggler's Holy Book (Message 289)
|
Re: Straggler's Holy Book (Message 288)
|
|
|
|
290
|
Re: Straggler's Holy Book (Message 290)
|
Re: Straggler's Holy Book (Message 289)
|
|
|
|
291
|
Re: Straggler's Holy Book (Message 291)
By ICANT
12-15-2009 5:46 PM |
Straggler's Holy Book (Message 286)
|
|
|
|
292
|
Re: Straggler's Holy Book (Message 292)
|
Re: Straggler's Holy Book (Message 291)
By ICANT
12-15-2009 5:46 PM |
|
|
|
293
|
Re: Straggler's Holy Book (Message 293)
By ICANT
12-15-2009 6:15 PM |
Re: Straggler's Holy Book (Message 292)
|
|
|
|
294
|
Re: Straggler's Holy Book (Message 294)
|
Re: Straggler's Holy Book (Message 293)
By ICANT
12-15-2009 6:15 PM |
|
|
|
295
|
what is "the Absence of Evidence?" (Message 295)
By RAZD
12-15-2009 8:44 PM |
Re: RIP - Absence of Evidence (Message 277)
|
|
|
|
296
|
still struggling with the simple facts. (Message 296)
By RAZD
12-15-2009 10:13 PM |
Subjective Evidence? The Shock Return!! (Message 278)
|
|
|
|
297
|
Restating the objective (Message 297)
|
Message 1
|
|
|
|
298
|
Re: Restating the objective (Message 298)
By ICANT
12-16-2009 12:43 AM |
Restating the objective (Message 297)
|
|
|
|
299
|
Re: Subjective Evidence? The Shock Return!! (Message 299)
|
Re: Subjective Evidence? The Shock Return!! (Message 284)
|
|
|
|
300
|
Re: Subjective Evidence? The Shock Return!! (Message 300)
|
Re: Subjective Evidence? The Shock Return!! (Message 285)
By ICANT
12-15-2009 4:50 PM |
|
|
|
301
|
Apology Acepted (Message 301)
|
still struggling with the simple facts. (Message 296)
By RAZD
12-15-2009 10:13 PM |
|
|
|
302
|
Beam Me Up Spoccy (Message 302)
|
still struggling with the simple facts. (Message 296)
By RAZD
12-15-2009 10:13 PM |
|
|
|
303
|
Re: Straggler's Holy Book (Message 303)
|
Re: Straggler's Holy Book (Message 287)
|
|
|
|
304
|
Message 304
|
Message 279
By Jon
12-15-2009 1:32 PM |
|
|
|
305
|
Erm.... Be Specific (Message 305)
|
Message 304
|
|
|
|
306
|
Message 306
By RAZD
12-16-2009 9:24 PM |
Absence of belief. (Message 272)
|
|
|
|
307
|
Do you ever read what people actually write? (Message 307)
By RAZD
12-16-2009 9:57 PM |
Apology Acepted (Message 301)
|
|
|
|
308
|
Silly Straggler Again. (Message 308)
By RAZD
12-16-2009 10:50 PM |
Beam Me Up Spoccy (Message 302)
|
|
|
309
|
Thread Closure (Message 309)
|
|
|
™ Version 4.2
