Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 80 (8898 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 03-25-2019 8:12 PM
23 online now:
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: WookieeB
Post Volume:
Total: 848,645 Year: 3,682/19,786 Month: 677/1,087 Week: 46/221 Day: 17/29 Hour: 0/2

EvC Forum All Forums Science Forums Biological Evolution Best Evidence Macro-Evolution

Key: Answered, Noted, Unanswered
Originator: idscience, 03-01-2012 5:17 PM
  Msg
Num
Message Details Reply To Replies
Topic's mood 1 Message 1
By idscience
03-01-2012 5:17 PM
 
Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 3)
By Omnivorous
03-01-2012 7:45 PM
Please define macroevolution first. (Message 5)
By RAZD
03-01-2012 8:08 PM
Message 10
By Dr Adequate
03-01-2012 8:24 PM
macroevolution is the only explanation (Message 84)
By New Cat's Eye
03-02-2012 10:45 AM
Evidence (for you to ignore, misrepresent, or deny) (Message 85)
By Coyote
03-02-2012 10:48 AM
Topic's mood 2 Thread Copied from Proposed New Topics Forum (Message 2)
By Admin
03-01-2012 7:13 PM
   
Topic's mood 3 Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 3)
By Omnivorous
03-01-2012 7:45 PM
Message 1
By idscience
03-01-2012 5:17 PM
Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 4)
By idscience
03-01-2012 8:01 PM
Topic's mood 4 Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 4)
By idscience
03-01-2012 8:01 PM
Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 3)
By Omnivorous
03-01-2012 7:45 PM
Macroevolution is a fact. (Message 6)
By jar
03-01-2012 8:10 PM
Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 7)
By RAZD
03-01-2012 8:13 PM
Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 11)
By Dr Adequate
03-01-2012 8:27 PM
Topic's mood 5 Please define macroevolution first. (Message 5)
By RAZD
03-01-2012 8:08 PM
Message 1
By idscience
03-01-2012 5:17 PM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 8)
By idscience
03-01-2012 8:20 PM
Topic's mood 6 Macroevolution is a fact. (Message 6)
By jar
03-01-2012 8:10 PM
Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 4)
By idscience
03-01-2012 8:01 PM
Re: Macroevolution is a fact. (Message 13)
By idscience
03-01-2012 8:32 PM
Topic's mood 7 Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 7)
By RAZD
03-01-2012 8:13 PM
Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 4)
By idscience
03-01-2012 8:01 PM
Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 15)
By idscience
03-01-2012 8:40 PM
Topic's mood 8 Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 8)
By idscience
03-01-2012 8:20 PM
Please define macroevolution first. (Message 5)
By RAZD
03-01-2012 8:08 PM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 9)
By Theodoric
03-01-2012 8:24 PM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 12)
By RAZD
03-01-2012 8:29 PM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 16)
By nwr
03-01-2012 8:42 PM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 22)
By Percy
03-01-2012 9:01 PM
Topic's mood 9 Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 9)
By Theodoric
03-01-2012 8:24 PM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 8)
By idscience
03-01-2012 8:20 PM
 
Topic's mood 10 Message 10
By Dr Adequate
03-01-2012 8:24 PM
Message 1
By idscience
03-01-2012 5:17 PM
 
Topic's mood 11 Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 11)
By Dr Adequate
03-01-2012 8:27 PM
Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 4)
By idscience
03-01-2012 8:01 PM
 
Topic's mood 12 Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 12)
By RAZD
03-01-2012 8:29 PM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 8)
By idscience
03-01-2012 8:20 PM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 23)
By idscience
03-01-2012 9:13 PM
Topic's mood 13 Re: Macroevolution is a fact. (Message 13)
By idscience
03-01-2012 8:32 PM
Macroevolution is a fact. (Message 6)
By jar
03-01-2012 8:10 PM
Re: Macroevolution is a fact. (Message 14)
By RAZD
03-01-2012 8:38 PM
Re: Macroevolution is a fact. (Message 17)
By jar
03-01-2012 8:45 PM
Re: Macroevolution is a fact. (Message 20)
By Dr Adequate
03-01-2012 8:58 PM
Topic's mood 14 Re: Macroevolution is a fact. (Message 14)
By RAZD
03-01-2012 8:38 PM
Re: Macroevolution is a fact. (Message 13)
By idscience
03-01-2012 8:32 PM
 
Topic's mood 15 Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 15)
By idscience
03-01-2012 8:40 PM
Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 7)
By RAZD
03-01-2012 8:13 PM
so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 18)
By RAZD
03-01-2012 8:48 PM
Evidence to Settle the Debate (Message 19)
By crashfrog
03-01-2012 8:51 PM
Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 21)
By Dr Adequate
03-01-2012 9:00 PM
Topic's mood 16 Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 16)
By nwr
03-01-2012 8:42 PM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 8)
By idscience
03-01-2012 8:20 PM
 
Topic's mood 17 Re: Macroevolution is a fact. (Message 17)
By jar
03-01-2012 8:45 PM
Re: Macroevolution is a fact. (Message 13)
By idscience
03-01-2012 8:32 PM
 
Topic's mood 18 so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 18)
By RAZD
03-01-2012 8:48 PM
Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 15)
By idscience
03-01-2012 8:40 PM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 32)
By idscience
03-01-2012 11:14 PM
Topic's mood 19 Evidence to Settle the Debate (Message 19)
By crashfrog
03-01-2012 8:51 PM
Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 15)
By idscience
03-01-2012 8:40 PM
Re: Evidence to Settle the Debate (Message 48)
By idscience
03-02-2012 2:13 AM
Topic's mood 20 Re: Macroevolution is a fact. (Message 20)
By Dr Adequate
03-01-2012 8:58 PM
Re: Macroevolution is a fact. (Message 13)
By idscience
03-01-2012 8:32 PM
 
Topic's mood 21 Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 21)
By Dr Adequate
03-01-2012 9:00 PM
Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 15)
By idscience
03-01-2012 8:40 PM
Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 31)
By idscience
03-01-2012 10:47 PM
Topic's mood 22 Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 22)
By Percy
03-01-2012 9:01 PM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 8)
By idscience
03-01-2012 8:20 PM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 24)
By idscience
03-01-2012 9:25 PM
Topic's mood 23 Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 23)
By idscience
03-01-2012 9:13 PM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 12)
By RAZD
03-01-2012 8:29 PM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 29)
By RAZD
03-01-2012 9:41 PM
Topic's mood 24 Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 24)
By idscience
03-01-2012 9:25 PM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 22)
By Percy
03-01-2012 9:01 PM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 25)
By Panda
03-01-2012 9:29 PM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 26)
By crashfrog
03-01-2012 9:34 PM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 27)
By Dr Adequate
03-01-2012 9:37 PM
idscience read PLEASE DEFINE MACROEVOLUTION FIRST (Message 28)
By Theodoric
03-01-2012 9:37 PM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 30)
By RAZD
03-01-2012 9:54 PM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 75)
By Percy
03-02-2012 7:54 AM
Topic's mood 25 Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 25)
By Panda
03-01-2012 9:29 PM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 24)
By idscience
03-01-2012 9:25 PM
 
Topic's mood 26 Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 26)
By crashfrog
03-01-2012 9:34 PM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 24)
By idscience
03-01-2012 9:25 PM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 46)
By idscience
03-02-2012 1:29 AM
Topic's mood 27 Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 27)
By Dr Adequate
03-01-2012 9:37 PM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 24)
By idscience
03-01-2012 9:25 PM
 
Topic's mood 28 idscience read PLEASE DEFINE MACROEVOLUTION FIRST (Message 28)
By Theodoric
03-01-2012 9:37 PM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 24)
By idscience
03-01-2012 9:25 PM
 
Topic's mood 29 Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 29)
By RAZD
03-01-2012 9:41 PM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 23)
By idscience
03-01-2012 9:13 PM
 
Topic's mood 30 Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 30)
By RAZD
03-01-2012 9:54 PM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 24)
By idscience
03-01-2012 9:25 PM
 
Topic's mood 31 Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 31)
By idscience
03-01-2012 10:47 PM
Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 21)
By Dr Adequate
03-01-2012 9:00 PM
Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 33)
By Dr Adequate
03-01-2012 11:27 PM
Topic's mood 32 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 32)
By idscience
03-01-2012 11:14 PM
so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 18)
By RAZD
03-01-2012 8:48 PM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 34)
By Dr Adequate
03-01-2012 11:36 PM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 53)
By RAZD
03-02-2012 2:56 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 88)
By Taq
03-02-2012 12:29 PM
Topic's mood 33 Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 33)
By Dr Adequate
03-01-2012 11:27 PM
Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 31)
By idscience
03-01-2012 10:47 PM
Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 35)
By idscience
03-02-2012 12:04 AM
Topic's mood 34 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 34)
By Dr Adequate
03-01-2012 11:36 PM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 32)
By idscience
03-01-2012 11:14 PM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 36)
By idscience
03-02-2012 12:18 AM
Topic's mood 35 Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 35)
By idscience
03-02-2012 12:04 AM
Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 33)
By Dr Adequate
03-01-2012 11:27 PM
Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 37)
By Dr Adequate
03-02-2012 12:20 AM
Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 51)
By anglagard
03-02-2012 2:50 AM
Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 66)
By Larni
03-02-2012 5:53 AM
Topic's mood 36 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 36)
By idscience
03-02-2012 12:18 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 34)
By Dr Adequate
03-01-2012 11:36 PM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 38)
By Dr Adequate
03-02-2012 12:27 AM
No he cannot define Macroevolution (Message 39)
By Theodoric
03-02-2012 12:32 AM
Topic's mood 37 Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 37)
By Dr Adequate
03-02-2012 12:20 AM
Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 35)
By idscience
03-02-2012 12:04 AM
 
Topic's mood 38 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 38)
By Dr Adequate
03-02-2012 12:27 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 36)
By idscience
03-02-2012 12:18 AM
 
Topic's mood 39 No he cannot define Macroevolution (Message 39)
By Theodoric
03-02-2012 12:32 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 36)
By idscience
03-02-2012 12:18 AM
Re: No he cannot define Macroevolution (Message 40)
By idscience
03-02-2012 12:51 AM
Topic's mood 40 Re: No he cannot define Macroevolution (Message 40)
By idscience
03-02-2012 12:51 AM
No he cannot define Macroevolution (Message 39)
By Theodoric
03-02-2012 12:32 AM
Re: No he cannot define Macroevolution (Message 41)
By Dr Adequate
03-02-2012 12:56 AM
Re: No he cannot define Macroevolution (Message 43)
By Coragyps
03-02-2012 1:12 AM
Re: No he cannot define Macroevolution (Message 47)
By dwise1
03-02-2012 1:38 AM
Topic's mood 41 Re: No he cannot define Macroevolution (Message 41)
By Dr Adequate
03-02-2012 12:56 AM
Re: No he cannot define Macroevolution (Message 40)
By idscience
03-02-2012 12:51 AM
 
Topic's mood 42 Evidence (Message 42)
By Coyote
03-02-2012 1:09 AM
 
Re: Evidence (Message 44)
By idscience
03-02-2012 1:22 AM
Topic's mood 43 Re: No he cannot define Macroevolution (Message 43)
By Coragyps
03-02-2012 1:12 AM
Re: No he cannot define Macroevolution (Message 40)
By idscience
03-02-2012 12:51 AM
Re: No he cannot define Macroevolution (Message 45)
By idscience
03-02-2012 1:23 AM
Topic's mood 44 Re: Evidence (Message 44)
By idscience
03-02-2012 1:22 AM
Evidence (Message 42)
By Coyote
03-02-2012 1:09 AM
 
Topic's mood 45 Re: No he cannot define Macroevolution (Message 45)
By idscience
03-02-2012 1:23 AM
Re: No he cannot define Macroevolution (Message 43)
By Coragyps
03-02-2012 1:12 AM
 
Topic's mood 46 Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 46)
By idscience
03-02-2012 1:29 AM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 26)
By crashfrog
03-01-2012 9:34 PM
 
Topic's mood 47 Re: No he cannot define Macroevolution (Message 47)
By dwise1
03-02-2012 1:38 AM
Re: No he cannot define Macroevolution (Message 40)
By idscience
03-02-2012 12:51 AM
Re: No he cannot define Macroevolution (Message 49)
By idscience
03-02-2012 2:14 AM
Topic's mood 48 Re: Evidence to Settle the Debate (Message 48)
By idscience
03-02-2012 2:13 AM
Evidence to Settle the Debate (Message 19)
By crashfrog
03-01-2012 8:51 PM
Re: Evidence to Settle the Debate (Message 50)
By Dr Adequate
03-02-2012 2:23 AM
Re: Evidence to Settle the Debate (Message 52)
By dwise1
03-02-2012 2:52 AM
Re: Evidence to Settle the Debate (Message 78)
By crashfrog
03-02-2012 8:08 AM
Re: Evidence to Settle the Debate (Message 90)
By Drosophilla
03-02-2012 1:19 PM
Topic's mood 49 Re: No he cannot define Macroevolution (Message 49)
By idscience
03-02-2012 2:14 AM
Re: No he cannot define Macroevolution (Message 47)
By dwise1
03-02-2012 1:38 AM
Re: No he cannot define Macroevolution (Message 54)
By anglagard
03-02-2012 2:58 AM
Topic's mood 50 Re: Evidence to Settle the Debate (Message 50)
By Dr Adequate
03-02-2012 2:23 AM
Re: Evidence to Settle the Debate (Message 48)
By idscience
03-02-2012 2:13 AM
 
Topic's mood 51 Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 51)
By anglagard
03-02-2012 2:50 AM
Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 35)
By idscience
03-02-2012 12:04 AM
 
Topic's mood 52 Re: Evidence to Settle the Debate (Message 52)
By dwise1
03-02-2012 2:52 AM
Re: Evidence to Settle the Debate (Message 48)
By idscience
03-02-2012 2:13 AM
Re: Evidence to Settle the Debate (Message 55)
By idscience
03-02-2012 3:16 AM
Topic's mood 53 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 53)
By RAZD
03-02-2012 2:56 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 32)
By idscience
03-01-2012 11:14 PM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 57)
By idscience
03-02-2012 3:36 AM
Topic's mood 54 Re: No he cannot define Macroevolution (Message 54)
By anglagard
03-02-2012 2:58 AM
Re: No he cannot define Macroevolution (Message 49)
By idscience
03-02-2012 2:14 AM
 
Topic's mood 55 Re: Evidence to Settle the Debate (Message 55)
By idscience
03-02-2012 3:16 AM
Re: Evidence to Settle the Debate (Message 52)
By dwise1
03-02-2012 2:52 AM
still no definition of macroevolution. (Message 56)
By RAZD
03-02-2012 3:21 AM
Re: Evidence to Settle the Debate (Message 59)
By dwise1
03-02-2012 4:07 AM
Re: Evidence to Settle the Debate (Message 83)
By dwise1
03-02-2012 10:34 AM
Topic's mood 56 still no definition of macroevolution. (Message 56)
By RAZD
03-02-2012 3:21 AM
Re: Evidence to Settle the Debate (Message 55)
By idscience
03-02-2012 3:16 AM
 
Topic's mood 57 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 57)
By idscience
03-02-2012 3:36 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 53)
By RAZD
03-02-2012 2:56 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 58)
By Trixie
03-02-2012 3:58 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 62)
By Huntard
03-02-2012 4:34 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 72)
By RAZD
03-02-2012 7:29 AM
Topic's mood 58 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 58)
By Trixie
03-02-2012 3:58 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 57)
By idscience
03-02-2012 3:36 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 60)
By idscience
03-02-2012 4:29 AM
Topic's mood 59 Re: Evidence to Settle the Debate (Message 59)
By dwise1
03-02-2012 4:07 AM
Re: Evidence to Settle the Debate (Message 55)
By idscience
03-02-2012 3:16 AM
Re: Evidence to Settle the Debate (Message 61)
By idscience
03-02-2012 4:30 AM
Topic's mood 60 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 60)
By idscience
03-02-2012 4:29 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 58)
By Trixie
03-02-2012 3:58 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 63)
By Kairyu
03-02-2012 5:13 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 65)
By Trixie
03-02-2012 5:43 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 73)
By RAZD
03-02-2012 7:47 AM
Topic's mood 61 Re: Evidence to Settle the Debate (Message 61)
By idscience
03-02-2012 4:30 AM
Re: Evidence to Settle the Debate (Message 59)
By dwise1
03-02-2012 4:07 AM
 
Topic's mood 62 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 62)
By Huntard
03-02-2012 4:34 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 57)
By idscience
03-02-2012 3:36 AM
 
Topic's mood 63 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 63)
By Kairyu
03-02-2012 5:13 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 60)
By idscience
03-02-2012 4:29 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 64)
By idscience
03-02-2012 5:24 AM
Topic's mood 64 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 64)
By idscience
03-02-2012 5:24 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 63)
By Kairyu
03-02-2012 5:13 AM
 
Topic's mood 65 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 65)
By Trixie
03-02-2012 5:43 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 60)
By idscience
03-02-2012 4:29 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 67)
By idscience
03-02-2012 6:13 AM
Topic's mood 66 Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 66)
By Larni
03-02-2012 5:53 AM
Re: Got evidence or reasoning? (Message 35)
By idscience
03-02-2012 12:04 AM
 
Topic's mood 67 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 67)
By idscience
03-02-2012 6:13 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 65)
By Trixie
03-02-2012 5:43 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 68)
By Tangle
03-02-2012 6:26 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 69)
By Panda
03-02-2012 6:59 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 70)
By Huntard
03-02-2012 7:18 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 74)
By Trixie
03-02-2012 7:49 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 76)
By RAZD
03-02-2012 8:00 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 89)
By Taq
03-02-2012 12:33 PM
Topic's mood 68 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 68)
By Tangle
03-02-2012 6:26 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 67)
By idscience
03-02-2012 6:13 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 92)
By idscience
03-02-2012 3:47 PM
Topic's mood 69 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 69)
By Panda
03-02-2012 6:59 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 67)
By idscience
03-02-2012 6:13 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 93)
By idscience
03-02-2012 3:51 PM
Topic's mood 70 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 70)
By Huntard
03-02-2012 7:18 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 67)
By idscience
03-02-2012 6:13 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 94)
By idscience
03-02-2012 3:56 PM
Topic's mood 71 micro-macro mixup (Message 71)
By Kairyu
03-02-2012 7:22 AM
   
Topic's mood 72 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 72)
By RAZD
03-02-2012 7:29 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 57)
By idscience
03-02-2012 3:36 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 96)
By idscience
03-02-2012 4:19 PM
Topic's mood 73 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 73)
By RAZD
03-02-2012 7:47 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 60)
By idscience
03-02-2012 4:29 AM
 
Topic's mood 74 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 74)
By Trixie
03-02-2012 7:49 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 67)
By idscience
03-02-2012 6:13 AM
 
Topic's mood 75 Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 75)
By Percy
03-02-2012 7:54 AM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 24)
By idscience
03-01-2012 9:25 PM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 98)
By idscience
03-02-2012 4:23 PM
Topic's mood 76 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 76)
By RAZD
03-02-2012 8:00 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 67)
By idscience
03-02-2012 6:13 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 99)
By idscience
03-02-2012 4:29 PM
Topic's mood 77 Is it a duck or what? (Message 77)
By Philo
03-02-2012 8:08 AM
 
Re: Is it a duck or what? (Message 80)
By Panda
03-02-2012 8:30 AM
Re: Is it a duck or what? (Message 101)
By idscience
03-02-2012 4:35 PM
Topic's mood 78 Re: Evidence to Settle the Debate (Message 78)
By crashfrog
03-02-2012 8:08 AM
Re: Evidence to Settle the Debate (Message 48)
By idscience
03-02-2012 2:13 AM
 
Topic's mood 79 Moderator Advisory (Message 79)
By Admin
03-02-2012 8:26 AM
 
macroevolution definitions (Message 81)
By RAZD
03-02-2012 8:52 AM
Re: Advisory (Message 82)
By Theodoric
03-02-2012 9:04 AM
Topic's mood 80 Re: Is it a duck or what? (Message 80)
By Panda
03-02-2012 8:30 AM
Is it a duck or what? (Message 77)
By Philo
03-02-2012 8:08 AM
 
Topic's mood 81 macroevolution definitions (Message 81)
By RAZD
03-02-2012 8:52 AM
Moderator Advisory (Message 79)
By Admin
03-02-2012 8:26 AM
 
Topic's mood 82 Re: Advisory (Message 82)
By Theodoric
03-02-2012 9:04 AM
Moderator Advisory (Message 79)
By Admin
03-02-2012 8:26 AM
idscience and the definition of macroevolution (Message 86)
By RAZD
03-02-2012 11:16 AM
Topic's mood 83 Re: Evidence to Settle the Debate (Message 83)
By dwise1
03-02-2012 10:34 AM
Re: Evidence to Settle the Debate (Message 55)
By idscience
03-02-2012 3:16 AM
 
Topic's mood 84 macroevolution is the only explanation (Message 84)
By New Cat's Eye
03-02-2012 10:45 AM
Message 1
By idscience
03-01-2012 5:17 PM
Re: macroevolution is the only explanation (Message 103)
By idscience
03-02-2012 4:50 PM
Topic's mood 85 Evidence (for you to ignore, misrepresent, or deny) (Message 85)
By Coyote
03-02-2012 10:48 AM
Message 1
By idscience
03-01-2012 5:17 PM
Re: Evidence (for you to ignore, misrepresent, or deny) (Message 104)
By idscience
03-02-2012 4:54 PM
Topic's mood 86 idscience and the definition of macroevolution (Message 86)
By RAZD
03-02-2012 11:16 AM
Re: Advisory (Message 82)
By Theodoric
03-02-2012 9:04 AM
Re: idscience and the definition of macroevolution (Message 87)
By Admin
03-02-2012 11:31 AM
Re: idscience and the definition of macroevolution (Message 105)
By idscience
03-02-2012 5:04 PM
Topic's mood 87 Re: idscience and the definition of macroevolution (Message 87)
By Admin
03-02-2012 11:31 AM
idscience and the definition of macroevolution (Message 86)
By RAZD
03-02-2012 11:16 AM
Re: idscience and the definition of macroevolution (Message 91)
By RAZD
03-02-2012 1:27 PM
Topic's mood 88 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 88)
By Taq
03-02-2012 12:29 PM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 32)
By idscience
03-01-2012 11:14 PM
 
Topic's mood 89 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 89)
By Taq
03-02-2012 12:33 PM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 67)
By idscience
03-02-2012 6:13 AM
 
Topic's mood 90 Re: Evidence to Settle the Debate (Message 90)
By Drosophilla
03-02-2012 1:19 PM
Re: Evidence to Settle the Debate (Message 48)
By idscience
03-02-2012 2:13 AM
 
Topic's mood 91 Re: idscience and the definition of macroevolution (Message 91)
By RAZD
03-02-2012 1:27 PM
Re: idscience and the definition of macroevolution (Message 87)
By Admin
03-02-2012 11:31 AM
 
Topic's mood 92 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 92)
By idscience
03-02-2012 3:47 PM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 68)
By Tangle
03-02-2012 6:26 AM
Photoreceptors (Message 125)
By caffeine
03-05-2012 10:30 AM
Topic's mood 93 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 93)
By idscience
03-02-2012 3:51 PM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 69)
By Panda
03-02-2012 6:59 AM
So do the examples given meet the criteria of macroevolution as defined? (Message 102)
By RAZD
03-02-2012 4:48 PM
Topic's mood 94 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 94)
By idscience
03-02-2012 3:56 PM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 70)
By Huntard
03-02-2012 7:18 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 95)
By Percy
03-02-2012 4:11 PM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 97)
By crashfrog
03-02-2012 4:21 PM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 113)
By Drosophilla
03-02-2012 6:02 PM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 117)
By Huntard
03-02-2012 10:45 PM
Topic's mood 95 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 95)
By Percy
03-02-2012 4:11 PM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 94)
By idscience
03-02-2012 3:56 PM
 
Topic's mood 96 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 96)
By idscience
03-02-2012 4:19 PM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 72)
By RAZD
03-02-2012 7:29 AM
macroevolution is a process not an hypothesis - are you talking about ToE? (Message 115)
By RAZD
03-02-2012 9:06 PM
Topic's mood 97 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 97)
By crashfrog
03-02-2012 4:21 PM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 94)
By idscience
03-02-2012 3:56 PM
 
Topic's mood 98 Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 98)
By idscience
03-02-2012 4:23 PM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 75)
By Percy
03-02-2012 7:54 AM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 100)
By Admin
03-02-2012 4:34 PM
Topic's mood 99 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 99)
By idscience
03-02-2012 4:29 PM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 76)
By RAZD
03-02-2012 8:00 AM
definitions, macroevolution etc (Message 116)
By RAZD
03-02-2012 9:45 PM
Topic's mood 100 Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 100)
By Admin
03-02-2012 4:34 PM
Re: Please define macroevolution first. (Message 98)
By idscience
03-02-2012 4:23 PM
 
Topic's mood 101 Re: Is it a duck or what? (Message 101)
By idscience
03-02-2012 4:35 PM
Is it a duck or what? (Message 77)
By Philo
03-02-2012 8:08 AM
Re: Is it a duck or is it another pratt? (Message 107)
By RAZD
03-02-2012 5:08 PM
Re: Is it a duck or what? (Message 109)
By Theodoric
03-02-2012 5:32 PM
Topic's mood 102 So do the examples given meet the criteria of macroevolution as defined? (Message 102)
By RAZD
03-02-2012 4:48 PM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 93)
By idscience
03-02-2012 3:51 PM
 
Topic's mood 103 Re: macroevolution is the only explanation (Message 103)
By idscience
03-02-2012 4:50 PM
macroevolution is the only explanation (Message 84)
By New Cat's Eye
03-02-2012 10:45 AM
Re: macroevolution is the only explanation (Message 106)
By New Cat's Eye
03-02-2012 5:04 PM
Re: macroevolution is the only explanation (Message 111)
By subbie
03-02-2012 5:52 PM
Topic's mood 104 Re: Evidence (for you to ignore, misrepresent, or deny) (Message 104)
By idscience
03-02-2012 4:54 PM
Evidence (for you to ignore, misrepresent, or deny) (Message 85)
By Coyote
03-02-2012 10:48 AM
 
Topic's mood 105 Re: idscience and the definition of macroevolution (Message 105)
By idscience
03-02-2012 5:04 PM
idscience and the definition of macroevolution (Message 86)
By RAZD
03-02-2012 11:16 AM
Re: idscience and the definition of macroevolution (Message 108)
By crashfrog
03-02-2012 5:13 PM
Re: idscience and the definition of macroevolution (Message 110)
By Percy
03-02-2012 5:33 PM
Re: idscience and the definition of macroevolution (Message 112)
By RAZD
03-02-2012 6:00 PM
Topic's mood 106 Re: macroevolution is the only explanation (Message 106)
By New Cat's Eye
03-02-2012 5:04 PM
Re: macroevolution is the only explanation (Message 103)
By idscience
03-02-2012 4:50 PM
 
Topic's mood 107 Re: Is it a duck or is it another pratt? (Message 107)
By RAZD
03-02-2012 5:08 PM
Re: Is it a duck or what? (Message 101)
By idscience
03-02-2012 4:35 PM
 
Topic's mood 108 Re: idscience and the definition of macroevolution (Message 108)
By crashfrog
03-02-2012 5:13 PM
Re: idscience and the definition of macroevolution (Message 105)
By idscience
03-02-2012 5:04 PM
 
Topic's mood 109 Re: Is it a duck or what? (Message 109)
By Theodoric
03-02-2012 5:32 PM
Re: Is it a duck or what? (Message 101)
By idscience
03-02-2012 4:35 PM
 
Topic's mood 110 Re: idscience and the definition of macroevolution (Message 110)
By Percy
03-02-2012 5:33 PM
Re: idscience and the definition of macroevolution (Message 105)
By idscience
03-02-2012 5:04 PM
 
Topic's mood 111 Re: macroevolution is the only explanation (Message 111)
By subbie
03-02-2012 5:52 PM
Re: macroevolution is the only explanation (Message 103)
By idscience
03-02-2012 4:50 PM
 
Topic's mood 112 Re: idscience and the definition of macroevolution (Message 112)
By RAZD
03-02-2012 6:00 PM
Re: idscience and the definition of macroevolution (Message 105)
By idscience
03-02-2012 5:04 PM
 
Topic's mood 113 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 113)
By Drosophilla
03-02-2012 6:02 PM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 94)
By idscience
03-02-2012 3:56 PM
 
Topic's mood 114 Moderator Warning (Message 114)
By Admin
03-02-2012 6:11 PM
   
Topic's mood 115 macroevolution is a process not an hypothesis - are you talking about ToE? (Message 115)
By RAZD
03-02-2012 9:06 PM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 96)
By idscience
03-02-2012 4:19 PM
 
Topic's mood 116 definitions, macroevolution etc (Message 116)
By RAZD
03-02-2012 9:45 PM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 99)
By idscience
03-02-2012 4:29 PM
 
Topic's mood 117 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 117)
By Huntard
03-02-2012 10:45 PM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 94)
By idscience
03-02-2012 3:56 PM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 118)
By Big_Al35
03-05-2012 7:53 AM
Topic's mood 118 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 118)
By Big_Al35
03-05-2012 7:53 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 117)
By Huntard
03-02-2012 10:45 PM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 119)
By Percy
03-05-2012 8:40 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 120)
By RAZD
03-05-2012 8:50 AM
Topic's mood 119 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 119)
By Percy
03-05-2012 8:40 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 118)
By Big_Al35
03-05-2012 7:53 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 123)
By Big_Al35
03-05-2012 10:21 AM
Topic's mood 120 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 120)
By RAZD
03-05-2012 8:50 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 118)
By Big_Al35
03-05-2012 7:53 AM
 
Topic's mood 121 What is macro-evolution? (Message 121)
By jar
03-05-2012 9:54 AM
 
Re: What is macro-evolution? (Message 122)
By RAZD
03-05-2012 10:11 AM
Re: What is macro-evolution? (Message 136)
By Tangle
03-05-2012 12:07 PM
Topic's mood 122 Re: What is macro-evolution? (Message 122)
By RAZD
03-05-2012 10:11 AM
What is macro-evolution? (Message 121)
By jar
03-05-2012 9:54 AM
 
Topic's mood 123 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 123)
By Big_Al35
03-05-2012 10:21 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 119)
By Percy
03-05-2012 8:40 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 124)
By crashfrog
03-05-2012 10:25 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 126)
By Percy
03-05-2012 10:38 AM
Topic's mood 124 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 124)
By crashfrog
03-05-2012 10:25 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 123)
By Big_Al35
03-05-2012 10:21 AM
 
Topic's mood 125 Photoreceptors (Message 125)
By caffeine
03-05-2012 10:30 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 92)
By idscience
03-02-2012 3:47 PM
 
Topic's mood 126 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 126)
By Percy
03-05-2012 10:38 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 123)
By Big_Al35
03-05-2012 10:21 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 127)
By Big_Al35
03-05-2012 10:53 AM
Topic's mood 127 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 127)
By Big_Al35
03-05-2012 10:53 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 126)
By Percy
03-05-2012 10:38 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 128)
By Percy
03-05-2012 11:17 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 129)
By jar
03-05-2012 11:26 AM
Topic's mood 128 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 128)
By Percy
03-05-2012 11:17 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 127)
By Big_Al35
03-05-2012 10:53 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 130)
By Big_Al35
03-05-2012 11:26 AM
Topic's mood 129 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 129)
By jar
03-05-2012 11:26 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 127)
By Big_Al35
03-05-2012 10:53 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 131)
By Big_Al35
03-05-2012 11:38 AM
Topic's mood 130 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 130)
By Big_Al35
03-05-2012 11:26 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 128)
By Percy
03-05-2012 11:17 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 132)
By Percy
03-05-2012 11:47 AM
Topic's mood 131 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 131)
By Big_Al35
03-05-2012 11:38 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 129)
By jar
03-05-2012 11:26 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 134)
By RAZD
03-05-2012 12:00 PM
The exceptions rule the day. (Message 135)
By jar
03-05-2012 12:07 PM
Topic's mood 132 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 132)
By Percy
03-05-2012 11:47 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 130)
By Big_Al35
03-05-2012 11:26 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 133)
By Big_Al35
03-05-2012 11:56 AM
Topic's mood 133 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 133)
By Big_Al35
03-05-2012 11:56 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 132)
By Percy
03-05-2012 11:47 AM
 
Topic's mood 134 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 134)
By RAZD
03-05-2012 12:00 PM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 131)
By Big_Al35
03-05-2012 11:38 AM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 137)
By Big_Al35
03-05-2012 1:57 PM
Topic's mood 135 The exceptions rule the day. (Message 135)
By jar
03-05-2012 12:07 PM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 131)
By Big_Al35
03-05-2012 11:38 AM
 
Topic's mood 136 Re: What is macro-evolution? (Message 136)
By Tangle
03-05-2012 12:07 PM
What is macro-evolution? (Message 121)
By jar
03-05-2012 9:54 AM
 
Topic's mood 137 Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 137)
By Big_Al35
03-05-2012 1:57 PM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 134)
By RAZD
03-05-2012 12:00 PM
Natural Selection in action (Message 138)
By jar
03-05-2012 2:09 PM
peppered moth thread (Message 143)
By RAZD
03-05-2012 4:27 PM
Topic's mood 138 Natural Selection in action (Message 138)
By jar
03-05-2012 2:09 PM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 137)
By Big_Al35
03-05-2012 1:57 PM
Re: Natural Selection in action (Message 139)
By Big_Al35
03-05-2012 2:38 PM
Topic's mood 139 Re: Natural Selection in action (Message 139)
By Big_Al35
03-05-2012 2:38 PM
Natural Selection in action (Message 138)
By jar
03-05-2012 2:09 PM
Re: Natural Selection in action (Message 140)
By Percy
03-05-2012 3:15 PM
Re: Natural Selection in action (Message 142)
By jar
03-05-2012 4:18 PM
Topic's mood 140 Re: Natural Selection in action (Message 140)
By Percy
03-05-2012 3:15 PM
Re: Natural Selection in action (Message 139)
By Big_Al35
03-05-2012 2:38 PM
Re: Natural Selection in action (Message 141)
By Big_Al35
03-05-2012 3:34 PM
Topic's mood 141 Re: Natural Selection in action (Message 141)
By Big_Al35
03-05-2012 3:34 PM
Re: Natural Selection in action (Message 140)
By Percy
03-05-2012 3:15 PM
 
Topic's mood 142 Re: Natural Selection in action (Message 142)
By jar
03-05-2012 4:18 PM
Re: Natural Selection in action (Message 139)
By Big_Al35
03-05-2012 2:38 PM
 
Topic's mood 143 peppered moth thread (Message 143)
By RAZD
03-05-2012 4:27 PM
Re: so can you define macroevolution or not? (Message 137)
By Big_Al35
03-05-2012 1:57 PM
 
Topic's mood 144 Message 144
By idscience
03-05-2012 4:38 PM
 
Message 145
By Perdition
03-05-2012 4:56 PM
Message 146
By jar
03-05-2012 5:01 PM
Message 147
By Dr Adequate
03-05-2012 5:17 PM
Message 148
By Theodoric
03-05-2012 5:25 PM
Message 149
By Admin
03-05-2012 5:53 PM
macroevolution is originally a scientific definition of a process (Message 151)
By RAZD
03-05-2012 7:19 PM
Message 152
By Pressie
03-06-2012 3:44 AM
Topic's mood 145 Message 145
By Perdition
03-05-2012 4:56 PM
Message 144
By idscience
03-05-2012 4:38 PM
 
Topic's mood 146 Message 146
By jar
03-05-2012 5:01 PM
Message 144
By idscience
03-05-2012 4:38 PM
 
Topic's mood 147 Message 147
By Dr Adequate
03-05-2012 5:17 PM
Message 144
By idscience
03-05-2012 4:38 PM
 
Topic's mood 148 Message 148
By Theodoric
03-05-2012 5:25 PM
Message 144
By idscience
03-05-2012 4:38 PM
 
Topic's mood 149 Message 149
By Admin
03-05-2012 5:53 PM
Message 144
By idscience
03-05-2012 4:38 PM
Message 150
By idscience
03-05-2012 6:26 PM
Topic's mood 150 Message 150
By idscience
03-05-2012 6:26 PM
Message 149
By Admin
03-05-2012 5:53 PM
Message 153
By Pressie
03-06-2012 4:27 AM
Topic's mood 151 macroevolution is originally a scientific definition of a process (Message 151)
By RAZD
03-05-2012 7:19 PM
Message 144
By idscience
03-05-2012 4:38 PM
 
Topic's mood 152 Message 152
By Pressie
03-06-2012 3:44 AM
Message 144
By idscience
03-05-2012 4:38 PM
 
Topic's mood 153 Message 153
By Pressie
03-06-2012 4:27 AM
Message 150
By idscience
03-05-2012 6:26 PM
Message 154
By idscience
03-06-2012 6:02 AM
Topic's mood 154 Message 154
By idscience
03-06-2012 6:02 AM
Message 153
By Pressie
03-06-2012 4:27 AM
Message 155
By Pressie
03-06-2012 8:25 AM
Global Warming (Message 156)
By jar
03-06-2012 8:31 AM
Topic's mood 155 Message 155
By Pressie
03-06-2012 8:25 AM
Message 154
By idscience
03-06-2012 6:02 AM
 
Topic's mood 156 Global Warming (Message 156)
By jar
03-06-2012 8:31 AM
Message 154
By idscience
03-06-2012 6:02 AM
 
Topic's mood 157 Thread Summaries Starting Now (Message 157)
By Admin
03-06-2012 8:38 AM
   
Topic's mood 158 Summary: Macroevolution is defined as a process that was already observed. (Message 158)
By RAZD
03-06-2012 10:51 AM
   
Topic's mood 159 It's all about the nested hierarchies (Message 159)
By Taq
03-06-2012 11:40 AM
   
Topic's mood 160 Message 160
By Big_Al35
03-06-2012 12:26 PM
   
Topic's mood 161 Summary (Message 161)
By Theodoric
03-06-2012 12:39 PM
   
Topic's mood 162 Summary: Disappointing (Message 162)
By Percy
03-06-2012 1:01 PM
   
Topic's mood 163 Summary (Message 163)
By Coyote
03-06-2012 1:26 PM
   
Topic's mood 164 Message 164
By subbie
03-06-2012 2:17 PM
   

Thread is open and has no recent unread messages.
Thread is open and has recent unread messages.
Thread is open and very active, but has no unread messages.
Thread is open, very active, and has unread messages.
Thread is closed and has no recent unread messages.
Thread is closed and has recent unread messages.
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019