Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 45 (9208 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: anil dahar
Post Volume: Total: 919,516 Year: 6,773/9,624 Month: 113/238 Week: 30/83 Day: 6/3 Hour: 0/0

EvC Forum ⇒ All Forums ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Geology and the Great Flood ⇒

Motley Flood Thread (formerly Historical Science Mystification of Public)

Key: •Answered, •Noted, •Unanswered
Originator: Faith, 05-27-2018 2:39 AM
  Msg
Num 		Message Details Reply To Replies
Topic's mood 1 Message 1
By Faith
05-27-2018 2:39 AM
  
•Message 3
By PaulK
05-27-2018 5:38 AM
•Message 4
By RAZD
05-27-2018 7:19 AM
•Message 5
By Modulous
05-27-2018 9:48 AM
•Message 6
By Percy
05-27-2018 10:53 AM
•Message 18
By Tangle
05-27-2018 2:38 PM
•Message 36
By kbertsche
05-27-2018 8:17 PM
Topic's mood 2 Thread Copied from Proposed New Topics Forum (Message 2)
By Adminnemooseus
05-27-2018 4:46 AM
    
Topic's mood 3 Message 3
By PaulK
05-27-2018 5:38 AM
 Message 1
By Faith
05-27-2018 2:39 AM
  
Topic's mood 4 Message 4
By RAZD
05-27-2018 7:19 AM
 Message 1
By Faith
05-27-2018 2:39 AM
•Message 8
By Tanypteryx
05-27-2018 12:26 PM
•Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 11)
By Faith
05-27-2018 12:53 PM
Topic's mood 5 Message 5
By Modulous
05-27-2018 9:48 AM
 Message 1
By Faith
05-27-2018 2:39 AM
  
Topic's mood 6 Message 6
By Percy
05-27-2018 10:53 AM
 Message 1
By Faith
05-27-2018 2:39 AM
•Message 7
By edge
05-27-2018 11:20 AM
•Message 10
By Capt Stormfield
05-27-2018 12:48 PM
•Message 30
By Faith
05-27-2018 4:47 PM
•Your lists (Message 41)
By Faith
05-27-2018 11:19 PM
•Your second list (Message 50)
By Faith
05-28-2018 11:58 AM
Topic's mood 7 Message 7
By edge
05-27-2018 11:20 AM
 Message 6
By Percy
05-27-2018 10:53 AM
•Message 9
By Tanypteryx
05-27-2018 12:43 PM
•Message 16
By Percy
05-27-2018 1:52 PM
Topic's mood 8 Message 8
By Tanypteryx
05-27-2018 12:26 PM
 Message 4
By RAZD
05-27-2018 7:19 AM
  
Topic's mood 9 Message 9
By Tanypteryx
05-27-2018 12:43 PM
 Message 7
By edge
05-27-2018 11:20 AM
  
Topic's mood 10 Message 10
By Capt Stormfield
05-27-2018 12:48 PM
 Message 6
By Percy
05-27-2018 10:53 AM
  
Topic's mood 11 Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 11)
By Faith
05-27-2018 12:53 PM
 Message 4
By RAZD
05-27-2018 7:19 AM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 12)
By Capt Stormfield
05-27-2018 1:01 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 13)
By Capt Stormfield
05-27-2018 1:12 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 17)
By Modulous
05-27-2018 2:01 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 19)
By Percy
05-27-2018 2:38 PM
•The public needs to earn respect (and also be willing to learn) (Message 20)
By jar
05-27-2018 3:30 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 22)
By NoNukes
05-27-2018 3:56 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 44)
By RAZD
05-28-2018 9:12 AM
Topic's mood 12 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 12)
By Capt Stormfield
05-27-2018 1:01 PM
 Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 11)
By Faith
05-27-2018 12:53 PM
  
Topic's mood 13 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 13)
By Capt Stormfield
05-27-2018 1:12 PM
 Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 11)
By Faith
05-27-2018 12:53 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 14)
By edge
05-27-2018 1:39 PM
Topic's mood 14 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 14)
By edge
05-27-2018 1:39 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 13)
By Capt Stormfield
05-27-2018 1:12 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 15)
By Faith
05-27-2018 1:45 PM
Topic's mood 15 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 15)
By Faith
05-27-2018 1:45 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 14)
By edge
05-27-2018 1:39 PM
  
Topic's mood 16 Message 16
By Percy
05-27-2018 1:52 PM
 Message 7
By edge
05-27-2018 11:20 AM
  
Topic's mood 17 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 17)
By Modulous
05-27-2018 2:01 PM
 Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 11)
By Faith
05-27-2018 12:53 PM
  
Topic's mood 18 Message 18
By Tangle
05-27-2018 2:38 PM
 Message 1
By Faith
05-27-2018 2:39 AM
  
Topic's mood 19 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 19)
By Percy
05-27-2018 2:38 PM
 Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 11)
By Faith
05-27-2018 12:53 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 21)
By Faith
05-27-2018 3:51 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 23)
By Faith
05-27-2018 4:07 PM
Topic's mood 20 The public needs to earn respect (and also be willing to learn) (Message 20)
By jar
05-27-2018 3:30 PM
 Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 11)
By Faith
05-27-2018 12:53 PM
•Re: The public needs to earn respect (and also be willing to learn) (Message 25)
By Faith
05-27-2018 4:13 PM
Topic's mood 21 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 21)
By Faith
05-27-2018 3:51 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 19)
By Percy
05-27-2018 2:38 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 26)
By PaulK
05-27-2018 4:19 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 49)
By Percy
05-28-2018 11:18 AM
Topic's mood 22 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 22)
By NoNukes
05-27-2018 3:56 PM
 Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 11)
By Faith
05-27-2018 12:53 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 24)
By Faith
05-27-2018 4:08 PM
Topic's mood 23 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 23)
By Faith
05-27-2018 4:07 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 19)
By Percy
05-27-2018 2:38 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 28)
By NoNukes
05-27-2018 4:27 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 52)
By Percy
05-28-2018 12:29 PM
Topic's mood 24 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 24)
By Faith
05-27-2018 4:08 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 22)
By NoNukes
05-27-2018 3:56 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 27)
By NoNukes
05-27-2018 4:25 PM
Topic's mood 25 Re: The public needs to earn respect (and also be willing to learn) (Message 25)
By Faith
05-27-2018 4:13 PM
 The public needs to earn respect (and also be willing to learn) (Message 20)
By jar
05-27-2018 3:30 PM
•You cannot earn respect by refusing to address reality. (Message 29)
By jar
05-27-2018 4:31 PM
•Re: The public needs to earn respect (and also be willing to learn) (Message 56)
By Percy
05-28-2018 1:08 PM
Topic's mood 26 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 26)
By PaulK
05-27-2018 4:19 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 21)
By Faith
05-27-2018 3:51 PM
  
Topic's mood 27 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 27)
By NoNukes
05-27-2018 4:25 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 24)
By Faith
05-27-2018 4:08 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 32)
By Faith
05-27-2018 4:56 PM
Topic's mood 28 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 28)
By NoNukes
05-27-2018 4:27 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 23)
By Faith
05-27-2018 4:07 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 31)
By Faith
05-27-2018 4:54 PM
Topic's mood 29 You cannot earn respect by refusing to address reality. (Message 29)
By jar
05-27-2018 4:31 PM
 Re: The public needs to earn respect (and also be willing to learn) (Message 25)
By Faith
05-27-2018 4:13 PM
  
Topic's mood 30 Message 30
By Faith
05-27-2018 4:47 PM
 Message 6
By Percy
05-27-2018 10:53 AM
•Message 58
By Percy
05-28-2018 1:55 PM
•Careful What You Wish For. (Message 74)
By Capt Stormfield
05-28-2018 6:20 PM
•Message 77
By NoNukes
05-28-2018 9:20 PM
•consistency ... not (Message 84)
By RAZD
05-29-2018 6:21 AM
Topic's mood 31 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 31)
By Faith
05-27-2018 4:54 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 28)
By NoNukes
05-27-2018 4:27 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 62)
By NoNukes
05-28-2018 2:40 PM
Topic's mood 32 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 32)
By Faith
05-27-2018 4:56 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 27)
By NoNukes
05-27-2018 4:25 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 33)
By DrJones*
05-27-2018 5:00 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 60)
By Percy
05-28-2018 2:08 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 66)
By NoNukes
05-28-2018 3:13 PM
Topic's mood 33 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 33)
By DrJones*
05-27-2018 5:00 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 32)
By Faith
05-27-2018 4:56 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 34)
By Faith
05-27-2018 5:05 PM
Topic's mood 34 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 34)
By Faith
05-27-2018 5:05 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 33)
By DrJones*
05-27-2018 5:00 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 37)
By edge
05-27-2018 9:10 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 61)
By Percy
05-28-2018 2:15 PM
Topic's mood 35 Predictable Hawaii (Message 35)
By Capt Stormfield
05-27-2018 6:44 PM
  
•Re: Predictable Hawaii (Message 38)
By edge
05-27-2018 9:17 PM
Topic's mood 36 Message 36
By kbertsche
05-27-2018 8:17 PM
 Message 1
By Faith
05-27-2018 2:39 AM
•Corals (Message 39)
By Faith
05-27-2018 10:32 PM
Topic's mood 37 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 37)
By edge
05-27-2018 9:10 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 34)
By Faith
05-27-2018 5:05 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 40)
By Faith
05-27-2018 10:37 PM
Topic's mood 38 Re: Predictable Hawaii (Message 38)
By edge
05-27-2018 9:17 PM
 Predictable Hawaii (Message 35)
By Capt Stormfield
05-27-2018 6:44 PM
  
Topic's mood 39 Corals (Message 39)
By Faith
05-27-2018 10:32 PM
 Message 36
By kbertsche
05-27-2018 8:17 PM
•Re: Corals (Message 63)
By Percy
05-28-2018 2:43 PM
Topic's mood 40 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 40)
By Faith
05-27-2018 10:37 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 37)
By edge
05-27-2018 9:10 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 42)
By PaulK
05-28-2018 1:04 AM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 43)
By edge
05-28-2018 8:51 AM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 45)
By Phat
05-28-2018 9:42 AM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 68)
By Percy
05-28-2018 3:19 PM
Topic's mood 41 Your lists (Message 41)
By Faith
05-27-2018 11:19 PM
 Message 6
By Percy
05-27-2018 10:53 AM
•Re: Your lists (Message 79)
By Percy
05-28-2018 9:47 PM
Topic's mood 42 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 42)
By PaulK
05-28-2018 1:04 AM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 40)
By Faith
05-27-2018 10:37 PM
  
Topic's mood 43 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 43)
By edge
05-28-2018 8:51 AM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 40)
By Faith
05-27-2018 10:37 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 47)
By Faith
05-28-2018 10:34 AM
Topic's mood 44 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 44)
By RAZD
05-28-2018 9:12 AM
 Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 11)
By Faith
05-27-2018 12:53 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 46)
By Phat
05-28-2018 9:47 AM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 48)
By Faith
05-28-2018 10:45 AM
Topic's mood 45 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 45)
By Phat
05-28-2018 9:42 AM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 40)
By Faith
05-27-2018 10:37 PM
  
Topic's mood 46 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 46)
By Phat
05-28-2018 9:47 AM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 44)
By RAZD
05-28-2018 9:12 AM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 85)
By RAZD
05-29-2018 6:27 AM
Topic's mood 47 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 47)
By Faith
05-28-2018 10:34 AM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 43)
By edge
05-28-2018 8:51 AM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 87)
By Percy
05-29-2018 6:44 AM
Topic's mood 48 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 48)
By Faith
05-28-2018 10:45 AM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 44)
By RAZD
05-28-2018 9:12 AM
•Murdock's National Geographic now sensationalist rag (Message 83)
By RAZD
05-29-2018 6:12 AM
Topic's mood 49 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 49)
By Percy
05-28-2018 11:18 AM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 21)
By Faith
05-27-2018 3:51 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 51)
By Faith
05-28-2018 12:14 PM
Topic's mood 50 Your second list (Message 50)
By Faith
05-28-2018 11:58 AM
 Message 6
By Percy
05-27-2018 10:53 AM
•Re: Your second list (Message 88)
By Percy
05-29-2018 10:25 AM
Topic's mood 51 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 51)
By Faith
05-28-2018 12:14 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 49)
By Percy
05-28-2018 11:18 AM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 54)
By Tangle
05-28-2018 12:58 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 55)
By Modulous
05-28-2018 1:08 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 181)
By Percy
05-31-2018 6:56 AM
Topic's mood 52 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 52)
By Percy
05-28-2018 12:29 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 23)
By Faith
05-27-2018 4:07 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 53)
By Faith
05-28-2018 12:54 PM
Topic's mood 53 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 53)
By Faith
05-28-2018 12:54 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 52)
By Percy
05-28-2018 12:29 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 57)
By Modulous
05-28-2018 1:11 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 59)
By PaulK
05-28-2018 2:06 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 134)
By Percy
05-30-2018 9:36 AM
•Micro and Macro Evolution Simplified (Message 139)
By RAZD
05-30-2018 10:34 AM
Topic's mood 54 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 54)
By Tangle
05-28-2018 12:58 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 51)
By Faith
05-28-2018 12:14 PM
  
Topic's mood 55 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 55)
By Modulous
05-28-2018 1:08 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 51)
By Faith
05-28-2018 12:14 PM
  
Topic's mood 56 Re: The public needs to earn respect (and also be willing to learn) (Message 56)
By Percy
05-28-2018 1:08 PM
 Re: The public needs to earn respect (and also be willing to learn) (Message 25)
By Faith
05-27-2018 4:13 PM
  
Topic's mood 57 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 57)
By Modulous
05-28-2018 1:11 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 53)
By Faith
05-28-2018 12:54 PM
  
Topic's mood 58 Message 58
By Percy
05-28-2018 1:55 PM
 Message 30
By Faith
05-27-2018 4:47 PM
  
Topic's mood 59 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 59)
By PaulK
05-28-2018 2:06 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 53)
By Faith
05-28-2018 12:54 PM
  
Topic's mood 60 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 60)
By Percy
05-28-2018 2:08 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 32)
By Faith
05-27-2018 4:56 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 65)
By Faith
05-28-2018 3:00 PM
Topic's mood 61 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 61)
By Percy
05-28-2018 2:15 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 34)
By Faith
05-27-2018 5:05 PM
  
Topic's mood 62 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 62)
By NoNukes
05-28-2018 2:40 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 31)
By Faith
05-27-2018 4:54 PM
  
Topic's mood 63 Re: Corals (Message 63)
By Percy
05-28-2018 2:43 PM
 Corals (Message 39)
By Faith
05-27-2018 10:32 PM
•Re: Corals (Message 64)
By PaulK
05-28-2018 2:54 PM
Topic's mood 64 Re: Corals (Message 64)
By PaulK
05-28-2018 2:54 PM
 Re: Corals (Message 63)
By Percy
05-28-2018 2:43 PM
  
Topic's mood 65 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 65)
By Faith
05-28-2018 3:00 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 60)
By Percy
05-28-2018 2:08 PM
•Complaining is simply childish whining. (Message 67)
By jar
05-28-2018 3:16 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 135)
By Percy
05-30-2018 9:50 AM
Topic's mood 66 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 66)
By NoNukes
05-28-2018 3:13 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 32)
By Faith
05-27-2018 4:56 PM
  
Topic's mood 67 Complaining is simply childish whining. (Message 67)
By jar
05-28-2018 3:16 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 65)
By Faith
05-28-2018 3:00 PM
  
Topic's mood 68 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 68)
By Percy
05-28-2018 3:19 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 40)
By Faith
05-27-2018 10:37 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 69)
By Faith
05-28-2018 3:24 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 78)
By Faith
05-28-2018 9:26 PM
Topic's mood 69 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 69)
By Faith
05-28-2018 3:24 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 68)
By Percy
05-28-2018 3:19 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 70)
By PaulK
05-28-2018 3:39 PM
•Another really stupid Post Faith. (Message 73)
By jar
05-28-2018 5:15 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 75)
By Tanypteryx
05-28-2018 7:19 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 137)
By Percy
05-30-2018 10:13 AM
Topic's mood 70 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 70)
By PaulK
05-28-2018 3:39 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 69)
By Faith
05-28-2018 3:24 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 71)
By Faith
05-28-2018 3:45 PM
Topic's mood 71 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 71)
By Faith
05-28-2018 3:45 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 70)
By PaulK
05-28-2018 3:39 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 72)
By PaulK
05-28-2018 4:01 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 138)
By Percy
05-30-2018 10:27 AM
Topic's mood 72 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 72)
By PaulK
05-28-2018 4:01 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 71)
By Faith
05-28-2018 3:45 PM
  
Topic's mood 73 Another really stupid Post Faith. (Message 73)
By jar
05-28-2018 5:15 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 69)
By Faith
05-28-2018 3:24 PM
  
Topic's mood 74 Careful What You Wish For. (Message 74)
By Capt Stormfield
05-28-2018 6:20 PM
 Message 30
By Faith
05-27-2018 4:47 PM
  
Topic's mood 75 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 75)
By Tanypteryx
05-28-2018 7:19 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 69)
By Faith
05-28-2018 3:24 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 76)
By Faith
05-28-2018 9:08 PM
Topic's mood 76 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 76)
By Faith
05-28-2018 9:08 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 75)
By Tanypteryx
05-28-2018 7:19 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 143)
By Percy
05-30-2018 12:29 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 145)
By Tanypteryx
05-30-2018 1:20 PM
Topic's mood 77 Message 77
By NoNukes
05-28-2018 9:20 PM
 Message 30
By Faith
05-27-2018 4:47 PM
  
Topic's mood 78 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 78)
By Faith
05-28-2018 9:26 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 68)
By Percy
05-28-2018 3:19 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 144)
By Percy
05-30-2018 12:54 PM
Topic's mood 79 Re: Your lists (Message 79)
By Percy
05-28-2018 9:47 PM
 Your lists (Message 41)
By Faith
05-27-2018 11:19 PM
•Re: Your lists (Message 95)
By Faith
05-29-2018 4:27 PM
•Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 97)
By Faith
05-29-2018 4:56 PM
Topic's mood 80 A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 80)
By Faith
05-28-2018 11:35 PM
  
•Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 81)
By PaulK
05-28-2018 11:58 PM
•Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 82)
By Tangle
05-29-2018 2:46 AM
•Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 86)
By RAZD
05-29-2018 6:43 AM
•Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 146)
By Percy
05-30-2018 3:00 PM
Topic's mood 81 Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 81)
By PaulK
05-28-2018 11:58 PM
 A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 80)
By Faith
05-28-2018 11:35 PM
  
Topic's mood 82 Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 82)
By Tangle
05-29-2018 2:46 AM
 A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 80)
By Faith
05-28-2018 11:35 PM
  
Topic's mood 83 Murdock's National Geographic now sensationalist rag (Message 83)
By RAZD
05-29-2018 6:12 AM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 48)
By Faith
05-28-2018 10:45 AM
  
Topic's mood 84 consistency ... not (Message 84)
By RAZD
05-29-2018 6:21 AM
 Message 30
By Faith
05-27-2018 4:47 PM
  
Topic's mood 85 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 85)
By RAZD
05-29-2018 6:27 AM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 46)
By Phat
05-28-2018 9:47 AM
  
Topic's mood 86 Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 86)
By RAZD
05-29-2018 6:43 AM
 A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 80)
By Faith
05-28-2018 11:35 PM
•Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 92)
By Faith
05-29-2018 11:41 AM
Topic's mood 87 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 87)
By Percy
05-29-2018 6:44 AM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 47)
By Faith
05-28-2018 10:34 AM
  
Topic's mood 88 Re: Your second list (Message 88)
By Percy
05-29-2018 10:25 AM
 Your second list (Message 50)
By Faith
05-28-2018 11:58 AM
•Re: Your second list (Message 89)
By Faith
05-29-2018 10:44 AM
Topic's mood 89 Re: Your second list (Message 89)
By Faith
05-29-2018 10:44 AM
 Re: Your second list (Message 88)
By Percy
05-29-2018 10:25 AM
•Re: Your second list (Message 90)
By PaulK
05-29-2018 11:17 AM
•Re: Your second list (Message 91)
By jar
05-29-2018 11:17 AM
•Re: Your second list (Message 154)
By Percy
05-30-2018 5:16 PM
Topic's mood 90 Re: Your second list (Message 90)
By PaulK
05-29-2018 11:17 AM
 Re: Your second list (Message 89)
By Faith
05-29-2018 10:44 AM
  
Topic's mood 91 Re: Your second list (Message 91)
By jar
05-29-2018 11:17 AM
 Re: Your second list (Message 89)
By Faith
05-29-2018 10:44 AM
•Re: Your second list (Message 96)
By Phat
05-29-2018 4:30 PM
Topic's mood 92 Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 92)
By Faith
05-29-2018 11:41 AM
 Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 86)
By RAZD
05-29-2018 6:43 AM
•Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 93)
By PaulK
05-29-2018 12:13 PM
•Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 94)
By Tangle
05-29-2018 12:57 PM
•Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 132)
By RAZD
05-30-2018 8:46 AM
Topic's mood 93 Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 93)
By PaulK
05-29-2018 12:13 PM
 Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 92)
By Faith
05-29-2018 11:41 AM
  
Topic's mood 94 Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 94)
By Tangle
05-29-2018 12:57 PM
 Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 92)
By Faith
05-29-2018 11:41 AM
  
Topic's mood 95 Re: Your lists (Message 95)
By Faith
05-29-2018 4:27 PM
 Re: Your lists (Message 79)
By Percy
05-28-2018 9:47 PM
•Re: Your lists (Message 158)
By Percy
05-30-2018 6:42 PM
Topic's mood 96 Re: Your second list (Message 96)
By Phat
05-29-2018 4:30 PM
 Re: Your second list (Message 91)
By jar
05-29-2018 11:17 AM
•Re: Your second list (Message 98)
By jar
05-29-2018 4:59 PM
Topic's mood 97 Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 97)
By Faith
05-29-2018 4:56 PM
 Re: Your lists (Message 79)
By Percy
05-28-2018 9:47 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 99)
By PaulK
05-29-2018 5:00 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 161)
By Percy
05-30-2018 8:06 PM
Topic's mood 98 Re: Your second list (Message 98)
By jar
05-29-2018 4:59 PM
 Re: Your second list (Message 96)
By Phat
05-29-2018 4:30 PM
  
Topic's mood 99 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 99)
By PaulK
05-29-2018 5:00 PM
 Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 97)
By Faith
05-29-2018 4:56 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 100)
By Faith
05-29-2018 5:12 PM
Topic's mood 100 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 100)
By Faith
05-29-2018 5:12 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 99)
By PaulK
05-29-2018 5:00 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 101)
By PaulK
05-29-2018 5:15 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 109)
By JonF
05-29-2018 8:53 PM
Topic's mood 101 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 101)
By PaulK
05-29-2018 5:15 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 100)
By Faith
05-29-2018 5:12 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 102)
By Faith
05-29-2018 5:19 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 104)
By Faith
05-29-2018 5:32 PM
Topic's mood 102 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 102)
By Faith
05-29-2018 5:19 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 101)
By PaulK
05-29-2018 5:15 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 103)
By PaulK
05-29-2018 5:29 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 107)
By Tangle
05-29-2018 6:36 PM
Topic's mood 103 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 103)
By PaulK
05-29-2018 5:29 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 102)
By Faith
05-29-2018 5:19 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 105)
By Faith
05-29-2018 5:42 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 106)
By Faith
05-29-2018 5:46 PM
Topic's mood 104 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 104)
By Faith
05-29-2018 5:32 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 101)
By PaulK
05-29-2018 5:15 PM
  
Topic's mood 105 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 105)
By Faith
05-29-2018 5:42 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 103)
By PaulK
05-29-2018 5:29 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 125)
By PaulK
05-30-2018 12:02 AM
Topic's mood 106 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 106)
By Faith
05-29-2018 5:46 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 103)
By PaulK
05-29-2018 5:29 PM
  
Topic's mood 107 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 107)
By Tangle
05-29-2018 6:36 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 102)
By Faith
05-29-2018 5:19 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 108)
By Faith
05-29-2018 7:25 PM
Topic's mood 108 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 108)
By Faith
05-29-2018 7:25 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 107)
By Tangle
05-29-2018 6:36 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 110)
By NoNukes
05-29-2018 9:04 PM
Topic's mood 109 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 109)
By JonF
05-29-2018 8:53 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 100)
By Faith
05-29-2018 5:12 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 111)
By Faith
05-29-2018 9:10 PM
Topic's mood 110 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 110)
By NoNukes
05-29-2018 9:04 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 108)
By Faith
05-29-2018 7:25 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 112)
By Faith
05-29-2018 9:15 PM
Topic's mood 111 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 111)
By Faith
05-29-2018 9:10 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 109)
By JonF
05-29-2018 8:53 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 113)
By edge
05-29-2018 9:22 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 136)
By JonF
05-30-2018 9:59 AM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 162)
By Percy
05-30-2018 8:20 PM
Topic's mood 112 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 112)
By Faith
05-29-2018 9:15 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 110)
By NoNukes
05-29-2018 9:04 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 153)
By NoNukes
05-30-2018 5:05 PM
Topic's mood 113 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 113)
By edge
05-29-2018 9:22 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 111)
By Faith
05-29-2018 9:10 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 114)
By Faith
05-29-2018 9:24 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 115)
By Faith
05-29-2018 9:38 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 116)
By Faith
05-29-2018 10:11 PM
Topic's mood 114 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 114)
By Faith
05-29-2018 9:24 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 113)
By edge
05-29-2018 9:22 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 117)
By edge
05-29-2018 10:14 PM
Topic's mood 115 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 115)
By Faith
05-29-2018 9:38 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 113)
By edge
05-29-2018 9:22 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 119)
By edge
05-29-2018 10:38 PM
•Faith's sheet flow to stream flow epic fail (Message 130)
By RAZD
05-30-2018 7:24 AM
Topic's mood 116 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 116)
By Faith
05-29-2018 10:11 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 113)
By edge
05-29-2018 9:22 PM
  
Topic's mood 117 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 117)
By edge
05-29-2018 10:14 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 114)
By Faith
05-29-2018 9:24 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 118)
By Faith
05-29-2018 10:19 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 120)
By Faith
05-29-2018 10:39 PM
Topic's mood 118 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 118)
By Faith
05-29-2018 10:19 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 117)
By edge
05-29-2018 10:14 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 121)
By edge
05-29-2018 10:52 PM
Topic's mood 119 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 119)
By edge
05-29-2018 10:38 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 115)
By Faith
05-29-2018 9:38 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 122)
By Faith
05-29-2018 10:56 PM
Topic's mood 120 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 120)
By Faith
05-29-2018 10:39 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 117)
By edge
05-29-2018 10:14 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 123)
By Modulous
05-29-2018 11:17 PM
Topic's mood 121 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 121)
By edge
05-29-2018 10:52 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 118)
By Faith
05-29-2018 10:19 PM
  
Topic's mood 122 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 122)
By Faith
05-29-2018 10:56 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 119)
By edge
05-29-2018 10:38 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 129)
By edge
05-30-2018 12:47 AM
Topic's mood 123 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 123)
By Modulous
05-29-2018 11:17 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 120)
By Faith
05-29-2018 10:39 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 124)
By Faith
05-29-2018 11:48 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 126)
By Faith
05-30-2018 12:07 AM
Topic's mood 124 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 124)
By Faith
05-29-2018 11:48 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 123)
By Modulous
05-29-2018 11:17 PM
  
Topic's mood 125 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 125)
By PaulK
05-30-2018 12:02 AM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 105)
By Faith
05-29-2018 5:42 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 127)
By Faith
05-30-2018 12:08 AM
Topic's mood 126 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 126)
By Faith
05-30-2018 12:07 AM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 123)
By Modulous
05-29-2018 11:17 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 147)
By Modulous
05-30-2018 3:39 PM
Topic's mood 127 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 127)
By Faith
05-30-2018 12:08 AM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 125)
By PaulK
05-30-2018 12:02 AM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 128)
By PaulK
05-30-2018 12:34 AM
Topic's mood 128 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 128)
By PaulK
05-30-2018 12:34 AM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 127)
By Faith
05-30-2018 12:08 AM
  
Topic's mood 129 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 129)
By edge
05-30-2018 12:47 AM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 122)
By Faith
05-29-2018 10:56 PM
•EDGE'S OBJECTIONS (Message 151)
By Faith
05-30-2018 4:46 PM
Topic's mood 130 Faith's sheet flow to stream flow epic fail (Message 130)
By RAZD
05-30-2018 7:24 AM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 115)
By Faith
05-29-2018 9:38 PM
•Re: Faith's sheet flow to stream flow epic for sure but not failed (Message 131)
By Faith
05-30-2018 8:43 AM
•Re: Faith's sheet flow to stream flow epic fail (Message 209)
By Faith
06-01-2018 12:34 AM
Topic's mood 131 Re: Faith's sheet flow to stream flow epic for sure but not failed (Message 131)
By Faith
05-30-2018 8:43 AM
 Faith's sheet flow to stream flow epic fail (Message 130)
By RAZD
05-30-2018 7:24 AM
•Re: Faith's sheet flow to stream flow still epic fail, as is crack flow. (Message 141)
By RAZD
05-30-2018 11:37 AM
•Re: Faith's sheet flow to stream flow still epic fail (Message 142)
By RAZD
05-30-2018 11:55 AM
Topic's mood 132 Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 132)
By RAZD
05-30-2018 8:46 AM
 Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 92)
By Faith
05-29-2018 11:41 AM
•Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 133)
By Faith
05-30-2018 9:23 AM
Topic's mood 133 Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 133)
By Faith
05-30-2018 9:23 AM
 Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 132)
By RAZD
05-30-2018 8:46 AM
  
Topic's mood 134 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 134)
By Percy
05-30-2018 9:36 AM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 53)
By Faith
05-28-2018 12:54 PM
  
Topic's mood 135 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 135)
By Percy
05-30-2018 9:50 AM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 65)
By Faith
05-28-2018 3:00 PM
  
Topic's mood 136 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 136)
By JonF
05-30-2018 9:59 AM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 111)
By Faith
05-29-2018 9:10 PM
  
Topic's mood 137 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 137)
By Percy
05-30-2018 10:13 AM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 69)
By Faith
05-28-2018 3:24 PM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 140)
By NoNukes
05-30-2018 10:40 AM
Topic's mood 138 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 138)
By Percy
05-30-2018 10:27 AM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 71)
By Faith
05-28-2018 3:45 PM
  
Topic's mood 139 Micro and Macro Evolution Simplified (Message 139)
By RAZD
05-30-2018 10:34 AM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 53)
By Faith
05-28-2018 12:54 PM
  
Topic's mood 140 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 140)
By NoNukes
05-30-2018 10:40 AM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 137)
By Percy
05-30-2018 10:13 AM
•Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 571)
By Minnemooseus
06-11-2018 11:36 PM
Topic's mood 141 Re: Faith's sheet flow to stream flow still epic fail, as is crack flow. (Message 141)
By RAZD
05-30-2018 11:37 AM
 Re: Faith's sheet flow to stream flow epic for sure but not failed (Message 131)
By Faith
05-30-2018 8:43 AM
  
Topic's mood 142 Re: Faith's sheet flow to stream flow still epic fail (Message 142)
By RAZD
05-30-2018 11:55 AM
 Re: Faith's sheet flow to stream flow epic for sure but not failed (Message 131)
By Faith
05-30-2018 8:43 AM
•Re: Faith's sheet flow to stream flow still epic fail (Message 149)
By Faith
05-30-2018 4:39 PM
Topic's mood 143 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 143)
By Percy
05-30-2018 12:29 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 76)
By Faith
05-28-2018 9:08 PM
  
Topic's mood 144 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 144)
By Percy
05-30-2018 12:54 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 78)
By Faith
05-28-2018 9:26 PM
  
Topic's mood 145 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 145)
By Tanypteryx
05-30-2018 1:20 PM
 Re: Nope, it's not for the "scientifically literate" and the public deserves more respect (Message 76)
By Faith
05-28-2018 9:08 PM
  
Topic's mood 146 Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 146)
By Percy
05-30-2018 3:00 PM
 A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 80)
By Faith
05-28-2018 11:35 PM
•Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 148)
By Faith
05-30-2018 4:33 PM
Topic's mood 147 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 147)
By Modulous
05-30-2018 3:39 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 126)
By Faith
05-30-2018 12:07 AM
•Video on the formation of the Grand Canyon (Message 155)
By Faith
05-30-2018 5:58 PM
•Video continued LIFTED WITHOUT TILTING (Message 156)
By Faith
05-30-2018 6:36 PM
Topic's mood 148 Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 148)
By Faith
05-30-2018 4:33 PM
 Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 146)
By Percy
05-30-2018 3:00 PM
•Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 150)
By ringo
05-30-2018 4:41 PM
Topic's mood 149 Re: Faith's sheet flow to stream flow still epic fail (Message 149)
By Faith
05-30-2018 4:39 PM
 Re: Faith's sheet flow to stream flow still epic fail (Message 142)
By RAZD
05-30-2018 11:55 AM
•Re: Faith's sheet flow to stream flow still epic fail (Message 165)
By Percy
05-30-2018 9:11 PM
Topic's mood 150 Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 150)
By ringo
05-30-2018 4:41 PM
 Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 148)
By Faith
05-30-2018 4:33 PM
•Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 152)
By Faith
05-30-2018 4:54 PM
Topic's mood 151 EDGE'S OBJECTIONS (Message 151)
By Faith
05-30-2018 4:46 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 129)
By edge
05-30-2018 12:47 AM
  
Topic's mood 152 Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 152)
By Faith
05-30-2018 4:54 PM
 Re: A Digression to define the Theory of Evolution (Message 150)
By ringo
05-30-2018 4:41 PM
  
Topic's mood 153 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 153)
By NoNukes
05-30-2018 5:05 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 112)
By Faith
05-29-2018 9:15 PM
  
Topic's mood 154 Re: Your second list (Message 154)
By Percy
05-30-2018 5:16 PM
 Re: Your second list (Message 89)
By Faith
05-29-2018 10:44 AM
  
Topic's mood 155 Video on the formation of the Grand Canyon (Message 155)
By Faith
05-30-2018 5:58 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 147)
By Modulous
05-30-2018 3:39 PM
•Re: Video on the formation of the Grand Canyon (Message 157)
By Modulous
05-30-2018 6:39 PM
•Garnets and burial depth (Message 296)
By Minnemooseus
06-03-2018 6:13 AM
Topic's mood 156 Video continued LIFTED WITHOUT TILTING (Message 156)
By Faith
05-30-2018 6:36 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 147)
By Modulous
05-30-2018 3:39 PM
•Re: Video continued LIFTED WITHOUT TILTING (Message 159)
By Modulous
05-30-2018 6:43 PM
Topic's mood 157 Re: Video on the formation of the Grand Canyon (Message 157)
By Modulous
05-30-2018 6:39 PM
 Video on the formation of the Grand Canyon (Message 155)
By Faith
05-30-2018 5:58 PM
•Re: Video on the formation of the Grand Canyon (Message 160)
By Faith
05-30-2018 7:06 PM
•Re: Video on the formation of the Grand Canyon (Message 163)
By Faith
05-30-2018 8:58 PM
Topic's mood 158 Re: Your lists (Message 158)
By Percy
05-30-2018 6:42 PM
 Re: Your lists (Message 95)
By Faith
05-29-2018 4:27 PM
  
Topic's mood 159 Re: Video continued LIFTED WITHOUT TILTING (Message 159)
By Modulous
05-30-2018 6:43 PM
 Video continued LIFTED WITHOUT TILTING (Message 156)
By Faith
05-30-2018 6:36 PM
  
Topic's mood 160 Re: Video on the formation of the Grand Canyon (Message 160)
By Faith
05-30-2018 7:06 PM
 Re: Video on the formation of the Grand Canyon (Message 157)
By Modulous
05-30-2018 6:39 PM
  
Topic's mood 161 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 161)
By Percy
05-30-2018 8:06 PM
 Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 97)
By Faith
05-29-2018 4:56 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 167)
By Faith
05-30-2018 9:17 PM
Topic's mood 162 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 162)
By Percy
05-30-2018 8:20 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 111)
By Faith
05-29-2018 9:10 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 164)
By Faith
05-30-2018 8:59 PM
Topic's mood 163 Re: Video on the formation of the Grand Canyon (Message 163)
By Faith
05-30-2018 8:58 PM
 Re: Video on the formation of the Grand Canyon (Message 157)
By Modulous
05-30-2018 6:39 PM
•Re: Video on the formation of the Grand Canyon (Message 193)
By Modulous
05-31-2018 2:24 PM
Topic's mood 164 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 164)
By Faith
05-30-2018 8:59 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 162)
By Percy
05-30-2018 8:20 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 166)
By Percy
05-30-2018 9:14 PM
Topic's mood 165 Re: Faith's sheet flow to stream flow still epic fail (Message 165)
By Percy
05-30-2018 9:11 PM
 Re: Faith's sheet flow to stream flow still epic fail (Message 149)
By Faith
05-30-2018 4:39 PM
•Re: Faith's sheet flow to stream flow still epic fail (Message 169)
By Faith
05-30-2018 9:23 PM
Topic's mood 166 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 166)
By Percy
05-30-2018 9:14 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 164)
By Faith
05-30-2018 8:59 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 168)
By Faith
05-30-2018 9:19 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 170)
By edge
05-30-2018 9:27 PM
Topic's mood 167 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 167)
By Faith
05-30-2018 9:17 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 161)
By Percy
05-30-2018 8:06 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 185)
By Percy
05-31-2018 9:23 AM
Topic's mood 168 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 168)
By Faith
05-30-2018 9:19 PM
 Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 166)
By Percy
05-30-2018 9:14 PM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 179)
By PaulK
05-31-2018 12:14 AM
•Re: Formation of walls quite clearly fits the Flood model (Message 188)
By Percy
05-31-2018 9:39 AM
Topic's mood 169 Re: Faith's sheet flow to stream flow still epic fail (Message 169)
By Faith
05-30-2018 9:23 PM
 Re: Faith's sheet flow to stream flow still epic fail (Message 165)
By Percy
05-30-2018 9:11 PM
•Re: Faith's sheet flow to stream flow still epic fail (Message 189)
By Percy
05-31-2018 9:52 AM
Topic's mood