Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,358 Year: 3,615/9,624 Month: 486/974 Week: 99/276 Day: 27/23 Hour: 1/1

EvC Forum ⇒ All Forums ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Creation/Evolution Miscellany ⇒

Hello, cousin! (re: Recent common ancestors to all living humans)

Key: •Answered, •Noted, •Unanswered
Originator: subbie, 07-03-2006 1:11 PM
  Msg
Num 		Message Details Reply To Replies
Topic's mood 1 Message 1
By subbie
07-03-2006 1:11 PM
  
•Seems Bogus (Message 3)
By Jazzns
07-03-2006 1:56 PM
•comparison to primary article (Message 6)
By pink sasquatch
07-03-2006 6:20 PM
•Message 7
By Larni
07-05-2006 6:01 AM
•Noah? (Message 43)
By randman
07-09-2006 2:57 PM
Topic's mood 2 Message 2
By AdminNosy
07-03-2006 1:23 PM
    
Topic's mood 3 Seems Bogus (Message 3)
By Jazzns
07-03-2006 1:56 PM
 Message 1
By subbie
07-03-2006 1:11 PM
•Re: Seems Bogus (Message 4)
By subbie
07-03-2006 2:12 PM
Topic's mood 4 Re: Seems Bogus (Message 4)
By subbie
07-03-2006 2:12 PM
 Seems Bogus (Message 3)
By Jazzns
07-03-2006 1:56 PM
•Re: Seems Bogus (Message 5)
By Jazzns
07-03-2006 3:13 PM
•mathematic models again? (Message 9)
By RAZD
07-05-2006 7:40 AM
Topic's mood 5 Re: Seems Bogus (Message 5)
By Jazzns
07-03-2006 3:13 PM
 Re: Seems Bogus (Message 4)
By subbie
07-03-2006 2:12 PM
  
Topic's mood 6 comparison to primary article (Message 6)
By pink sasquatch
07-03-2006 6:20 PM
 Message 1
By subbie
07-03-2006 1:11 PM
  
Topic's mood 7 Message 7
By Larni
07-05-2006 6:01 AM
 Message 1
By subbie
07-03-2006 1:11 PM
•No bottleneck (Message 8)
By nwr
07-05-2006 7:22 AM
Topic's mood 8 No bottleneck (Message 8)
By nwr
07-05-2006 7:22 AM
 Message 7
By Larni
07-05-2006 6:01 AM
  
Topic's mood 9 mathematic models again? (Message 9)
By RAZD
07-05-2006 7:40 AM
 Re: Seems Bogus (Message 4)
By subbie
07-03-2006 2:12 PM
•Re: mathematic models again? (Message 10)
By pink sasquatch
07-05-2006 3:04 PM
Topic's mood 10 Re: mathematic models again? (Message 10)
By pink sasquatch
07-05-2006 3:04 PM
 mathematic models again? (Message 9)
By RAZD
07-05-2006 7:40 AM
•Re: mathematic models again? (Message 11)
By RAZD
07-05-2006 9:23 PM
Topic's mood 11 Re: mathematic models again? (Message 11)
By RAZD
07-05-2006 9:23 PM
 Re: mathematic models again? (Message 10)
By pink sasquatch
07-05-2006 3:04 PM
•wrong again... (Message 12)
By pink sasquatch
07-06-2006 11:00 AM
Topic's mood 12 wrong again... (Message 12)
By pink sasquatch
07-06-2006 11:00 AM
 Re: mathematic models again? (Message 11)
By RAZD
07-05-2006 9:23 PM
•Re: wrong again... (Message 13)
By Jazzns
07-06-2006 11:12 AM
•It just doesn't add up pink. (Message 21)
By RAZD
07-08-2006 12:16 AM
Topic's mood 13 Re: wrong again... (Message 13)
By Jazzns
07-06-2006 11:12 AM
 wrong again... (Message 12)
By pink sasquatch
07-06-2006 11:00 AM
•Re: wrong again... (Message 14)
By pink sasquatch
07-06-2006 11:47 AM
Topic's mood 14 Re: wrong again... (Message 14)
By pink sasquatch
07-06-2006 11:47 AM
 Re: wrong again... (Message 13)
By Jazzns
07-06-2006 11:12 AM
•Re: wrong again... (Message 15)
By Jazzns
07-06-2006 1:19 PM
Topic's mood 15 Re: wrong again... (Message 15)
By Jazzns
07-06-2006 1:19 PM
 Re: wrong again... (Message 14)
By pink sasquatch
07-06-2006 11:47 AM
•Re: wrong again... (Message 16)
By pink sasquatch
07-06-2006 1:44 PM
Topic's mood 16 Re: wrong again... (Message 16)
By pink sasquatch
07-06-2006 1:44 PM
 Re: wrong again... (Message 15)
By Jazzns
07-06-2006 1:19 PM
•Re: wrong again... (Message 17)
By Jazzns
07-06-2006 1:48 PM
Topic's mood 17 Re: wrong again... (Message 17)
By Jazzns
07-06-2006 1:48 PM
 Re: wrong again... (Message 16)
By pink sasquatch
07-06-2006 1:44 PM
•incredulity is not a criticism (Message 18)
By pink sasquatch
07-06-2006 3:00 PM
Topic's mood 18 incredulity is not a criticism (Message 18)
By pink sasquatch
07-06-2006 3:00 PM
 Re: wrong again... (Message 17)
By Jazzns
07-06-2006 1:48 PM
•Re: incredulity is not a criticism (Message 19)
By Jazzns
07-06-2006 4:14 PM
Topic's mood 19 Re: incredulity is not a criticism (Message 19)
By Jazzns
07-06-2006 4:14 PM
 incredulity is not a criticism (Message 18)
By pink sasquatch
07-06-2006 3:00 PM
•some model details (Message 20)
By pink sasquatch
07-06-2006 5:10 PM
Topic's mood 20 some model details (Message 20)
By pink sasquatch
07-06-2006 5:10 PM
 Re: incredulity is not a criticism (Message 19)
By Jazzns
07-06-2006 4:14 PM
  
Topic's mood 21 It just doesn't add up pink. (Message 21)
By RAZD
07-08-2006 12:16 AM
 wrong again... (Message 12)
By pink sasquatch
07-06-2006 11:00 AM
•Did or could have (Message 22)
By NosyNed
07-08-2006 12:28 AM
•Re: It just doesn't add up pink. (Message 23)
By anglagard
07-08-2006 12:39 AM
•Re: It just doesn't add up pink. (Message 24)
By nwr
07-08-2006 1:12 AM
Topic's mood 22 Did or could have (Message 22)
By NosyNed
07-08-2006 12:28 AM
 It just doesn't add up pink. (Message 21)
By RAZD
07-08-2006 12:16 AM
  
Topic's mood 23 Re: It just doesn't add up pink. (Message 23)
By anglagard
07-08-2006 12:39 AM
 It just doesn't add up pink. (Message 21)
By RAZD
07-08-2006 12:16 AM
•email for paper (Message 26)
By RAZD
07-08-2006 10:20 AM
Topic's mood 24 Re: It just doesn't add up pink. (Message 24)
By nwr
07-08-2006 1:12 AM
 It just doesn't add up pink. (Message 21)
By RAZD
07-08-2006 12:16 AM
•Message 25
By RAZD
07-08-2006 10:17 AM
Topic's mood 25 Message 25
By RAZD
07-08-2006 10:17 AM
 Re: It just doesn't add up pink. (Message 24)
By nwr
07-08-2006 1:12 AM
•Message 27
By nwr
07-08-2006 11:03 AM
•genealogical, not genetic (Message 29)
By pink sasquatch
07-08-2006 11:31 AM
Topic's mood 26 email for paper (Message 26)
By RAZD
07-08-2006 10:20 AM
 Re: It just doesn't add up pink. (Message 23)
By anglagard
07-08-2006 12:39 AM
•Appendicies for Paper (Message 28)
By anglagard
07-08-2006 11:08 AM
Topic's mood 27 Message 27
By nwr
07-08-2006 11:03 AM
 Message 25
By RAZD
07-08-2006 10:17 AM
•Message 30
By RAZD
07-08-2006 11:58 AM
Topic's mood 28 Appendicies for Paper (Message 28)
By anglagard
07-08-2006 11:08 AM
 email for paper (Message 26)
By RAZD
07-08-2006 10:20 AM
•Re: Appendicies for Paper (Message 31)
By RAZD
07-08-2006 12:02 PM
Topic's mood 29 genealogical, not genetic (Message 29)
By pink sasquatch
07-08-2006 11:31 AM
 Message 25
By RAZD
07-08-2006 10:17 AM
•Re: genealogical, not genetic (Message 33)
By RAZD
07-08-2006 12:39 PM
•Got the paper, but ... (Message 36)
By RAZD
07-08-2006 8:39 PM
Topic's mood 30 Message 30
By RAZD
07-08-2006 11:58 AM
 Message 27
By nwr
07-08-2006 11:03 AM
•Message 32
By nwr
07-08-2006 12:26 PM
Topic's mood 31 Re: Appendicies for Paper (Message 31)
By RAZD
07-08-2006 12:02 PM
 Appendicies for Paper (Message 28)
By anglagard
07-08-2006 11:08 AM
  
Topic's mood 32 Message 32
By nwr
07-08-2006 12:26 PM
 Message 30
By RAZD
07-08-2006 11:58 AM
•Message 34
By RAZD
07-08-2006 12:41 PM
Topic's mood 33 Re: genealogical, not genetic (Message 33)
By RAZD
07-08-2006 12:39 PM
 genealogical, not genetic (Message 29)
By pink sasquatch
07-08-2006 11:31 AM
  
Topic's mood 34 Message 34
By RAZD
07-08-2006 12:41 PM
 Message 32
By nwr
07-08-2006 12:26 PM
•Message 35
By nwr
07-08-2006 1:07 PM
Topic's mood 35 Message 35
By nwr
07-08-2006 1:07 PM
 Message 34
By RAZD
07-08-2006 12:41 PM
  
Topic's mood 36 Got the paper, but ... (Message 36)
By RAZD
07-08-2006 8:39 PM
 genealogical, not genetic (Message 29)
By pink sasquatch
07-08-2006 11:31 AM
•Re: Got the paper, but ... (Message 37)
By nwr
07-08-2006 9:09 PM
•Re: Got the paper, but ... (Message 44)
By sfs
07-09-2006 5:07 PM
Topic's mood 37 Re: Got the paper, but ... (Message 37)
By nwr
07-08-2006 9:09 PM
 Got the paper, but ... (Message 36)
By RAZD
07-08-2006 8:39 PM
•Re: Got the paper, but ... (Message 38)
By nwr
07-08-2006 9:39 PM
Topic's mood 38 Re: Got the paper, but ... (Message 38)
By nwr
07-08-2006 9:39 PM
 Re: Got the paper, but ... (Message 37)
By nwr
07-08-2006 9:09 PM
•How many generations? (Message 39)
By RAZD
07-09-2006 1:00 AM
Topic's mood 39 How many generations? (Message 39)
By RAZD
07-09-2006 1:00 AM
 Re: Got the paper, but ... (Message 38)
By nwr
07-08-2006 9:39 PM
•Re: How many generations? (Message 40)
By nwr
07-09-2006 10:24 AM
Topic's mood 40 Re: How many generations? (Message 40)
By nwr
07-09-2006 10:24 AM
 How many generations? (Message 39)
By RAZD
07-09-2006 1:00 AM
•Re: How many generations? (Message 41)
By RAZD
07-09-2006 1:36 PM
Topic's mood 41 Re: How many generations? (Message 41)
By RAZD
07-09-2006 1:36 PM
 Re: How many generations? (Message 40)
By nwr
07-09-2006 10:24 AM
•Re: How many generations? (Message 42)
By nwr
07-09-2006 2:39 PM
•incorrect ideas about peer-review and ancestry (Message 53)
By pink sasquatch
07-10-2006 2:45 PM
Topic's mood 42 Re: How many generations? (Message 42)
By nwr
07-09-2006 2:39 PM
 Re: How many generations? (Message 41)
By RAZD
07-09-2006 1:36 PM
•Re: How many generations? (Message 48)
By RAZD
07-10-2006 12:03 AM
Topic's mood 43 Noah? (Message 43)
By randman
07-09-2006 2:57 PM
 Message 1
By subbie
07-03-2006 1:11 PM
•Re: Noah? (Message 45)
By Wounded King
07-09-2006 6:42 PM
Topic's mood 44 Re: Got the paper, but ... (Message 44)
By sfs
07-09-2006 5:07 PM
 Got the paper, but ... (Message 36)
By RAZD
07-08-2006 8:39 PM
•Re: Got the paper, but ... (Message 51)
By RAZD
07-10-2006 12:10 AM
Topic's mood 45 Re: Noah? (Message 45)
By Wounded King
07-09-2006 6:42 PM
 Noah? (Message 43)
By randman
07-09-2006 2:57 PM
•Re: Noah? (Message 46)
By randman
07-09-2006 10:13 PM
Topic's mood 46 Re: Noah? (Message 46)
By randman
07-09-2006 10:13 PM
 Re: Noah? (Message 45)
By Wounded King
07-09-2006 6:42 PM
•Re: Noah? (Message 47)
By nwr
07-09-2006 11:19 PM
•Re: Noah? (Message 49)
By RAZD
07-10-2006 12:04 AM
Topic's mood 47 Re: Noah? (Message 47)
By nwr
07-09-2006 11:19 PM
 Re: Noah? (Message 46)
By randman
07-09-2006 10:13 PM
  
Topic's mood 48 Re: How many generations? (Message 48)
By RAZD
07-10-2006 12:03 AM
 Re: How many generations? (Message 42)
By nwr
07-09-2006 2:39 PM
  
Topic's mood 49 Re: Noah? (Message 49)
By RAZD
07-10-2006 12:04 AM
 Re: Noah? (Message 46)
By randman
07-09-2006 10:13 PM
•Re: Noah? (Message 50)
By randman
07-10-2006 12:07 AM
Topic's mood 50 Re: Noah? (Message 50)
By randman
07-10-2006 12:07 AM
 Re: Noah? (Message 49)
By RAZD
07-10-2006 12:04 AM
•Re: Noah? (Message 52)
By RAZD
07-10-2006 12:14 AM
•Re: Noah? (Message 63)
By PaulK
07-11-2006 9:01 AM
Topic's mood 51 Re: Got the paper, but ... (Message 51)
By RAZD
07-10-2006 12:10 AM
 Re: Got the paper, but ... (Message 44)
By sfs
07-09-2006 5:07 PM
•Re: Got the paper, but ... (Message 55)
By sfs
07-10-2006 10:05 PM
Topic's mood 52 Re: Noah? (Message 52)
By RAZD
07-10-2006 12:14 AM
 Re: Noah? (Message 50)
By randman
07-10-2006 12:07 AM
  
Topic's mood 53 incorrect ideas about peer-review and ancestry (Message 53)
By pink sasquatch
07-10-2006 2:45 PM
 Re: How many generations? (Message 41)
By RAZD
07-09-2006 1:36 PM
•Re: incorrect ideas about peer-review and ancestry (Message 54)
By sfs
07-10-2006 9:53 PM
•I stand corrected - now lets deal with the math problem ... (Message 56)
By RAZD
07-10-2006 11:15 PM
Topic's mood 54 Re: incorrect ideas about peer-review and ancestry (Message 54)
By sfs
07-10-2006 9:53 PM
 incorrect ideas about peer-review and ancestry (Message 53)
By pink sasquatch
07-10-2006 2:45 PM
  
Topic's mood 55 Re: Got the paper, but ... (Message 55)
By sfs
07-10-2006 10:05 PM
 Re: Got the paper, but ... (Message 51)
By RAZD
07-10-2006 12:10 AM
  
Topic's mood 56 I stand corrected - now lets deal with the math problem ... (Message 56)
By RAZD
07-10-2006 11:15 PM
 incorrect ideas about peer-review and ancestry (Message 53)
By pink sasquatch
07-10-2006 2:45 PM
•still haven't read thoroughly, it seems... (Message 57)
By pink sasquatch
07-10-2006 11:55 PM
•Re: I stand corrected - now lets deal with the math problem ... (Message 58)
By nwr
07-11-2006 12:00 AM
Topic's mood 57 still haven't read thoroughly, it seems... (Message 57)
By pink sasquatch
07-10-2006 11:55 PM
 I stand corrected - now lets deal with the math problem ... (Message 56)
By RAZD
07-10-2006 11:15 PM
•Message 59
By RAZD
07-11-2006 8:09 AM
Topic's mood 58 Re: I stand corrected - now lets deal with the math problem ... (Message 58)
By nwr
07-11-2006 12:00 AM
 I stand corrected - now lets deal with the math problem ... (Message 56)
By RAZD
07-10-2006 11:15 PM
•Re: I stand corrected - now lets deal with the math problem ... (Message 60)
By sfs
07-11-2006 8:22 AM
•Re: I stand corrected - now lets deal with the math problem ... (Message 62)
By PaulK
07-11-2006 8:50 AM
•So what is this good for? Unchecked speculation? (Message 64)
By RAZD
07-15-2006 8:40 AM
Topic's mood 59 Message 59
By RAZD
07-11-2006 8:09 AM
 still haven't read thoroughly, it seems... (Message 57)
By pink sasquatch
07-10-2006 11:55 PM
  
Topic's mood 60 Re: I stand corrected - now lets deal with the math problem ... (Message 60)
By sfs
07-11-2006 8:22 AM
 Re: I stand corrected - now lets deal with the math problem ... (Message 58)
By nwr
07-11-2006 12:00 AM
•Re: I stand corrected - now lets deal with the math problem ... (Message 61)
By nwr
07-11-2006 8:43 AM
Topic's mood 61 Re: I stand corrected - now lets deal with the math problem ... (Message 61)
By nwr
07-11-2006 8:43 AM
 Re: I stand corrected - now lets deal with the math problem ... (Message 60)
By sfs
07-11-2006 8:22 AM
  
Topic's mood 62 Re: I stand corrected - now lets deal with the math problem ... (Message 62)
By PaulK
07-11-2006 8:50 AM
 Re: I stand corrected - now lets deal with the math problem ... (Message 58)
By nwr
07-11-2006 12:00 AM
  
Topic's mood 63 Re: Noah? (Message 63)
By PaulK
07-11-2006 9:01 AM
 Re: Noah? (Message 50)
By randman
07-10-2006 12:07 AM
  
Topic's mood 64 So what is this good for? Unchecked speculation? (Message 64)
By RAZD
07-15-2006 8:40 AM
 Re: I stand corrected - now lets deal with the math problem ... (Message 58)
By nwr
07-11-2006 12:00 AM
•Re: So what is this good for? Unchecked speculation? (Message 65)
By nwr
07-15-2006 9:21 AM
•Re: So what is this good for? Unchecked speculation? (Message 66)
By sfs
07-15-2006 10:21 PM
Topic's mood 65 Re: So what is this good for? Unchecked speculation? (Message 65)
By nwr
07-15-2006 9:21 AM
 So what is this good for? Unchecked speculation? (Message 64)
By RAZD
07-15-2006 8:40 AM
•but good science is cross-checked (Message 69)
By RAZD
07-16-2006 9:18 PM
Topic's mood 66 Re: So what is this good for? Unchecked speculation? (Message 66)
By sfs
07-15-2006 10:21 PM
 So what is this good for? Unchecked speculation? (Message 64)
By RAZD
07-15-2006 8:40 AM
•Re: So what is this good for? Unchecked speculation? (Message 67)
By macaroniandcheese
07-16-2006 1:28 PM
Topic's mood 67 Re: So what is this good for? Unchecked speculation? (Message 67)
By macaroniandcheese
07-16-2006 1:28 PM
 Re: So what is this good for? Unchecked speculation? (Message 66)
By sfs
07-15-2006 10:21 PM
•Handshake Jack (Message 68)
By RAZD
07-16-2006 9:08 PM
Topic's mood 68 Handshake Jack (Message 68)
By RAZD
07-16-2006 9:08 PM
 Re: So what is this good for? Unchecked speculation? (Message 67)
By macaroniandcheese
07-16-2006 1:28 PM
•Re: Handshake Jack (Message 70)
By sfs
07-16-2006 9:26 PM
•Re: Handshake Jack (Message 72)
By macaroniandcheese
07-16-2006 9:59 PM
Topic's mood 69 but good science is cross-checked (Message 69)
By RAZD
07-16-2006 9:18 PM
 Re: So what is this good for? Unchecked speculation? (Message 65)
By nwr
07-15-2006 9:21 AM
•Re: but good science is cross-checked (Message 71)
By sfs
07-16-2006 9:30 PM
Topic's mood 70 Re: Handshake Jack (Message 70)
By sfs
07-16-2006 9:26 PM
 Handshake Jack (Message 68)
By RAZD
07-16-2006 9:08 PM
  
Topic's mood 71 Re: but good science is cross-checked (Message 71)
By sfs
07-16-2006 9:30 PM
 but good science is cross-checked (Message 69)
By RAZD
07-16-2006 9:18 PM
•theoretical physicists ... (Message 75)
By RAZD
07-16-2006 10:11 PM
Topic's mood 72 Re: Handshake Jack (Message 72)
By macaroniandcheese
07-16-2006 9:59 PM
 Handshake Jack (Message 68)
By RAZD
07-16-2006 9:08 PM
•Re: Handshake Jack (Message 73)
By RAZD
07-16-2006 10:06 PM
Topic's mood 73 Re: Handshake Jack (Message 73)
By RAZD
07-16-2006 10:06 PM
 Re: Handshake Jack (Message 72)
By macaroniandcheese
07-16-2006 9:59 PM
•Re: Handshake Jack (Message 74)
By macaroniandcheese
07-16-2006 10:11 PM
Topic's mood 74 Re: Handshake Jack (Message 74)
By macaroniandcheese
07-16-2006 10:11 PM
 Re: Handshake Jack (Message 73)
By RAZD
07-16-2006 10:06 PM
  
Topic's mood 75 theoretical physicists ... (Message 75)
By RAZD
07-16-2006 10:11 PM
 Re: but good science is cross-checked (Message 71)
By sfs
07-16-2006 9:30 PM
•Re: theoretical physicists ... (Message 76)
By sfs
07-16-2006 11:08 PM
Topic's mood 76 Re: theoretical physicists ... (Message 76)
By sfs
07-16-2006 11:08 PM
 theoretical physicists ... (Message 75)
By RAZD
07-16-2006 10:11 PM
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)

Thread is open and has no recent unread messages.
Thread is open and has recent unread messages.
Thread is open and very active, but has no unread messages.
Thread is open, very active, and has unread messages.
Thread is closed and has no recent unread messages.
Thread is closed and has recent unread messages.
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024