|
|
Msg
Num
|
Message Details
|
Reply To
|
Replies
|
|
1
|
Message 1
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
Message 2
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
Message 3
By Percy
01-15-2007 9:28 PM |
Message 1
|
|
|
|
4
|
Oh? Is that the case, eh? (Message 4)
By Jon
01-16-2007 1:10 AM |
Message 1
|
|
|
|
5
|
Message 5
|
Message 1
|
|
|
|
6
|
Message 6
|
Message 3
By Percy
01-15-2007 9:28 PM |
|
|
|
7
|
Message 7
|
Message 1
|
|
|
|
8
|
Message 8
By Jon
01-16-2007 5:35 AM |
Message 6
|
|
|
|
9
|
Message 9
|
Message 6
|
|
|
|
10
|
Message 10
|
Message 6
|
|
|
|
11
|
Message 11
By nator
01-16-2007 10:34 AM |
Message 6
|
|
|
|
12
|
Message 12
By Tusko
01-16-2007 10:51 AM |
Message 1
|
|
|
|
13
|
Message 13
|
Message 1
|
|
|
|
14
|
Message 14
By Percy
01-16-2007 12:46 PM |
Message 6
|
|
|
|
15
|
Re: Oh? Is that the case, eh? (Message 15)
|
Oh? Is that the case, eh? (Message 4)
By Jon
01-16-2007 1:10 AM |
|
|
|
16
|
Concern about Topic (Message 16)
By Admin
01-16-2007 1:14 PM |
|
|
|
|
17
|
Re: Oh? Is that the case, eh? (Message 17)
|
Re: Oh? Is that the case, eh? (Message 15)
|
|
|
|
18
|
Message 18
By Taz
01-16-2007 2:02 PM |
Message 1
|
|
|
19
|
**Bling--Bling** (Message 19)
By Jon
01-16-2007 3:09 PM |
Re: Oh? Is that the case, eh? (Message 15)
|
|
|
|
20
|
Re: Oh? Is that the case, eh? (Message 20)
By nator
01-16-2007 11:13 PM |
Re: Oh? Is that the case, eh? (Message 15)
|
|
|
|
21
|
the population dilemma (Message 21)
|
Message 12
By Tusko
01-16-2007 10:51 AM |
|
|
|
22
|
Re: the population dilemma (Message 22)
|
the population dilemma (Message 21)
|
|
|
|
23
|
Re: the population dilemma (Message 23)
By Tusko
01-17-2007 7:01 AM |
the population dilemma (Message 21)
|
|
|
|
24
|
Re: the population dilemma (Message 24)
By Tusko
01-17-2007 7:53 AM |
the population dilemma (Message 21)
|
|
|
|
25
|
Re: the population dilemma (Message 25)
By nator
01-17-2007 8:57 AM |
the population dilemma (Message 21)
|
|
|
|
26
|
Re: the population dilemma (Message 26)
|
the population dilemma (Message 21)
|
|
|
|
27
|
Re: the population dilemma (Message 27)
|
the population dilemma (Message 21)
|
|
|
|
28
|
Re: the population dilemma (Message 28)
|
Re: the population dilemma (Message 23)
By Tusko
01-17-2007 7:01 AM |
|
|
|
29
|
Re: the population dilemma (Message 29)
|
Re: the population dilemma (Message 24)
By Tusko
01-17-2007 7:53 AM |
|
|
|
30
|
Re: the population dilemma (Message 30)
|
the population dilemma (Message 21)
|
|
|
|
31
|
Re: the population dilemma (Message 31)
By Tusko
01-17-2007 7:19 PM |
Re: the population dilemma (Message 28)
|
|
|
|
32
|
Re: the population dilemma (Message 32)
By nator
01-17-2007 7:22 PM |
Re: the population dilemma (Message 29)
|
|
|
|
33
|
Re: the population dilemma (Message 33)
By Tusko
01-17-2007 7:37 PM |
Re: the population dilemma (Message 29)
|
|
|
|
34
|
Re: the population dilemma (Message 34)
|
Re: the population dilemma (Message 33)
By Tusko
01-17-2007 7:37 PM |
|
|
|
35
|
Re: Oh? Is that the case, eh? (Message 35)
|
Re: Oh? Is that the case, eh? (Message 15)
|
|
|
|
36
|
Message 36
|
Message 10
|
|
|
|
37
|
no (Message 37)
|
Message 11
By nator
01-16-2007 10:34 AM |
|
|
|
38
|
Now we're getting somewhere! (Message 38)
|
Re: Oh? Is that the case, eh? (Message 17)
|
|
|
|
39
|
Re: Now we're getting somewhere! (Message 39)
|
Now we're getting somewhere! (Message 38)
|
|
|
|
40
|
Re: the population dilemma (Message 40)
By Tusko
01-18-2007 7:59 AM |
Re: the population dilemma (Message 34)
|
|
|
|
41
|
Topic Drift Alert! (Message 41)
By Admin
01-18-2007 9:10 AM |
Now we're getting somewhere! (Message 38)
|
|
|
|
42
|
yes (Message 42)
By nator
01-18-2007 9:30 AM |
no (Message 37)
|
|
|
|
43
|
My Position (Message 43)
|
Topic Drift Alert! (Message 41)
By Admin
01-18-2007 9:10 AM |
|
|
|
44
|
Re: the population dilemma (Message 44)
|
Re: the population dilemma (Message 30)
|
|
|
|
45
|
Re: the population dilemma (Message 45)
|
Re: the population dilemma (Message 44)
|
|
|
|
46
|
Re: My Position (Message 46)
|
My Position (Message 43)
|
|
|
|
47
|
Re: My Position (Message 47)
|
My Position (Message 43)
|
|
|
|
48
|
Re: My Position (Message 48)
|
Re: My Position (Message 47)
|
|
|
|
49
|
Re: the population dilemma (Message 49)
By Percy
01-18-2007 6:54 PM |
Re: the population dilemma (Message 44)
|
|
|
|
50
|
Message 50
|
Re: the population dilemma (Message 44)
|
|
|
|
51
|
Re: the population dilemma (Message 51)
|
Re: the population dilemma (Message 44)
|
|
|
|
52
|
Some questions for Limbosis (Message 52)
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
Re: Some questions for Limbosis (Message 53)
By RAZD
02-05-2007 6:39 PM |
Some questions for Limbosis (Message 52)
|
|
|
|
54
|
Re: Some questions for Limbosis (Message 54)
By EODoc
02-05-2007 9:10 PM |
Some questions for Limbosis (Message 52)
|
|
|
|
55
|
Re: Some questions for Limbosis (Message 55)
|
Re: Some questions for Limbosis (Message 54)
By EODoc
02-05-2007 9:10 PM |
|
|
|
56
|
Re: Some questions for Limbosis (Message 56)
By Iname
02-05-2007 11:26 PM |
Re: Some questions for Limbosis (Message 54)
By EODoc
02-05-2007 9:10 PM |
|
|
|
57
|
Nice post without nastiness (Message 57)
|
Re: Some questions for Limbosis (Message 56)
By Iname
02-05-2007 11:26 PM |
|
|
|
58
|
why evolution is not sound science (Message 58)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 1:47 AM |
Re: Some questions for Limbosis (Message 55)
|
|
|
|
59
|
Re: why evolution is not sound science (Message 59)
|
why evolution is not sound science (Message 58)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 1:47 AM |
|
|
|
60
|
the dreaded transitional species (Message 60)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 1:59 AM |
Re: Some questions for Limbosis (Message 55)
|
|
|
|
61
|
Re: why evolution is not sound science (Message 61)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 2:04 AM |
Re: why evolution is not sound science (Message 59)
|
|
|
|
62
|
Re: the dreaded transitional species (Message 62)
|
the dreaded transitional species (Message 60)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 1:59 AM |
|
|
|
63
|
Re: why evolution is not sound science (Message 63)
|
Re: why evolution is not sound science (Message 61)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 2:04 AM |
|
|
|
64
|
Re: Some questions for Limbosis (Message 64)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 2:41 AM |
Re: Some questions for Limbosis (Message 55)
|
|
|
|
65
|
Re: Some questions for Limbosis (Message 65)
|
Re: Some questions for Limbosis (Message 64)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 2:41 AM |
|
|
|
66
|
Dogs & Cats (Message 66)
By PaulK
02-06-2007 2:57 AM |
Re: Some questions for Limbosis (Message 64)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 2:41 AM |
|
|
|
67
|
Re: Some questions for Limbosis (Message 67)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 3:36 AM |
Re: Some questions for Limbosis (Message 56)
By Iname
02-05-2007 11:26 PM |
|
|
|
68
|
tiktaalik (Message 68)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 3:52 AM |
Dogs & Cats (Message 66)
By PaulK
02-06-2007 2:57 AM |
|
|
|
69
|
Your Sources Would Like For You to Stop Emarrasing Them (Message 69)
|
Re: Some questions for Limbosis (Message 67)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 3:36 AM |
|
|
|
70
|
clarification (Message 70)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 4:23 AM |
Re: Some questions for Limbosis (Message 65)
|
|
|
|
71
|
Re: why evolution is not sound science (Message 71)
|
why evolution is not sound science (Message 58)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 1:47 AM |
|
|
|
72
|
Re: tiktaalik (Message 72)
By PaulK
02-06-2007 4:32 AM |
tiktaalik (Message 68)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 3:52 AM |
|
|
|
73
|
Laws of Thermodynamics (Message 73)
|
clarification (Message 70)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 4:23 AM |
|
|
|
74
|
Re: clarification (Message 74)
|
clarification (Message 70)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 4:23 AM |
|
|
|
75
|
Re: the dreaded transitional species (Message 75)
|
the dreaded transitional species (Message 60)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 1:59 AM |
|
|
|
76
|
Re: Your Sources Would Like For You to Stop Emarrasing Them (Message 76)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 4:40 AM |
Your Sources Would Like For You to Stop Emarrasing Them (Message 69)
|
|
|
|
77
|
Re: tiktaalik (Message 77)
|
tiktaalik (Message 68)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 3:52 AM |
|
|
|
78
|
Re: Laws of Thermodynamics (Message 78)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 4:47 AM |
Laws of Thermodynamics (Message 73)
|
|
|
|
79
|
Re: Your Sources Would Like For You to Stop Emarrasing Them (Message 79)
|
Re: Your Sources Would Like For You to Stop Emarrasing Them (Message 76)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 4:40 AM |
|
|
|
80
|
Re: tiktaalik (Message 80)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 4:57 AM |
Re: tiktaalik (Message 77)
|
|
|
|
81
|
Re: Your Sources Would Like For You to Stop Emarrasing Them (Message 81)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 5:03 AM |
Re: Your Sources Would Like For You to Stop Emarrasing Them (Message 79)
|
|
|
|
82
|
Re: Some questions for Limbosis (Message 82)
|
Re: Some questions for Limbosis (Message 64)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 2:41 AM |
|
|
|
83
|
Re: tiktaalik (Message 83)
|
Re: tiktaalik (Message 80)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 4:57 AM |
|
|
|
84
|
Re: Some questions for Limbosis (Message 84)
|
Re: Some questions for Limbosis (Message 67)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 3:36 AM |
|
|
|
85
|
Re: Your Sources Would Like For You to Stop Emarrasing Them (Message 85)
|
Re: Your Sources Would Like For You to Stop Emarrasing Them (Message 81)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 5:03 AM |
|
|
|
86
|
Re: tiktaalik (Message 86)
By PaulK
02-06-2007 5:28 AM |
Re: tiktaalik (Message 80)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 4:57 AM |
|
|
|
87
|
Re: Your Sources Would Like For You to Stop Emarrasing Them (Message 87)
|
Re: Your Sources Would Like For You to Stop Emarrasing Them (Message 76)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 4:40 AM |
|
|
|
88
|
Re: tiktaalik (Message 88)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 5:38 AM |
Re: tiktaalik (Message 83)
|
|
|
|
89
|
Blew it Already (Message 89)
|
Re: tiktaalik (Message 88)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 5:38 AM |
|
|
|
90
|
Re: Some questions for Limbosis (Message 90)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 5:55 AM |
Re: Some questions for Limbosis (Message 84)
|
|
|
|
91
|
Re: Blew it Already (Message 91)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 6:05 AM |
Blew it Already (Message 89)
|
|
|
|
92
|
Re: Some questions for Limbosis (Message 92)
|
Re: Some questions for Limbosis (Message 90)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 5:55 AM |
|
|
|
93
|
Re: Some questions for Limbosis (Message 93)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 6:52 AM |
Re: Some questions for Limbosis (Message 92)
|
|
|
|
94
|
Re: tiktaalik (Message 94)
|
Re: tiktaalik (Message 80)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 4:57 AM |
|
|
|
95
|
Re: tiktaalik (Message 95)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 7:25 AM |
Re: tiktaalik (Message 94)
|
|
|
|
96
|
Re: tiktaalik (Message 96)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 7:27 AM |
Re: tiktaalik (Message 94)
|
|
|
|
97
|
Re: Some questions for Limbosis (Message 97)
|
Re: Some questions for Limbosis (Message 93)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 6:52 AM |
|
|
|
98
|
Re: tiktaalik (Message 98)
|
Re: tiktaalik (Message 95)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 7:25 AM |
|
|
|
99
|
Life and chemical evolution (abiogenesis) (Message 99)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 7:59 AM |
Re: tiktaalik (Message 98)
|
|
|
|
100
|
Re: Blew it Already (Message 100)
|
Re: Blew it Already (Message 91)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 6:05 AM |
|
|
101
|
Welcome to EvC (Message 101)
|
Re: tiktaalik (Message 96)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 7:27 AM |
|
|
|
102
|
Keep To the Topic (Message 102)
|
Re: Blew it Already (Message 100)
|
|
|
|
103
|
Re: Blew it Already (Message 103)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 8:35 AM |
Re: Blew it Already (Message 100)
|
|
|
|
104
|
TEMPORARY CLOSING (Message 104)
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
Re: clarification (Message 105)
|
clarification (Message 70)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 4:23 AM |
|
|
|
106
|
mutations are almost always detrimental to the organism (Message 106)
By jar
02-06-2007 11:19 AM |
Re: Some questions for Limbosis (Message 84)
|
|
|
|
107
|
Re: clarification (Message 107)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 12:08 PM |
Re: clarification (Message 105)
|
|
|
|
108
|
Re: clarification (Message 108)
By PaulK
02-06-2007 12:16 PM |
Re: clarification (Message 107)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 12:08 PM |
|
|
|
109
|
Re: mutations are almost always detrimental to the organism (Message 109)
|
mutations are almost always detrimental to the organism (Message 106)
By jar
02-06-2007 11:19 AM |
|
|
|
110
|
Re: clarification (Message 110)
|
Re: clarification (Message 107)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 12:08 PM |
|
|
|
111
|
Re: mutations are almost always detrimental to the organism (Message 111)
By jar
02-06-2007 12:41 PM |
Re: mutations are almost always detrimental to the organism (Message 109)
|
|
|
|
112
|
Caution Crash (Message 112)
|
Re: clarification (Message 110)
|
|
|
|
113
|
Re: mutations are almost always detrimental to the organism (Message 113)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 12:44 PM |
mutations are almost always detrimental to the organism (Message 106)
By jar
02-06-2007 11:19 AM |
|
|
|
114
|
Re: mutations are almost always detrimental to the organism (Message 114)
|
Re: mutations are almost always detrimental to the organism (Message 111)
By jar
02-06-2007 12:41 PM |
|
|
|
115
|
Re: mutations are almost always detrimental to the organism (Message 115)
By jar
02-06-2007 12:58 PM |
Re: mutations are almost always detrimental to the organism (Message 113)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 12:44 PM |
|
|
|
116
|
Re: mutations are almost always detrimental to the organism (Message 116)
|
Re: mutations are almost always detrimental to the organism (Message 113)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 12:44 PM |
|
|
|
117
|
Re: mutations are almost always detrimental to the organism (Message 117)
|
Re: mutations are almost always detrimental to the organism (Message 113)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 12:44 PM |
|
|
|
118
|
Thermodynamics and the Faith of Atheism (Message 118)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 1:39 PM |
Re: clarification (Message 110)
|
|
|
|
119
|
Re: Thermodynamics and the Faith of Atheism (Message 119)
|
Thermodynamics and the Faith of Atheism (Message 118)
By EODoc
02-06-2007 1:39 PM |
|
|
|
120
|
Topic Closed - Can't Stay on Topic (Message 120)
|
|
|
™ Version 4.2
