|
Msg Num
|
Message Details
|
Reply To
|
Replies
|
|
1
|
Message 1
|
|
|
|
2
|
Message 2
|
|
|
|
3
|
I'm the friend in question (Message 3)
|
Message 1
|
|
|
4
|
Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 4)
By nwr
08-17-2005 12:39 AM
|
|
|
|
5
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 5)
|
Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 4)
By nwr
08-17-2005 12:39 AM
|
|
|
6
|
Sorry...but no (Message 6)
|
Message 1
|
|
|
7
|
I was lumping things together. (Message 7)
|
Sorry...but no (Message 6)
|
|
|
8
|
Positive evidence? (Message 8)
|
I was lumping things together. (Message 7)
|
|
|
9
|
Quote (Message 9)
|
|
|
|
10
|
Re: Quote (Message 10)
|
Quote (Message 9)
|
|
|
11
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 11)
By Monk
08-17-2005 9:52 AM
|
Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 4)
By nwr
08-17-2005 12:39 AM
|
|
|
12
|
Re: Quote (Message 12)
|
Re: Quote (Message 10)
|
|
|
13
|
Question (Message 13)
By jar
08-17-2005 10:57 AM
|
Re: Quote (Message 12)
|
|
|
14
|
Re: I was lumping things together. (Message 14)
|
I was lumping things together. (Message 7)
|
|
|
15
|
Message 15
|
Message 1
|
|
|
16
|
Re: I was lumping things together. (Message 16)
|
I was lumping things together. (Message 7)
|
|
|
17
|
Message 17
|
Message 1
|
|
|
18
|
Message 18
|
Message 15
|
|
|
19
|
Message 19
|
Message 18
|
|
|
20
|
POTM? (Message 20)
|
Message 18
|
|
|
21
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 21)
By nwr
08-17-2005 9:13 PM
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 5)
|
|
|
22
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 22)
By nwr
08-17-2005 9:18 PM
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 11)
By Monk
08-17-2005 9:52 AM
|
|
|
23
|
Message 23
|
Message 15
|
|
|
24
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 24)
By Monk
08-17-2005 10:02 PM
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 22)
By nwr
08-17-2005 9:18 PM
|
|
|
25
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 25)
By nwr
08-17-2005 10:49 PM
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 24)
By Monk
08-17-2005 10:02 PM
|
|
|
26
|
Message 26
|
Message 23
|
|
|
27
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 27)
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 25)
By nwr
08-17-2005 10:49 PM
|
|
|
28
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 28)
By Monk
08-18-2005 12:37 AM
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 25)
By nwr
08-17-2005 10:49 PM
|
|
|
29
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 29)
By nwr
08-18-2005 12:44 AM
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 27)
|
|
|
30
|
Newtonian Physics (Message 30)
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 28)
By Monk
08-18-2005 12:37 AM
|
|
|
31
|
Classical != Newtonian (Message 31)
By PaulK
08-18-2005 2:30 AM
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 28)
By Monk
08-18-2005 12:37 AM
|
|
|
32
|
Re: Classical != Newtonian (Message 32)
By Monk
08-18-2005 11:53 AM
|
Classical != Newtonian (Message 31)
By PaulK
08-18-2005 2:30 AM
|
|
|
33
|
Re: Classical != Newtonian (Message 33)
By PaulK
08-18-2005 12:09 PM
|
Re: Classical != Newtonian (Message 32)
By Monk
08-18-2005 11:53 AM
|
|
|
34
|
Re: Newtonian Physics (Message 34)
By Monk
08-18-2005 12:11 PM
|
Newtonian Physics (Message 30)
|
|
|
35
|
Re: Classical != Newtonian (Message 35)
By Monk
08-18-2005 12:16 PM
|
Re: Classical != Newtonian (Message 33)
By PaulK
08-18-2005 12:09 PM
|
|
|
36
|
Re: Classical != Newtonian (Message 36)
By PaulK
08-18-2005 12:20 PM
|
Re: Classical != Newtonian (Message 35)
By Monk
08-18-2005 12:16 PM
|
|
|
37
|
Re: Classical != Newtonian (Message 37)
By Monk
08-18-2005 12:37 PM
|
Re: Classical != Newtonian (Message 36)
By PaulK
08-18-2005 12:20 PM
|
|
|
38
|
Re: Classical != Newtonian (Message 38)
|
Re: Classical != Newtonian (Message 32)
By Monk
08-18-2005 11:53 AM
|
|
|
39
|
Re: Classical != Newtonian (Message 39)
By Monk
08-18-2005 1:23 PM
|
Re: Classical != Newtonian (Message 38)
|
|
|
40
|
Re: Classical != Newtonian (Message 40)
|
Re: Classical != Newtonian (Message 39)
By Monk
08-18-2005 1:23 PM
|
|
|
41
|
Re: Classical != Newtonian (Message 41)
By Monk
08-18-2005 3:04 PM
|
Re: Classical != Newtonian (Message 40)
|
|
|
42
|
Not truth but Accuracy (Message 42)
|
Re: Newtonian Physics (Message 34)
By Monk
08-18-2005 12:11 PM
|
|
|
43
|
Re: Not truth but Accuracy (Message 43)
By Monk
08-18-2005 7:46 PM
|
Not truth but Accuracy (Message 42)
|
|
|
44
|
Re: Newtonian Physics (Message 44)
|
Re: Newtonian Physics (Message 34)
By Monk
08-18-2005 12:11 PM
|
|
|
45
|
Re: Not truth but Accuracy (Message 45)
By nwr
08-18-2005 8:20 PM
|
Re: Not truth but Accuracy (Message 43)
By Monk
08-18-2005 7:46 PM
|
|
|
46
|
Re: Not truth but Accuracy (Message 46)
By Monk
08-18-2005 8:56 PM
|
Re: Not truth but Accuracy (Message 45)
By nwr
08-18-2005 8:20 PM
|
|
|
47
|
Re: Not truth but Accuracy (Message 47)
By nwr
08-18-2005 9:26 PM
|
Re: Not truth but Accuracy (Message 46)
By Monk
08-18-2005 8:56 PM
|
|
|
48
|
Re: Not truth but Accuracy (Message 48)
By Monk
08-18-2005 10:35 PM
|
Re: Not truth but Accuracy (Message 47)
By nwr
08-18-2005 9:26 PM
|
|
|
49
|
This is getting silly (Message 49)
|
Re: Not truth but Accuracy (Message 48)
By Monk
08-18-2005 10:35 PM
|
|
|
50
|
Message 50
|
Message 15
|
|
|
51
|
ToG (Message 51)
|
Message 50
|
|
|
52
|
Re: This is getting silly (Message 52)
By Monk
08-19-2005 10:39 AM
|
This is getting silly (Message 49)
|
|
|
53
|
Message 53
|
Message 50
|
|
|
54
|
the nature of everything (Message 54)
|
Re: This is getting silly (Message 52)
By Monk
08-19-2005 10:39 AM
|
|
|
55
|
Re: the nature of theory vs practice (Message 55)
By Monk
08-19-2005 1:11 PM
|
the nature of everything (Message 54)
|
|
|
56
|
Why "Sigh"? I am confused. (Message 56)
By John
08-19-2005 1:33 PM
|
Re: the nature of theory vs practice (Message 55)
By Monk
08-19-2005 1:11 PM
|
|
|
57
|
Message 57
|
|
|
|
58
|
topic? (Message 58)
|
Message 57
|
|
|
59
|
Re: Why "Sigh"? I am confused. (Message 59)
By Monk
08-19-2005 3:12 PM
|
Why "Sigh"? I am confused. (Message 56)
By John
08-19-2005 1:33 PM
|
|
|
60
|
Re: Why "Sigh"? I am confused. (Message 60)
|
Re: Why "Sigh"? I am confused. (Message 59)
By Monk
08-19-2005 3:12 PM
|
|
|
61
|
Re: Why "Sigh"? I am confused. (Message 61)
By John
08-19-2005 4:07 PM
|
Re: Why "Sigh"? I am confused. (Message 59)
By Monk
08-19-2005 3:12 PM
|
|
|
62
|
Re: ToG (Message 62)
|
ToG (Message 51)
|
|
|
63
|
Re: ToG (Message 63)
|
Re: ToG (Message 62)
|
|
|
64
|
ID not a science (Message 64)
|
Message 1
|
|
|
65
|
Re: ID not a science (Message 65)
|
ID not a science (Message 64)
|
|
|
66
|
Re: ID not a science (Message 66)
|
Re: ID not a science (Message 65)
|
|
|
67
|
VERY SILLY!!!! (Message 67)
|
|
|
|
68
|
Welcome to EvC (Message 68)
|
VERY SILLY!!!! (Message 67)
|
|
|
69
|
Re: VERY SILLY!!!! (Message 69)
|
VERY SILLY!!!! (Message 67)
|
|
|
70
|
Message 70
|
|
|
|
71
|
Message 71
By nwr
02-20-2006 12:01 PM
|
Message 70
|
|
|
72
|
Message 72
|
Message 71
By nwr
02-20-2006 12:01 PM
|
|
|
73
|
Message 73
|
Message 71
By nwr
02-20-2006 12:01 PM
|
|
|
74
|
Message 74
By nwr
02-20-2006 2:52 PM
|
Message 73
|
|
|
75
|
Message 75
|
Message 74
By nwr
02-20-2006 2:52 PM
|
|
|
76
|
Message 76
|
Message 75
|
|
|
77
|
Message 77
|
Message 76
|
|
|
78
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 78)
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 11)
By Monk
08-17-2005 9:52 AM
|
|
|
79
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 79)
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 78)
|
|
|
80
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 80)
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 79)
|
|
|
81
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 81)
By nwr
06-29-2006 11:41 PM
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 80)
|
|
|
82
|
Message 82
By Rob
06-30-2006 12:43 AM
|
Message 1
|
|
|
83
|
Message 83
By Rob
06-30-2006 12:54 AM
|
Message 70
|
|
|
84
|
Message 84
By nwr
06-30-2006 1:17 AM
|
Message 82
By Rob
06-30-2006 12:43 AM
|
|
|
85
|
Message 85
By Rob
06-30-2006 1:54 AM
|
Message 84
By nwr
06-30-2006 1:17 AM
|
|
|
86
|
Message 86
|
Message 85
By Rob
06-30-2006 1:54 AM
|
|
|
87
|
Message 87
By nwr
06-30-2006 8:54 AM
|
Message 85
By Rob
06-30-2006 1:54 AM
|
|
|
88
|
Message 88
By Rob
06-30-2006 9:50 AM
|
Message 86
|
|
|
89
|
Davies is WRONG. (Message 89)
By jar
06-30-2006 10:09 AM
|
Message 85
By Rob
06-30-2006 1:54 AM
|
|
|
90
|
Message 90
|
Message 15
|
|
|
91
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 91)
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 80)
|
|
|
92
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 92)
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution (Message 91)
|
|
|
93
|
Re: Newtonian Physics (Message 93)
|
Re: Newtonian Physics (Message 34)
By Monk
08-18-2005 12:11 PM
|
|
|
94
|
Message 94
|
Message 85
By Rob
06-30-2006 1:54 AM
|
|
|
95
|
Message 95
By Rob
06-30-2006 9:14 PM
|
Message 94
|
|
|
96
|
Message 96
|
Message 95
By Rob
06-30-2006 9:14 PM
|
|
|
97
|
Message 97
By Rob
07-01-2006 12:11 PM
|
Message 96
|
|
|
98
|
Message 98
|
Message 97
By Rob
07-01-2006 12:11 PM
|
|
|
99
|
Message 99
|
Message 97
By Rob
07-01-2006 12:11 PM
|
|
|
100
|
Message 100
By Rob
07-01-2006 1:35 PM
|
Message 98
|
|
|
101
|
Message 101
By Rob
07-01-2006 1:48 PM
|
Message 99
|
|
|
102
|
Message 102
|
Message 101
By Rob
07-01-2006 1:48 PM
|
|
|
103
|
Message 103
By Rob
07-01-2006 3:46 PM
|
Message 102
|
|
|
104
|
Message 104
By Rob
07-01-2006 4:33 PM
|
Message 102
|
|
|
105
|
Message 105
By nwr
07-01-2006 5:13 PM
|
Message 104
By Rob
07-01-2006 4:33 PM
|
|
|
106
|
Message 106
By Rob
07-01-2006 7:23 PM
|
Message 105
By nwr
07-01-2006 5:13 PM
|
|
|
107
|
Message 107
|
Message 106
By Rob
07-01-2006 7:23 PM
|
|
|
108
|
Message 108
By Rob
07-01-2006 8:56 PM
|
Message 107
|
|
|
109
|
Message 109
|
Message 108
By Rob
07-01-2006 8:56 PM
|
|
|
110
|
Message 110
|
Message 101
By Rob
07-01-2006 1:48 PM
|
|
|
111
|
Message 111
By Rob
07-03-2006 8:44 PM
|
Message 110
|
|
|
112
|
Suspended again (Message 112)
|
Message 111
By Rob
07-03-2006 8:44 PM
|
|
|
113
|
Turn this around (Message 113)
|
Message 82
By Rob
06-30-2006 12:43 AM
|
|
|
114
|
Re: Turn this around (Message 114)
|
Turn this around (Message 113)
|
|
|
115
|
Re: Turn this around (Message 115)
|
Re: Turn this around (Message 114)
|
|
|
116
|
Re: Turn this around (Message 116)
By nator
07-22-2006 8:29 PM
|
Re: Turn this around (Message 115)
|
|
|
117
|
Re: Turn this around (Message 117)
|
Re: Turn this around (Message 115)
|
|
|
118
|
Re: Turn this around (Message 118)
|
Re: Turn this around (Message 116)
By nator
07-22-2006 8:29 PM
|
|
|
119
|
Re: Turn this around (Message 119)
|
Re: Turn this around (Message 118)
|
|
|
120
|
Re: Turn this around (Message 120)
|
Re: Turn this around (Message 119)
|
|
|
121
|
It is rhetoric not science (Message 121)
|
Message 1
|
|
|
122
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 122)
By Frog
08-25-2006 10:27 AM
|
It is rhetoric not science (Message 121)
|
|
|
123
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 123)
By CK
08-25-2006 10:36 AM
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 122)
By Frog
08-25-2006 10:27 AM
|
|
|
124
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 124)
|
It is rhetoric not science (Message 121)
|
|
|
125
|
T o p i c ! (Message 125)
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 122)
By Frog
08-25-2006 10:27 AM
|
|
|
126
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 126)
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 122)
By Frog
08-25-2006 10:27 AM
|
|
|
127
|
Re: Turn this around (Message 127)
|
Re: Turn this around (Message 119)
|
|
|
128
|
Dissambiguation (Message 128)
By qed
08-27-2006 3:02 PM
|
It is rhetoric not science (Message 121)
|
|
|
129
|
please explain (Message 129)
By qed
08-27-2006 3:05 PM
|
Re: Turn this around (Message 127)
|
|
|
130
|
Re: please explain (Message 130)
By RAZD
08-27-2006 3:36 PM
|
please explain (Message 129)
By qed
08-27-2006 3:05 PM
|
|
|
131
|
Re: Turn this around (Message 131)
|
Re: Turn this around (Message 127)
|
|
|
132
|
Re: Turn this around (Message 132)
|
Turn this around (Message 113)
|
|
|
133
|
Re: Turn this around (Message 133)
|
Re: Turn this around (Message 127)
|
|
|
134
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 134)
|
It is rhetoric not science (Message 121)
|
|
|
135
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 135)
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 134)
|
|
|
136
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 136)
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 135)
|
|
|
137
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 137)
By Percy
08-28-2006 8:45 AM
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 134)
|
|
|
138
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 138)
By nator
08-28-2006 9:06 AM
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 136)
|
|
|
139
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 139)
By Percy
08-28-2006 9:09 AM
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 136)
|
|
|
140
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 140)
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 137)
By Percy
08-28-2006 8:45 AM
|
|
|
141
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 141)
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 138)
By nator
08-28-2006 9:06 AM
|
|
|
142
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 142)
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 139)
By Percy
08-28-2006 9:09 AM
|
|
|
143
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 143)
By jar
08-28-2006 8:33 PM
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 142)
|
|
|
144
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 144)
By Percy
08-28-2006 8:42 PM
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 142)
|
|
|
145
|
Message 145
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 140)
|
|
|
146
|
Message 146
|
Message 145
|
|
|
147
|
Message 147
|
Message 146
|
|
|
148
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 148)
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 136)
|
|
|
149
|
Message 149
|
Message 146
|
|
|
150
|
Design does not imply a designer (Message 150)
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 136)
|
|
|
151
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 151)
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 136)
|
|
|
152
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 152)
By jar
08-29-2006 9:15 AM
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 151)
|
|
|
153
|
Message 153
By Percy
08-29-2006 9:38 AM
|
Message 146
|
|
|
154
|
Message 154
|
Message 147
|
|
|
155
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 155)
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 148)
|
|
|
156
|
Message 156
By Percy
08-29-2006 11:46 AM
|
Message 154
|
|
|
157
|
Message 157
|
Message 149
|
|
|
158
|
Re: Design does not imply a designer (Message 158)
|
Design does not imply a designer (Message 150)
|
|
|
159
|
Re: Design does not imply a designer (Message 159)
By Percy
08-29-2006 2:39 PM
|
Re: Design does not imply a designer (Message 158)
|
|
|
160
|
Message 160
By Percy
08-29-2006 3:02 PM
|
Message 157
|
|
|
161
|
Re: Design does not imply a designer (Message 161)
|
Re: Design does not imply a designer (Message 158)
|
|
|
162
|
Message 162
|
Message 157
|
|
|
163
|
Message 163
|
Message 154
|
|
|
164
|
Message 164
|
Message 153
By Percy
08-29-2006 9:38 AM
|
|
|
165
|
Message 165
|
Message 156
By Percy
08-29-2006 11:46 AM
|
|
|
166
|
Message 166
By Percy
08-29-2006 8:16 PM
|
Message 164
|
|
|
167
|
Message 167
By Percy
08-29-2006 8:30 PM
|
Message 165
|
|
|
168
|
ID = Anti-Science (Message 168)
|
Message 1
|
|
|
169
|
Message 169
|
Message 165
|
|
|
170
|
fossils (Message 170)
|
Message 169
|
|
|
171
|
Message 171
|
Message 160
By Percy
08-29-2006 3:02 PM
|
|
|
172
|
Message 172
|
Message 171
|
|
|
173
|
Message 173
|
Message 171
|
|
|
174
|
Selective blindness (Message 174)
|
Message 165
|
|
|
175
|
Yes, Darwins theory is science. Now back to ID. (Message 175)
|
Message 171
|
|
|
176
|
Message 176
By Percy
08-30-2006 7:08 AM
|
Message 171
|
|
|
177
|
Message 177
|
Message 171
|
|
|
178
|
Message 178
|
Yes, Darwins theory is science. Now back to ID. (Message 175)
|
|
|
179
|
Message 179
|
Message 171
|
|
|
180
|
For Reference (Message 180)
|
Message 162
|
|
|
181
|
IC is falsified (Message 181)
By RAZD
08-30-2006 7:29 PM
|
Message 171
|
|
|
182
|
Message 182
|
Message 169
|
|
|
183
|
Aspersions on Geologic Dating (Message 183)
|
Message 182
|
|
|
184
|
Re: Selective blindness (Message 184)
|
Selective blindness (Message 174)
|
|
|
185
|
What about creationism/ID? (Message 185)
By Percy
08-31-2006 12:50 AM
|
Message 182
|
|
|
186
|
Message 186
|
Message 177
|
|
|
187
|
Message 187
|
Message 182
|
|
|
188
|
ROFL!! (Message 188)
|
Message 187
|
|
|
189
|
Re: ROFL!! (Message 189)
By ringo
08-31-2006 3:34 AM
|
ROFL!! (Message 188)
|
|
|
190
|
Message 190
By RAZD
08-31-2006 7:48 AM
|
Message 182
|
|
|
191
|
Message 191
|
Message 172
|
|
|
192
|
complex and linear systems (Message 192)
|
ROFL!! (Message 188)
|
|
|
193
|
Message 193
By Percy
08-31-2006 4:30 PM
|
Message 191
|
|
|
194
|
Re: ROFL!! (Message 194)
|
ROFL!! (Message 188)
|
|
|
195
|
The who with the what now? (Message 195)
|
Message 191
|
|
|
196
|
Re: Selective blindness (Message 196)
|
Selective blindness (Message 174)
|
|
|
197
|
Re: Selective blindness (Message 197)
By Percy
08-31-2006 7:52 PM
|
Re: Selective blindness (Message 196)
|
|
|
198
|
predictions (Message 198)
By nator
08-31-2006 8:16 PM
|
Re: Selective blindness (Message 196)
|
|
|
199
|
Oh, Very Well. (Message 199)
|
Re: Selective blindness (Message 197)
By Percy
08-31-2006 7:52 PM
|
|
|
200
|
Re: please explain (Message 200)
|
please explain (Message 129)
By qed
08-27-2006 3:05 PM
|
|
|
201
|
Re: please explain (Message 201)
|
Re: please explain (Message 200)
|
|
|
202
|
Re: Oh, Very Well. (Message 202)
|
Oh, Very Well. (Message 199)
|
|
|
203
|
Message 203
|
Re: please explain (Message 200)
|
|
|
204
|
theories, extropolations, predictions--oh, my! (Message 204)
|
Message 203
|
|
|
205
|
Re: IC is falsified (Message 205)
|
IC is falsified (Message 181)
By RAZD
08-30-2006 7:29 PM
|
|
|
206
|
Message 206
|
|
|
|
207
|
Re: Selective blindness (Message 207)
|
Re: Selective blindness (Message 196)
|
|
|
208
|
Re: IC is falsified (Message 208)
By Percy
09-01-2006 7:40 AM
|
Re: IC is falsified (Message 205)
|
|
|
209
|
Re: Oh, Very Well. (Message 209)
By Percy
09-01-2006 7:51 AM
|
Oh, Very Well. (Message 199)
|
|
|
210
|
Re: What about creationism/ID? (Message 210)
|
What about creationism/ID? (Message 185)
By Percy
08-31-2006 12:50 AM
|
|
|
211
|
Re: What about creationism/ID? (Message 211)
|
Re: What about creationism/ID? (Message 210)
|
|
|
212
|
Re: What about creationism/ID? (Message 212)
By Percy
09-01-2006 1:34 PM
|
Re: What about creationism/ID? (Message 210)
|
|
|
213
|
Re: What about creationism/ID? (Message 213)
By nator
09-01-2006 4:17 PM
|
Re: What about creationism/ID? (Message 210)
|
|
|
214
|
Re: What about creationism/ID? (Message 214)
|
Re: What about creationism/ID? (Message 210)
|
|
|
215
|
Re: IC is falsified -- Still. (Message 215)
By RAZD
09-01-2006 8:35 PM
|
Re: IC is falsified (Message 205)
|
|
|
216
|
Re: IC is falsified -- Still. (Message 216)
|
Re: IC is falsified -- Still. (Message 215)
By RAZD
09-01-2006 8:35 PM
|
|
|
217
|
Re: please explain (Message 217)
|
Re: please explain (Message 200)
|
|
|
218
|
Message 218
|
Message 187
|
|
|
219
|
momentary correction: natural process (Message 219)
|
Message 218
|
|
|
220
|
Re: IC is falsified -- Still. (Message 220)
|
Re: IC is falsified -- Still. (Message 216)
|
|
|
221
|
Message 221
|
Message 190
By RAZD
08-31-2006 7:48 AM
|
|
|
222
|
Message 222
|
Message 193
By Percy
08-31-2006 4:30 PM
|
|
|
223
|
Re: ROFL!! (Message 223)
|
Re: ROFL!! (Message 194)
|
|
|
224
|
Message 224
|
Message 218
|
|
|
225
|
Message 225
|
Re: ROFL!! (Message 223)
|
|
|
226
|
Message 226
By Percy
09-03-2006 8:26 AM
|
Message 222
|
|
|
227
|
Re: ROFL!! (Message 227)
By Percy
09-03-2006 9:24 AM
|
Re: ROFL!! (Message 194)
|
|
|
228
|
Re: ROFL!! (Message 228)
By Percy
09-03-2006 9:25 AM
|
Re: ROFL!! (Message 194)
|
|
|
229
|
so you agree ID adds ... nothing? (to science anyway) (Message 229)
By RAZD
09-03-2006 9:30 AM
|
Message 221
|
|
|
230
|
Message 230
By Percy
09-03-2006 10:00 AM
|
Message 218
|
|
|
231
|
Re: ROFL!! (Message 231)
|
Re: ROFL!! (Message 227)
By Percy
09-03-2006 9:24 AM
|
|
|
232
|
Re: Selective blindness (Message 232)
|
Re: Selective blindness (Message 207)
|
|
|
233
|
Re: Selective blindness (Message 233)
|
Re: Selective blindness (Message 232)
|
|
|
234
|
Re: ROFL!! (Message 234)
By Percy
09-04-2006 9:35 AM
|
Re: ROFL!! (Message 231)
|
|
|
235
|
Re: Selective blindness (Message 235)
|
Re: Selective blindness (Message 232)
|
|
|
236
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 236)
|
Re: It is rhetoric not science (Message 155)
|
|
|
237
|
Message 237
|
Message 157
|
|
|
238
|
IS ID Science? (Message 238)
|
|
|
|
239
|
Re: IS ID Science? (Message 239)
By PaulK
09-07-2006 2:13 AM
|
IS ID Science? (Message 238)
|
|
|
240
|
Re: IS ID Science? (Message 240)
|
IS ID Science? (Message 238)
|
|
|
241
|
Re: IS ID Science? (Message 241)
|
IS ID Science? (Message 238)
|
|
|
242
|
Re: IS ID Science? (Message 242)
|
IS ID Science? (Message 238)
|
|
|
243
|
Re: IS ID Science? (Message 243)
By RAZD
09-07-2006 7:16 AM
|
IS ID Science? (Message 238)
|
|
|
244
|
Re: IS ID Science? (Message 244)
By Percy
09-07-2006 7:49 AM
|
IS ID Science? (Message 238)
|
|
|
245
|
Re: IS ID Science? (Message 245)
|
Re: IS ID Science? (Message 239)
By PaulK
09-07-2006 2:13 AM
|
|
|
246
|
Re: IS ID Science? (Message 246)
By PaulK
09-30-2006 6:07 PM
|
Re: IS ID Science? (Message 245)
|
|
|
247
|
Re: IS ID Science? (Message 247)
By Admin
09-30-2006 9:16 PM
|
Re: IS ID Science? (Message 245)
|
|
|
248
|
Re: IS ID Science? (Message 248)
|
Re: IS ID Science? (Message 245)
|
|
|
249
|
Message 249
|
|
|